Polity: Refugees and aid - we’re laggards
139 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Newer→ Last
-
Steve Barnes, in reply to
Oh, not again! This argument wasn’t sound the first time it appeared in this thread.
From the same troll. I have reported the tosser, he will keep coming back though, he has nothing better to do with his time obviously.
-
Ian Dalziel, in reply to
what do you do to help when they get here?
Gee Daman, how can I ever prove to you that I too have my place in the scheme of things, perhaps not as proactive as Bishop Brian Tamaki, who couldn't wait for them to get here - he just flew directly to Greece to sort things out - What a guy! What a Christian! What a dick...
-
Joe Wylie, in reply to
-
Shona Francis, in reply to
Accepting refugees who have something to contribute to our country such as qualified skills - I'm okay with that.
We could do with an economic boost. However accepting 600+ at one time will strain our current economy until refugees find work or are efficient in English. -
Saud Al, in reply to
I agree with you I do not think it should be at once but, in less time frame than two years.
Government can make a deal with the refugees to send them to work in the labor work, where there is lack or workers, such as, Christchurch to help in the re built and pay them slightly less than the normal worker but not to the stage that it will make them have a poor life. -
Steve Barnes, in reply to
However accepting 600+ at one time will strain our current economy until refugees find work or are efficient in English.
As many have said before most Syrians already speak English, among quite a few other languages too. If 600 people will strain our economy then our economy is already in dire straits, which it may well be but our current Government is adamant that it is OK, in fact it is a Rock Star economy, which would, I guess, make it Mark Knopfler, a Rock Star in Dire Straits.
Government can make a deal with the refugees to send them to work in the labor work, where there is lack or workers, such as, Christchurch to help in the re built and pay them slightly less than the normal worker but not to the stage that it will make them have a poor life.
-
chris, in reply to
As many have said before most Syrians already speak English, among quite a few other languages too.
Incidentally migrants on partner visas or family reunification visas aren’t required to speak English. Our family reunification visa system may have its issues but the lack of English language proficiency is not chief amongst them. Were English not the global lingua franca these persistent trivial objections you're patient enough to respond to might be less comical:
In one recent two-hour class, a twentysomething American teacher led a dozen advanced students through their grammar lessons by asking them to recount how they spent their weekend. There was a familiar refrain in the classroom as one student after another said she spent her time watching television—tuned not to Al Jazeera or another of the Arabic satellite channels, but rather to that juggernaut of daytime TV, The Oprah Winfrey Show.
Deena, a veiled 20-year-old Damascus University student, cheerfully explained the extent of Oprah’s influence over Syrians both male and female. To them, the queen of American pop culture, who sits down with politicians and Brad Pitt alike, represents everything that’s missing in Syrian society today. “On Oprah, everyone speaks freely about whatever they like,” Deena said. “They talk about sex, politics, family, all their problems in life. In Syria, we also all have these problems, but we can’t talk about them—that’s our biggest problem."
Even ISIS are in on it.
As Maz said 8 days ago:
Net migration to NZ was approx 60000 last year. “Where are they all going to live? What will they do? What about the language barrier?”
And we’re squabbling about a few hundred refugees; shameful and pathetic. We could take tens of thousands, if we just cut back a little on normal immigration. -
I believe that New Zealand can defiantly handle more than 600 refugees taking these 600 over the next few years is not the impact we need. I believe we need to take more of an immediate action. I agree with the above comment from Steve suggesting that if our economy is going to become to strain from 600 people we are already in a dire situation. I find it hard to believe that if these country’s that have been mentioned above are able to take these large amounts of refugees and New Zealand is not. In 28 years we have not changed our quota for the number of refugees we take each year. The fact that we are also spending a pathetic amount in regards aid to the refuges. Our country has plenty of space for more people. These refuges are willing to work. They are capable people that are in need of a place to live safely. We as a country need a to make a choice to make a difference and convince the government to make more changes. People are always willing to volunteer and help. If there is a debate about weather they can speak English it has been made clear that many of them already speak English. It is up to the public now to make sure that as the news begins to shy away from this issue that we keep it active. The public must continue to put pressure on the government to make more changes and help these people.
-
linger, in reply to
But isn’t it wonderful to suddenly have so many newly-registered first-time posters? (The irony of not feeling automatically able to welcome them all, on this thread especially, is not lost on me. Post-Troll Suspicion Disorder, eh.)
-
Important lesson (take note, Unitec): if you are a communications department setting an assignment to "go online and damage a brand", do be careful to specify "not our brand, though!".
-
linger, in reply to
I suspect the assignment was something like “join an online argument”, rather than anything going more directly against the institutional code of conduct; but it would have been nice if they’d also provided some clear guidelines for what constitutes a constructive argument, and it would have been even better if their tutors had helped provide moderation. I don’t necessarily blame the students, but there’s been a failure of oversight in setting them loose here. There are strict ethical guidelines for community-based fieldwork, and those should apply to online communities too.
-
And so we mark our calendars for September 2016 to see what next years iteration of the class brings.
-
Bart Janssen, in reply to
Important lesson (take note, Unitec): if you are a communications department setting an assignment to “go online and damage a brand”, do be careful to specify “not our brand, though!”.
I'd like some alone time with the teacher that set that assignment to discuss the pros and cons of such a project.
-
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”
Well, that worked out just fine for the US, the country that John Key idolises but, Nah, we can't afford it. Apparently we need more billionaire businessmen, regardless of who they are or where they come from.
Post your response…
This topic is closed.