Posts by Ian MacKay

Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First

  • Hard News: There's a lot of it about,

    Idiotsavant: Read your blog. For those of us not in the Beltway, it is a great read/perspective. Thanks

    Bleheim • Since Nov 2006 • 498 posts Report

  • Hard News: There's a lot of it about,

    The speculation surrounding the Labour support for Winston is diverse. Expediency would have called for Labour to be shed of Peters. I do not think that the reason would be that Peters would throw dirt as many right wingers suggest. As Peters said the remaining enquiries are about the NZF rather than Peters. What are the positive reasons for Labour hanging on to Peters?

    Bleheim • Since Nov 2006 • 498 posts Report

  • Hard News: Crash and Contempt,

    Saw elsewhere "A vote for National is a Vote for ACT!!" Or have I got that back to front? or "A vote for Key is a vote for Douglas"

    Bleheim • Since Nov 2006 • 498 posts Report

  • Hard News: Crash and Contempt,

    By the way hunters in NZ use silencers on rifles to avoid scaring the other targets eg rabbits.

    Bleheim • Since Nov 2006 • 498 posts Report

  • Hard News: Crash and Contempt,

    That is where the line is becoming so thin.
    Methinks, with technology what it is today, assumption, presumption, supposition, and MSM combined have drawn the line well before any courtroom.

    Sofie: Well said again and I still think there are recent occasions when the accused is hammered long before a defence can be mounted. What would it take to reign in MSM abuse (to my mind anyway) of justice?

    Bleheim • Since Nov 2006 • 498 posts Report

  • Hard News: Crash and Contempt,

    So just to be clear Russell: is it ok to prejudice someone's right to a fair trial (eg all Lockett's co-defendants) as long as there is enough public interest? I fear you have left too much dangling here:

    That is still the question to me. On a wider front the fundamental belief in "innocent until proven guilty" and "allowing due process", should be reasons to not publish. In this case of the Dom, it is authenticated documentation, where-as the Veitch and Peters the information was not. Perhaps all holds should be off. Publish whatever you like and call it "in the public interest."

    Bleheim • Since Nov 2006 • 498 posts Report

  • Island Life: Waiting For Roddo,

    I stayed on Prime after the great Warriors win to watch Rodney at work. Impressions count. When Hide was asked if he had anything to hide over the question of his own Party Funding, I thought for a moment that he showed some anxiety at the thought the spotlight might be turned on him. Perhaps not. And yet….

    Bleheim • Since Nov 2006 • 498 posts Report

  • Busytown: See me grow,

    Actually it is great to hear of you son's curiosity, as it is fundamentally the province of intelligence. Bright kids know the answers but very bright kids ask the questions. "The Question is the Answer". Sadly observations show that it is very rare for kids to ask questions in classrooms. Sometimes actively discouraged.

    Bleheim • Since Nov 2006 • 498 posts Report

  • Hard News: Need to Know,

    An interesting analysis of Peters position on Scoop 08
    http://election08.scoop.co.nz/

    Bleheim • Since Nov 2006 • 498 posts Report

  • Hard News: Need to Know,

    The Parliament Timetable on the Live Broadcast on-line shows that September 9,10,11, are sitting days and then 23 as only other day set aside. ???

    Bleheim • Since Nov 2006 • 498 posts Report

Last ←Newer Page 1 36 37 38 39 40 50 Older→ First