Speaker: Why Auckland, and New Zealand, needs the city rail link
81 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 2 3 4 Newer→ Last
-
merc,
Knowing National and their knife habit, Joyce may well vie for the leadership post election, oh dear.
-
Ian Dalziel, in reply to
the Central Station in Courtenay Place
is that why that street is so wide?I think Courtenay Place used to be Tram and Trolley Bus terminus / transfer area, but judging by this live streaming cam they have got rid of the bus stops in the middle of the road that used to be there when I worked in Blair Street in the '80s and when visiting earlier...
-
Sacha, in reply to
Nah, minister of finance next. PM next election.
-
merc, in reply to
Oh dear God, Joyce is the poster child for better school lunches.
-
All New Zealand needs Auckland functioning as well as possible, source of 36% of our GDP, so this is truly a project of National Significance.
The flip side of this is pretty obvious we are a city, 31% of the population, of National Significance. If we want to put in a subway we can do it and we can pay and we do not need central government.
-
Russell Brown, in reply to
I believe the Greens (and many public transport advocates) were pushing this before the Council very gratifyingly and publicly hopped on the bandwagon.
The Auckland Council endorsed the route almost as soon as it was constituted: how’s that bandwagon-jumping? ARTA announced it had a developed a provisional route back in March 2008. Both Banks and Brown supported it in last year’s mayoral election – and both actually voiced support for it before the Greens launched their excellent fast-track campaign in July last year.
Certainly before Labour agreed to support it. And ‘generous’ is a contrast with some of the attitudes expressed in the other direction, which we don’t need to revisit here. It was great to see the parties working together contructively at that Britomart launch event last year, alongside Heart of the City and other organisations.
Yes. I just don’t see the point in phrasing it as some sort of policy-pinching. People have been trying to get this thing done since the 1920s.
-
Steve Barnes, in reply to
Nowhere near it.
Well, I have to admit to being a little disingenuous there ;-)
BUT...
I think you will find that the total cost of Brittomart, including the undergrounding of the rail on Customs St, exceeded that total by quite a margin and that was in 2001 dollars and didn't include the cost of borrowing by Auckland City Council.
I'm guessing here but I would imagine that the cost of the City Loop has been deliberately inflated to lower the BCR. Bloody Joyce. -
Sacha, in reply to
I just don’t see the point in phrasing it as some sort of policy-pinching. People have been trying to get this thing done since the 1920s.
I agree.
-
Sacha, in reply to
If we want to put in a subway we can do it and we can pay and we do not need central government.
If only that were true. Govt holds more than just the purse strings.
-
Gabor Toth, in reply to
...the Central Station in Courtenay Place
is that why that street is so wide?
Almost - but not quite. The City Council bought up all the land on the northern side of Courtenay Place and demolished all the buildings on it around the turn of last century. This enabled them to widen the street and turn Courtenay Place into a public transport hub to coincide with the electrification of the trams in 1904 and the gradual extension of the tramlines out to the suburbs (particularly with the completion of the Hataitai tram tunnel in 1907). The number of tram lines running through the city meant that any thoughts of running (steam) trains into the city were soon discarded (electric passenger rail units did not arrive until 1938).
-
Homai to the Airport through Blockhouse Bay, Glen Eden toHenderson. Kumeu to Albany, Glenfield, Birkenhead and bridge or tunnel to Britomart. Next loop from Panmure to Botany Downs, Flatbush to Homai. But first get the direct link from the airport, through Onehunga to Britomart. Gosh. That would mean you could catch the train from anywhere south to the airport as well.
Now you have a decent network. Finishing the City Link is just touching on the biggie. It will improve things but it should merely be the start.
-
Angus Robertson, in reply to
If only that were true. Govt holds more than just the purse strings.
But they only care about the purse strings. If Auckland wants a rail loop and is willing to pay for it, no central government will get in the way.
-
Patrick Reynolds, in reply to
There is something very insincere and cynical about Nikki Kaye's 'support' for this project. It's like she has a free pass to muddy the waters, the Nats know the people want this but not only are not going to help fund it have done nothing but work hard to make it appear less affordable and not as necessary as it is. She also repeats Joyce's lies about how much they have/are funding rail in AK and the rest of the country. Virtually all of the numbers they quote were either sums voted under the previous gov [who should have done more] or are loans... meanwhile they push more fantasy math around their ongoing and impoverishing motorway orgy. Remember Nikki was allowed to go offline about mining too, this is where they learnt the usefulness of this idea. No chance she'll achieve anything meaningful, but fall perfectly into line behind the big boys when it comes to supporting their insane, imbalanced and petrol eating transport policy: 'Show me the money, Nikki'.
-
Patrick Reynolds, in reply to
Angus, I just don't just want something in particular, I want a rational, balanced, and transformative transport investment programme with our money.
Do you mean because the Link is in one place the people around it should pay for it directly? Well every single road is only ever in one place too, so AK should pay for Southland's roads AND AK's roads and rail too? 2 billion+ is spent a year BY US on transport infrastructure all I'm suggesting is the completely reasonable thought that some of it goes on this, but also that a more balanced process is used that isn't based on crazy MOT and NZTA models designed to favour the current ministers whims and prejudices. And friends.
-
Bart Janssen, in reply to
the project needs to be sold way more compellingly
Oh good just what we need a marketing team.
-
Central government transport policy currently seems to be developed from the point of view of a private car driver, as the default position. But the default position should be that of a non driver. Only a proportion of adults have access to private cars and probably a greater number of people are too young to drive, or choose not to, can't afford to, or are unable to. Some disabled people, for example, will be dependent on public transport all their lives. The non driving population will become an even bigger proportion of the population over time, so it seems crazy not to plan for the needs of the majority.
-
izogi, in reply to
This enabled them to widen the street and turn Courtenay Place into a public transport hub to coincide with the electrification of the trams in 1904 and the gradual extension of the tramlines out to the suburbs (particularly with the completion of the Hataitai tram tunnel in 1907).
Tram infrastructure left quite an imprint over much of Wellington. The main reason for the wide, winding shallow-gradient roads up towards Brooklyn and Karori is that they were the steepest gradient fully-loaded trams could get up, and that was using the special trams built with the lower gear ratios, or whatever the equivalent is for electric engines.
-
James Butler, in reply to
Central government transport policy currently seems to be developed from the point of view of a private car driver
And the commercial truck driver, don't forget them. The trucking sector is by far the biggest beneficiary of the RONS program.
-
merc,
Apparently, according to Mr Joyce the city of the future runs on even bigger trucks than we have now.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
And the commercial truck driver, don't forget them. The trucking sector is by far the biggest beneficiary of the RONS program.
And Big Cycling too, they're all road users who won't get a damned thing out of a rail loop, but could cut those Kaitai-Invercargill trips down with the cycleway of National Party significance.
The stupid thing is that good rail is really, really good for cars and trucks, because it takes lots of private vehicles off the road. It's a really cost effective way of keeping our road infrastructure efficient. If only the petrol heads could grasp this, they'd realize they get a lot of bang for rail buck.
-
Kumara Republic, in reply to
Even when money isn't a factor, the message from central Govt to Auckland is clear: roads are for your own good, so be good Aucklanders and toe the line.
-
merc,
Ports and ferries are tied into this as well, and waterfronts and digital cables, and airports...how the Nats don't see the connections and the need for an aligned environmental policy is just gobsmacking.
-
Sacha, in reply to
just what we need a marketing team
competent campaigning has become such a novelty
-
I confess, it's taken me too long to realise what a sweet way into town the Western Line is from Pt Chev. Baldwin Ave is a 5 min drive from where I am, and a fairly safe place to leave the car if I'm in for a big one.
-
Sacha, in reply to
Central government transport policy currently seems to be developed from the point of view of a private car driver
A driver from Albany, at that. Who liked playing with toy trucks as a boy, perhaps.
Post your response…
This topic is closed.