Island Life by David Slack

But Turkey's Fine

The Guardian dubbed Cindy Baxter the antipodean scourge of the oil companies. She acquired that reputation by locking horns with Shell in Nigeria, running the StopEsso campaign, taking on BP in Colombia and generally raising hell with the Seven Sisters.

That surprised me, because when she was a press secretary in the PM’s office, she was the quiet retiring type: never rattled any cages, tended to keep her thoughts to herself.

But you have to consider the times. We had all but full employment, the Labour party was the strongest it had ever been. The whole country was quietly reaping the benefits of the Douglas revolution, the farmers had never been happier and the election of 1990 loomed as a mere formality.

So. One of your feisty types.

She has been back in New Zealand for a year or so, working for Greenpeace, and we were talking a little while ago about running a few of her thoughts on the returning-expat experience.

This afternoon I was putting together a little generator thing that enables you to bullet-point your year – adapting a clever idea of Martha's - when Cindy sent this over, so I’ll tinker a bit more with the bullet-pointer, and pass the microphone over to Ms Baxter who is exercised not on matters of global warming, but rather on a pressing matter of Christmas etiquette.

Ever had one of those moments where you're at a dinner party and you're served something you hate? You have a choice: eat it and shut up, whilst trying not to make faces, and push as much of it under your fork as possible or just admit that you don't like it, don't eat it, and face the music head on. Either way it's uncomfortable.

Well this Christmas, please spare a thought for those of us who can't stand candied fruit: mince pies, Christmas cake and Christmas pudding. We are steeling ourselves for the annual onslaught of rejection.

If you're happy to eat fruit mince, then you won't have noticed the offence people can take if you refuse those precious mince pies they've slaved over. Having their special festive fare refused is tantamount to a slap in the face.

You try to just say 'no thank you' but it never seems to work - At least not the first time. 'Oh go on, I made them specially' is the next effort, followed swiftly by 'but it's good luck'. You're eventually forced into that impolite, bah humbug place where you have to emphatically state that you hate the stuff and it makes you sick.

The reactions to this (depending on the emphatic-ness of your repudiation) vary, but offence is often taken at the mildest of rejections - and you're forced into apologising for what your stomach and tastebuds tell you is a rational decision. Or you're told off for not respecting some ancient tradition or other (something about having to taste 12 different Christmas cakes in a season).

The only reason we have this stuff in our Christmas fare harks back to the pioneering days when our relations sent us cake on the boat from London. They used preserved and candied fruit so that the cake wouldn't go off on the way when posted in July. Surely we're over that old thing now and can move on to fresh fruit?

So my plea to all you hosts out there who are faced with one of us fruit mince haters: just smile and move on to another guest. Don't force them into a corner. If you do, make sure you're prepared for the consequences. Offer them something else - chocolate's always a winner.

And to you fellow-haters of fruit mince, candied peel and all those trimmings, my thoughts are with you in this festive season.

His master's voice

Sandy, when you’ve tidied this up, send it over to Licke, Spitte, Polish and Spin to give it the usual gussying up, then send it to the Minister, but for God’s sake don’t let them change it too much. We want these buggers to sit up and pay attention.
……..

Dear Pussy

Do you want to know how far Telecom’s share price will fall if you go ahead with unbundling?

Want a guess? Well do you, Pussy?

I’ll tell you.

It’ll drop 30 cents.

And what’s at stake if it drops 30 cents?

The stock market, Henry. That’s right. If we go down, you turkeys are coming down with us. Think it can’t happen? Our shares make up more than 20 per cent of the market. It’ll drop like a stone.

And why does this matter to you? Well let’s start with the Government superannuation fund.

What have you got that invested in?

That’s right, Einstein: Telecom.

How are you going to like it when the market plunges? What are you going to do when the headlines say worst day since 1987.

Yeah, yeah, big-arse companies can lose a fortune without hurting the rest of the economy. You think we were all asleep when Fletcher Challenge got carved up? Heard it all before, been to the boring business school classes, got the diploma.

But wise up Chester, we’re the big gorilla in the pen. You know and I know that it would realistically mean buggerall to the economy in the long run if we went down. In fact it would probably be quite positive for everyone who isn’t us. There’d still be a telecoms market and the rest of the economy would probably get a bit of a lift from having our chokehold taken off it.

But do you trust the voters to look that far ahead? Do you, bollocks. They’d just be all: oh no, oh no, the sky is falling, look at poor Telecom, look at the poor sharemarket, what will we do now?

You think they wouldn’t? Want to put a lazy 100 large on it? I’ve got it right now in my wallet, mate.

And if that hasn’t got your sphincter nice and tight, try this on for size: The Aussies. You dump on us and you know who gets to pick up the bone? The bloody Aussies! Telstra Bloody Clear, the mongrels. Look, they won’t do even a half-way decent job of running telecoms in New Zealand. Telcos never do any good in a foreign country. Look what a dog’s breakfast my company made of AAPT in Australia.

And another thing.

You know those flash 3G phones we sent you saps? Well you can whistle for getting any mp3s or home movies on those suckers if we don’t get what we want.

Why should we put any of our profits back into the market if un-freaking-bundling is all the thanks we get?

Stuff the upgrades, stuff the flash high speed service to every door in the country that we’ve been banging on about. You’ll get none of it.

Now be a good boy and vote like you’re told.

A one night stand with Ronald

The universities, institutions of higher learning and of course, wananga, are a little quieter this month, so let us now all spare a moment's thought for the army of young New Zealanders who are presently using their available holiday hours to wash our dishes, pour our wines, flip our burgers and do the bidding of obnoxious property developers and tax lawyers all over the Viaduct Basin. Been there, done that, got the lifelong aversion to wankers.

Let us also spare a moment to compare the size of the pay packet I took home for more or less the same work - making due historical allowance for the muscle of your friendly trade union - two decades ago.

I had an entertaining conversation with Matt McCarten the other day about his supersize my pay campaign, and his unionist-versus-boss debate on Nine to Noon with Vicki Salmon about the world's first Starbucks strike. I told him I'd all but picked up the radio and given it a shake to see if the speaker wasn't distorting, because I could swear I'd heard her described their nine dollar an hour employees as "partners".

That's a good one, I said. You heard right, he said. In fact, he said, he'd become so accustomed to hearing that kind of management gilding of the lily, that he really doesn't notice it any more.

Our partners! I've led a life a little too ordinary to comprehend all the permutations of the typical SM predilection, but I'm willing to bet that even your most elaborately nipple-clamped, cuffed and blindfolded love slave is unlikely to characterise a nine dollar an hour relationship with an international conglomerate as a "partnership".

This was more or less verified in the next sentence or two, when Linda Clark pressed Salmon on their level of staff turnover. Why, they had the best in the industry, she declared. The average was something like 135% per year, while Starbucks boasted a mere 75% or so. Again, I may be a relatively white bread sort of guy, but in my assessment, if 75% of them are moving on within a year, honey, you're not conducting relationships with "partners"; you're having a succession of one night stands.

Matt knows the numbers, and he can no doubt demonstrate to you how much better-paid, relatively speaking, I would have been when I had my turn as a "partner" in the fast food business. I can't recall for sure, but I think in 1978 I was getting $2.40 an hour.

Come with me now as I relive that wonderful first year in Wellington before I got my big break and a decent job in a pub. Once that happened, I was truly as happy as a pig in the squelching stuff, I have to say. It was still worth about 2.40 an hour, but it translated into colossally better pay thanks to the longer hours, overtime rates, and weekend penal rates. But first you have to pay your dues, and mine began at the Courtenay Place McDonalds in the winter of 1978.

What an exciting place this brand new McDonalds was to visit on a Sunday afternoon. We'd fill our trays with Big Macs, Quarter Pounders with Cheese, Hot Apple Pies and coffees and fall upon our feasts. We were way-impressed, and - it probably goes without saying - easily. I asked for a job.

Step behind the curtain; the magic evaporates. The onion comes in bags as big as your torso: desiccated little pellets that reconstitute in water. You heave the fries and the apple pies out of bathtubs of oil, and into their attractive packaging. It's a very clean kitchen with thorough procedures for keeping it spotless, but as the shift wears on, you get filmed in oil.

You also get to wear a paper cap that does nothing to imbue you with any babe magnetism, and when that gorgeous woman from your English 101 tutorial presents herself at the counter, you hope she's looking past the smock and cap and into your soul which, even as you stand there shaking fries into paper bags, suggests a certain Parisian world-weariness and great wisdom, informed by deep questions of existentialism and the theatre of the absurd.

She may have seen all this, and more besides, but it's hard to tell as she turns on her heel, makes for the door with her cheeseburger, fries and coke, and in another moment is through the doors and gone from your life for another day.

Approximately 45,000 other young people work in this store, but at closing time, just two of you are rostered on to hose down all the grease-lined trays and extractor hoods, and a vast array of small implements of preparation. An hour or two before day-break, it feels, you stow away the last of them and trudge back up Manners Street and Boulcott Street to your flat.

After a month or so of this you think: I wonder if they have any jobs at Homestead Chicken. By the next weekend, you are dumping chicken pieces in bathtubs of oil in a busy outlet on Adelaide Road.

Here, you discover that the small local chain is a bit more rough and ready than your big American one. Procedures are a little more ad hoc. The floor begins the day spotlessly clean, but within an hour you're skating across a deep film of chicken grease, which rises with every passing hour. A combination of oil and water completely soaks your socks and sneakers and begins its way up your trousers, reaching your knees by the end of your shift.

None of this is taxing work compared to three good hours on the farm, but it's pretty dreary, and you don't feel especially pleased for the customers when you see trays of cooked chicken falling to the floor, being scooped swiftly back onto the serving tray and slotted into the warming cabinet.

You may have to work a bit harder now to believe me when I tell you that this was far and away a superior-tasting chicken to the one on offer at Kentucky Fried. The shop was also quite generous at giving you plenty to take home; the flatmates loved it. I didn't trouble them with the hygiene details.

And then the summer holidays arrived. Homestead could give me a couple more shifts, but not a full time job. So I rang Kentucky Fried in Johnsonville. I had experience. At Homestead chicken. Excellent, they said, I could start on Monday. But I couldn't work for Homestead as well.

Excuse me?

They're the opposition. You'll have to choose.

This is ridiculous, I said to myself. What am I going to do? Steal the colonel's secret recipe? I decided to do both jobs and say nothing.

Johnsonville has never struck me as a very dynamic or interesting place. There was nothing about its Kentucky Fried store that offered anything to change my point of view. Business in the daytime was slow. You took your pieces of chicken, you coated them in flour, you got your great big barrel of the colonel's secret recipe of herbs and spices (which looks like gunpowder - a sort of metallic grey, with a strong smell of pepper), you shook that all over the chicken and then you loaded it all into the fridge and waited for lunchtime when you cooked a few desultory trays' worth, and watched the clock tick slowly by.

I like Bob Marley, I really do; but the summer of 1978, Is This Love was playing every seven minutes all day long on Radio Windy and it became the soundtrack of my long dull days in Johnsonville. If I ever hear the tune again it will be too soon. That and Hot Child In The City, which had the further handicap of being a piece of complete shit to begin with.

This might have all rolled along uneventfully had I not been reading a chart of sales figures on the notice board one morning as I enjoyed a cup of coffee and a smoke.

I spend every spare moment reading. I will read a muesli packet if that's the only thing on the table at breakfast. So that morning, I read the sales chart as I enjoyed my coffee and my Rothmans.

The manager was deeply suspicious. Why could I possibly be interested in this information?

Why was I reading it?

More significantly: had I really quit my job at Homestead?

I'm a keen reader; I also prefer not to lie very much. As a matter of fact, I said, I was still working at the other one. Well, mate, he said, you have to choose right now: them or us.

Too easy. The chicken tasted better at Homestead and they didn't play Radio Windy. I bailed, and got myself a second job washing dishes at The Coachman. Staff ate well at Des Britten's restaurant, and he never once asked if I was washing dishes for any other leading Wellington chef.

The next installment in this story, if you want to keep following it, appeared here last year but it doesn't exactly address the Starbucks strike issue, which you'll recall was where we began.

David Young wrote an interesting piece about the minimum wage in the Listener this week that suggested that although it may not be a job killer, it may nevertheless push the whole wage scale up. That's worth bearing in mind, but I have to say I'm behind Matt McCarten's campaign nevertheless. How far would you say 9 dollars an hour would take you?

There's an argument that low pay rates motivate people to move on up and out of these jobs and keep the skill level rising. We appreciated the opportunity, and we were willing to do a decent day's work, but I don't recall meeting anyone at McDonalds or Kentucky Fried or Homestead Chicken or the Coachman who had any plans to spend the next twenty years hosing down greasy kitchen equipment.

And we sure as hell didn't see ourselves as "partners".

Outside, It's Auckland

If you were one of the few hundred people who queued up outside Real Groovy overnight for U2 tickets, I have good news. In fact even better news than the astonishing revelation that within minutes of selling out the first show, the promoters had managed to arrange a second one. The wonderful news is that U2 is not, in fact, the only band in the world. And as if that revelation isn't exciting enough, some of them will be coming to New Zealand! This summer!

Exciting details here, here, here and here

No sneer intended in any of this, really. They're a fine band, and a line like Outside it's America still does it for me. It's just that I got a little closer to the frenzy this morning than I might otherwise have expected, and I was shocked-I-tell-you-shocked. Our neighbour asked if she could come over and use the broadband connection to improve her chances of logging on to Ticketmaster to buy a couple of tickets.

By all means, I said. She and her partner were last over here to enjoy our broadband a couple of weeks ago on the occasion of his brother's online wedding in Las Vegas, and let me tell, you that truly was fun. They brought over some bubbly and we raised our glasses to the happy gathering in the Little Chapel, Las Vegas, Nevada, as they raised theirs to everyone back in New Zelland.

This morning, I watched in less then total surprise as the Ticketmaster website groaned under the strain and failed to let Vicky log on. Continuing the sneering, I notice they use an ASP platform to run their web site. Did the ASP.Net revolution pass you by guys, or has someone taken your server hostage? Perhaps the commission on the U2 tickets might be enough to fund an overhaul.

I doubt we'll be hearing any expression of remorse from anyone about this. They'll be too busy getting the punters to jump in grateful appreciation at the second offering next Monday.

In any case, expressions of contrition really are becoming a devalued currency.

David Benson-Pope doesn't appear to feel inclined to offer anything of the sort, nor even anything more gracious than the word "bozo" to characterise the conclusions of the police who chose not to send him to the principal's office.

And Allan Peachey has cribbed from page one of the PR practitioners' manual and turned in a performance that wouldn't get you an 'Achieved" on NCEA standards.

"I made a mistake and I've said I'm sorry" is thin enough, but delivered with the bad grace that this one was, it becomes risible.

I'm just trying to think of the various things I did at school that got me into trouble and how well that strategy would have served me.

"Well yes sir, I was smoking under the bridge and it was a mistake but I said I'm sorry, now put that cane down and let's move on."

"Well yes sir, we snuck into town and had lunch at the Empire Tavern and it was a mistake, but I said I'm sorry, now let's move on."

"Well yes sir, we carved up the playing fields with a "borrowed car" and it was a mistake, but for heaven's sake I said I'm sorry, now let's move on."

There used to be a cartoon on the noticeboard of the law library when I was a student. It had the picture of an exasperated lawyer sitting across the desk from his client saying, "For pity's sake man, you need to understand: you can't shoot 37 people and expect to settle out of court."

Allan has made an interesting start and shows promise, but he must try harder.

Another Hanging

I don't know if Damian wants us to set up a bit of a Crossfire effort here, but I'll take the bait. What's up with the deification of Van Nguyen he asks.

I'd say: identification.

I don't identify with trying to sneak 400 grams worth of death sentence through Singapore, but I look at the picture of a young guy and I remember being that young. I don't identify with risking your life to help out your brother with his gambling debts, but I hear the story and I think of all the ways my brother was willing to bail me out of a jam when I was young and stupid.

Once you've identified with the subject of the story, you take more interest. It's not necessarily logical or rational, but it's how we tend to deal with the world and its news.

That's how we deal with the notion that several thousand children will die of starvation on any given day, while we go about our comfortable lives.

That's how we deal with the apparent illogicality of extensive coverage of an earthquake that kills perhaps ten people in the USA in comparison to the attention given to a flood or earthquake that kills several thousand in some more remote third world country.

If it becomes part of our immediate mental neighborhood, we pay more attention. Like politics - as Tip O'Neill is endlessly quoted - all news is local.

So we noticed what was happening to Van Nguyen, and we were drawn into the story.

Even in my natural state of incurable optimism I could see no good outcome for him, and that only amplified the sense of identification, imagining the hopeless, pitiful experience.

I remember when the same thing happened to Barlow and Chambers almost twenty years ago. That got, in my recollection, somewhat more ambivalent coverage here, and I think that was in part because that sense of identification played out a little differently. These were a couple of guys whose photos suggested something more akin to the various characters whose pictures had been splashed across our screens as the Mr Asia story had its pages turned.

Less photogenic, in other words, and should that make a difference? No, and yet it does - the identification is diminished because their image doesn't suggest the innocence that the picture of Van Nguyen does.

Yes, that's really no good basis for a distinction, but I believe we make it anyway. We identify a little more because we see in that young face, whether it's a trick of the eye or not, a less culpable character, and we therefore see him as less different to us than your sterotypical drug runner.

The whole narrative seemed all the more grim to me because I'd watched it unfold with Barlow and Chambers in KL - two guys then about the same age as me - and I'd thought: They'll cave at the last minute. They won't want to cause some international standoff.

But they didn't. I remember going out to the car to listen to the radio at the appointed hour and sure enough, they did it.

Ten or so years later, when I was making a regular trip to KL to run workshops, I went on a tour of the old city jail. I don't like to think that there was any kind of prurient curiosity to it, but perhaps I'm unreasonably ennobling my motivations. In any event, I found to my grim astonishment that the star turn of the exhibit was a presentation that takes you to the small, barren cells where the two men spent their last days, and which walks you along the corridor to the gallows where the Malaysian government made good on its conviction.

In those dismal surroundings, silence might be sufficient, you might think, but in fact there is a soundtrack playing endlessly on a less than five minute loop which builds with the sound of an accelerating heart beat and then the crash of the trapdoor.

So, again: drawn into the story.

I couldn't see a way out for Van Nguyen, and sure enough, there wasn't. It's entirely correct to argue that he is only one of many who have gone this way, and it is equally correct to argue that drugs potentially waste other lives. But taking a life in this way diminishes us, and even if we don't make the same protest in every instance, and even if we have been deluded into seeing Van Nguyen as a less culpable and more moral man than he in fact was, it does nothing to diminish the potency of the two best arguments I turn to any time this subject comes up.

One I appropriated for a black parody the other day - A Hanging by George Orwell. The other is that great old song by Steve Earle, Billy Austin, which runs like this:

My name is Billy Austin
I'm Twenty-Nine years old
I was born in Oklahoma
Quarter Cherokee I'm told
Don't remember Oklahoma
Been so long since I left home
Seems like I've always been in prison
Like I've always been alone
Didn't mean to hurt nobody
Never thought I'd cross that line
I held up a filling station
Like I'd done a hundred times
The kid done like I told him
He lay face down on the floor
guess I'll never know what made me
Turn and walk back through that door
The shot rang out like thunder
My ears rang like a bell
No one came runnin'
So I called the cops myself
Took their time to get there
And I guess I could'a run
I knew I should be feeling something
But I never shed tear one
I didn't even make the papers
'Cause I only killed one man
but my trial was over quickly
And then the long hard wait began
Court appointed lawyer
Couldn't look me in the eye
He just stood up and closed his briefcase
When they sentenced me to die
Now my waitin's over
As the final hour drags by
I ain't about to tell you
That I don't deserve to die
But there's twenty-seven men here
Mostly black, brown and poor
Most of em are guilty
Who are you to say for sure?
So when the preacher comes to get me
And they shave off all my hair
Could you take that long walk with me
Knowing hell is waitin' there
Could you pull that switch yourself sir
With a sure and steady hand
Could you still tell yourself sir
That you're better than I am
My name is Billy Austin
I'm twenty-nine years old
I was born in Oklahoma
Quarter Cherokee I'm

told

For what it's worth, the song ends with almost the same sound effect as the jail tour in KL.