Hard News: Where your money goes
254 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 Newer→ Last
-
Those satellite accounts I linked to earlier are based on estimating voluntary contributions. I don't know any detail about how they did that, but I understand it's internationally standardised somehow.
Maybe similar categories could be applied to individual organisations so they can be comparable?
-
There are plenty of other monetary avenues business can follow without slotting themselves into the finance stream of reputable charities.
I take your point about ethics being central - and fortunately most who deal with charities do behave, well, charitably.
However, some businesses specialise in areas more likely to be relevant to charities - like fundraising or TXT gateway services. Should they all have to be charitable too? A for-profit business may be better placed to support specialisation, innovation and similar risky behaviours that might not sit comfortably with a charitable ethos.
I'm a big fan of organisations working together from their strengths, and collaborating accordingly rather than just adopting traditional purchaser-supplier or donator-receiver relationships. Sponsorship is only one form, and philanthropic funders are moving towards smarter and more engaged models too.
Negotiating partnerships does take effort. I asked Rick earlier whether that might be one reason for KidsCan's overhead proportions being high so far. Maybe it's the way they have chosen to tackle things, or how fast they have tried to grow? May not be the best use of money, despite intentions.
I don't know enough to answer that for myself - which is the bigger point about disclosure and reporting that has been raised. Doesn't make some of the particular aspects we know already look less dubious though, particularly the related party transactions. Sunlight will help. I look forward to reading more when Rick comes back to us.
-
From the HOS article:
Helson blamed tall poppy syndrome for the controversy.
Which reminds me of the idea that "tall poppy syndrome" is claimed by people who think they should be immune to any criticism after achieving a certain amount of success.
-
Good, now the Dancing with the Stars money is being challenged. I've long thought there must be some middle people there taking very large cuts from the txt votes.
-
Destiny Church followers have been fond of quoting scripture when justifying the worldly rewards claimed by "Bishop" Brian - they don't muzzle the ox that treads the grain. We''ll no doubt be hearing some weaselly-worded variations on this theme from vested charity-associated interests over the next week or three.
-
Following on from Russel's thoughts about the Howlett Foundation...
If I run a charity and it qualifies for full tax-exempt status, and my charity makes a loss because my running costs are higher than the money I raised, does my charity get a tax refund to offset the loss?
I had a look at the Charities Commission website and the IRD website (here and here, but it doesn't say. Anyone else know?
-
Ooops sorry that should read Russell
*blush*
-
The IRD should be taking a keen interest in the books of not only KidsCan and their related charities, but the entire fund raising sector.
Government will move with glacial speed on regulating this can of worms, but one would hope that if charitable trust status is being abused, the tax man will swoop very quickly.
-
Good, now the Dancing with the Stars money is being challenged. I've long thought there must be some middle people there taking very large cuts from the txt votes.
Yup. The transparency issue there is really simple. Just tell the public the sum that will actually go to the charity.
-
Absolutely agree, Dave.
Because as the law currently stands, if your charity has been granted tax exempt status, you don't even have to file an income tax return unless IRD requests one (and they'll only do that if they're auditing you).
Craaaazy. The more I find out about the laws governing (or rather, not governing) charities in NZ, the more I feel sure that there is enormous potential for bogus "charities" to screw the system.
As one of the Herald articles linked to earlier said:
Based on annual reports, the Charities Commission estimates the sector to have a combined income of $16.7 billion a year, drawing on donations of $1.4b.
Which is a shit-load of pretty much unregulated moolah floating around.
-
The most immediate payoff would come from unravelling the relationships between gaming machine trusts and the horse-racing "industry". No surprise who was their Minister for the last few years..
-
"between gaming machine trusts and the horse-racing 'industry"
o my, yes!
But that is one gigantic vermiferous entanglement, with a huge number of interested/involved parties...and, I deeply suspect, a complete lack of willingness to even start any kind of enquiry-
-
Ah Winston, how we miss thee. Not.
So Sacha, can you elaborate a wee bit? (Assuming you can do so without opening Russell up to strongly-worded letters from libel lawyers). I'm not really up on the details of those relationships. What do we know that makes people think they're a bit dodgy?
-
Not an expert, sorry. I think it came up here a while back, so a search might be fruitful.
-
Here is one prepared to dance for his food. Donations accepted. This is in appreciation of the charities that do do good. Thank you. :)
-
Hell, I'd donate to that cockatoo anytime! The energy! The verve!
(You can also catch him at Discovery's "Being Animal" - a site I love, and thoroughly reccommend.)
(Still working on the embedding...)
-
Arrrgh!
*Discovery News. Born Animal*
Worth a visit despite your frustration with an idiot- -
Paticularly as aforesaid stranger (the first one) wanted personal details and suggested making a contribution, after I had said "Why?" in answer to their question
but yeh, free speech isn't always fun.
If he wanted your help on global warming its because we are now entering a desperation faze.
-
The person (not a he) didnt want my help on global warming -they wanted my personal & credit card details.
'faze' is kind of accurate for what they were doing -
-
Hey Islander, does this help your embedding?
Try two of these [
Then paste the url (http:// .....)
then do a pipe like | (the one above the \)
then say what you want (eg disovery news born animal)
then do two of these ]
I always give this it's own line or two if needed.When you preview it will have what you wrote after the |
When it's youtube and only youtube you just copy the whole url and paste on Public Address at the reply box. I give it its own line as well but your preview wont show up the youtube link until you post it so it does feel like a bit of a gamble each time. Good luck.
Discovery news Born Animal -
Oh Sofie. The headbanging parrot is delicious.
-
The headbanging parrot is delicious.
Have ya seen the Michael Jackson tribute he does and there is a Back Street Boys number as well. not sure which one he sings in but it's one of those. He is pretty.. oh so pretty. :)
-
The person (not a he) didnt want my help on global warming -they wanted my personal & credit card details.
They almost certainly wanted you to join the green movement because it's a movement that doesn't take money from political parties or business because taking money from either institution is a corruption of its goals.
It needs neutrality.It has a pretty decent record of results too because it is fronted by crazy bastards who sail into nuclear testing sites and into the paths of huge whaling ships.
So they need you. ....but you obviously got a very bad pitch , possibly from an overseas student who is passionate about her earth but not so skilled in the nice words you have to say to get peoples attention to the worlds number one problem.
Lets get those crazy bastards out again and get this pollution shit solved in one generation.
-
Thanks Sofie! Giovanni offered advice too. I think my inner geek is - nonexistent...
Jeremy E - I support Sea Shepherd. (I was a member of Project Jonah over 30 years ago.)
-
I support anyone who says solve global warming now.
Post your response…
This topic is closed.