Posts by Sacha
-
Southerly: Tower Insurance Have Some Bad…, in reply to Emma Hart,
Nor are we expecting to be able to change anything. The worst-hit areas of Chch already all voted in Labour MPs
Frankly that seems one of the least effective means of influence at present - I'd go with media and reaching out to relevant organisations and networks other than political parties. But you'd need a clear aim and some coherence first. That might be a lot to ask for many people right now.
-
Up Front: How About Now?, in reply to Lilith __,
<cough>
roflnui
-
Hard News: The scandal that keeps on giving, in reply to 3410,
a climate of recent admitted fraudulent passport use
Which seems to be skewing the coverage. There are other plausible reasons for foreign security interests in Christchurch at that time. If that's what this was.
-
It's unsurprising that the SIS would be more sensitive with the US trade negotiators meeting in Christchurch at the time of the quake. One wonders if the accompanying US security presence may have had any comptetitive/cooperative impact on their keenness too.
-
Hard News: The scandal that keeps on giving, in reply to Pete Sime,
Enjoy
Brilliant
-
Hard News: The scandal that keeps on giving, in reply to ,
Stephen, can you please link to the story and maybe quote a few highlights rather than paste the whole content here. It breaches copyright, for one thing.
-
The core problem with that 'story' is it reduces a social event to a financial transaction.
No doubt it's less challenging that way for Actoid fanbois, but the rest of us are somewhat more grownup about life.
-
Up Front: How About Now?, in reply to nzlemming,
seems valid enough
-
Up Front: How About Now?, in reply to nzlemming,
</coat_hat>
</html>you missed a </body>
-
Hard News: The scandal that keeps on giving, in reply to Stephen Judd,
Do we? Key is generally not on top of things without a minder and a briefing. And he dimly knows PMs shouldn't talk about the SIS. He's as likely if not more so to be covering up his ignorance of what's going on.
Sounds plausible, yes.