Posts by mark taslov
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
then two months later, everything back on track, loving words said, they make a go for mark II, but again a month later, tommy husband driving home from work, runs over the cat, wife goes out and gets another abortion....
-
i'm thinking of issues such as a married couple, decided to make a baby, bun in the oven a month down the track they have an argument over what to have for tea, harsh words aired, wife goes out and gets an abortion, and what can be done to prevent that?
-
you missed the logic?
i'll say it again
in cases where there was no instance of rape, sexual abuse or protection, used then the man should have the right to a mediated and counselled stay of execution of that child.
and i'm thinking especially in a marriage or civil union
the logic being that by requiring the men by law to play a larger post coital role in the childs development or lack of, in the hopes of encouraging more actively responsible attitude towards sexual intercourse.
which part of the logic is problematic for you lucy?
-
just feel we've been matronized too long
-
you could call it trolling stephen, but you could also call it playing devil's advocate, depending on how up to date you are with the latest newspeak,
btw, can anyone define 'wingnuts' for me, seems to be a new buzzword for the media cliques but i looked in the dictionary and all i came up with was:
"a nut having two flat, widely projecting pieces such that it can be readily tightened with the thumb and forefinger."
-
like lucy went on to say:
"but I'd rather not legislate with only the best of circumstances in mind."
it's simply that you feel your voice must be heard.
it's been conditioned into you since childhood
and it's directly related to the fact the system maintains a logic espousing personality as the prime qualification for leadership over
YOU. -
ha, kyle there's no hole in this argument, i would apologize, but i just get a kick out of whipping up a storm. It's a small pleasure i get during election years, watching the self proclaimed freethinkers turn fundamentalist bipolar cases. like every issue must be a validated real opinion. what people say they must stand by! etc etc and anything outside the traditional left right choices is trolling or psychopathic, it's hilarious, as far as i see the whole thing in reality as is, it's a non issue, sure the laws have loopholes, but on the whole the system seems to be working fine. so why try to fix a functioning machine, why does new zealand need to sew up all the breathing holes?
If Russell wants to stir up a bit of abortion fanaticism I'm more than happy to oblige in giving opinion holders a target to vent at.
-
it's cause and effect. lucy all you need to worry about as a pro choice female is that the fish aren't swimming,
Now, if a man came to an agreement with a woman that she would have the kid and he would then take full legal and financial responsibility for it, that's another story, but that's more akin to surrogacy.
that's my point, because of this woman who has made this agreement, then suddenly changes her mind after watching a 'lost' episode, then what are the rights of the father?
nothing
why is this?
there's nothing creepy or psychopathic about it Danyl, Stephen's right you've been trolled,
and the upshot is, that alot of prochoicers are not in fact prochoice, but pro woman's choice, I mean seriously the arguments being made about men who would veto an abortion and then leave the women to suffer simply higlhlights a single obvious fact that both stephen and lucy you have a strong idea that the NZ female is a complete retard when it comes to choosing a sexual partner.
-
personally i think this would make men more responsible too, encouraging responsibiltiy does tend to encourage responsibility
-
well lucy, using a woman as his baby incubator is no different from using a man as a lifelike dildo imho.