Good points George
But on a house that was run of the mill in a normal location for want of going into every possible scenario, the 'building' cost part of a bill would never get to tens of thousands.
Most councils don't hello themselves by sending out a bill at the end of a building consent application and include building development levies, resource consents accounts and other things like water connection and sewer connection charges, and in some large metropolitan areas this can take the final amount to a lot.
A recent survey by MBIE showed that it took about 8 - 12 hours to actually process, then you'd pay for say 8-10 inspections.
The total fire that part could be in most cases between 3-5k.
A lot of mis information is out there about the building consent cost.
Sure those other things have to be paid, but if a council had significant infrastructure to up keep then your development levies could be heaps, but you're not required by law to pay for that at the start, you can pay it at CCC and even arrange with the TA to pay it off and still get the CCC.
Resource consents are because an owner wants to do something that isn't permitted in the district plans or regional plans and are under different legislation.
The choice to build somewhere, or something that isn't automatically permitted is on the owner or developer, they should have been well aware at the start.
Lastly I'm afraid we're all caught in the politics of user pays.
Local government councilors in an attempt to make themselves look good generally have avoided infrastructure upgrades nationally for decades to limit rate increases.
This has caught up nearly every TA in NZ, so now they actually have to spend up big time, they have indirectly increased what you and I pay for building consents, resource consents and anything else to avoid subsidizing the costs out of the general rate take.
It's years of avoidance that we're all paying for now, and a mentality that the general ratepayers should not subsidize the cost of your house build at all!
I'm not sure if this works for the common good at all, especially on simple small jobs where the proportionate cost relative to the value of the work is high.
But very rarely is the cost of your consent dictated by the people you deal with at the coal face with building control.
Having a Prime Minister that can't even hit a nail on the head does not mean the rest of the country are an incompetent hamfisted wunch of Bankers.
The one time I met David Lange, around a year before he became PM, was when he was a fellow guest at an Auckland wedding. As I made to set my drink onto the railing of a second-storey balcony, not far from where Lange was settled in conversation, a carpenter to whom I'd just been introduced quietly suggested that I find a better spot, as the railing was already bearing the weight of the leader of the opposition, and he didn't trust skew nailing at the best of times.
tip of the bloody iceberg.
That horrifies me. If that is all verifiable then people should be exposing all of it to all MP's bar National. Expose everything now and I'd be complaining to the Mayor! See if the 3D program will run with it as a follow up to their first investigation. C'mon Christchurch residents, complain !
If that is all verifiable...
It's a site I bookmarked some time ago which has since been a handy reference. I'd imagine much of the author's spin would be actionable in a strictly legal sense, but unfolding events continue to confirm the underlying facts.
Surely a big part of the problem is the deep cultural (is that the right word?) denial of corruption in NZ, when disruptions such as the Canterbury earthquakes only seem to confirm that it flourishes in plain sight. I feel that our best hope right now is the growing impetus for a Royal Commission. The wheels of justice may grind slowly, but they have provided some degree of redress against this sort of thing in the past.
I'd like to a see a lot more GOOD rules.
I discovered this year that the breeze blocks on lower part of a house I own had never been properly sealed. This allowed the lower flat to be damp. This meant I had a heater on down there to keep it dry....which lead to the extension cord catching fire (induction - don't coil those things) and the lower floor was gutted by fire.
They discovered the damp problem during the fire repairs. No problem, dig out the foundation by hand and clean / recoat the wall, replace the novaflow....and fill it with scoria. Done
Now connect it to the drain under the downspout. Oh.....there is no drain under the downspout. It's just concreted in to look like it goes to a drain. The rain water was just getting pushed up the old novaflow towrd the unsealed wall that was always damp. Now I need a drain.
$20,000 later and I'm all sorted....fixing problems that were entirely the result of shonky builders cutting corners.
My other house only cost me $17,000 to fix a couple of months later. The developer had moved my house (1987) - and my water connection - then built several houses over top of my water connection. No one knows where it (the pipe) actually is to this day. Eventually - it leaked. before my times, but the previous owner dodged that bullet by selling it to me. I paid the $300 / month water bills until that got to $700 . month and I *just* got an entirely new water connection from a different street (the one I actually live in) connected as the monthly bill hit $3550.
Bring on those "loopy rules". They might have saved $37,000 this year.....alone.
The problem I’ve seen is you might find a good builder, but he’s subbing to a gang of Afghans or indeterminate Asian folk who can’t speak English…..and you really have NO idea what’s going. Unless you know what you’re looking at, even if you’re standing right there watching there’s a lot they can get away with.
Students and artists should use a new building set to be demolished to make way for a stadium that "may never happen", a developer says.
The Kirk Roberts Consulting Engineers' office building opened at the corner of Barbadoes and Lichfield St in 2012. It was the first large commercial building rebuilt in central Christchurch post-earthquake.
The Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (Cera) acquired it with plans to demolish it to make way for the covered stadium as part of the blueprint.
According to 2013 forecasts, construction of the new covered stadium should have started in March this year.
Cera this year pushed completion of the contentious anchor project to late 2021. Christchurch City Councillor Raf Manji said in May the project had been pushed to late 2024 or 2025.
which lead to the extension cord catching fire (induction – don’t coil those things)
Moving house has its problems as well...
I think these are the folk who moved Dr Haywood to Dunsandel...
It does seem then that there is not really a problem with 'loopy rules' but mostly 'loopy people' implementing them...
Context is everything - I'd have though that with databases and systems being what they are, a flow chart and 'idiot list' could be generated for any building consent process to aid both parties...
Wow. Despite all the precautions it (disaster) still happened. Amazing....
Tip of the iceberg
That is an amazing read.
Meanwhile, over in the righteous space, they too are discussing 'loopy rules'.
And bugger me dead if a couple of the righteous ain't trying to make this about having to accommodate the pesky disabled.
This disabled access, and toilets for the disabled has to be the biggest load of shit in the past 20-30 years, and that’s saying something.
A little straw poll: who here has EVER seen a person in a wheelchair entering or leaving a public toilet? I have never seen one, ever.
How many people have seen a person in a wheelchair “accessing” [we used to just “go into”] a building? In my dim dark memory banks I think I might have seen one, once.
Well hallebleedinglujah Mr Garrett et al....
And bugger me dead if a couple of the righteous ain't trying to make this about having to accommodate the pesky disabled.
Because of course they are. Urgh.
An appropriately Neanderthal response.
Back to your cave Mr Garrett!
They certainly sounds like Gerry. I've always thought of him as the archetypal arrogant, corrupt Nat bully boy. It's a stain on Key's record that he put such a person in charge of the rebuild.
Its not as if the information on doing the job properly is not easily availiable...
THE GUIDE FOR
Written in a language designed for twelve year olds complete with cute dog and printed coffee stains...
Well, written for people who could not build a Doghouse or Garden Shed without supervision.
The article describes a case in WA where an organic farmer lost his certification because his neighbour's GM crop contaminated his property.
Surely against the 'rules'?
The Court ruled against the organic farmer, and said "that the farmer could not, by putting their land to an abnormally sensitive use thereby unilaterally enlarge their own rights and impose limitations on the operations of their neighbours to an extent greater than would otherwise be the case".
Progress...don't ya'll just love It???
There again, on the other hand, the whole bloody Christchurch thing has been a joke.
And a sad and twisted one at that.
I publish www.buildingguide.co.nz. I read Steve's posts with interest. He clearly believes himself to be a good builder (and he may well be) but he highlights the interesting thing around Master Builders which is that you don't have to be a builder to join. The Licensed Builder scheme on the other hand requires a minimum of skill levels to qualify, but there are poor builders who qualify and then it will take years to weed them out. And that's after the whole thing was dumbed down.
In the meantime we have a resurgent sector that saw a mass departure of skilled workers following the GFC, so we have less skilled workers, many of whom don't really care about quality workmanship, building too many houses and with many more yet to come on stream as the SHAs develop.
There's a lot more, but it's a bloody mess and the deregulation/laissez faire approach by National is now seeing a repeat situation of the structures that led to the Leaky Homes fiasco. Which, by the way, is far from being resolved and which we are still building. And John Gray does a shitload of amazingly good work trying to help desperate people through really really shitty situations they find themselves in because of poor rules, poor oversight by councils, poor design and, yes, bad bloody builders.
And why on earth would we trust Paula Bennett to know anything about building. At all?
Helen Kelly has pointed out that the Minister was pushing those ludicrous myths herself on TV in June, to justify said taskforce.
You know, it could just be that the minister was ignorant, believed all the rubbish going around their social circles about government was true, and sought rightly to fix it. Only to be told it was all rubbish by a proper investigative body. Oops.
I mean, it's true that good builders don't really need inspected all the time, it's just also true that we have good builders because they get inspected all the time and don't really have any choice in the matter. When the inspection rules got softened, just a bit, half the new houses went rotten, but that doesn't happen any more, so ....
Like the old mines inspectors. Hadn't had a mine explosion in years, what was even the point of all those inspections? Hmm? Oh, right.
The main workmanship problem ( there were a few ) was that their builder was supposed to install 'dripper lines' from windows -
Good grief. A shonky execution of an afterthought from a kneejerk reaction to bad legislation.
Drip lines were the "solution" to allowing monolithic cladding to be used on anything other than a shed. Back in the day we were required to install trays under joinery, as the mullion and jamb joints at the cill run through and any amount of sealing, silicone... yuk.... would eventually give up and leak. In my opinion the new regs around window and door openings are over the top, that combined with the desire to build "airtight" buildings will, eventually, lead to rotting and decay through lack of adequate ventilation of the structure. Buildings should "breathe" so that any damp which manages to get in can get out, nothing can be perfect so you mitigate. I fear knowledge has been lost and we may never recover.
We need apprentices, we need good teachers. We don't need "Licenced" building companies employing minimum wage hammerhands building, what in most cases, peoples biggest investment. Once again we should look to Germany and the way it regulates these things. The first step is to respect your builder the way you would respect your doctor and to do that we need good rules that are backed up by good workmanship and that can't happen with our current system run by clueless and ruthless businesspeople.
So however skilled and capable you might be, the rest of us have to trust in the work of others.
So long as the general public are kept in ignorance without the education and resources freely available to oversee inspectors’ work and knowledgeably supervise builders.
But there are resources available for consumers - Building Guide, for one. But people have to choose to seek them out...