Hard News: What Now?
914 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 37 Newer→ Last
-
Robyn Gallagher, in reply to
To be honest, I think this isn't a conversation we should be having now.
This is a conversation I've seen other Christchurch residents have on Twitter. I appreciate it absolutely could be distressing for some, but I know others are comforted by thoughts of a beautiful new Christchurch.
-
My kids' school is also in the bus exchange building (mine are at the primary school, Emma's at the secondary next door) so if, or whether they will be going back to that site is a discussion for a loooong way in the future. I feel, however, that we are much luckier than those damaged schools in the eastern suburbs because our school community is built on a shared philosophy rather that a neighbourhood so school really is wherever we meet.
-
recordari, in reply to
Some of it was also because the Allies renounced the idea of endlessly punishing them for it, and instead rebuilt those countries, rather than squeezing their throats with sanctions.
Ahem. Some might say... another time maybe.
-
Megan Wegan, in reply to
The two Churches mentioned are warnings, not memorials and therefore are not suitable analogies for Christchurch’s Cathedral IMHO.
Fair point, and one I hadn't thought of. I saw it when I was 16, and all I really saw was an extraordinarily beautiful, and moving, building.
-
This is very close to the bus exchange.
-
One problem will be striking a balance between getting things built quickly and building quality things to last. My understanding is that the response to the September quake was to cut the red tape so that developers could knock things up quickly. That doesn't preclude adherence to earthquake codes, but might count against involvement of all stakeholders in conversations about design principles etc. I worked for 15 years in a prefab that had been set up as temporary office accommodation many years before (and it's still there 10 years later), so I can see a real challenge in transitioning from rubble to exemplary without going through something fairly nasty on the way.
-
This is a conversation I’ve seen other Christchurch residents have on Twitter. I appreciate it absolutely could be distressing for some, but I know others are comforted by thoughts of a beautiful new Christchurch.
Oh, not the one about rebuilding*; I don't mind that one at all. The one about how one's favourite policy prescriptions are now utterly and exactly what's called for, and if you disagree you're an inhuman monster who likes rich pricks /gold plated assets more than Christchurch? That really annoys me.
* Although I think I dislike the word rebuilding; it's going to be building full stop, especially given how crap the CBD was beforehand.
-
I'm amazed at how much of the inner-city damage I was unaware of as I walked through it (Colombo St by Cashel mall through to the Square and then up Worcester to the botanic gardens). One of the kids I was walking with had bare feet so I was concentrating on keeping his every step glass-free.
-
Megan Wegan, in reply to
One of the things I am finding really hard, looking at photos, is not being able to figure out where things are. I'm so used to being able to glance at a photo of the central city and know exactly where it is, and I've lost all my landmarks.
Which as why, as much as I want to see you all as soon as possible, I am also dreading it.
-
-
Napier picked up the previous decades architecture style.
This is constantly stated, but I don’t think that is actually what happened. Napier was rebuilt all at once in the quickest and cheapest way possible that didn’t use heavy masonry of the type that has proved (again) it’s lethality in Christchurch. No one noticed it was “Art Deco” or even worth preserving until the 1980’s
(/rant/ In fact, Art Deco has become a death sentence for any heritage building in Napier that pre-dates the 1931 earthquake. These building, especially in previously lovely seaside suburbs like Ahuriri and West Shore, have been bowled over and replaced with modern "Art Deco-ish" pastiches in acts of cultural Philistinism that is scarcely credible in a modern city /rant over/)
People argue Napier isn’t even really Art Deco, but whatever it is – and here might perhaps be a lesson for rebuilding Christchurch – is it is a coherent style that when viewed collectively is greater than the sum of it’s parts.
-
Isn't anyone thinking of the boy-racers? Where will they drive now?
-
Sacha, in reply to
It seems that unless something really stupid happens (always possible) that what is built anew will be safe.
Here's hoping that recent proposals to 'streamline' NZ's building standards are re-considered in light of this disaster - for example, to make sure sure they address liquefaction.
Executive officer of the New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering, Win Clark, said the problem started with the first clause of the New Zealand Building Code, which worked on the basis that modern one-storey houses needed to be built on good ground. But there was nothing about liquefaction in the code, Clark said. He described those omissions as "oversights".
"There certainly needs to be a review to identify and highlight these issues."
Of course there may be an element of
how one's favourite policy prescriptions are now utterly and exactly what's called for
-
Just popping back after going through that photo-set to plug it again, it’s extraordinary. So much I hadn’t previously seen.
Amazing. Although I'm struggling with the use of the 'like' button in the circumstances. Raises a different level of emotional response which FB isn't necessarily designed for.
'Dumbstruck' might be more apt.
-
Matthew Poole, in reply to
Isn’t anyone thinking of the boy-racers? Where will they drive now?
"Anywhere they like, but the more broken glass, pot holes and sink holes there are, the better," would be the response from many residents of CHC, I suspect.
-
Jolisa, in reply to
What Emma said, re affirmative action for people working out of Chch.
And this:
Poor people, poor housing, distinct lack of resourcing. A lot of people who were about to get kicked in the crotch by Welfare Reform anyway.
Is it naive to hope that a pause button has been pressed on that proposal by the horrible coincidence of nature randomly kicking these people in the crotch? And not just a pause button, but a rewind. Indeed, an eject. Taking us back to first principles: inasmuch as we do to the least of our brethren, etc.
Not to get ahead of ourselves or anything, but: like many an aesthete & utopian I can't help hoping for really positive and beautiful things to come out of the rebuilding process, especially in the visible heritage areas. Old made new, new that looks old (it can be done), brilliant hybrids, safe and gorgeous. The symbolism will be huge.
But that will be mostly for show if creative rebuilding doesn't start immediately at the other end, too: neighbourhoods constructed around the needs of the neediest. New urbanist principles, mixed-income housing communities, post-oil transport strategies. If a whole street is uninhabitable, make a new one that embraces a mews for bikes and collective cars. Facilitate collective onsite childcare, collaborative cooking. Ensure supermarkets within walking distance of all. Rethink house design that assumes all families are nuclear. Rethink state housing altogether. I'm just randomly brainstorming, really, howling into the dust, but I'm inspired by examples like this and this, and always by this and this.
-
Che Tibby, in reply to
Napier was rebuilt all at once in the quickest and cheapest way possible
i've heard this argued about CHCH. people might be 'talking green', but what will decide the day is the cheapest and most effective way to recover and get on with business.
that might mean that CHCH ends up NZLs greenest city, because Green is oh-so avant-garde.
OTOH they might end up with the Oaks complex.
-
giovanni tiso, in reply to
Is it naive to hope that a pause button has been pressed on that proposal by the horrible coincidence of nature randomly kicking these people in the crotch? And not just a pause button, but a rewind. Indeed, an eject. Taking us back to first principles: inasmuch as we do to the least of our brethren, etc.
I would vigorously agree, but for the accusation that I may be one of those people whose favourite policy prescriptions...
(In fact, I'm exactly that person. Una-fucking-pologetically.)
-
but what will decide the day is the cheapest and most effective way to recover and get on with business.
Whether it is Royal Crescent in Bath, Napier's CBD or a historic street of untouched state houses in Wellington, over time a preserved set of coherent building can actually come to be perceived as quite attractive.
-
If a whole street is uninhabitable, make a new one that embraces a mews for bikes and collective cars.
I am not familiar with the geology of Christchurch, but if whole suburbs have been substantively destroyed by liquifaction I would have thought now would be a good time to re-locate the whole suburb to a greenfield location with more suitable soil type, if such ground exists.
The previous site can revert to agricultural land.
-
Kate Hannah, in reply to
aesthete and utopian - Oh I agree completely. A new (old) kind of neighbourhood that includes rather than excludes, is not designed as a dormitory for workers but as a locale for living and working. Where all the different ways people contribute to society count, not just the things they get paid for. (small rant: when my father-in-law was out of work last year, he went on every school trip with the grandies. THe teachers LOVED having this engaged intelligent grandparent who would spend his whole time explaining things to the kids - how does the welfare working group even pretend to understand how to value that contribution?).
I'd like to think that Christchurch can build, and rebuild, and memorialise in a spirit that saw those beautiful (destroyed) churches built orginally - the best materials, designs and people engaged in making something that will live long after they are gone.
-
hmmm... not sure if this story really needs be on front page of herald.co.nz
-
Jolisa, in reply to
The replacement street doesn't have to be in the same place (see also: New Orleans) but yes, point taken.
-
Jolisa, in reply to
Where all the different ways people contribute to society count, not just the things they get paid for. (small rant: when my father-in-law was out of work last year, he went on every school trip with the grandies. The teachers LOVED having this engaged intelligent grandparent who would spend his whole time explaining things to the kids – how does the welfare working group even pretend to understand how to value that contribution?).
Yes. Precisely. A pause while we all go and re-read Counting for Nothing (with appropriate revisionist nuancing, where necessary, of the old-school gender binary it sprang from) (probably not that much nuancing needed, more's the pity).
-
I have recently been made aware of the The Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Memorial Disaster Reduction and Human Renovation Institution aka, the Kobe Earthquake Museum. Apparently it has an earthquake simulator that is gruntier than the one at Te Papa. I think I'll have to pay a visit.
Post your response…
This topic is closed.