OnPoint: The Source
217 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 Newer→ Last
-
Steve Reeves, in reply to
And Key is an honourable man. As Shakespeare did not write.
-
Emma Hart, in reply to
The second just brings attention to the incongruity of the two parts. But it still asserts both of them are true.
"You are a member of the ACT party, and I am going to have sex with you."
"You are a member of the ACT party, but I am going to have sex with you."
Different things.
-
Hebe, in reply to
BUT what about this from a stuff report
On Thursday, Bailey's Linkdin profile had been checked out by an adviser in Social Development Minister Paula Bennett's office, Ng said.Gotcha! Nice one Keith Ng.
-
So the general tone amongst many who should know better is, "How dare someone ask for money from WINZ!"
Heh, indeed.
-
Hebe, in reply to
"You are a member of the ACT party, and I am going to have sex with you."
"You are a member of the ACT party, but I am going to have sex with you."
Different things.Both beastiality though.
-
Tom Beard, in reply to
I hear what you're saying but I can't answer. You're logic is irrefutable but I cannot understand why you say that.
And so on but your understanding may be at odds with mine.This bar doesn't have any bourbon but it does make a very nice Martini. My apartment is small, but it's close to Cuba St. Ooh, you are awful, but I like you.
It doesn't negate the first statement, but it may negate a judgement that might be expected based on it.
-
Richard Aston, in reply to
Loving the surreal diversion here
This bar doesn’t have any bourbon but it does make a very nice Martini. My apartment is small, but it’s close to Cuba St. Ooh, you are awful, but I like you.
You are a member of the ACT party, and I am going to have sex with you.””
Ok Ok what happened next ?
-
Tom Beard, in reply to
Ok Ok what happened next ?
It's a James Bond script adapted by Harold Pinter, then translated into Hungarian and back.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
Different things.
Yup, I'm sure the ACT member really cares.
-
Islander, in reply to
Both beastiality though.
Heh!
With really low life forms at that- -
Emma Hart, in reply to
Yup, I'm sure the ACT member really cares.
Given one is an insult, I'm pretty sure s/he would, yeah. I mean, unless they were really desperate... Oh. I see your point.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
Oh. I see your point.
I used to belong to ACT u c ;-) I know how they think....they ain't called Randroids for nuthin'
ETA: Oh crap that has innuendo I didn't compute, er... mean.
-
Russell Brown, in reply to
Different things.
That was brilliant.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
That was brilliant.
Yes, only Emma could insult someone by having sex with them.
-
nzlemming, in reply to
Heh!
With really low life forms at thatThey're only just holding onto paua
-
BenWilson, in reply to
<applauds>
-
Islander, in reply to
+1!
-
Emma Hart, in reply to
Yes, only Emma could insult someone by having sex with them.
I think I was just complisulted.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
Quite distinct from inplementing you. One is in the but, the other the and.
-
nzlemming, in reply to
oooooooh, a palpable it.
-
The worst part is I'm pretty sure you guys aren't even high.
-
Emma Hart, in reply to
oooooooh, a palpable it.
All the best ones are.
Quite distinct from inplementing you.
Inplementation isn't really my strength. I'm all about the theory.
The worst part is I'm pretty sure you guys aren't even high.
This is the internet. You're pretty sure we're not cats.
-
Hebe, in reply to
Shush all of you. MSM are reading; it confirms all their worst theories. We want to be taken seriously, right?
-
nzlemming, in reply to
Fuck that shit.
-
Graeme Edgeler, in reply to
About 10 years back I had occasion to go to a WINZ office, or whatever they were called back then
They're not called WINZ offices now, and it was over 10 years ago when that stopped. But still the best rebranding ever. The organisation was only called WINZ for a couple of years, but it still persists. Whatever agency came up with it was genius.
Post your response…
This topic is closed.