Speaker by Various Artists

67

Vote Grey Warbler

by GHill1

I, on behalf of that lovely little bird called the Grey Warbler need your help. The 2007 Bird Of The Year voting is drawing to a close.

Last year the Fantail won with its Can-Can styled flirting with the human public. What a show-off.

Who's in the lead? That big fat green doofus the Woodpigeon. Nice bird and all, but really... there is a pure, and ironically unsung New Zealander that deserves your vote.

What's more worrying is that a great deal of block voting is coming in for the black fronted tern. Not the rare and purely New Zealand Fairy Tern. Just the dumb old black fronted sea chook! This is a disgrace.

I am asking for you to consider voting (it's easy) for The GREY WARBLER! Currently running 5th, which is better than this darling has done for some time.

Vote here.

Why vote GW?

A: It is in fact 2 birds. It is the parent of most Shining Cookoos who bludge off the goodwill of the Warbler Community from egg right through to adolescence just for them to drop off their own delinquent children to other GREY WARBLERS!!

B: Its song is the most often heard purely New Zealand bird song, yet it is so tiny and secretive that it is rarely seen. It's not going to do anything for itself (unlike that hussy the Fantail) to gain favour with Homo sapiens, other than sing. That's class.

C: The sheer effort put into its song. This little bird truly shakes from tailfeather to beak when in song.

D: It is not drab. It exhibits flashes of a Fantail-like tail when hunting its only food... insects, yet doesn't make a grand affair of the matter. Class again.

E: It is New Zealand's LIGHTEST bird along with the Rifleman. Edith Piaf, eat your heart out.

Listen here and if you've been outside New Zealand for any length of time ... weep.

And read about this charming songster here.

Vote for whom you like, but please consider our sub-conscious sound-symbol of New Zealand, the Grey Warbler carefully, before you do.

Yours, Graeme Hill
Secretary
Committee to Elect Grey Warbler 2007

Reviews and endorsements

"Presently, from some manuka thicket, a sombre plumaged little bird will emerge, light on some topmost twig, and pour forth to three-quarters of the globe - for in his ecstasy he nearly sings a circle - this faint sweet trill that heralds fuller spring."
Herbert Guthrie-Smith, 1910.

"The ghost of a kitten's mew - the echo of dwarf violins played in the moon" Allan Bell.

"I owe them everything. Brilliant parents who sacrificed so much for me. I just wish I knew how to pay them back. " S. Cookoo

"Since we've been here they've been nothing but welcoming. Tremendous neighbours." Wally Waxeye, 2007.

"Singing to me comes easy, so when I see the effort that those little buggers put in I feel like I'm Sean Fitzpatrick seeing Terry Wright with a half-gap on the wing and I cheer Go Go Go!!". Brian Bell-Byrd

It is indeed fuller spring. Vote Grey Warbler.

5

Across the Desert with Mandy Morbid (Part Three)

by Dr Creon 14OCT07

A couple of folks have suggested to me that after two episodes this series seemed unconcluded. Neither are particularly prurient types, so I can't imagine that they're on tenterhooks, waiting to be titillated by an account of the orgiastic night in Vegas that it seems my taste for the sensational is willing me to write.

For the most part, our time in Vegas was spent looking for rooms -- with the intention, for the most part, of sleeping in them. Looking for rooms in Vegas presented two significant challenges: finding hotel reception desks deep within the murky acreage of floor-space devoted exclusively to pokie machines; and the fact that there were no rooms. We spent hours, surrounded in the smoky dark by representatives of the innumerable breeds constituting that particular species -- the bewildered American, distinguishable by his unreflective bluster and air of perennial homelessness.

Something that surprised me in America, from Harlem to Hollywood, was the way Zak Smith's haircut elicits endless comments from complete strangers. "But this is what Americans are supposed to look like," I silently reasoned. "Self-evident truths, the pursuit of happiness, the romantic, revolutionary spirit...?" A pokie-playing philosopher in one of these desperate hotel lobbies possibly got to the heart of the matter: "Nice cut, brother," he said. "Everyone can't get away with that."

Above: Getting away with it.

Zak and Mandy took me to a restaurant in Vegas adjacent to, but removed from, the otherwise overwhelming wash of tack. There was leather upholstery, unremarkable waiting staff, a complete absence of flashing lights. Zak had juice, Mandy toast, Creon coffee. Midnight had come and gone. We'd seen the town and enough human tragedy for one lifetime. And we still didn't have rooms. So we decided to keep moving. Hell, LA was only five or six hours away, and I was keen to begin broadening my understanding of porn. We made it, heavy-lidded, around sun-up.

Yes, I'm actually here to write about porn. Porn. It's such a good word, porn. One of those instances where a language finds the perfect phonetic rendering. Esperanto would have been a far greater success if it'd built its vocabulary on all the best words from the world's languages. Star is also pretty good, come to that. The successful coinage of pornstar, then, is actually no great surprise.

The problem with porn, though -- the thing, not the word -- is that it's so terribly boring. I wanted to know about porn, so I watched some porn -- boring. And I looked on the net -- boring. I even sat down with Zak and alt. porn director, Benny Profane, explicitly to "talk porn," and, while the company and conversation couldn't be faulted, it was as if we were happy circling aimlessly and fruitlessly around a topic whose vacuity guaranteed its inexhaustibility.

Benny Profane pretty much invented alt. porn; but as he acknowledges, a bunch of other people seemed to have the same idea in the same week. He's attracted to the genre for, among other things, one simple reason: with porn, as long as you provide the requisite minutes of graphic sex, you've pretty much got a free hand to do whatever the hell you want with the rest of the movie.

So what's alt. porn when it's at home? If it's cynical Benny you're talking to, alt. porn simply means more of the same porn clichés but now incorporating tattoos, piercings, hair dye, better scripts and cooler music. If it's idealistic Benny you're talking to -- and this is a lovely great teddy-bear of a man, intelligent, thoughtful, conscientious, sensitive, uncompromising, with a pair of enormous sideburns that make him disarmingly reminiscent of teen-wolf -- if its idealistic Benny you're talking to, alt. porn represents a genre that's subversive, activist, and that hopefully goes some way towards repairing our unhealthy relationship, under god and the dollar, to sex and corporeality -- precisely where the demand for traditional porn comes from in the first place.

Now, of course some people don't find porn boring. (Only, it's not exactly water-cooler-type conversation, so we don't really know who these are, do we?)

And plenty of people don't find talking, or writing, or reading about porn necessarily boring.

I mean, it's kind of titillating, even for us prudes, if it's at a safe, ironic distance, ensconced in discourse.

I guess I could have framed these stories more truthfully as a journey with a couple of fascinating human beings: Mandy Morbid, an intelligent young woman of poise, who speaks her mind, knows her mind, is seemingly untouched by the ambivalence and coquettishness that afflicts so many her age; and Zak Smith, one of those guys who can speak engagingly and insightfully on pretty much anything, from fundamentalist Christian American politicians, to Civil War battles, to the semiotics of baseball, who also, in passing, happens to do the most astonishing things with the conjunction of his imagination, and paper, paint and ink.

But no. I went for the porn angle.

Maybe that's because listing real-world qualities is somewhat pornographic itself; it reads like a curriculum vitae, that pornography of the labour market, and feels false, insincere, contrived.

Anyways, I got to thinking about why I'd choose to exploit my friendship with these people for the sake of a few laughs; how I perceived my readers (and myself) as implicitly intrigued by the adult film industry. My thoughts revolved around a few things: our begrudging fascination with porn; the feeling we might entertain that it actually services only a market of ironic viewers; the way it catches our attention and captures our imagination; the way the word pornstar is so electrified with meaning.

It seems to me that this all derives from the disruption porn enacts upon our culture's uneasy negotiations with representation (by which I mean how we deal with the endless, tension-filled co-dependence between "image" and "reality").

On the one hand porn is utterly ridiculous -- boring even -- because it is so manifestly false. Yet on the other hand it is so manifestly real. This is untenable. We like our movies to be comfortingly real for only exactly as long as we're watching them, after which they become comfortingly contrived.

We are happy to live within representation as long as we can all know better after the fact.

But with porn, our representation is some girl's reality. Some guy's reality. Who is that girl? Who is that guy? Is what we can never stop asking.

And that's why we like to comfort ourselves with ideas of their exploitation, their drug-dependence, their destructive childhoods, their victimhood. God forbid they're just doing a job, even enjoying it, more or less.

So our ironic attitude to porn -- watching it with our mates, laughing too loud -- is an attempt we make to transcend the fundamental disturbance that occurs within porn: we want to make it into an image of itself, to contain within representation that which disables the category of representation. The supposedly shameful, non-ironic enjoyment of the good-faith consumer of porn cannot be countenanced -- because it is an eliding of the representation in favour of an engagement (however sad) with the real. A submerging rather than a transcending.

And that stirring in your pants while you're watching with your mates must be repressed by your acculturation in the bad-faith discourse of sublimation.

This sublimation is not unusual, of course, and is enacted far more frequently in our experiences of regular, sanctioned pornography. In fact, for every ironic consumer, there are numerous good-faith consumers of porn. Yet how many people don't watch Trinny and Susannah for the singular pleasure of loathing them? The universal hatred that these two inspire is nothing more than the transcendent recognition that what they do is pornography: the conversion of a real, living body into marketable fodder through the disingenuous agency of mediatised representations of sympathy and love.

But the disingenuousness is greater, the pornography deeper, than you might think. Trinny and Susannah actually sell us our own hatred-within-irony. We are paying for the pleasure of our own clever illusion of transcendence -- the pleasure of believing that we can overcome the impossibility of not engaging through representation. We are, if you like, the unknowing pornstars of our pleasure -- self-images of real experience accessed only through a futile transcendence -- which is, in fact, the product we, as ironic consumers, purchase by and large.

Alt. porn is perhaps a movement away from this debilitating culture of self-consciousness. It has the audacity to suggest that sex -- on camera, under lights, with a script -- might still be fun.

And that the makers of alt. porn might be people who are not drug-dependent, cash-dependent, damaged or disturbed. That quite possibly they are people who enjoy a lifestyle where their bodies are less regulated by the imperatives of irony, where they can live in their own versions of the real, where they can get away with a haircut.

My journey across the desert with Mandy Morbid and Zak Sabbath was, for all of us, an exercise in reality: the stresses of shifting house; feeling cramped and ill; driving too long; the awkwardness of spending multiple hours in unfamiliar company; the slight, glowing revelations as you begin to know someone; the tensions that arise and dissipate as things are perceived, misperceived, forgotten; the hilarity of the unpredicted and unpredictable; the ability to care for another, despite the nagging concerns of the self; the amazing human capacity to find something to say; the bad food, and the hunger that's preferable to more bad food; the folks, the roads, the stops and starts: the marvels of experience.

47

Moving Right Along

by Foreign Field 5

There's not much more the Dropkicks can say about Sunday morning that hasn't already been spoken in the forums, other than to agree that Wayne Barnes was clearly not the man for the job. Taking that into account, we'd also like to acknowledge the French for a colossal defence that was clearly what won them the game.

Watching rugby over the years we've come to notice that what most often causes losses is the inability to score as many points as the other team, and we'd like to suggest to those insanely angry New Zealanders out there that they man up to this loss a little more. The referee was not the cause of the All Black's complete inability to change the script in that last ten minutes, nor was he the cause of the numerous small bad decisions that prevented us getting ahead on the points table.

We'd also like to acknowledge the French for what may well have been the best response to the Haka we've seen. Not sure if you noticed, but when the French formed on the halfway they were wearing red, white and blue vests. A symbolic act that eventually represented the game itself. A Tricolore line that could not be crossed, no matter what we threw at it.

And so we move right along, after all, there's still plenty of rugby to be played at this World Cup. And we loves us some rugby.

Regardless of the outcome on October 14, we're not alone in thinking that the real winners have to be Argentina. Where that first game was considered an upset, the win against Scotland was not. This is a small but significant movement in thought, and brings us to the question, how do we rope them into our competition before the 6-Nations rope them into theirs?

What's often claimed to be the main stumbling block to the inclusion of Argentina in the Tri-Nations is the logistics of moving players between South Africa, Australia, Argentina and New Zealand. Furthermore there's the risk of saturation games and loss of fan/watcher interest. Let's face it, too much rugby can water down your enthusiasm.

We aren't convinced that the logistical issue is insurmountable, if the IRB thinks outside the box a little.

So here we go. One of the plans for expanding the Super 12 seems to have been the principle "more of a good thing is bloody excellent". We aren't convinced this was sound thinking. More rugby, is basically just "more". It's not different, interesting, or compelling. It's like that extra bit of chicken in your quarter pack. Delicious, but basically just more of the same.

The Dropkicks think that the IRB need to apply the principle that "variety is the spice of life". Instead of sticking to the conventional, time-consuming round-robin style tournament, why not send the whole shebang on tour every year? This would mean having one country host all or most of the games themselves (Argentina and South Africa could co-host, as could New Zealand and Australia), and minimising travel for the players and their families.

This increases the number of 4-Nations fixtures to 10, but you could easily limit the time between games because there is no need to consider travel. Taking this into account, the tour could potentially start in South Africa in 2008, move to Australia in 2009, New Zealand in 2010, and Argentina in time for the next World Cup.

And why would this be more useful than a round-robin? Because what the IRB needs to place the emphasis on for an expanded Tri-Nations is not more bloody rugby, no matter how much we love the game. More rugby will not win fans. But a better rugby experience, a "spicier" or "gala"-style rugby will.

Let's look at the Sevens for example. People love it. It's got colour, lots of life, a variety of teams all under the same roof, and basically it's just heaps of fun. With a tour you get a carnival atmosphere for a few weeks, just like the Lions did, and it will draw people to the game. That's the kind of business plan you want to generate, not "damn... we can make even more money by providing even more mediocre rugby experiences for the fans."

Think about it there Mr. IRB. And then we'll stop sending you letters.

The Dropkicks

Some Foreign Field is kindly sponsored by Whisky Galore

231

It's the recrimination I don't need …

by Russell Brown

I was on my bike, literally, by the time the post-match interviews were underway. It was a lovely morning, and the streets were quiet between home and Coyle Park, the green area at the point of Point Chevalier. Just the odd glum driver trundling home, those silver fern flags fluttering pointlessly from the windows.

I pulled up at the park and sat on one of the benches, overlooking the harbour for a few minutes. The tide was low, but the water shimmered in the sunshine and the breeze was light. What a nice place to live, I thought.

On return, I cooked a brunch of free-range bacon, breakfast sausages, poached eggs, grilled tomatoes, mushrooms and lekkerbrot bread with Rocket Fuel sauce while I listened to Finlay Macdonald and Bill Ralston (who make a great team, by the way) insist they wouldn't mention the rugby on Radio Live, then raise it with every guest. To make it worse, the album of the week -- selected by Finlay's usual host Andrew Patterson before he went on holiday -- was James Blunt. It was actually funny.

So was the scene at St Lukes mall a couple of hours later, when I dropped to kids off at the movies. People -- men especially -- were wandering about distractedly, hoping that a little commerce night change the subject.

Throughout out the day, I argued the toss and commiserated with the regulars in our World Cup blog about what had happened. My philosophical mood rather eroded as I watched clips of the critical incidents.

I checked the readers' comment sections on the Stuff and Herald sites, and was additionally depressed by the bile, recrimination and hacking at tall poppies. Some New Zealanders are really ghastly at times like this.

It is only a game. But what exactly did happen? We've all heard the theories:

The Rotation Policy

Maybe, in the case of the midfield, where playing a fine fullback at centre again proved a fateful decision. It might all have been different if Conrad Smith had been playing all year; or if Tana Umaga had hung on for the World Cup. But the core of the team wasn't in doubt, and the All Blacks have come into late-season tours in Europe and monstered the opposition with anyone the coaches cared to put on the field. But in a wider sense, yes: everything about our rugby was sacrificed to the World Cup and it didn't work.

The All Blacks were "arrogant"

Easy to type, but what does it mean? That they thought they'd stroll to victory? I don't think so. You can't help being overwhelming favourites. Everyone thought so, including the Australian who dropped five million dollars with the bookies yesterday. If anything, they struggled to carry the burden of expectation.

The All Blacks played like showponies and you can't do that and win the big ones

Eh? The All Black tight forwards were magnificent and Ali Williams had his best game for his country. They dominated the set-pieces and had nearly three quarters of the possession. Indeed, you had to wish they had thrown it around a bit more. I can't recall seeing an All Black team so shy of instinct.

But one thing occurs to me in light of this: does the All Blacks "private shrink" Gilbert Enoka ever have a performance review? You have to wonder ...

The All Blacks didn't have a Plan B

Yep, they did. They just carried it out so grimly and mechanically that it became the problem. How many times have we armchair coaches urged them to tighten it up, hang on to the ball and win ugly? They did what they had discussed doing while they were a man down: kept the ball close, soaked up time. It didn't work. I think the captain has to accept some responsibility for allowing that to drag on.

Injuries

Was Dan Carter 100% fit when he took the field? At any rate, he was below his best. Losing his replacement, Nick Evans, to an injury shortly afterwards, was really foul luck. And losing Jerry Collins perhaps hurt more than anything else. Yes, the French lost Bentsen, but a deal with the Devil that kept them both on the field would have been just fine with me.

The French defended brilliantly

And how. The French made 176 tackles compared to the All Blacks' 36. That's a barely credible statistic, but apparently it happened. I still don't understand how they could do that much defending -- and so effectively slow down the All Black ball -- and concede only two penalties in the entire match (and none in the second half). Indeed, there were a whole suite of penalties that might have been awarded in this last-gasp incident on the French line. Which brings us to …

The Referee

I know Paddy O'Brien's told us all to grow up, but I can't see the point in being all staunch and insisting Wayne Barnes' performance didn't have a significant impact on the result. It clearly did. In the case of McAllister's sin-binning, Jauzion milked it (you can see him fly backwards, arms flailing as if from some mighty impact while McAllister, who is presumably made of solid granite, just turns and runs back toward his line) and Barnes, in his second year of test refereeing, lost his composure. Barnes blew his whistle nine times before he calmed down enough to talk to the players and send McAllister from the field. You could almost hear his heartbeat jackhammering in his ears. Having looked at the clip more times than is probably wise, I don't think it was even a penalty. Missing the forward pass in the clinching French try was forgivable, given that he was unsighted, but on another day perhaps that wouldn't have happened either. I guess it's our fault for following a game where officiating isn't so much a matter of adjudication as opinion.

The game would only have to have been microscopically different for the narrative to have changed entirely. Had the forward pass been spotted and the ball returned to where it had been most of the time -- in the French half, in the hands of the All Blacks -- we'd probably have been hailing So'oialo's try as evidence of the All Blacks grinding their way back against outrageous fortune. If the All Blacks had snared that drop goal -- with both first-fives off the field -- or earned that elusive penalty on attack, it would have been "All Blacks snatch victory in thriller".

But they didn't, and what one of our correspondents characterised as a "cosmic joke" continues. But it's only a game, and I've had a hell of a lot of fun watching the All Blacks play in the past three years; they have frequently been brilliant. I'm going about my business and the young men involved will be feeling worse than anyone. I hope none of the bilious fools spewing angrily onto the newspaper forums gets within cooee of the team, because they don't need it. And neither do I.

PS: Jeremy Andrew has again won the Whisky Galore ad copy competition with "The whisky is younger than the All Blacks' losing streak ... but much easier to swallow ...". I have one more bottle of whisky to award, so keep trying once you know the result of Argentina-Scotland. I'll have to discuss the extent of the promotion with the good people at Whisky Galore now, but if you were to pop into their online store for a look, that would be nice.

189

Quantum Competition

by Foreign Field 4

Having solemnly taken on board the entreaties against over-confidence of my Dropkicks colleagues, I have come to a decision. I'm offering two fine bottles of whisky from our sponsors for this week's ad copy competition: one in case of victory, the other, unthinkably defeat against the French in Cardiff.

Think of it as a sort of quantum uncertainty competition.

Enter via the discussion for this post, as follows: study the Whisky Galore ads on the main Public Address pages, and give me up to a dozen words to run across two frames of the Flash advertisement. Humour is always good.

The best slogan referring to an All Black victory, and the best for an All Black defeat will earn a good dram delivered to the door. But on Monday, obviously, only one will actually be used in the ad.

I remain confident; a position somewhat buttressed by the impression that, short of divine intervention, Fabien Pelous is already making excuses for defeat.

Allez Les Noirs is confident too. Meanwhile Scrumbag (hat tip: ruggerblogger) sizes up the French team.

Returning to whisky, I celebrated delivering a major piece of work on Wednesday evening by cracking the Old Malt Cask Director's Tactical 1988, which I had been planning to save for the final, and pouring a couple of glasses. It was just the way I remembered it: sensational. Here's hoping it's a good omen.