Posts by Sacha
-
Hard News: Science: it's complicated, in reply to Bart Janssen,
the "escape" of DNA from the millions of hectares of GM crops grown for the last 2 decades
Again, I don't follow this closely but isn't there evidence of gene transfer between GM and non-GM horticultural species?
-
Speaker: This is your National Library, in reply to vangam,
eh?
-
Up Front: P.A. Story, in reply to Emma Hart,
Where is the Winkie of St Richie?
Under the ruck
-
Hard News: Science: it's complicated, in reply to Bart Janssen,
there is no reason to even remotely believe that the "escape" of DNA could cause any harm
I hope you can see how that might be regarded as exaggeration. And it's a short step from there to bias.
-
Hard News: Science: it's complicated, in reply to BenWilson,
the closest to the front end of the project you get, the more experienced and better paid the people tend to be
I bet frontline tech support folk wish you were correct about that
-
Southerly: Things to be Grateful For: A…, in reply to Just thinking,
is it feasible?
No. CERA will legally force the land to be vacated so they can sell it to private developers unencumbered.
-
Hard News: Science: it's complicated, in reply to BenWilson,
More cunning tactics
sadly, yes
-
Hard News: Science: it's complicated, in reply to andin,
Sometimes I feel like all the Waitangi disputes are an extension of the old English Pakeha/Maori conflict which is still being tussled out. And I wish you guys would just take it outside.
It is. And outside where?
-
Hard News: Science: it's complicated, in reply to Bart Janssen,
Sorry, I overreacted
All good. Passion about science is a valuable commodity.
-
Hard News: Science: it's complicated, in reply to Bart Janssen,
There is also a huge amount of research out there trying to find any allergy to GMO - all of which has shown no allergic response to GMO.
That's what I was asking, thanks. I'm not so interested in the topic as others, so I recall opposition a while back based on lack of precautionary research. No dog in the fight.