Hard News: What to Do?
315 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 13 Newer→ Last
-
I think that I heard during Question Time today that the wording could be altered if the Ref Organisers were willing. Tail end with something about a consultation with the Clerk? Anyone out there?
Not at this point in the process. Far too late for that now (without a law change).
-
Remember that Helen Clark received a lot of criticism for not including it as part of the electoral ballot in November?
Yes, and I wasn't buying that it was logistically and financially impossible. I do however perfectly understand the political angle that this was the last thing Clark (or anyone else) wanted that back on the agenda during an election that was going to be enough of a shit fight.
I wonder whether Key would have come out so strongly stating how stupid this is if it had been run with the General Election!
-
If you're Pakeha, it's all too easy to think that there is no difference. I saw some unpublished analysis that showed a very high correlation between answering "New Zealander" and experiencing redness of the neck.
I haven't seen any such studies, but that was my anecdotal impression.
-
Graeme, like the rest of the world we changed from race to ethnicity as a concept some time ago. Not that you'd know listening to talkback, I guess.
-
a whole lot of our compatriots not knowing the difference between nationality and ethnicity
I thought the major problem was our Government not wanting to ask a question about race.Ummm, not sure. Both 'race' and 'ethnicity' can be problematic. But the latter as the connotation of something you identify yourself with - which I guess is what the government/department was after. (As opposed to race being seen more as something you are categorised as part of.)
-
If you're Pakeha, it's all too easy to think that there is no difference. I saw some unpublished analysis that showed a very high correlation between answering "New Zealander" and experiencing redness of the neck.
The Census identification "New Zealander" gives me as much mirth as the current CIR question. Back in the day, somewhere around 1840, "New Zealander" meant Maori, and was commonly used as such in official documents and in literature.
Perhaps some citizens should make a concerted effort to encourage the Census to allow them to identify themselves as Hottentots or Mulattos.
-
I saw some unpublished analysis that showed a very high correlation between answering "New Zealander" and experiencing redness of the neck.
I can point you to a study that used the old census question with Pākehā, and those who used the write in options knew fewer Māori words. Not quite the same as redness of the neck, but perhaps less open.
-
James Green, I'd be obliged for a link to that study-
-
Answering New Zealander skewed a lot of otherwise useful census data. But I heard - and there must be people here who actually work for Stats NZ and so know much better than me - that it was most likely to be used as an answer by older pakeha men in the south island.
-
I'm going to end up in a head-desk coma if I hear one more story bitching about the cost of referenda, and perhaps that's a sufficient reason in itself to do away with the damn things. Perhaps someone should point out to these people that we'd save a shit load of dosh if we shut down the Police, the judiciary and appointed Jerry Mateparae dictator for life. It wouldn't be a country worth living in, but it would save a lot of money.
A better argument for doing away with CIRs is that they're utterly meaningless, and would be if you could run them and get change from a twenty.
-
My definition of Pakeha, involves understanding Maori protocol.
I have not seen it defined that way before, Steven. To me it means I am from New Zealand but I am not Maori. I certainly do not feel at all "European" and tauiwi seems to fit more recent migrants better.
-
And recent migrants from Europe seem far more fittingly described as "European New Zealanders". Statistics NZ just lost their nerve when they removed Pakeha as the preferred term.
-
Watching Campbell Live by any chance, Craig?
You're correct that the main reason CIRs are a bad idea is that they're bad democracy. But still: bad, waste of time ideas that cost quite a lot are naturally more concerning than bad ideas that waste time but little else.
-
Sacha, didn't they have both options? I can't recall. Certainly I think they should have had both as tick box options: Pakeha, or NZ European.
I prefer NZ European to just putting New Zealander, for reasons I may go into if I get drunk enough. I have no problem with Pakeha either, though.
-
Something that occurs to me is that the wording of the question is required to:
... be such as to convey clearly the purpose and effect of the indicative referendum;Now, I reckon the question being asked doesn't do this. It doesn't indicate whether and how the Crimes Act should be changed, in other words to reinstate S.59 or something else. any voter is unable to tell what the effect of the referendum would be, should Parliament decide to give it effect.
Obviously the Clerk thought otherwise. I wonder (Graeme?) whether that decision can be challenged, or whether it's covered by parliamentary privilege?
-
I think I'd be vaguely happy with the wording if the word 'good' was taken out of it. Talk about subjectivity overload.
I don't want to support the referendum makers, but I can imagine a posse of goofy people sitting around trying to create a question that distinguishes them from bad parents and the sort of discipline they might dish out - ie - a thrashing, a beating, a killing. And these 'good' parents only want to give Johnny a tap on the hand when he goes too close to the fire, the traffic, the witch in the cupboard at the bottom of the stairs etc. I am very tempted to spoil the ballot - the obvious answer to me is 'It's not.' (Wasn't that the point of giving the police discretionary powers?) But I really want them to lose - so I'll be voting 'yes'.
-
The wording of the question is up to the petitioner. Whether or not it becomes a CIR depends upon whether or not 10% of voters think it should. Democracy has always replied upon the wisdom of crowds - you have to take the crunchy with the smooth, as Billy Bragg might once have said.
-
While you're topping up, Steve, I remembered that this conversation had happened hereabouts a few years back under the watchful tutelage of a respected specialist now marshalling middle eastern tweets. Worth a read.
They're taking over. The 'New Zealanders' I mean. As you can see, they're actively killing off the white-folk, looting their homes and renaming their children.
-
Obviously the Clerk thought otherwise. I wonder (Graeme?) whether that decision can be challenged, or whether it's covered by parliamentary privilege?
I don't believe it would be covered by parliamentary privilege, but it's a little late to challenge it now.
-
the obvious answer to me is 'It's not.' (Wasn't that the point of giving the police discretionary powers?) But I really want them to lose - so I'll be voting 'yes'.
The point of re-stating the discretionary power that already existed anyway, was to make people think that the answer is 'It's not' when the law is that a smack is now a criminal offence.
-
Why "deface" the paper?
I say do it because it sends a message that it IS a ridiculous question AND it has the added advatage that it gets counted.
I always thought it would be great to form the "Informal Party". No entry fee and you get a total at the end of the night.
-
I seem to remember that the proposed scheme wasn't that good.
And as I remember it considerably lowered the amount of the super payment as a percentage of the average wage.
-
Did anyone hear about the woman who received emails thanking her for signing the 'smacking' petition, when she hadn't done so?
-
Hmmm, not so sure. I don't mind being called Pakeha, though - to me it's shorthand for "New Zealander of European origin" or something along those lines. I've never felt any kind of "relationship" with Maori other than "Hi, how ya doing?". Are we reading too much into this?
-
I like "pakeha" a lot - I'm happily pakeha - in the US I'd be a "honky" - not a nice word - it's great to have a word that's neutral that describes me
Post your response…
This topic is closed.