Paul Henry will slap him on the back telling him how he understands what men have to put up with and that "The B***ch" deserved it for being so pushy.

Veitch's behaviour is a completely different kind of disgusting to Henry. Neither of them are particularly pleasant individuals.

But what point does dreaming up this kind of scenario serve? On the one hand it undermines the true horror of Veitch's actions, and on the other it attributes opinions to Henry that are unfair and unsubstantiated. Why not stick to criticising them for their actual beahviour?