Hard News: Going solar?
129 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Newer→ Last
-
Bart Janssen, in reply to
Power companies have imposed a moratorium on new solar connections and want to impose a fee on people with solar installations of around $120 a year. In Arizona the PowerCos tried to impose a $50 per month “penalty” on solar powered houses
This is just the free market system at the stupid extreme. It makes perfect sense for the power company to try and increase its profits - that includes using political pressure to hamstring competitors. It isn't evil as such just "good business" - bearing in mind that's all they've ever learned.
Stepping back and considering the good of society as a whole is an utterly alien concept and very very hard for them to grasp.
So while it's worthwhile recognising the sillyness of their actions, heaping scorn on them is not worthwhile.
-
I’m late to this conversation but just in case it is still useful I wrote a few blog posts about solar power in NZ back in Feb/ April last year Is Solar Power for Home Practical for NZ?
I wrote a series of posts at the time and some of it may be dated but the ability to use much less power in the summer is a great thing for most people.
The quick summary is that if you can do the water heater AND some PV AND you are connected to the grid there are some real savings to be made. The priority is for most households hot water heating so sort that first and then do PV if you can.
PV panel pricing is about as low as they will go now. Ideally you would want to be connected to the grid as that gives you a storage option.
One of my brothers has a wind powered generator and whole container shed full of batteries & other tech which at the time cost close to $50k but since it was more than that to connect to the power on his rural property was still worth it. The point for most people though is if you are on the grid then you avoid all of those hard storage related costs.
Your hot water cylinder is a store of sorts and so making sure it is the right size / fit for purpose may be part of the investigation. Given that power pricing is going up each year there will be a tipping point for most people between 5 & 10 years where they have paid off the bulk of their solar costs and are partly protected against future price rises for any extra power they use.
If you happen to be building new check out the zero energy house project in Pt Chev, Auckland That house combines solar water heating, solar tiles and other smart design features like LED lighting and a specific design approach to minimise energy usage / maximise light and heat from the sun etc.
What impressed me about the zero energy house project was that owners had taken extra care to measure everything about their energy usage and that makes the house an exemplary example for the building industry.
I also saw a few weeks ago Warren Buffett going large on Solar and promising to double his investment in that sector to something like $15b which in the US is small but it is a clear signal to market of some kind of tipping point for investors there ( and elsewhere.)
Buffett ready to double solar, wind bet
For Russell – Shay Brazier & Jo Woods are very close neighbours of yours and it would be worth a chat with them about the zero energy house if you haven’t already done that.
what power crisis is a local (Auckland) company who have done many of the residential and larger PV projects over the last few years. Their 2Kw residential system is down to $8,995 which is very similar to what it was back in April 2013 when I first looked at their systems.
Most houses would want / need more like 4-5kw systems which are also priced in that link.
-
Lucy Telfar Barnard, in reply to
a decent second hand wood stove will cover all cooking , house heating , (radiators) and hot water for washing needs, of a large household.
The only problem might be the life expectancy of such a system . . . 50-100 years.
Still , good value for the money.We used a wood stove through my childhood on the commune. The only problem being life expectancy is only the only problem if you're time rich. Apart from the additional maintenance and cleaning (compared to an electric or gas cooktop/oven), they're not much chops for coming home at 6.30pm and whipping up a quick dinner in 15 minutes or so for the tired hungry troops. The fire needs to be stacked, and lit, and coaxed (if it's winter). And you can forget about whipping up a quick batch of muffins before your short-notice guests arrive, as it takes a lot longer for the oven to warm up, and keeping it at the required temperature to bake takes more input as well.
I love wood stoves, but they suit my country life, not my city life.
-
Lucy Telfar Barnard, in reply to
a decent second hand wood stove will cover all cooking , house heating , (radiators) and hot water for washing needs, of a large household.
The only problem might be the life expectancy of such a system . . . 50-100 years.
Still , good value for the money.We used a wood stove through my childhood on the commune.
The only problem being life expectancy is only the only problem if you're time rich.
Apart from the additional maintenance and cleaning (compared to an electric or gas cooktop/oven), they're not much chops for coming home at 6.30pm and whipping up a quick dinner in 15 minutes or so for the tired hungry troops. The fire needs to be stacked, and lit, and coaxed (if it's winter). And you can forget about whipping up a quick batch of muffins before your short-notice guests arrive, as it takes a lot longer for the oven to warm up, and keeping it at the required temperature to bake takes more input as well.
I love wood stoves, but they suit my country life, not my city life.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
Don't forget all the wood collecting, chopping and stacking too. You probably should have a decent chainsaw unless you're really handy with an axe.
-
Lucy Telfar Barnard, in reply to
Not forgotten by any means (collecting brush and wood, breaking and splitting kindling were all part of my chores as a child), though if you don’t mind spending the money you could get round some of that by buying your wood pre-split. Though of course that eats into the savings.
-
Farmer Green, in reply to
But don't forget that those planting trees at a steady rate have older trees which have to be used . Not to mention the odd wind-blow.
And of course communities are far less common than they once were ; a lot of social capital has gone down the drain in the last 50 years.. But family farms remain as the type of sustainable community where firewood harvesting is a low-key social activity which provides employment, as well as renewable energy on top of the straight production and amenity values. -
In the first decades of the third millennium, notions of household self-sufficiency , in anything, seem quaint.
-
Steve Barnes, in reply to
In the first decades of the third millennium, notions of household self-sufficiency , in anything, seem quaint.
And this entire thread seems almost 90s.
Less than 20K
2kw PV panels
60 amp Mppt controller
4.5kw Inverter/Charger
400 Ah Lithium iron phosphate battery stack (600x400x800mm) @ nominal 55 volts (54-58 @ 75-100% charge)
5.2 Kva diesel generator (for long cloudy periods, run for 3-4 hours a day (3 ltrs diesel) )
On demand Gas hot water with solar preheat.To connect to the grid would have been 40K soo.. no brainer.
-
So I think in the public interest, I might invest in a bit more plumbing (so I can bypass our drainwater heat exchanger), and update with some data, both on how much money is saved, and how much efficiency is reduced through fouling.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
Cost an absolute fortune.
What? You didn't forge it yourself? You soft city slicker.
-
Hebe, in reply to
Reading the Ecan clean heat appliance regs, it seems that we could put in a wood-fired wetback cooker with radiators in a new build. Which would then be close to my ideal system: wetback/solar PV and running radiators off that and no grid connection.
-
Worik Stanton, in reply to
I have a friend who has both. Installed the hot water system first and a year later installed the PV. Says now doing it again he would not have installed the hot water system.
Do the research. Price the PV system. Watts per square metre hot water will be better. Dollar per watt, it may well be PV
-
Hebe, in reply to
Grumble grumble bloody Ecan. I like those stoves. Filed thanks.
-
Hi Russell, and other commenters
Russell your question has received a lot of great answers. If I can add one more hopefully useful view and share our lessons from the Zero Energy House. At the zero energy house we assessed the solar on the basis of savings vs increased mortgage cost.
For Solar water heating:
A solar hot water system of around 4m2 (2 x 2m2 panels) might generate around 2200kWh of hot water per annum, at $0.22/kWh this is a saving on your power bill of $485/a. At $7360 it would cost around $575/a to repay the additional mortgage a repayment over the same period as the system life of 25 years, at 6%/a interest. Where energy prices go up at 3% per annum you have saved more money than your repayments (including interest) after 8 years. The obvious risk is that the interest rate goes up. The nice thing about an agreed repayment plan with Nova perhaps, or though it is a little hard to see how your power bill will less when you are saving much less than $123/month.
For Photovoltaic:
A typical 4kWp system would probably generate 5,000kWh/a, and might cost around $12,000, at the same mortgage terms as above the repayment cost is around $940/a. Assuming you manage to use 25% of the energy generated directly in the house, and export the rest you would avoid paying $264 for imported energy and be paid $446 for exported energy, a saving of $910/a, (assuming an export tariff of $0.17kWh and import price of $0.22/kWh). Where energy prices go up at 3% per annum you have saved more money than your repayments (including interest) after 2 years. There are 2 obvious risks here, 1) interest rates go up, 2) export price goes down.
There are of course a few other questions to consider including:
- The quality and longevity of the system components and installation
- The energy tariffs you are currently on and how it changes over time
- If you sell your house are the buyers willing to pay you more as a result of the solar hot water system to allow you to recover the invested money if this hasn’t already been recovered from the savings
- How long will there be 4 people using hot water, as reduce hot water usage, will reduce your savings.
- Are there other technologies to consider such as hot water heat pumps, and could these be combined with one of the technologies aboveI’ll leave you to work out if these figures apply to you, and draw your own conclusions. Do drop us an email via the Zero Energy House if you want to discuss more, or wanted to drop in for a coffee some time.
-
With respect to instant hot water from electricity, when we put in the Solar Hot Water System, we looked at getting an electric instant hot water for the kitchen sink (because it was as far from the roof HWC as possible). What I wanted was a thermostat regulated one that I could put on the Hot Water pipe that would heat the water to the required temperature, so once the water sitting in the pipes had drained through and the water from the cylinder started arriving, the electric instant hot water wouldn't be doing much any more. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any product that worked like this. All of them seemed to assume a cold water feed, and heated for a fixed time to give an approximate output. So I did the math and wasting the 5 litres of water in the piping and then using the Solar hot water, was much better than using electricity to heat cold water. In point of fact, the water is not wasted, as we use it to rinse things off before we start the dishes anyway.
I also wanted the hot water pipe connected to the dishwasher, but the plumber talked me out of it, and stated that it would invalidate the warranty. I still regret that I wasn't more forceful about it. Has anyone else ever connected a hot water feed to the dishwasher ?
-
Lucy Telfar Barnard, in reply to
Grumble grumble bloody Ecan
Not just Ecan, it’s the whole MfE list system I have issues with. The best that any woodburner on their list can claim is that it’s not quite as ugly as most of the others. Being a pyromaniac, I want a small woodburner for my city life, for aesthetic purposes rather than heating necessity. Because I want it for aesthetic purposes, I want it to be pretty, or cute. To be precise, I want it to be this: http://www.stovesessex.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/DovreVintage30Enam.png. According to Norwegian testing standards, it meets our requirements for efficiency and emissions. But New Zealand doesn’t accept foreign testing standards, because… our wood might be different. Or foreign stoves might be dangerous in wood-framed houses. Or some other excuse for protectionism. Getting it tested to NZ standards would be over $10K, which is well outside the budget. So all I can do is sulk, and rage to anyone who will listen (or read. Thank you for reading.)
-
Rob Stowell, in reply to
Has anyone else ever connected a hot water feed to the dishwasher ?
We do, to an ASKO which claims saving up to 75% of the power in the 'enviro' cycle (which uses a water temp of 55 degrees) when you provide hot water to the machine.
Because we also have a long run from tank to kitchen, and seldom have 55 degree water anyway, the electricity saving will be considerably less on average. Still, solar/wetback hot water is something we can afford to chew through in a way that power isn't, so it works out for us. -
Rob Stowell, in reply to
a small woodburner for my city life, for aesthetic purposes
We always wanted on of these 'studio' fires. They look good, but as our architect affirmed (he put one in in his own huge open-plan Queenstown house) just don't put out enough heat for a big space.
-
Bart Janssen, in reply to
We always wanted on of these ‘studio’ fires.
If you are just going for looks then this is the fireplace we've always wanted. Of course our little Ahead home really has no place for it :).
-
Chris Waugh, in reply to
According to Norwegian testing standards, it meets our requirements for efficiency and emissions.
Hmmm... Norway. Lots of forest, lots of wooden buildings, properly cold winters, but those buildings stay warm*. If the woodburner is good enough to keep the Norwegians happy, then how could it possibly be a problem in NZ?
*I was only there for a summer, but you could tell the houses were built properly in a way NZ houses are not.
-
I sent off for a brochure for those focus fires, Bart. The cost of them was eye-watering.
Chris, I agree entirely, though the issue for NZ MfE is mostly about keeping the air clean, with efficiency a by-product of that.
Still, NS3058/3059 measures aerosol mass using a dilution tunnel. Our New Zealand Standard 7403:1992 (AS4013) uses a similar method, but as recent local Consumer testing has shown, type of wood and testing regime makes a big difference to outputs.
To add insult to the whole thing, Consumer's test also found that outputs for actual use vary significantly from test outputs - and the manufacturers' need to tweak their models to best meet testing standards, may reduce air quality performance in real conditions. These differences make our refusal to accept other testing systems even more ridiculous.
-
The trouble is (if it’s the gyrofocus you’re talking about) it’s pretty near impossible to get an open fire to pass emissions tests. I say “pretty near” because I haven’t heard of any that passed, but don’t know enough to say it’d be impossible. Or it could be they don’t pass the efficiency requirement (the other thing required to be on the MfE list)
If you’re talking about one of the glass-doored models, you might have a better chance. I don’t know how difficult it would be to homebuild a model that would pass the MfE stesting standards, but suspect it might be challenging. The particularly difficult part would be that without your own lab, you couldn’t be confident it would pass the test, and each attempt would cost $10K.
ETA: I take that all back. Open fires are outside the testing standards, and rules for them vary from council to council. So it you want the gyrofocus, it wouldn't have to pass the testing regime at all - but your local regional council might not allow it anyway. -
Hebe, in reply to
Funky woodburners wood be wonderful. But first you need to get KDC to get the unachievable and inhumane Christchurch pollution targets brought into line with European cities and allow people to instal cleaner burners -- in new builds too.
-
Bart Janssen, in reply to
So who would like a funky wood burner?
When we finally build "the house", you know the one you dream about building but it's never the right time, a funky wood burner would be on the list of must haves.
Just one issue, the one we liked from that web site is surely a piece of copyrighted art (rightly so since it is beautiful), so deriving funky designs "in the style of" would be cool/hot but direct copies would be less cool.
And since we wouldn't be building in CHCH the restrictions would be less draconian ... hmmm Dragon fire, good name no?
Post your response…
This topic is closed.