Posts by Sofie Bribiesca
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Hard News: Dirty Politics, in reply to
So that's the level she/they are prepared to go? Sick Bitch.
Plus she must be feeling a little bit put out ? Is it all true? How can she want to silence/kill Hager if none of it's true. She is suggesting death threats and promoting death . That's disgusting. See what this Govt has sowed? Fucking sick. -
Hard News: Dirty Politics, in reply to
Was there meant to be something after the colon?
oscopy?
Right up them? ; )I'll get me hat...
-
Hard News: Dirty Politics, in reply to
I know politicos will say other stuff is worse but Joe Public doesn’t really care. But playing with people’s lives is different.
Whilst I understand your sentiment and nothing surprises me with Collins, I think you have missed another glaring fact that this Govt has been playing with people's lives every day since 2008 but I'd go back into 2005 with Brash , the Exclusive Brethren, and JK in Helensville at least.
-
Hard News: Dirty Politics, in reply to
It says Collins got a prisoner transferred at Slater’s request, among other things.
Now that's interesting ! That puts everything for sale. But we knew that right?
-
Hard News: Dirty Politics, in reply to
Danyl nominates the hacking of Labour’s computers and abuse of of SIS information as the two big takeaways so far.
I'd go with that . Dirty, and by track record we see deals that frankly stink and we get to pay for this shit. I really think (just an opinion of mine) that Labour can look really stupid when things like "sorry for being a man right now" goes viral because a bunch of employed shitstirrers jump in and before you know it the seed is planted. I give anything like that 24 hours to take hold. Once again job done. The smug pride that then continues in the House is childish. That's our democracy. And John Armstrong bleats on.
-
Most great “scoops” by gallery jouraists are fed to them. Their jobs simply don’t permit real, long-game investigation.
That's a cop out . How about they stay up a bit later and do some research. By the time their gossip goes to print the comments section that follows shortly after carries new info that has cause for good argument against what's printed thus rendering that gallery journo pointless. Chief Political Commentator my arse. Business Analysis. My arse. Tory, definitely.
-
Hard News: Dirty Politics, in reply to
That was what I thought.
Aren't hackers any good these days?
-
Hard News: Not doing justice, in reply to
Does it matter any more?
Nope. Soundbites will beat you everytime.Anyone can be everyone.Perception beats all.
-
Hard News: Not doing justice, in reply to
Idiots and wind, every time. No need to read anything significant into it, other than hoons will be hoons
.Ah!!!! Finally!!!The voice of reason.Vote Deborah.
Absolutely. Plus probably a bit to do with the big loudest fight in town being about Dotcom wanting to bring down Key and graffiti (possibly seen as not 'that bad" as it's just a bit of cardboard so German against Jew alterations being the fastest point to show dislike, as Steven Crawford suggested) being an expression for disaffected.Images get a quick response. Some are getting noticed more quickly than others. Point made.
-
Hard News: Not doing justice, in reply to
However JK chose not to, allowing more breathing space for a damaging inflammatory meme that amounted to a convenient untruth.
Par for the course since about, coming on 6 years ago now. Had IMP not existed today, I suspect it would have been "the nasty greens" or "the looney left" JK was consistently inflaming untruths in the House which were repeated for media to take up on a regular basis. If that is just a bit of banter in politics then why is there any surprise as to where it leads to?
I thought Laila Harre said on Breakfast that Dotcom was doing a good job promoting youth getting out to vote, barely audible as Christie tried to talk over her at the same time as demanding it was her job to clarify. I didn't see the Key interview the day before, Does Christie talk over Key as he is meant to clarify what he was insinuating? He (for me) came across as being bloody rude. Why ask a question then talk over your guest?