Posts by Steve Barnes
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Craig. It is far too early for me to discuss this in depth, I think my head is full of socks or something, don't you ever sleep?
I do not disagree with you at all. I think people should be allowed to do all kinds of things that I wouldn't want to as long as they don't do it in the street and frighten the horses.
In a country that glorifies violent behaviour (Rugby) I find it more than a little disingenuous to prohibit one from sucking a little dick occasionally. -
Make sure you move to Wellington or Christchurch in range of TelstraClear cable. The service is shit compared to the Saturn/Paradise days, but it's still the best option.
Unless you want to move to Sweden and be really old
-
Ahhh Craig. So well informed on those so important facts.
Accipere quam facere praestat injuriam
As they say (italics are just so Italic, doncha think?) -
Always felt that vibe with a mate Bevin in the headless chooks as well. It certainly commands your attention.
I thought that was NRA wasnit?
-
Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat.
Nemo me impune lacessit, is it getting hot in here?
In other News.
I went to Drinking pretetiously tonight at the Lundun bar.
Good grief. Has ever a bar gone so far downhill? (Gluepot excluded) I would rather drink vomit from a vagrants sock than suffer the excuse for beer in that hell hole. Whilst looking for more info. on tonights proceedings come across a post by the name of Jaffa Pete who sugested that Galbraiths already has such a gathering, all be it "Unauthorised" that includes more significant members of the left that we rarely see here. Annat innit? -
No, Steve, it means 'ignorance of the law is no excuse"
Estne volumen in toga, an solum tibi libet me videre?
-
I knew a lesbian couple who went to Lesbos for a holiday. One of them came back pregnant.
Girlz can do anything. Apparently.
-
Will we be Drinking Liberally tonight?
-
Ignorantia juris non excusat
Which means "I speak Latin and you don't"
Almost any leader of a political organisation would have some kind of legal "Fighting Fund" and keep it seperate from all other donations, as far as I know. It makes sense as different laws apply to different kinds of "Funds". I'm sure Graeme Edgeler could elaborate. -
Good one Dinah. It made me think this;
Herald: " What songs are currently on your iPod playlist."
Key: "iPod?"