Posts by Sofie Bribiesca
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Legal Beagle: Voting in the Flag Referendum, in reply to Ian Dalziel,
The ‘cheesey’ things they purport to be ‘ferns’ look more like combs or tombstones/surfboards…
Intermission…
Righto, as you were ;) -
Legal Beagle: Voting in the Flag Referendum, in reply to Bart Janssen,
That’s my problem, five logos.
Winston weighs in.
-
Hard News: The Police Ten 7 State, in reply to BenWilson,
but in this particular case their reasons for anonymity might actually be well-founded. It could be someone who has felt the information stranglehold and the commentary straitjacket personally.
So many types of wrong but. Gilbert needs others shouting for him, not hiding.
-
Hard News: The Police Ten 7 State, in reply to Lucy Telfar Barnard,
You’re either one or the other. And you’re generally judged by the company you keep.
Academic research is a completely different company you keep.
Unless of course you are Sir Pita Sharples.
There are many examples of his working with and advocacy of funding gangs (public tax payer funds) for initiatives that could have fallen into a category of research if it needed a label and he got knighted for it . He had even finished ministering when knighted. -
Legal Beagle: Voting in the Flag Referendum, in reply to victor brown,
so why are we not just voting once for our one favourite flag? incase two flags get the exact same number of votes??
Because.... JohnKey
-
Legal Beagle: Voting in the Flag Referendum, in reply to linger,
Yes that was an intended pun. Shudda " and "
-
Hard News: The Police Ten 7 State, in reply to Steven Price,
Police are worried that “their” information might be misrepresented. That is simply one of the risks of an open society.
Police even do it themselves
Police have been caught out tampering with South Auckland's burglary statistics,
-
Legal Beagle: Voting in the Flag Referendum, in reply to Jason Kemp,
It would be nice if we weren't being manipulated ,don't you think? If the rules were being followed rather than willy nilly adding an extra flag just to get some votes no matter if it splits choices. Putting together a panel with conflict of interest and hey presto 3 silver ferns to choose from. Using a man passed away to make a point about silver ferns, completely inappropriate.The enormous waste of money, another point. Plus, an example of "substantive at all" will be on the lips of many war veterans. It's under the flag they stand and for the flag that they represent. I'll give them that respect if nothing else. Actually I guess you are relaxed about that, rereading your comment that you are "just not bothered either way.
-
David Fisher in the Herald again
It may have a link elsewhere -
Legal Beagle: Voting in the Flag Referendum, in reply to Ian Dalziel,
whatcha think?
Well, could work, Carter ( and Key for that matter) being reptilian shape shifters. Would help if Carter (jerkoff) sorts out his hard of hearing any incident that requires his friggin’ ears :)
The Pan (t)opticon still needs someone in the middle though. Hey, Richie McCaw needs a new job!
