Posts by JC Carter
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Speaker: Science and Democracy, in reply to Bart Janssen,
o because if you read his essays he fully references his data. Where he doesn't know himself he can access scientists who do know and can give you the citations.
So on one side we have an ethics document that attempts to tell scientists to stick to their area of expertise, yet on the other you are allowed to if you reference your data/access other scientists?
Nothing prevents any scientist from referencing any commentary or accessing other scientists which makes the section in the ethics document pointless. Cannot have it both ways.
-
only represent themselves as experts in their fields of competence as defined by their formal qualifications or other demonstrable experience (Rule 4.1(2)a)
---wouldn't that mean that the chief scientist would have to zip up about an enormous range of topics that he currently opines on?