Posts by Sofie Bribiesca

Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First

  • Up Front: All Together Now,

    Hey Chris,

    those members of the judiciary who seem to be taking quite dramatic liberties with the laws,

    If that was so,it would not go unnoticed and ignored by anyone else dealing with the case. It may be your opinion and we hear this all the time by many radio hosts call ins.Why would a Judge flout the law because it took their fancy on the day?
    I would have to know the law and be prepared to argue in a courtroom to try and prove that sort of accusation or I would shut up.

    here and there. • Since Nov 2007 • 6796 posts Report

  • Up Front: All Together Now,

    Had the nameless, faceless judge who 'discharged...gave" this judgment, been subject to the same media scrutiny as the victim and defendant, I think we might start to see some different results.

    The Judge aint nameless, faceless.The Judge has decided the "scrutiny" from media and other such situations warranted name suppression because of this individual case( remembering they are individual). To lump a Judges decision into "just name and shame and damn the consequence" (which that blowhole wants and has done), is the exact different result that leads to victimisation, (that is human nature) and /or discrimination. ( Veitch case was a perfect example of the public taking different sides)
    I would like to believe that experts in their field have the authority to decide, and that decision is reasoned appropriately for each individual case in the courtroom. Just as one cannot see the wood for the trees, if you look harder, there is probably another reason for the suppression. These people (our Judges) should know their job. The judge is not nameless or faceless. They are not hiding, just doing their job.IMHO

    here and there. • Since Nov 2007 • 6796 posts Report

  • Cracker: Of Racks and Ratings,

    It'll be back shortly on a different channel. One that has Southpark on it a lot.

    Excellent. Now, where is Colbert?

    here and there. • Since Nov 2007 • 6796 posts Report

  • Cracker: Of Racks and Ratings,

    It all costs money, I guess but even the current NZ system of PM costs an estimated $5m annually to run.

    That sounds like a rort.
    @ 3410
    Well, I liked it, but fucking loud!(yep, forgot those plugs, but how could you tell with plugs in anyway?) Muffled. It really seems reliant on a full house to get the correct acoustics.
    Thanks, my friends were so jealous, kept getting "Biatch" by text :) ROCK AND GROHL!!

    here and there. • Since Nov 2007 • 6796 posts Report

  • Cracker: Bare Breasts Key for Important…,

    my 1/2/3 command,

    Never search for Chuck Norris, he finds you.
    Chucky dog.

    here and there. • Since Nov 2007 • 6796 posts Report

  • Hard News: We still died at each other's…,

    Jesus fuck, George -

    Well, that's one for my book. "Ranapianisms."
    BTW. Contributions / reminders are welcomed.Ta in advance SB.

    here and there. • Since Nov 2007 • 6796 posts Report

  • Up Front: All Together Now,

    Meh

    here and there. • Since Nov 2007 • 6796 posts Report

  • Up Front: All Together Now,

    In the 80s it was... Dobermanns...?

    Madam's right Sir. :)
    Saved a doberman once. It was running scared and free on the Melbourne Motorway. we named him Kaiser. Bit of a punk thing.

    here and there. • Since Nov 2007 • 6796 posts Report

  • Up Front: All Together Now,

    In the 80s it was... Dobermanns...?

    Madam's right Sir. :)

    here and there. • Since Nov 2007 • 6796 posts Report

  • Up Front: All Together Now,

    Islander, before Stella, we had Missy, ( a pure pitbull). T'other half thought she was not nice.I said individual. She was 3 months old when she got into the neighbours backyard. I looked out the window and Missy turned, looked up, and said ""good-bye". gone. First heat. Eight weeks later, xmas, up north, Stella was born. :)

    here and there. • Since Nov 2007 • 6796 posts Report

Last ←Newer Page 1 472 473 474 475 476 678 Older→ First