Posts by Sacha
-
Legal Beagle: Kim Dotcom and the GCSB, in reply to Chris Waugh,
GCSB's assurance that the person is under investigation
Investigation would be a Police role. I suspect we'll hear more about that over the next day or two.
-
Cracker: What Would Charlotte Do?, in reply to Russell Brown,
a Twitter argument with other journalists
not broadcasters then?
-
OnPoint: Because Statistical Rigour, in reply to linger,
the act of publication makes the numbers seem meaningful
Exactly as intended. Well done, 'free' press.
-
Legal Beagle: Kim Dotcom and the GCSB, in reply to Graeme Edgeler,
You appear to have an inaccurate impression of the scale of damage awards in such cases in New Zealand
or an accurate one of the size of said surplus. :)
-
Seems the govt tried to tidy things up in August while Mr English was acting Prime Minister. Naturally he can't recall any details - and it is claimed did not tell Key who only found out last week. Honest.
Further, RadioLive relays this interpretation:
Labour says Bill English signed an indemnity order making NZ liable for any damages case taken by Kim Dotcom over unlawful spying by GCSB
-
Legal Beagle: Kim Dotcom and the GCSB, in reply to Graeme Edgeler,
the media reporting tomorrow's High Court hearing would have let us know
that seems to explain the timing quite well, yes.
-
Legal Beagle: Kim Dotcom and the GCSB, in reply to Sacha,
Paul Buchanan just told Radio NZ in a lengthy interview
which is now online (27 mins, listening options)
-
Legal Beagle: Kim Dotcom and the GCSB, in reply to John Holley,
I recall speculation it was GCSB at the time. Maybe others were reading the newspaper instead of those cursed blogs and Twitr. :)
-
Cracker: What Would Charlotte Do?, in reply to Damian Christie,
or hasn't had their morning coffee
my typng gets even wors
-
OnPoint: Re: Education, in reply to Russell Brown,
A high priesthood of data analysis
That's just insecure whinging.