Posts by Sofie Bribiesca
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Speaker: An Open Letter To David Cunliffe, in reply to Craig Ranapia,
I really get that the government isn’t shaking down to your taste,
And this one Craig? You are well aware why this doesn't float our boat and you are well aware for why. We don't like liars and cheats and corrupt Government that promotes and pays staff on our taxes. You would be the first to scream, yes scream, with an almighty holier than thou expectation that we should understand if the shoe was on t'other foot.
You of all are well aware of the stench. Quit making pitiful excuses for your acceptance of this sewerage embarrassing our Country. But I don't hold my breath. I think you sold out. Just my opinion ,of course. Don't lose any sleep now y'hear.
-
Speaker: An Open Letter To David Cunliffe, in reply to Craig Ranapia,
calling anyone an animal tended to provoke the kind of dudgeon aimed squarely at one’s arse.
Sorry, my dog is a princess. Any animal on this planet can be treated with respect when they earn it. like all animals, some just wallow in shit. The problem being, some can just be nasty or stupid.
-
Speaker: An Open Letter To David Cunliffe, in reply to Sacha,
stop humping that chair leg, little seymour
Trophy of the day ;)
-
Speaker: An Open Letter To David Cunliffe, in reply to Craig Ranapia,
how about you stop calling Dunne and Seymour “poodles”
Oh pileeze. If not poodles, lapdogs. Oh look over there ----> Flavell just became flavour of the month. So. 1,2,3,4 Parties. Ain't no monster. Only got 4 heads. Whatevs. :)
-
Speaker: An Open Letter To David Cunliffe, in reply to Kracklite,
Accompanied by more than one commentator saying “go away, you’re not one of us.”
My comment is because she was being smug and rude. In good faith (we all have no problem with Ranapiaismania) she would be welcome. To denigrate us for being involved is insulting so I'll give back as good as is served Kracklite. I can be a bitch and do put it to use when provoked.
-
Speaker: An Open Letter To David Cunliffe, in reply to anna g,
All your other hand-wringing and blame and conspiracy theories and bickering all simply serves to emphasise Mr Dann’s points and gives substantial momentum to the claim that the wonderful John Key deserves at least four terms.
So you popped in with your head stuck firmly in the sand (and somewhere else I could suggest but wont lower myself to your level). Yes some didn't want Cunliffe last time nor this but the situation now is, he has the right to do what he has done 'cos y'know that's Labour's way of choosing their leader and guess what? ,he won last time. What ever you think doesn't mean diddly squat so head back to the lying,corrupt poisoned "fool aid" that awaits you on Planet Teamkey. Your insults are pitiful. We are okay having our discussions in the open.
-
Speaker: An Open Letter To David Cunliffe, in reply to Craig Ranapia,
And we’re really going to bring Dirty Politics into it? If you want to go there, Kyle, I’ll ask whether that label is better applied to people who only respect the rules when they find it politically convenient to do so.
Craig it applies to John fucking Key, his obfuscation of due process over the last 6 years ,his ability to fudge the truth ,denigrate the whistleblowers and his general school bully attitude to anyone who would question his ability to tell the truth for once. Craig ,please don't brush away the fact that Key hasn't answered one question that doesn't suit him. Thing is we the public would like some answers and there is NONE!
-
Speaker: An Open Letter To David Cunliffe, in reply to Sacha,
I wish more people would get really clear about what they are prepared to support and what they aren’t and then act accordingly.
If the fucking party cant get their shit together what's the fucking point. We are seeing selfish posturing and it aint about the Party.
-
What gets my goat is this. How can anyone in Labour from the OP leader down to any member etc see any advantage in airing their differences anywhere else but in Party / members/ Caucus meetings. Thrash it out amongst yourselves and come out with a plan that is worthy of announcing. What we are seeing is a Party bickering with "he said,she said" childish behaviour. It's ridiculous that so many want to squabble. It was just really sad to see James want to give up so quickly if one person in Labour was going to stay on. I think there is proof that there are many personalities in Labour and it's hard anywhere to get along with a large group of people, but I thought if a common goal existed then it should be ok to have meetings until it gets sorted. I thought Politics was a career decision. If there are many amongst Labour who don't want DC and many in Unions announcing they may not vote his way this time and caucus support declining ,then DC wont get the job and everyone else can be happy. To air this all in the public domain is tainting the Party and to suggest that DC should have to be different to everyone else in Labour and give up his right to run for Leader, is antidemocratic to say the least. Bitching hasn't helped anyone least the Labour Perty.
-
Speaker: An Open Letter To David Cunliffe, in reply to BenWilson,
You might want to look the word up. And Bart too. I don’t want to play dictionary monitor today.
Ultimatum : Either he goes or I do! Ultimatum.