Posts by Sacha
-
Capture: Two Tales of a City, in reply to Ian Dalziel,
I think they are over-stadiaing their case
every religion needs churches (in this case, mainly paid for by the public)
-
Field Theory: Olympics-eve, in reply to Tim Robinson,
half-pie
that's half-pai
(as in, half kapai) -
Field Theory: And they're off!, in reply to Graeme Edgeler,
I genuinely missed it #notashamed
-
Field Theory: And they're off!, in reply to Russell Brown,
the logo is a deconstructed "2012"
ah
-
Legal Beagle: Presuming innocence, in reply to Matthew Poole,
Len's conduct
Used anonymising Trusts as used to be allowed for central govt elections.
-
Legal Beagle: Presuming innocence, in reply to Matthew Poole,
By announcing to the world that they believed Ambrose was a criminal, the Police reached conclusions about matters that were not in their purview
Certainly did. Not their job to judge a case - and I support any changes to fix what seems to be a slide in that direction.
-
Up Front: The Up-Front Guides: The…, in reply to Russell Brown,
He's left himself a little out
He has, notes GayExpress. Story includes link to original audio of Key talking with Marcus Lush about the matter.
-
Hard News: John Banks: The volunteer did…, in reply to Graeme Edgeler,
Is there any case law around this key phrase from 134(1) that might have guided the Police's assessment of whether to lodge a case?:
knowing that it is false in any material particular
-
Hard News: John Banks: The volunteer did…, in reply to Graeme Edgeler,
There is a six month time limit for that charge
Ah, got you - that clarifying clause only applies to the lesser offence.
-
Hard News: John Banks: The volunteer did…, in reply to Rich of Observationz,
he or she took all reasonable steps to ensure that the information was accurate
Like reading the return, perhaps?
Seriously, how do the Police justify not laying charges and letting a court judge the matter?