Posts by Jacqui Dunn
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Muse: Reel Life: Pliéing Turkey, in reply to
Suggest you look over --------------> there.
Well, I was looking earlier, but I see it has progressed somewhat. Actually, for what it's worth, mine was a genuine enquiry. The person's wording is ambiguous.
-
Muse: Reel Life: Pliéing Turkey, in reply to
Not sure that this is red-blooded enough for me.
What's not red-blooded enough? The review, the thread, or the film?
-
Up Front: Say When, in reply to
I wasn’t sure who made the comment Russell quoted, whether it was a he or a she hence the neutral they.
OK. Sorry. My mistake again. (TBH I rather thought it was unusual for you [singular]).
-
Muse: TV Review: Good Gods Almighty!, in reply to
Any time :)
-
Up Front: Say When, in reply to
Just for clarity, it wasn’t her, but a commenter.
Ah. My mistake - apologies to Boganette.
-
Muse: TV Review: Good Gods Almighty!, in reply to
Oh Craig, I was just playing one-up-personship, thass all!
-
Up Front: Say When, in reply to
Gosh you're fast with your fingers and links, Emma! Impressive.
However, my comment was a response to Bart's. True, this argument may have been going on for some time in other threads, but I was simply referring to what has been quoted in this thread.
-
Hard News: Gaying Out, in reply to
Probably even capital gains tax. Sigh.
Well, it does sort of start with a "c". But please, let's not eh?
-
Up Front: Say When, in reply to
Erm…. could you change that “they” to “she” perhaps? Generalizations abound today.
For what it’s worth, I think Boganette might have got more agreement and less aggrievement if she’d used “some” in front of “men”.
ETA: Snap(pish) Emma. While I was composing my three lines, you've comprehensively answered.
-
Up Front: Say When, in reply to
For some reason I thought of Pam Ayers.
And I'm glad you did! :)