Posts by George Darroch

Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First

  • Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?,

    So...the big plan is to eventually privatise social welfare? Why else would a core government function be moved to an "arms length" entity?

    Probably. But having something at arm's length also gives you more political space - you can distance yourself from the operations of the entity.

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

  • Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?,

    Sue Bradford:

    Aucklanders – the fight back against the worst recommendations in the Rebstock report starts now. Join us – Auckland Against Poverty – in a picket, 2pm today outside Work & Income, Sel Peacock Dr, Henderson.

    I'm off to join her in a bit.

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

  • Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?,

    Godwinning the show does not win you anything.

    That said, I'm absolutely for universal free contraception, sexual and fertility health services, but singling out one group in society is highly disturbing.

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

  • Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?,

    Reduction in beneficiary numbers by 100,000 by 2021. Big. Fucking. Whoop. That'll happen without a single policy change, assuming the economy manages to recover of its own devices.

    No, as far as I can tell they mean all beneficiaries, including sickness, DPB, disability, and unemployment. IIRC unemployment alone is 70,000 right now.

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

  • Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?,

    Aaaaaaaaand, it's out. Fundamental change signalled (Scoop).

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

  • Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?,

    I'm pretty sure Craig would have wanted better than that from Key

    So this a thread for trolling Craig? He can speak for himself, you know? As you well would know if you've been here longer than five minutes.

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

  • Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?,

    [self-redacted. adds nothing to the conversation]

    Craig, snap.

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

  • Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?,

    Bait and switch, my friends, bait and switch. Try not to get too incandescent too soon.

    Hahahaha jk?

    We're not joking
    Just joking
    We are joking
    Just joking
    We're not joking

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

  • Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?,

    Since this is likely to be a rather down thread; I'm enjoying a lot of the recession humour coming from the US. Thought Catalog deserves an honourable mention, for its ironic un/deremployed graduate aesthetic.

    I have noticed ironic humour coming back, for better but mostly worse. 1991, all over again.

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

  • Hard News: Welfare: Back to the Future?,


    For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.

    Believe it or not, I actually agree with this to a very large degree. People of productive capacity should be contributing to society. But since state provision of universal employment is detested by both major parties, and we don't all have sheep or own land where we plant our grains, this is beside the point. Either there is a job for you, or there is not.

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

Last ←Newer Page 1 81 82 83 84 85 227 Older→ First