Posts by Russell Brown
-
Hard News: The Messenger God, in reply to
I think we’re still figuring out conversational norms and etiquette for the internet.
We have got way better at it, though. I remember the years when internet use was ramping up, and people had not yet learned to breathe before writing their emails. Yikes.
-
Hard News: The Messenger God, in reply to
A place where we have little time to think about how we could/should reply.
That is a good observation. How many of our communications problems stem from the closing window of time to reflect?
-
OnPoint: What Andrew Geddis Said, But…, in reply to
Sorry guys, I've been snatching posting moments in a very full, complicated day and clearly doing a terrible job of it. Feel embarrassed.
-
OnPoint: What Andrew Geddis Said, But…, in reply to
A friend of mine’s quip on Facebook. In two senses, he’s absolutely right. The first is that anything that is being redacted is almost certainly something that should have been highlighted, and the second is that by redacting the entire thing they’ve highlighted just what they’ve done.
That's an awesome paragraph, bro. Just sayin'.
-
OnPoint: What Andrew Geddis Said, But…, in reply to
Not sure its all been one way in that regard Tom. I went to a meeting about the Unitary Plan in Beachhaven about a week ago, and the officers there still, despite being repeatedly told by members of the public present that 3 stories was possible, tried really really hard to stick to the line it was only 2.
This is a confusing issue. The defined exceptions that make an extra two metres possible in mixed housing zones aren’t actually part of the Unitary Plan, but are essentially the same resource consent rules that allow basement and attic extensions under the current rules: proximity to boundary, shade, etc. They're not intended to permit three-storey devlopments.
(NB: Suburbs like Mt Eden already have plenty of buildings higher than this in what will be mixed housing zones. There's currently no upper restriction, subject to the rules.)
I think the council is explaining this poorly, but I don’t think there has been intent to deceive. In terms of the Unitary Plan, they're actually right. Ben Ross explains.
-
Queen of Thorns also responds to Geddis in her inimitable style:
I’d just like to end with a little thought experiment for the class: imagine that Labour were in power and passed any legislation – say, to plant more native trees on public land, or to make it illegal to waterboard people – and then said “but you can’t see the advice we’ve made this decision on, and you can never ever challenge it.”
Oh, and passed it under urgency.
Just imagine it. The Kiwiblog commentariat would shit themselves. W****O**’s servers would probably explode. You’d hear Cactus Kate’s screams all the way across the Pacific.
Add this to Sky City’s 35-year protection clause and our whole constitution just got taken out back and shot in the head, and National’s turned the corpse into a ventriloquist’s doll and is assuring us that democracy is just resting after a rather vigorous squawk.
I tried to point out something similar last week to some Kiwiblog regulars who were gamely insisting that Key and Joyce should be congratulated for "getting the job done" with the deeply compromised process of the SkyCity conference centre shemozzle. No luck, I'm afraid. They just weren't seeing it.
-
<BLOODY BIG I WAS A DISTRACTED LOON TODAY EDIT IN THE INTERESTS OF GETTING SOMEONE’S NAME RIGHT FINALLY.>
Claire Browning’s Pundit column on Geddis, the Crown Minerals Act and various other elisions of democracy is worth reading.
-
Hard News: A Golden Age for the Arts?, in reply to
Yeah, I expect Oppositions to oppose but, frankly, Labour’s art policy last go around was long on platitudinous waffle and short on substance. I expect a bit more at this point from a Government-in-waiting that another spokesman holding a listening tour so folks can say it all one more time.
Yes -- and it undermines any criticism they might have of current government policy. It's an area where Labour has heritage and should be strong and articulate.
-
Today’s adventures in RIS redaction …
Simon Bridges flatly denies Moana Mackey’s claim that the legal advice on amendments to the Crown Minerals Act (which somehow needs correcting a month after it was passed) was that they were in breach of international law.
But the minister cannot explain why the legal advice he is referring to was deleted from the Regulatory Impact Statement. (from about 2.00)
Seriously?
-
Awesomely enough, Luke Buda of the Phoenix Foundation was born in 1979 in Wroclaw.