Hard News: The March for Democracy
759 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 … 27 28 29 30 31 Newer→ Last
-
I look forward to your return.
Can I underline that. I've always gravitated to Joe and Ian's posts in a thread, reading them ahead of much of the page, if only for the smile the phraseology inevitably brings.
Nobody on this forum has an incisive turn of phrase that matches Mr. Wylie (and there is some heavy competition herein).
And Ian, yes. Miss you both big time already.
-
In the Swiss case i got it wrong about the minarets being used to broadcast prayers 5 times a day. Sorry folks.
If they're not being used for broadcast purposes then i think RB is right about the posters being outlandish , depicting the minarets as missiles .
-
If they're not being used for broadcast purposes then i think RB is right about the posters being outlandish , depicting the minarets as missiles .
Um, would it be within the realms of possibility that's it's "outlandish" to dog-whsitle that over a billion human beings are terrorists? 82% of Swiss are Christians (basically evenly divided between Roman Catholics and Swiss Reformed); and I think they'd take severe exception to being equated with terrorist groups like the IRA, or posters depicting the spires of churches as missiles.
The rather sad irony is that Switzerland is a nation whose own history is marked by sectarian conflict that escalated into a civil war in 1847. With that fresh in everyone's mind, the Federal Constitution of 1848 guaranteed the equal treatment of both Catholics and Protestants in all cantons, regardless of which denomination formed a majority or controlled the canton government.
-
If they're not being used for broadcast purposes then i think RB is right about the posters being outlandish , depicting the minarets as missiles .
Even if they were, the sad irony of a country largely made up of Christians (who ring bells on Sunday morning, and other times) being concerned about a different religion making regular noises, would seem just a tad hypocritical.
And y'know, the whole pushing several hundred thousand people into the terrorist box because of their religion.
-
the sad irony of a country largely made up of Christians
I think Juan Cole is rather good on all this:
So Switzerland, after centuries of striving for civilization and enlightenment, has just about reached the same level of tolerance as that exhibited by a small Gulf Wahhabi country, the people of which were mostly Bedouins only a hundred years ago.
The response to this in Indonesia is best described, as is much in this country, as confused. Both the government and the largest Islamic body, the NU have strongly condemned it, but in a land where Christianity counts for two of the officially accepted religions (Protestant and RC are regarded as separate faiths, and you legally have to profess to one of the 6..atheism is effectively illegal) it's increasingly hard to build a church...planning and other barriers are being used to prevent construction and some local government have torn churches down for breaches of recently written or re-written by-law, thus enforcing a de-facto ban on such, this having met with a loud silence from central government for reasons of political expediency, not wishing to offend an small but noisy radical minority.
The NU has asked followers not to overreact, and in particular, not to attack Swiss interests, which is more or less seen as a call to arms to do exactly that.
Like the recent flurry to attack Malaysia over a TV ad which allegedly used an Indonesian song, these things come and go in the nation.
82% of Swiss are Christians
Just to be picky, 27% of the nation are said to be atheist or agnostic, which, if true, puts the Christian percentage at 68-69%
-
Yet PAS bloggers try & convince themselves that there views represent majority widespread public opinion. They don't! Anyone who doesn't agree with PAS status quo on any of the above is ridiculed & condemned with sarcasm.Widespread public opinion is condemned here. PAS doesn't care as its anti democratic.
Is it me or does the general 'mob' not have any sense of irony?
-
You've perhaps missed the charms of this later instalment of whining from the oppressed.
-
I have no problem with minarets in Wellington. They might drown out Benjamin Easton's ranting up at the MoJ.
A few stonings would be good for laffs, even.
-
Ah yes the Letters of Bruce to the Kevins clearly states the use of the biblical alkathene pipe in cases of theft.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10616286
-
Hide and his Mates Intend to Steal 1/3 of New Zealand
This is so wrong I can't let it slide.
Not only is the Dancing Fool trying to stack the vote with the "Landed Gentry" and the change in the method of voting, from STV to FPP (locked in for 2 elections) He also wants all the assets.When it comes to our public assets, then we see why Minister Hide wants less democracy in Auckland. Hide will appoint the initial directors to the boards that control our water, transport and other utilities.
Maybe it's time for us to march or, at least, pay attention to what is happening to our largest City. This is not just about Auckland, this is the thin end of the wedge.
Time to stand up and be counted. -
I agree, this is one of the few cases where mass protest action could actually influence the outcome...
Scare Key and his backers with the prospect of years in the opposition wilderness should this bill be passed in it's current form.
-
Well, let's organise then. Anybody know what the schedule is for the bill?
-
I'm a novice at this, but I can't seem to find (short of reading the full text of all 3 bills) a reference to this in the legislation...
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Legislation/Bills/Default.htm?search=42432935
-
Anybody know what the schedule is for the bill?
1.00 am, Monday 21st December, Muttering behind bike sheds behind Beehive, passing of wads of used twenties in brown paper envelopes.
1.15 am Sneak into Debating Chamber, pass bill under extreme urgency.
1.20 am. Borrow Bollards Ute and drive to Auckland to load up on "Assets"
10.30 am. Start on the piss.
11.30 pm. Dance under OUR stars. -
Thought I'd drag this ol' thread back up for a few reasons.
Here's the 911th reason.
Who would of thought the likes of Ron Paul would want people to know about this?. -
Yep, Ron Paul is a Truther from way back.
-
Oh the irony of dismissing revelations as "truthiness"
I would rather, as I always try to do, apply Occam's Razor.
Which is more likely?
1. A mad guy, who happened to work for the CIA for a while, did it from a cave in Afghanistan.
2. Israel did it to put all the balls in their basket. With help from the CIA & FBI
3. Bush did it so he could finish his Daddy's war. With help from the CIA & FBI
4. The landlord did it for the insurance. With help from the CIA & FBI
5. The CIA acted alone.
6. A bunch of guys from Saudi Arabia trained in secret for months and just by chance NORAD shut down their defences on the day they decided to act and within an hour or two the FBI & the CIA found all the evidence to prove Osama Bin Laden was behind it and just happened to be hiding in a country the USA had, merely coincidentally, been wanting to put an OIL pipeline through for years.
?
Of course, we all know the last scenario to be true.
Who's the "Truther" now Gio ?. -
Sorry, I thought this was the bit where we all laughed at Ron Paul. Frankly I visit his site for the ads alone, they never disappoint.
Btw, Steve, Truther is the name the Truthers give themselves, not a slur.
-
Steve, in order for options 2, 3, 4 and 5 to be on a fair footing with 1 and 6, you need to add the equivalently far-fetched provisos, eg " and every US military officer has maintained their silence since" or " and in this instance the insurance companies were happy to pay the claim no questions asked" or "because when you want to start a war in one country the best way is a false flag operation that fingers another", and so on.
I guess the most disappointing part of the "it's all the Jews' fault" explanation is it's so tiresomely unoriginal.
-
Like I've said before, I find both sides of this to be various shades of bullshite. There will always be agendas, either before or after such a horrendous act, that will be aided by nefarious explanations.
Gio. My point was the abuse of the word "Truth" from both sides is, at least, disingenuous, the truth is just not known.
Stephen.I guess the most disappointing part of the "it's all the Jews' fault" explanation is it's so tiresomely unoriginal.
I couls paraphrase myself there, "the abuse of the term "it's all the Jews' fault" from both sides is, at least, disingenuous."
Israel is not the poor downtrodden victim some like to claim, not only powerful in its own right but highly influential in American policy. Palestinians are Semites too but some can be convinced that "All Arabs are Fundamentalist Muslims" without realising what they've been suckered into for the sake of the greater God, oil.
Anyway, I ain't here to preach, just voicing my discomfort. -
So you're saying you really think 9/11 was an Israeli plot? I just want to be clear here.
If you don't, what was the point you were making by providing that link? I really don't understand what you are getting at. What is the nature of the discomfort are you expressing by posting that link?
disingenuous
I do deliberately conflate the Israeli plot angle with "the Jews did it," because I genuinely believe it is an antisemitic explanation. It depends on belief in scheming Jew tropes for its plausibility.
Yes, I know Palestinians are Semites. Antisemitism still means Jew-hating and it's not my fault that the German Jew-hater who coined the phrase botched his etymology. Again, what the fuck? What does that have to do with whether "it's an Israeli plot" is an antisemitic explanation?
-
Gio. My point was the abuse of the word "Truth" from both sides is, at least, disingenuous, the truth is just not known.
Yet for you the content of that link on the Ron Paul site qualifies as "revelations". This puzzles me.
I've just this minute come across this letter that Lewis Carroll wrote to a child friend:
Don't be in such a hurry to believe next time-I'll tell you why-If you set to work to believe everything, you will tire out the muscles of your mind, and then you'll be so weak you won't be able to believe the simplest truest things.
Only last week a friend of mine set to work to believe Jack-the-giant-killer. He managed to do it, but he was so exhausted by it that when I told him it was raining (which was true) he couldn't believe it, but rushed out into the street without his hat or umbrella, the consequence of which was his hair got seriously damp, and one curl didn't recover its right shape for nearly two days.
"Hurry to believe" describes possibly all of us in relation to both official explanations and conspiracy theories. But Truthers are the fastest of them all, and that alone exposes them very quickly if you bother to read their literature.
-
"revelations". This puzzles me.
Possibly not the best choice of words, would you accept "bit of news" or "bit of gossip" instead?.
I do deliberately conflate the Israeli plot angle with "the Jews did it," because I genuinely believe it is an antisemitic explanation. It depends on belief in scheming Jew tropes for its plausibility.
I had no intention of messing with your beliefs. Merely pointing out a logical possibility.
-
It would help me a lot l if you made your points less obliquely, because I'm still struggling to see what they are. I've asked you directly whether you believe the claims made in the link you posted, or alternatively to explain why you posted it, and you just respond with evasiveness. I feel trolled, and I don't like it.
-
Charlie Wilson's war? Just as a backgrounder. I doubt all of what I read on this, but one thing that seems to be required for real truthiness to prevail is a sufficient amount of time to pass. How long? How long is a piece of string?
Needless to say, I think we have some way to go. What is already apparent is that Bush (junior and senior), Rumsfeld and co were not above some pretty dodgy manipulations of the truth to advance their agendas in Iraq, and the Meddle East©*. We can agree on that, right? If they weren't clever enough to orchestrate it (Iraq I mean) then they were at least too stupid to prevent it.
*That was a typo, but I'm owning it.
Post your response…
This topic is closed.