Island Life by David Slack

The Call of the Wild

Within a couple of years of graduating, I was already done with my first career choice.

Advertising: what was I thinking? This, in case you haven't read it.

By the winter of 1983, we had a bad economy, a bad Prime Minister, and I had no special interest in hanging around.

My friend Richard was done with being a junior lawyer, and he had the perfect suggestion. We would go to Canada: Whistler, Banff, or some other fine ski resort. Somewhere with fresh powder every morning and fresh dishes for kitchen hands every evening. We wouldn't mind the work at all. Ski all day, hone our skills and then on to Europe where we would become ski instructors at a Swiss finishing school and in due course marry into some small European principality or other. Couldn't be better.

If I hadn't been offered a job with Dominion Breweries: car, expense account, upward management mobility in a Brierley company, I would absolutely not have had my head turned, and I would not have had to tell Richard with about four weeks to go that he'd be making the trip on his own.

If I had been a better kind of mate, I would have gone to Canada, and if I had gone to Canada, it would have all worked out precisely as we predicted. But I didn't go. Richard broke his leg within a couple of weeks, hobbled off the mountain and flew on to an office job in London. At that point, he possibly regretted having staged a ritual burning of his work suit just before he left New Zealand.

For much of my ensuing adult life I have been atoning for this appalling lapse in mateship with the occasional small gesture, and the following would be one of them.

I recommend you take yourself off to a Tisdalls store just as soon as you can, because if you read just one catalogue this year, you should read the one Richard has produced this year for the family business.

Yes, really. A store catalogue. Beautifully designed, with some lovely writing. Their intention is to produce something that isn't laden with the usual commercial flannel. To this end, they've asked award-winning New Zealand novelists and poets to produce the little vignettes that appear throughout.

“IT WAS AN ISOLATED HUT AND HE WASN’T SUPRISED TO FIND IT EMPTY. As he was about to light the fire he heard laughter rise above the wind and rain outside. The laughter dropped away when the door swung open...”

This would be the third or fourth year they've done this, and this one is an especially nice job. Go and pick up a copy of Ever After and tell me you don't feel a little tempted to get out amongst the great New Zealand bush this summer. If you really don't feel the call of the wild, at least check out some of the survival gear. It could come in quite handy if we get bird flu this Christmas.

Reading Between The Lines

How devout a Muslim is Michelle Leslie?

How much distortion do you have to apply to a story to come up with a headline that that declares: Ministers First in Queue for Flu Pills?

How stupid would you feel to discover to your great surprise that the other half of the building you tenanted was full of hydroponic equipment and leaf after leaf of fine NZ green?

All valid questions, but not the one that I feel most impelled to answer this morning. The question I left hanging on Friday was: Who is Accident? What kind of man or woman is the person who penned this signature?

Thank you one and all for your answers to that question.

Jessica Reid thinks Accident is "definitely male".

He's professional, smart and in his early to mid twenties. He lives off KFC and Pepsi. He works in IT. He has two good friends who he keeps in regular contact with (they went to school together in Palmy). He owns the Lord of the rings DVD box set and watches it incessantly. He doesn't know many females. He lives in a student flat although with his salary he doesn't need to. At school he was good at Maths and geography.




Laura Roylance also thinks he's male: "men tend to have messier handwriting".

He is relatively literate because there are no spelling mistakes. (The "e" in "Compensation" is not really there but it's eluded to, so it's not a spelling mistake.) And let's face it, NZ is hardly a nation of people who are great at grammar and spelling, so he is of above average intelligence.

He is probably well educated - an Arts grad most likely, because a lot of us end up working for the big G and its departments. Accident is certainly not a Med School grad, because although his writing is messy, it is not messy enough for a medical professional (perhaps this is why he chose an Arts degree?).

He's probably left-handed, judging from the left lean to the writing.

The "e" in "Accident" looks like one of those backwards-3-style Es that were popular in high schools in the 1980s and early 90s, so he's probably in his early to mid 30s.

Accident must be around that age anyway, because he also has a healthy disregard for authority, and sufficient experience to know that he should follow through. Oh, and he also knows that it's not likely anyone will notice or care, so repercussions will be minimal.

Good sense of humour, too.



Daniel Nicholls says my guess is far too romantic.

That is most definitely a man's signature. Scruffy, un-ironed white shirt, loosely tucked in, who has worn the same tie his mum bought him last xmas.

He was having a joke with his mates about signing ACC…and wrote the letter and signed it. After his mates left he meant to redo it probably, but it slipped his mind and he Accidentally sent it….



Span(ner in the works) would like to add into the mix that Accident appears to have studied physics at some point in the past, possibly at school.

I say this because in my experience the practice of physics study does horrible things to anyone's handwriting and I detect a certain attempt to control what would otherwise be quite a ratty signature.

No offence to Mr/Ms Accident intended of course, I suffer from the same affliction.



Going by his first name, writes Duncan,

Accident was not a planned child, with something of a chip on the shoulder through constant reminder of the fact (especially when signing all those letters). The second name suggests that the child had some redeeming features - possibly accounting for his or her generous nature.



Robyn Gallagher casts her keen graphologist's eye over the signature and concludes:

I agree with your impression that the ACC signer is a woman in her early 30s, though she could be a bit younger.

When she went to school, she learned printing, not cursive writing, and as a result, her attempt to join together letters to make a proper, grown-up signature is rather clumsy - look at the join of the 'e' and 'n' in both 'Accident' and 'compensation'. Now, I went to two primary schools - one taught printing, the other cursive writing, so I assume that cursive writing was phased out in the '80s, which probably makes her around my age or younger.

The writer is right-handed, which is apparent from the way the 'o's have been written in a clockwise fashion.

My initial reaction was that it was written by a man due to its messiness (in my experience, men tend to have messier handwriting than women, but not always), but I looked closer and I actually think it's a woman.

It's the 'd' and 'e' in 'Accident' that remind me of the way that the cool girls at my school started writing in the third form. The 'd' has no downstroke and the 'e' is a cross between a capital E and a sigma.

I like to imagine that she was picked to be the signer after several attempts by the marketing department proved to be less than satisfactory (Fiona's signature was too girlie, Brian's was totally illegible, and the handwriting font, well, it looked like a font), so finally Mel, a PA, was asked to write "Accident Compensation Corporation" and it looked warm, friendly and ordinary enough to pass the test, so it was the chosen one.



Llew of Sunnyo manages to find allusionary room in the cast not only for the blogosphere's most controversial provincial redneck but also its least likeable woman.

A signature like that must be reassuring, it implies you have the support of an entire corporation, not just some nobody claims clerk.

I'm guessing that Accident Compensation Corporation has to be a woman. A man, even a callow youth, would sign his own name to wring a little power & respect out of the situation [viz:]

AJ Cheesewax,
Claims Clerk

Even some women:

Cath Yodgers
GM, Claims Division

Whereas my primary take on her is that she's young, somewhere in her very early twenties, shy, unassuming, a follower rather than a leader during work hours, but as in all these situations I'd like to think that she's pretty hot in a coy Jennifer Aniston kind of way, parties hard, but discreetly in the weekends & possibly routinely goes without underwear.

I think this view is evidenced by the jaunty little dotted "i"s, the devil may care "n"s and the slightly mischievous slope of the signature.

The other possibility... is that it is the night shift computer operator, who doesn't have the authority to sign letters, a 300lb bearded & bespectacled geek, probably an immigrant from Canada, who spends his evenings performing system backups & printing out & signing form letters, and his days watching Cartoon Network, smoking dope & surfing the net for pornography. The signature looks like that because at that time of night, he has the shakes.

BTW - Vote for SunnyO.blogspot.com & the Wellingtonista.blogspot.com (best lifestyle site) here:



This tour de force would have won him a book if he hadn't worked in that shameless self-promotion. I leave it to you to decide how to act, noting only that it is becoming increasingly apparent that he has invested significant personal stock in a successful outcome at the Netguide Awards, and a vote might bring him much more joy than some book about local politics. (As an aside, I can't speak for the others but I suspect that the official PA line is that although we have a two year old trophy on the mantelpiece, another one would be nice, so if you want to keep the sparkling prose coming, you know what to do.)

Because Llew has disqualified himself, I therefore duly declare the winner of Civil War and Other Optimistic Predictions (Slack, Penguin, favourably-reviewed with a couple of priggish exceptions) to be Ed Haszard Morris for this equally entertaining contribution. I generously forsake any copyright interest in the contribution and leave it to him to clean up with the movie rights.

Accident is a person of indeterminate gender in their mid-50s.

During their upbringing in a small King Country town, Accident was subjected to more than the fair share of normal childhood taunts. This may be attributed to their indeterminate gender, or more likely, to their debilitating bad haircut.

Accident managed to overcome the difficulties of childhood in a small town, and grew into a lithe and intelligent young adult. Enrolling at the equally young Waikato University for a B.Soc.Sci. in Human Geography was the logical next step after U.E.

Like many students in the late 60s and early 70s, Accident fell in with the hippie crowd, and consequently fell out of love with higher learning. A succession of manual labouring jobs eventually led to the ownership of a small second-hand bookshop in 1980s Auckland.

This naturally crashed along with the sharemarket, and Accident returned to the family farm a broken person.

Several years and many job applications later, salvation came in the form of a case-worker's job with the ACC. This appealed not only to the pinko socialist tendencies learned in Accident's hippie days, but also to some of the more base traits instilled by Accident's farm upbringing.

With this combination of caring, sharing, and putting the lame out of their misery, Accident soon rose through the ranks to the current position at the head of the little-known Anthropomorphisation section. This business unit is charged with the unenviable task of giving the corporation a more human image, even going so far as to create a signature.

Accident had a wonderful Labour weekend trapping possums, thank you for asking.



Any resemblance to any person living, dead, or employed by the Accident Compensation Corporation is of course purely coincidental etc, and we trust you had a nice weekend with the possums.

Orwell That Ends Well

It was in Auckland, a sodden morning of the rains. A sickly light, like yellow tinfoil, was slanting over the high walls into the jail yard. We were waiting outside the condemned cells, a row of sheds fronted with double bars, like small animal cages. Each cell measured about ten feet by ten and was quite bare within except for a plank bed and a pot of drinking water. In some of them assorted men and women were squatting at the inner bars, with their blankets draped round them. These were the condemned Herald writers, due to be hanged for treason within the next week or two.

One prisoner had been brought out of his cell. He was a puny wisp of a man, with a shaven head and vague liquid eyes. He had a small goatee and moustache, somewhat in the style of a diminished Russell Brown. Six tall warders were guarding him and getting him ready for the gallows. Two of them stood by with rifles and fixed bayonets, while the others handcuffed him, passed a chain through his handcuffs and fixed it to their belts, and lashed his arms tight to his sides. They crowded very close about him, with their hands always on him in a careful, caressing grip, as though all the while feeling him to make sure he was there. It was like men handling a fish which is still alive and may jump back into the water. But he stood quite unresisting, yielding his arms limply to the ropes, as though he hardly noticed what was happening.

Seven o'clock struck and the sound of a birdcall from a transistor radio, desolately thin in the wet air, floated from a nearby Mount Eden home. The superintendent of the jail, who was standing apart from the rest of us, moodily prodding the gravel with his stick, raised his head at the sound. He was a retired NZRFU official with graying temples, heavy jowls and a gruff voice. 'Christ, what’s the hold up, Farrar,' he said irritably. 'The man ought to have been dead by this time. Aren't you ready yet?'

Farrar, the head jailer, a stout man in his late thirties, shining pate and gimlet-eyed, waved his hand. 'Sorry, about that sir, sorry,' he bubbled. 'Just had a slight hitch hooking up the feed for my live blog. The hangman is waiting. We can begin any time you like.'

'Well, quick march, then. The prisoners can't get their breakfast till this job's over.'

We set out for the gallows. Two warders marched on either side of the prisoner, with their rifles at the slope; two others marched close against him, gripping him by arm and shoulder, as though at once pushing and supporting him. The rest of us, New Zealand Party observers and the like, followed behind. Suddenly, when we had gone three metres, the procession stopped short without any order or warning. A dreadful thing had happened – John Campbell, come goodness knows whence, had appeared in the yard. He came bounding among us with a loud volley of questions, and leapt round us wagging his finger, and raging at the insanity of putting reporters to death for criticising their country’s foreign minister. It was a wide sweeping monologue, half diatribe, half prayer. For a moment he darted about us prodding with accusations: “you can’t do this!”; “It’s not treason, it’s sedition”; “Don’t you know they abolished hanging for treason in 1989?” - and then, before anyone could stop him, he had made a dash for the prisoner, and jumping up tried to pull him free from the guards. Everyone stood aghast, too taken aback even to grab at the current affairs host.

'Who let that little creep in here?' said the superintendent angrily. 'Catch him, someone!'

A warder, detached from the escort, charged clumsily after Campbell, but he bobbed, weaved and declaimed just out of his reach, taking everything as part of the game. A young Investigate magazine reporter picked up a handful of gravel and tried to stone him away, but he dodged the stones and came after us again. His indignant outbursts echoed from the jail walls. The prisoner, in the grasp of the two warders, looked on incuriously, as though this was another formality of the hanging. It was several minutes before someone managed to catch Campbell. Then we put my handkerchief through his suit belt and moved off once more, with the Campbell Live host still objecting noisily.

It was about ten metres to the gallows. I watched the bare pale white back of the prisoner marching in front of me. He walked clumsily with his bound arms, but quite steadily, with that bobbing gait of the journalist who never loses the capacity to reach the bar for another. At each step his muscles slid neatly into place, the lock of hair on his scalp danced up and down, his feet printed themselves on the wet gravel. And once, in spite of the men who gripped him by each shoulder, he stepped slightly aside to avoid a puddle on the path.

It is curious, but till that moment I had never realized what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious journalist. When I saw him step aside to avoid the puddle, I saw the mystery, the unspeakable wrongness, of cutting a life short, even that of a reporter, when it is in full tide. This man was not dying, he was alive just as we were alive. All the organs of his body were working – head throbbing from symptoms of coffee withdrawal, stomach crying out for a Big Mac, lungs tickling from the residual effects of a two-pack-a day habit, - all toiling away in solemn foolery. His nicotine-stained nails would still be growing when he stood on the drop, when he was falling through the air with a tenth of a second to live. His eyes saw the yellow gravel and the grey walls, and his brain still remembered, foresaw, reasoned - reasoned even about puddles. He and we were a party of men walking together, seeing, hearing, feeling, understanding the same world; and in two minutes, with a sudden snap, one of us – Frank O'Sullivan - would be gone - one mind less, one world less.

The gallows stood in a small yard, separate from the main grounds of the prison, and overgrown with tall prickly weeds. It was a brick erection like three sides of a shed, with planking on top, and above that two beams and a crossbar with the rope dangling. The hangman, a grey-haired convict in the denim uniform of the prison, was waiting beside his machine. He greeted us with a servile crouch as we entered. At a word from Colin, the two warders, gripping the prisoner more closely than ever, half led, half pushed him to the gallows and helped him clumsily up the ladder. Then the hangman climbed up and fixed the rope round the prisoner's neck.

We stood waiting, five yards away. The warders had formed in a rough circle round the gallows. And then, when the noose was fixed, the prisoner began crying out on his god. It was a high, reiterated cry of 'Winston! Winston! Winston! Winston!', not urgent and fearful like a prayer or a cry for help, but steady, rhythmical, almost like the tolling of a bell. Campbell answered the sound with a groan. The hangman, still standing on the gallows, produced a small cotton bag like a flour bag and drew it down over the prisoner's face. But the sound, muffled by the cloth, still persisted, over and over again: 'Winston! Winston! Winston! Winston! Winston!'

The hangman climbed down and stood ready, holding the lever. Minutes seemed to pass. The steady, muffled crying from the prisoner went on and on, 'Winston! Winston! Winston!' never faltering for an instant. The superintendent, his head on his chest, was slowly poking the ground with his stick; perhaps he was counting the cries, allowing the prisoner a fixed number - fifty, perhaps, or a hundred. Everyone had changed colour. The New Zealand Party officials had gone grey like bad coffee, and one or two of the bayonets were wavering. We looked at the lashed, hooded man on the drop, and listened to his cries - each cry another second of life; the same thought was in all our minds: oh, kill him quickly, get it over, stop that abominable noise!

Suddenly the superintendent made up his mind. Throwing up his head he made a swift motion with his stick. 'Fuck this for a joke!' he shouted almost fiercely, “Let him down!”

There was a clanking noise, and then dead silence. The prisoner had fainted, and the rope was twisting on itself. I let go of Campbell, and he galloped immediately to the back of the gallows; but when he got there he stopped short, barked a command to his cameraman and then retreated into a corner of the yard, where he stood among the weeds, looking pensively out at us. We went round the gallows to inspect the prisoner. He was unconscious, but the slightest smirk of triumph lay across his face.

The superintendent reached out with his stick and poked the limp reporter. 'He's all right,' said the superintendent. He backed out from under the gallows, and blew out a deep breath. The moody look had gone out of his face quite suddenly. He glanced at his wrist-watch. 'Eight minutes past seven. Well, I tell you what, they can get some other stupid bastard to do this, I’m not up to it.’

The warders unfixed bayonets and marched away. Campbell, sobered and yet conscious of having contributed to the aversion of a tragedy, slipped after them, commenting quietly in a reflective Piece To Camera. We walked out of the gallows yard, past the condemned cells with their waiting prisoners, into the big central yard of the prison. The convicts, under the command of warders armed with batons, were already receiving their breakfast. They squatted in long rows, each one holding a small bowl, while two warders with buckets marched round ladling out sodden Weetbix; it seemed quite a homely, jolly scene, after the attempt at a hanging. An enormous relief had come upon us now that the job was abandoned. One felt an impulse to sing, to break into a run, to snigger. All at once everyone began chattering gaily.

The Investigate magazine reporter walking beside me nodded towards the way we had come, with a knowing smile: 'Do you know, that reporter guy, when he heard his appeal had been dismissed, he pissed on the floor of his cell. From fright. Like an M and M? From The Warehouse, two dollars a box. The brown ones are real nice.'

Several people laughed - at what, nobody seemed certain.

Farrar was walking by the superintendent, talking garrulously. 'Well, sir, this was an excellent performance. I got the whole thing streaming on the webcast - flick! like that. It doesn’t always work so well. I’ve had cases where the bandwidth has dried up and I’ve had to slip in a few jpegs of my Ralph magazine scans, just to keep fresh images coming!'

'Ralph scans, eh? That's bad,' said the superintendent.

I found that I was laughing quite loudly. Everyone was laughing. Even the superintendent grinned in a tolerant way. 'You'd better all come out and have a drink,' he said quite genially. 'I've got a few dozen cans of Tui in the car. We could do with it.'

We went through the big double gates of the prison, into the road. 'Ralph magazines!' exclaimed Bridget Saunders suddenly, and burst into a loud chuckling. We all began laughing again. At that moment Farrar's anecdote seemed extraordinarily funny. We all had a drink together, reporter and New Zealander alike, quite amicably. O’Sullivan was still unconscious a hundred yards away.

And sealed with a kiss

I am accident-prone. Even as I write, I carry the scars of my most recent moments of clumsiness: scratched lower legs which I acquired during a morning of chainsawing; a toenail that's deep blue from the trauma of being torn from its pad; and a thigh that bears a wide and, frankly, impressive bruise that I acquired by running with a damaged hamstring.

No surprise, then, that I have a steadily accumulating collection of letters from the Accident Compensation Corporation. I used to be noble and principled and wave away the forms when they pulled them out at the doctor's surgery. No, I really didn't want to make a claim - no, it seemed too trifling a matter, no, I was quite happy to pay the bill myself. But these days it takes more time to dissuade them than it does to answer a couple of questions and let them punch, process and despatch the claim online.

So the other day I got another nice letter from the ACC, and here it is. It's nicely written: helpful, clear, succinct, with just the right tone of approachability and goodwill. But for one small quirk, I can't fault it.

The quirk is this: they conclude with the "signature" of the Accident Compensation Corporation.

I daresay that, legally speaking, this is the correct procedure. If the lecturer covered this in Company Law, I was quite possibly asleep. It's not the legal dimension that interests, me, though, but rather the sense conveyed of a living, breathing, letter-signing entity named Accident Compensation Corporation.

Every signature tells a story, and this one suggests to me a smart, efficient woman in her early thirties. Perhaps a little brisk, certainly very organised and methodical. She works hard all week, and gets everything done before the office drinks on Friday afternoon, but on the weekend, she's more light hearted, and perhaps somewhere within the range prescribed by Patty Loveless:

I ain't the woman in red, I ain't the girl next door
But if somewhere in the middle's what you're lookin' for
I'm that kind of girl



But perhaps I'm reading too much into it.

There's just something so jaunty about the signature, though, that you feel almost compelled to send a nice thank-you note.

Dear Accident, you might write, thanks very much for taking care of that. The leg is already much better thank you, and I expect to be walking again in a few weeks. Hope you had a nice a Labour Weekend. Did you manage to get away up North? We spent a couple of days at Waipu Cove in a house just by the beach. Etc.

That's just my impression, though. I could be miles off. And that's where we get to the audience participation bit. What do you make of the signature? What kind of man, woman or beast is Accident? Best description wins a copy of Civil War and Other Optimistic Predictions. Signed.

Three Score and Ten

Poor old beleaguered McDonalds. You do your best each morning as you empty your hash browns into the deep fryers and melt the cheese over people's breakfast sandwiches, but what thanks do you get? A generation ago, you called yourself a family restaurant and everyone agreed with you. Today, thanks to obsessive health Nazis like Morgan Spurlock, you're just another evil corporate monster and an enemy of the people.

Where did it all go wrong? I asked myself last night as I finally got around to watching Supersize Me on the lately-equally-maligned-TV One. There was no arguing with the data as Morgan ploughed his way through 30 days of Big Macs, fries and buckets of Coke.

His liver is melting! We've never seen anything like it! declared his doctors.

His tongue was in his cheek! declared McDonalds in a commercial made specially for the occasion.

You guys will have to peddle faster than that I declared, as the commercial scrolled through the company's diverse rebuttals.

He ate too much! they said. We have salads now, and our beef is 100% pure! We sponsor kids' sport! Please don't keep watching this! What's on Prime? Hey, is that someone at your front door?

You can declare that your heart is in the right place, and you can get the estimable Sarah Ulmer to make all the arguments you like in favour of your salads, but dude, come on. You give kids free toys to make them eat your food. A bucketful of Coke has more spoonfuls of sugar in it than even Mary Poppins would think was good for you. Your food is crap in a pretty wrapper and you know it.

* * * *
I have been a poor correspondent lately, so let's catch up on responses to various recent posts. First: that list of Christmas presents at Hammacher Schlemmer.

Kathinka writes that my mention of that venerable retailer reminded her of "long ago, cold war, nuclear shelters.... and a poem written by E.Y. "Yip" Harburg"

Hammacher Schlemmer is selling a shelter,
worthy of Kubla Kahn's Xanadu dome,
Plushy and swanky with posh hanky-panky
that affluent yankees can really call home.

Hammacher Schlemmer is selling a shelter,
a push-button palace, florescent repose,
electric devices for facing a crisis,
with frozen fruit ices and cinema shows.

Hammacher Schlemmer is selling a shelter,
of chromium kitchens and rubber tile dorms
with waterproof portals to echo the chortles
of weatherproof mortals in hydrogen storms.

What a great come-to-glory emporium
to enjoy a deluxe moratorium
where nuclear heat can beguile the elite
in a creme-de-la-creme crematorium

Robert Southon, on the other hand, said bugger the Christmas presents, how was the half marathon?

Thanks for asking Robert. Getting closer to 1 hour 30 all the time, thanks. According to this, I did 1.34.11 but as well as starting the race about six minute early, the buggers also stuffed up the capture of the net time of many runners, myself included, so I WILL have my 14 seconds thank you and I WILL declare myself to have done it in 1.33. Not that you get precious about this or anything.

The Harbour Bridge course is a great run, and I came in two minutes faster than last year, feeling much more comfortable with it. Robert writes that he's running a half in Barcelona on the 27th aiming for 1.28, which gets you automatically into the New York marathon in the men's 40-50 age group. Now that's a target I could really get excited about next year.

People were asking me at the start of this week: as someone who exercises regularly and who has a heart attack in his imperfect medical history, how was I feeling? Meaning, I guess: if that can happened to Rod Donald, how much comfort can you take from pursuing good health?

How I was feeling was: this is awful for his friends and family, and it seems wrong to be dwelling on my own fortunes. And yet, it's a fair question. As we now know, it wasn't a heart attack, but it's nevertheless true that sometimes fit healthy people can die of one. Still, the more you do to protect yourself, the more you diminish your vulnerability. It doesn't give you an absolute guarantee, but it improves your prospects, and that's reason enough for me.

Beyond that, you just have to reconcile yourself to the fragility of human life. By far the greater number of us will live to 70 and beyond, but the sobering reality is that terminal illness, accident, and sheer rotten luck will take friends, family and maybe our own life sooner.

A couple of months after the heart attack, I met one of the nurses from coronary care at the swimming pool. We sat at the end of a lane, chatting. She told me: "perhaps you should prepare yourself for dying soon." I've been swimming, running and living my life with the determination to prove her wrong for the last 17 years. I might, and I might not, but it won't be for want of trying.

On a less perturbing subject, the list of Pania suspects motivated Mark Payne to write from Denmark with news that proved just how damn hard it is do something that hasn't been done somewhere else.

It must be the State of Denmark who did it, he said; they need a replacement for their own. Details here and here.

No doubt about the motive, then. As for the means, he posits that it would have been something involving an expensive chair, a blonde porn star, and a pastry. Sure, they've arrested someone else now, but how do we know they're not just leaning on this suspect just as they apparently did on the first two, to get to the big fish?

From a civil liberties point of view, you'd have to say there's something a bit perturbing about chucking the first two in the cells for the weekend, but then on the other hand, it was just one weekend. In Britain, you could be in there for thirty days.

Going yet further back in neglected correspondence - and I really promise not to get this far behind again - some interesting responses to the question of risk assessment.

I'm becoming an ever-greater disappointment to Phil Sage, I can tell, who writes: "yeah it is a real shame those church designers 500 years ago did not think about the impact of electrical lighting & EU safety directives." Look ahead, Phil, look ahead! Like Andrew, for instance, who writes:

Lighting that can enhance a room is so available, long life, low voltage high wattage bulbs, energy efficient placed around the walls using stands, lighting paintings, wall hangings, just feature lighting or hung low over work stations so cool.

As for churches, he says, they should "just go back to using candles as befits their bronze age gods and philosophies."

With such illumination, when people walk into these places they will realize they are stepping back in time…hey presto, no ladders needed for bulb changing, legislation rendered obsolete.

My principal interest, though, was the question of risk assessment and how onerous or otherwise it might be.

Adam Hunt grew up just over the border from Norfolk and is fluent in "Naaarfark" so he offered a phonetically correct risk assessment for the church in question

"Oi Jarge [george], eve yew gart toime tew change a bulb in the Chaaarch?"

"Oi dewnt new, have yew gart a loight boh"

"Its a bit hoigh boh"

"Bargered if'd oid gew up thoyar, ars abewt 50 foot boh"

"Tell yew warrrt, thaart silly owld baarrstard at the church is tew toight tew boy wun oh them long loif bulbs, sew eee makes me gew up thoyer evry yee-ar.

Woi dewnt the old twat put one o them thar lew energy lamps in, then we'd ewnly aff t gew up evry 5 yoir?"

"oh arr, but then them tory twats wouldn't have nuthin to woin abewt would they - after all, Crutch of Ungland is a bot ard up int it?"

"ohh arrr".

Sally helpfully wrote that we have much the same experience here in New Zealand.

I work for Universal Homes, and there are many firms in the construction industry that now adopt the policy that anyone [who is going to go on or work at] a building site needs to have a "Site Safety Certificate" ie they've attended a course which outlines the same sort of 'risk assessment' you mentioned. (Apparently the big companies get a discount on their ACC premiums if everyone does it)
The basis is summarised as (from memory) 5x5 - Take five minutes at the start of the job to stand back 5 steps and look for any areas of risk, and how these can be 'minimalised' (note this is not 'eliminated'). Falling is still the highest death and injury cause in the building industry.
The other main thrust of the seminar is to have a safety register- where any issue is written down, so data can be accumulated over time to determine if the problem is ongoing and can be minimalised.

For more info, she says try www.sitesafe.org.nz

Fair enough. We'd all like to live to 70 and beyond, after all.

POSTSCRIPT

One more random reflection on life, courtesy of the ever-entertaining Llew at Sunnyo who's not quite sure of its provenance.


Women are like apples on trees. The best ones are at the top of the tree. Most men don't want to reach for the good ones because they are afraid of falling and getting hurt. Instead, they just take the rotten apples from the ground that aren't as good, but easy to pick up...

The apples at the top think something is wrong with them, when in reality, they're amazing. They just have to wait for the right man to come along - the one who's brave enough to climb all the way to the top of the tree.

Share this with other women who are good apples, even those who have already been picked.

Now Men...

Men are like a fine wine. They begin as grapes, and it's up to women to stomp the shit out of them until they turn into something acceptable to have dinner with.



Have a nice weekend.