Posts by Sacha
-
a business specialising in utes
for women
-
Surely someone posted this already?
xkcd for the win
-
ETA
You know you're not a real geek when your first thought is "nuts"
-
This could spark a tabloid telly race to the bottom
-
deep love of neologism
there has to be a word for that..
-
I'm pretty sure Sacha was referring to the times when women were banned from appearing on stage
Thanks, Lucy. Imagine persuading people after the ban was lifted that women were capable of performing those female characters - and the problems finding many who were capable when they had not had a chance to prove themselves or build experience.
Craig, attitudes about disability are the same type of social phenomenon as attiudes about race. There's a long and ugly history for both, still unfolding. I'm not in the mood to go into any more depth tonight when I suspect few others here disagree with that. However we can discuss it ad infinitum when my new blog is ready.
-
Touche. I believe the key word in Angus's posts is "relevant". And his argument isn't.
-
I didn't realise it was legal either. Would have appreciated them interviewing a lawyer, though I realise how poorly that might compete with wobbly frolicking.
Let's see a week or two of the show before we declare its descent into utter tabloidism. I'd love to see Campbell do a Jon Stewart, but not holding my breath as all those writers would be expensive.
-
Oversimplifying again, I see. I trust others understood what I was saying.
-
If there's to be any banging, better about the white collar crims who fleeced many of their life savings.