Posts by Lilith __
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Hard News: Moving right along?, in reply to DexterX,
Their situations are not comparable.
They are comparably stupid, so there.
I really don't think so. If everybody who'd ever had an affair was pilloried, there wouldn't be many left to do the accusing.
How many have to answer a fraud charge?
-
Hard News: Moving right along?, in reply to DexterX,
Brown is as credible as Banks – they are both victims of their own stupidity.
Banks is facing a criminal charge. Their situations are not comparable.
-
Capture: Two Tone, in reply to Morgan Nichol,
IMO, if you can shoot raw, you have to shoot raw.
I've never done this, because I take a lot of photos and I can't be bothered with huge files. The amount of compression in a standard camera jpg is minimal. My 2c.
-
And can I just say, the more exaggerated and disgusting the attacks on Len Brown, the more public sympathy he gets. His opponents are not doing themselves any favours.
-
Hard News: Moving right along?, in reply to Seamus Harris,
I don’t recall calling him a ‘stalker’, and while his treatment of Bevan appears poor, I am not sure it qualifies as ‘abuse’
“leverage his authority to pester a junior for sex” was what you said . That’s pretty much the definition of “abusive stalker”, isn’t it?
Since there's no evidence for what you say, you are being potentially defamatory. -
Capture: Two Tone, in reply to Nora Leggs,
Heh, love your work, Nora! Although those men seem to be meeting clandestinely in a parking lot!
-
Hard News: Moving right along?, in reply to Rob Stowell,
it’s been denied
It's also been denied by the hotels concerned. So that accusation's a dead duck.
-
Hard News: Moving right along?, in reply to Seamus Harris,
Well Russell (or whoever is in charge here) is welcome to edit posts as they see fit.
And you are welcome not to be an ass who requires editing!
-
Guys, this thread was sordid enough without that!
And Seamus, say what you like on your own blog, if you defame people here it gets Russell into trouble.
-
Legal Beagle: Fact check: Q+A on mayoral…, in reply to Matthew Hooton,
the law may not be relevant in explaining people’s behaviour. It is what people thought the law is. And I suspect that there were those involved in all this who believed the law is as Michelle Boag (mis)explained it, which is why they did what they did.
It's a pity Boag et al didn't do research or get advice before speaking on the subject.