Posts by Sacha
-
Up Front: A Real Character, in reply to Emma Hart,
True - and for me I should clarify "talk" includes Sign.
-
Legal Beagle: It's (almost) never that simple, in reply to Sacha,
I've copied my post to the accessibility thread (which seems more fitting), if you feel moved to respond to it.
-
Speaker: Properly Public: It's our information, in reply to Kumara Republic,
The Human Rights Act might actually come into play too
(put this response on wrong thread):
For sure. But everyone would rather get on with the job than waste time on that, I'm sure.
The core issue as I see it is Lockwood's misunderstanding: it is actually Parliament's accessibility that's being supported, not Mojo's. So it's not a matter of personal support funding.
The inconsistency over his stated approach to wheelchair-users should make that obvious even to someone clearly wedded to old thinking like him. And it shows more than ever the crying need for a competent education programme for everyone including our politicians.
-
Up Front: A Real Character, in reply to Craig Ranapia,
the test is even simpler for disabled characters
1) they exist
2) bonus points if they talk at all
3) and extra gold star if they're actually played by a disabled actor. -
Legal Beagle: It's (almost) never that simple, in reply to Kumara Republic,
For sure. But everyone would rather get on with the job than waste time on that, I'm sure.
The core issue as I see it is Lockwood's misunderstanding: it is actually Parliament's accessibility that's being supported, not Mojo's. So it's not a matter of personal support funding.
The inconsistency over his stated approach to wheelchair-users should make that obvious even to someone obviously wedded to old thinking like him. And it shows more than ever the crying need for a competent education programme for everyone including our politicians.
-
Speaker: Properly Public: It's our information, in reply to Kiwiiano,
It's pathetic that they think scanned paper can't be copied.
what's pathetic is that they think being uncopyable is right
-
Up Front: A Real Character, in reply to Bart Janssen,
Probably about as well as you’d understand 15th century English
surprisingly well. no idea why
-
Up Front: A Real Character, in reply to Bart Janssen,
so what did you say when you actually needed a lie down? #puritans
-
Investors eyeing up those tasty Council assets.
-
Speaker: Properly Public: It's our information, in reply to Russell Brown,
Mr 1%