<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Up Front: Reviewing the Election</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338996#post338996</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338996#post338996</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/67942217/health-minister-to-parents-shop-around-for-free-gp-visits" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Just for Steve Curtis</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:29:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338849#post338849</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338849#post338849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You sound like a defeatist.</q></p><p>No, I just think solving a problem the hard way is some puritanical shit. Upping political interest could work or it could continue to fail as it has done for nearly half a century. My efforts will do diddly squat for that even if I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:53:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338846#post338846</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338846#post338846</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That would be soooo much easier than just making people vote. We just have to change the entire world, how it works, and everyone in it.</q></p><p>Our grandparents managed it, and the neoliberals did it as well. Systemic change is possible. You sound like a defeatist.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:39:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338844#post338844</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338844#post338844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just imagine how much more we would put children at the centre of policy if they had a vote.</q></p><p>I keep hoping we'd have more concern for the future> As someone above said, young people have to live with it for longer. Kids also tend to go through a rabid…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:06:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338843#post338843</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338843#post338843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Maybe it's totally appropriate to let kids vote directly into the current system. That's another issue again, and it can work then great. But if it isn't then I think there's merit in at least having something.</q></p><p>My point is that if we're going to look at the arbitrary exclusion…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:51:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338814#post338814</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338814#post338814</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Really you're not supposed to vote if you've been overseas for more than 3 years &ndash; in fact you're allowed to if you come back for a visit every 3 years &ndash; when I moved to the US in the mid 80s it was as if NZ fell off the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 16:39:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338808#post338808</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338808#post338808</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This whole discussion so far has gone along the usual path of such discussions in New Zealand. Everyone is talking about method...</q></p><p>...and then you go on to discuss another method. Quite a costly one. Perhaps it could work in tandem with compulsory voting which would collect fines to offset…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:52:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338806#post338806</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338806#post338806</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm going to keep on promoting the lowering of the voting age to 12 or even 10. I would also have been a women's suffrage advocate in the decades before 1993 had I been around then. What seems unthinkable historically often becomes the norm.<br />Just imagine how much more we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 12:28:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338802#post338802</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338802#post338802</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I am in two minds about overseas voting. On the one hand, the vote is a fundamental human right of every New Zealand citizen. On the other, why should a student loan defaulter who has skipped the country to get away from their obligations get a vote? Why should someone…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:06:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338795#post338795</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338795#post338795</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So if non-voting comes down to not voting when you're young, why did young people vote in the 80's, 70's, 60's, and 50's?</p><p>I couldn't get to a booth in '93, so first voted in '96. Youf then didn't vote because Labour was the crazy right wing party being voted…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 00:28:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338786#post338786</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338786#post338786</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Except that it's a well known result in political science that voting/not-voting is a habit so it is likely that it wouldn't be a momentary bounce, it'd be a long term shift in voting propensity amongst the affected cohorts.</q></p><p>If you think it's all good to make extrapolations beyond the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:38:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338784#post338784</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338784#post338784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Except that it's a well known result in political science that voting/not-voting is a habit so it is likely that it wouldn't be a momentary bounce, it'd be a long term shift in voting propensity amongst the affected cohorts.</p><p>Further, yes, it won't fix the ongoing decline in voter turnout.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:31:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338783#post338783</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338783#post338783</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is a tricky one. On one hand I like the idea of 12 yo's having the vote because that other "Coming of age" ritual, for many, is going down the Pub. What is the first rule of Pub?<br /> You don't mention Politics or Religion.</p><p>But. Until the age of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:51:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338781#post338781</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338781#post338781</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Says something about our attitude to children and young people.</q></p><p>I guess. But it also says something about our attitude to murder and manslaughter. They're extremely serious crimes. Judges have discretion in sentencing and a premeditated murder by a young person is something that there should be very serious consequences…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:38:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338780#post338780</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338780#post338780</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Dropping the voting age, whether it is righteous or not, isn't going to do really address Emma's main point about declining turnout. Even if the dream scenario that 16 year old kids have entirely higher levels of political participation than kids 2 year older than them, something we have no…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:25:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338778#post338778</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338778#post338778</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.justice.govt.nz/policy/constitutional-law-and-human-rights/human-rights/international-human-rights-instruments/international-human-rights-instruments-1/convention-against-torture/united-nations-convention-against-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman-or-degrding-treatment-or-punishment-new-zealand-periodic-report-6/article-11/20-age-of-criminal-responsibility " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> The age of criminal responsibility in NZ is 10 years old.</a> 10 and 11 year olds can be charged with murder or manslaughter, but the idea of letting them participate in the democratic system is not even considered. Says something about our attitude to children and young people.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:49:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338777#post338777</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338777#post338777</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Yet as far as I’m aware there isn’t a similar restriction on being eligible to vote.</q></p><p>Or to be voted for.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:37:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338773#post338773</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338773#post338773</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>is that also the age at which someone can be tried as an adult in the courts?<br />No prosecution without representation…</q></p><p>According to the Juries Act of 1981, eligibility for jury service is "Every person who is currently registered as an elector". Presumably that's everyone of voting age. Listed among…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:22:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338772#post338772</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338772#post338772</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you think that the line is driving, sex, and leaving school, the voting age should be 16.</q><br />is that also the age at which someone can be tried as an adult in the courts?<br />No prosecution without representation...</p><p>is 16 also the age at which the state stops paying…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:07:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338770#post338770</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338770#post338770</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There's a strong <a href="http://www.votesat16.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">campaign in the UK</a> to lower the voting age to 16. I'm all for it. From my side of the 18 entry age of voting, the main advantage to lowering it to 16 is that because most 16-year-olds are still in school, it's easy to deliver voting…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:34:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338759#post338759</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338759#post338759</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If you think that the line is driving, sex, and leaving school, the voting age should be 16.</p><p>(PS hear hear Hilary!)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:46:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338755#post338755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338755#post338755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>what about in some kind of segregated parliamentary system that’s tied to the real one?</q></p><p>It's an interesting idea. It's also a massive and major political change to how we operate. That level of change has only happened once in my life, the switch to MMP. I don't think I'd…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:36:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338754#post338754</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338754#post338754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is there evidence that it does more than add noise to the result?</q></p><p>I'm not sure what you're asking. For it to be only noise, the people who would not have voted otherwise would have to vote randomly. If they don't, if there is a pattern to the way they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:33:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338753#post338753</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338753#post338753</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Great. Now please identify that age.</q></p><p>16-18 in NZ. </p><p>But this is my opinion and not the point I'm trying to make, which is that maturity does actually matter. If you can convince me that it's irrelevant, then the correct age is "as soon as they can mark the sheet",…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:30:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338752#post338752</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338752#post338752</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>All of those apply as equally to the 18-25 age group and can be backed up with studies of brain development.</q></p><p>Studies of brain development don't make 14 year olds have the same responsibilities as adults. Our laws and customs do. The brains of 18-25 may be less developed than…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:06:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338750#post338750</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338750#post338750</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It would be worth lowering the voting age to 12. After all our 12 year olds have access to all the knowledge and wisdom of the world at their fingertips, and most schools have some election focus at general election time. School students are also accustomed to the concept of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:28:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338746#post338746</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338746#post338746</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Gee, Moz.  It's just a compromise over not being able to vote at all, as happens presently, before people grow up and have the same rights for voting as everyone other resident. The point is to have something that might help to foster engagement earlier while people are still under…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:20:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338745#post338745</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338745#post338745</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They’ve omitted to mention the potentially preclusive step between ‘fill it in’ and ‘upload it’, namely getting the document witnessed.</q></p><p>They really did. Mark, I've been told the Justice and Electoral Select Committee is still taking submissions on the election process, even though their deadline has officially passed. I'm sure…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:11:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338740#post338740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338740#post338740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I think there’s pretty sound reasons not to let them vote, quite aside from whether they would show up. 14 year olds are legally children. They have far lesser responsibilities than adults. On average they have very rudimentary knowledge about a whole lot of very important things. And their dependence…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:16:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338732#post338732</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338732#post338732</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>what about in some kind of segregated parliamentary system that’s tied to the real one? Let younger people vote for representatives. Those reps get speaking time in parliament...{but no vote} </q></p><p>That sounds great. I'm all for it. But I don't think it goes far enough, we should do the same…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:54:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338731#post338731</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338731#post338731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I think "official" adulthood is a perfectly reasonable compromise.</q></p><p>Great. Now please identify that age.</p><p>Is it 10, the age of criminal responsibility? 16, the age at which you can consent to sex? 18, the age at which you can drink? 21, the traditional "age of majority"? 25, the age…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338719#post338719</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338719#post338719</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So now, if you’re overseas and not voting from somewhere like the Embassy in London, you can download a ballot paper, print it out, fill it in, scan it, and upload it.</q></p><p>They’ve omitted to mention the potentially preclusive step between ‘fill it in’ and ‘upload it’, namely getting the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:50:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338715#post338715</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338715#post338715</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think there’s pretty sound reasons not to let them vote, quite aside from whether they would show up. 14 year olds are legally children. They have far lesser responsibilities than adults.</q></p><p>As in my earlier comment (but which was not well phrased), what about in some kind of segregated…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:21:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338714#post338714</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338714#post338714</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> You simply have no valid data on which to base that statement.</q></p><p>That's true, but there's also no data against it. So I guess an argument based on other data we do have is all there is, and most of the evidence out there is that very young people are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:25:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338708#post338708</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338708#post338708</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Until we get to a state where neither of those parties can dominate we have no system for change.</q></p><p>I think it's important to distinguish between "most voters accept the current system" and "we can't change the system". We have the former right now, and as with the "black lives…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:43:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338694#post338694</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338694#post338694</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9QFO3V_Z4Q" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9QFO3V_Z4Q</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:03:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338692#post338692</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338692#post338692</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Same applies here. We have a system for changing the way we’re governed</q></p><p>Actually I'd argue that at the moment we don't. Much as I loathe the money grubbing venal National party and their campaign to make their mates rich I cannot see any real difference in the Labour party.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:42:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338691#post338691</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338691#post338691</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Voter turnout would drop markedly</q></p><p>If you mean turnout as a percentage of those eligible would drop then ...</p><p>Bollocks. Pure baseless speculation. 14-18 yr olds are often remarkably opinionated, usually also ill-informed, but that's not their fault. You simply have no valid data on which to base that statement.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:39:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338682#post338682</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338682#post338682</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Given that contact and engagement via political parties is a driver of voter turnout I do think we should make it easy for parties to communicate with voters if we are serious about increasing turnout and engagement.</p><p>It’s also not the case that if you stop people accessing roll data…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:25:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338679#post338679</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338679#post338679</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As far as direct mail goes,</q></p><p>Keir, if you're answering my comment I started from wanting a solution to "only people willing to have their address published can vote". As Emma alluded, not everyone who wants to keep their address private is willing (or able) to jump through legal hoops…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:43:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>NBH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338672#post338672</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338672#post338672</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Voter turnout would drop markedly.</q></p><p>If you're basing that on the existing low participation rate of 'young people', I don't think you can make that statement with such certainty.  One of the elements of the habituation argument for lowering the voting age is that because &ndash; as izogi notes above…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:40:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338671#post338671</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338671#post338671</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Higher voter turnout, like what it does achieve in Australia, over and over and over.</q></p><p>It's supposed to achieve a parliament that is fully representative of the people, whether they wanted to vote or not.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:20:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338669#post338669</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338669#post338669</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What would happen if we dropped the voting age to, say, 14?</q></p><p>Voter turnout would drop markedly.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:17:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338668#post338668</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338668#post338668</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As far as direct mail goes, (a) modern campaigns can be very very targetted, and often use demographic, geographic, and other data in ways it would be extremely hard if not impossible to replicate through an NZPost interface, and (b) it would be prohibitively expensive to use NZPost to print,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:09:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338667#post338667</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338667#post338667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If one doesn't wish to condone that, then not voting is a reasonable response.</q></p><p>Yeah, nah. Not voting is expressing consent to the current arrangement. </p><p>This is currently obvious in the USA with their "black lives don't really matter that much" campaign, where white people continue to demonstrate that they're…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:02:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338666#post338666</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338666#post338666</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Australian local election I cast a donkey vote... At the time I went to pains to search the rules about the legality of submitting spoiled ballots.</q></p><p>FWIW my understanding is that you're required to be marked off on the roll as having obtained a ballot, and you're strongly encouraged to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:57:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338664#post338664</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338664#post338664</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There is a reasonable moral argument for not voting. "Democracy" is a process which enables a plurality of the population to use violence (the power of the state comes down ultimately to a monopoly of violence) to coerce a minority to comply with its wishes. If one doesn't wish to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:32:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338663#post338663</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338663#post338663</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The reason the NZLP should have access to electoral roll data is that voter contact by political parties is a key driver of voter turnout, and voter engagement with the electoral system. And there's a similar argument for non-party groups that want to use the data for civic engagement purposes...…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:31:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338662#post338662</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338662#post338662</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Is there evidence that it does more than add noise to the result?</p><p>In my limited experience of an Australian local election I cast a donkey vote ranking thirty-something candidates, which felt stupid and destructive to their election (because adding noise is all it does) but after a few hours…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:30:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338661#post338661</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338661#post338661</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I took that oath, but consider that in a society governed by laws, the only duties of a citizen (which are much the same as the duties of someone passing through the Auckland transit lounge for 3 hours) are to obey those laws.</p><p>If there isn't a law making you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:26:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338660#post338660</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338660#post338660</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So with compulsory voting, you force the non-voters to attend the ballot and at least go through the motions of expressing a preference.</p><p>What is this meant to achieve? How is it different from declaring that the non-voters voted in the same proportion as the voters, and hence we have…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:12:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338659#post338659</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338659#post338659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What is this meant to achieve? </q></p><p>Higher voter turnout, like what it does achieve in Australia, over and over and over.</p><p><q>It’s not removing disengagement, it’s just renaming it.</q></p><p>No, it's doing a lot more than that. It's actually recording it, officially, in some detail. It's treating as a duty…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:09:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338658#post338658</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338658#post338658</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Regarding both dropping the age of suffrage and compulsory voting. If we did either of those things <em>and nothing else</em>, we'd get:</p><p> &ndash; a large waste of money, time, and effort on the part of the EC, dealing with deliberately spoiled/blank ballot papers</p><p> &ndash; a larger section of the eligible…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:01:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338657#post338657</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338657#post338657</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Rob Salmond has a <a href="http://polity.co.nz/content/electoral-roll-data" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">new post</a> up regarding access to electoral rolls. </p><p><q>The regrettable part is that this solution would perpetuate the current double standard where it is OK to run a civic participation campaign using roll information if out are also standing in the election, but not if you…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:58:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338656#post338656</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338656#post338656</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Russel Brand didn’t help much, there.</q></p><p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/russell-brand-calls-for-uk-to-join-greek-revolution-after-anticapitalist-antiausterity-coalition-syriza-wins-in-athens-10004783.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Though he seemed to change his tune when SYRIZA won in Greece</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:49:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338655#post338655</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338655#post338655</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So with compulsory voting, you force the non-voters to attend the ballot and at least go through the motions of expressing a preference.</p><p>What is this meant to achieve? How is it different from declaring that the non-voters voted in the same proportion as the voters, and hence we have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:28:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nigel McNie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338654#post338654</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338654#post338654</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I write a bit about this. I've written about the issues for online voting regarding our rights here: <a href="https://medium.com/@nigelmcnie/democratic-principles-and-online-voting-836b7dbd1c73" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://medium.com/@nigelmcnie/democratic-principles-and-online-voting-836b7dbd1c73</a></p><p>And also about New Zealand's steady march towards having online voting here: <a href="https://medium.com/@nigelmcnie/the-next-step-for-online-voting-in-new-zealand-498ce4e86201" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://medium.com/@nigelmcnie/the-next-step-for-online-voting-in-new-zealand-498ce4e86201</a></p><p>In short: In today's internet environment, it's just not possible to uphold our democratic rights to a free…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:16:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338653#post338653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338653#post338653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No, not at all, that’s kind of the opposite of what I was trying to say.</q></p><p>I did think so, thanks for clarifying.</p><p>Compulsory voting seems like such and easy fix for declining participation. We went through all this before, can't find the thread just now.</p><p>I find the arguments…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:15:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338652#post338652</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338652#post338652</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is appealing to a disenchanted niche vote wrong? If so, then we should be happy kids don’t vote.</q></p><p>No, not at all, that’s kind of the opposite of what I was trying to say. In a non-proportional system, it’s easier to ignore a minority group of voters. It’s easier for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:49:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338651#post338651</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338651#post338651</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>One of the arguments for compulsory voting is that parties would then not be able to ignore a particular section of the (eligible) population, because those people have to vote. I think that stacks up less in a proportional system, because there are fewer barriers in the way of a…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:29:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338649#post338649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338649#post338649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It could be quite a cool thing, though.  Political parties could send delegates around schools to speak to youth about their voting decisions they’d actually be making towards a real outcome, have debates and so on.  Being at local political debates is often a completely different experience from watching the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:46:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338647#post338647</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338647#post338647</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>, David Farrar used the National Party’s copy of the Roll to try to look up a female MP’s home address in order to pass it on to Cameron Slater</q></p><p>I thought Farrars prime role for national in the election area, was in the drawing of the electoral boundaries. <br />Now…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:39:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338646#post338646</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338646#post338646</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Cue people complaining about partisan teachers</q></p><p>Because partisan parents are sooooo much better</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:26:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338645#post338645</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338645#post338645</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>hacking issues</q></p><p>I'm not sure I believe that hacking an e-election is any worse than the blatant purchasing of policy by donors that exists now.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:24:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338638#post338638</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338638#post338638</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There’s a third and obvious possibility. They think that their vote doesn’t count for much in the big picture. It’s a 3 millionth share in not much by way of choice.</q></p><p>Russel Brand didn't help much, there.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:15:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338637#post338637</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338637#post338637</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What would happen if we dropped the voting age to, say, 14?</q></p><p>That could be interesting if it makes it easier for schools to foster more youth interest while they're still inside the system. (Cue people complaining about partisan teachers.)</p><p>If there are too many cold feet amongst those who…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:04:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338636#post338636</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338636#post338636</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Is it always that some people simply don’t understand politics and find it too confusing and irrelevant to bother with or don’t see options they like, or more that they don’t feel a very strong connection to New Zealand and its future?</q></p><p>There's a third and obvious possibility. They think…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:33:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338630#post338630</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338630#post338630</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I wonder whether a lot of young people just don’t ‘get’ politics. They don’t see how it is relevant. Most of the post-young people I have met who don’t vote (there aren’t many of these in my daily life, so small sample), don’t do it out of a sense of…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:39:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338623#post338623</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338623#post338623</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>we are beginning to head towards a time where hacking our elections become merely a question of cost/benefit. I'm glad to hear online voting isn't a priority for the 2017 general election at least.</q></p><p>Same here.  I think the hacking issues could be dealt with to some degree of acceptence,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:59:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338622#post338622</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338622#post338622</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>why I find the Commission so fabulous they're probably brunette and have an opinion on the Oxford comma.</q></p><p>I love them already.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:57:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>william blake</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338618#post338618</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338618#post338618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sorry I just said something verry silly. Selfie redact.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:43:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Susan Snowdon</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338615#post338615</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338615#post338615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I have a friend (mid 30s) who was finally persuaded to go on the electoral roll last year. Now she is a trifle annoyed because officialdom has found her and called her up for jury duty...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:29:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant Taylor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338611#post338611</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338611#post338611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think democracy would be much improved by the active inclusion of young people in the electoral process. Government is for the future as much as it is for the present. We might end up with more positive child and youth policies, even.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 19:29:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338606#post338606</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338606#post338606</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What would happen if we dropped the voting age to, say, 14?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:27:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338605#post338605</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338605#post338605</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>voter contact by political parties is a key driver of voter turnout</q></p><p>They don't necessarily need the roll for this.</p><p>Because the roll (thank god) doesn't have any online contact details, online engagement doesn't involve it at all. And parties can knock on doors, attend events and a bunch of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:25:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338601#post338601</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338601#post338601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Rob’s point about the double standard is well made. What I can’t see is a compelling argument as to why he, or other private individuals, should have access to that information, which outweighs concerns for people’s physical safety.</q></p><p>There isn’t one, but there isn’t one for having it available for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:03:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338600#post338600</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338600#post338600</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>more a question of perceived irrelevance</q></p><p>yeah that was what I was getting at as well.</p><p><q>I wonder whether a lot of young people just don’t ‘get’ politics.</q></p><p>And yet I disagree, they get it at the macro level, they realise that by not voting they are letting their Mom…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:56:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338599#post338599</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338599#post338599</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The reason Rob (or rather, Rob via the NZLP) should have access to electoral roll data is that voter contact by political parties is a key driver of voter turnout, and voter engagement with the electoral system. And there's a similar argument for non-party groups that want to use the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:52:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Andrew</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338598#post338598</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338598#post338598</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not because they can’t change the result (they know they can) but because a change in the name of the government makes no real difference.To be deeply cynical, they are all baddies, they just wear different coloured T-shirts, red, blue, green, and yellow</q></p><p>It doesn't matter who you vote for,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:49:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant Taylor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338596#post338596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338596#post338596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>those folks abstaining from the vote do it casually </q></p><p>I wasn't thinking of it being 'casual' disinterest, Bart &ndash; more a question of perceived irrelevance. I think Emma addresses this in her imagined campaign message to young people, trying to make it relevant by playing a generation gap dynamic:</p><p><q>.…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:41:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338594#post338594</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338594#post338594</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But I also think there is a level of frustration with the lack of difference between the “goodies” and the “baddies” that leaves many with the feeling that their vote does not matter.</q></p><p>So, the EC ran those ‘your vote is a powerful thing’ ads with the changing faces. But…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:31:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338592#post338592</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338592#post338592</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>so that when the big game comes around, they know who the goodies and baddies are, which side they are on, and at least roughly the rules and objectives of the game,</q></p><p>I think that kind of underrates those who have chosen not to vote. There is an assumption that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:20:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant Taylor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338589#post338589</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338589#post338589</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The declining participation rate is a really serious concern for some pretty obvious reasons, some of which are probably practical (such as general acceptance of the rule of law) as well as matters of principle. Thinking about how people might get exposed to politics between elections (so that when the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:34:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338588#post338588</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338588#post338588</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The recommendations on the Electoral Roll run pretty contrary to Rob Salmond’s arguments that the data be made more open – interesting to see it come up here.</q></p><p>Okay, to me this looks like two people/groups identifying similar problems, and suggesting different solutions. So at the moment, </p><p><q>If rolls and…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:18:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338587#post338587</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338587#post338587</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The recommendations on the Electoral Roll run pretty contrary to Rob Salmond's arguments that the data be made <a href="http://polity.co.nz/content/my-submission-2014-election-inquiry" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">more open</a> &ndash; interesting to see it come up here.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:44:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338586#post338586</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338586#post338586</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Was there an option for, “because all the candidates were lying cheating scumbags”?</q></p><p>Um... there's "Didn't know who to vote for", I guess...</p><p><q>How did you manage to write an entertaining column about voting? </q></p><p>But Bart, voting is fascinating. Utterly fascinating. Let me tell you all about the EC's plans…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:33:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338584#post338584</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338584#post338584</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The main reasons non-voters gave for not voting ...</q></p><p>Was there an option for, "because all the candidates were lying cheating scumbags"?</p><p>And</p><p>How did you manage to write an entertaining column about voting? <genuflects></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:26:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338582#post338582</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338582#post338582</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It creates an environment that changes humanity into extremism in the minds of voters.</q></p><p>Word.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:15:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338581#post338581</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338581#post338581</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Democracy is as much about consultation &amp; participation as it is about voting.  Hence the failed “democracies” where voting has been established but after that it’s corrupt business and authority as usual. </p><p>The demise of real consultation and a sense that most citizens’ opinions no longer matter loom as a crisis…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:10:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338580#post338580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338580#post338580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Meanwhile the enfranchised majority vote for the same old spanners who are dismantling our country nut by bolt, creating further disenfranchisement.</q></p><p>I think it's worth noting that, of 670 'informal' votes, 66% were people casting a party vote, and not a candidate vote. Only 2% were the other way around.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:05:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338579#post338579</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338579#post338579</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is the voter turnout graph based on ‘all voters’ or those ‘enrolled to vote’ voters.</q></p><p>It's not completely clear from context, but the figure given in the point immediately underneath it is "voter turnout of those eligible to enrol".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:56:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>william blake</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338578#post338578</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338578#post338578</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Citizens who do not vote presumably feel disenfranchised, even in an MMP system, for a raft of personal reasons. I think it is a difficult argument to win over a voter to cast their vote for the least damaging candidate.</p><p>Meanwhile the enfranchised majority vote for the same old spanners…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:47:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Curtis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338577#post338577</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338577#post338577</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Is the voter turnout graph based on 'all voters' or those 'enrolled to vote' voters.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:40:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338575#post338575</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338575#post338575</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As an aside, to add in that the website with all NZ’s legislation has been tweaked to improve accessibility. See the bottom of <a href="http://t.co/V8sqO3kcNg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://t.co/V8sqO3kcNg</a> </q></p><p>About bloody time. I spent the whole of the PAL project hammering the need into them (I ran the Government Web Standards programme from 2002-2005 and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:22:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nigel McNie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338574#post338574</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338574#post338574</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Indeed, that's a really good point. There are some myths around online voting, and the "it might lift turnout" is so common it make me ill. It was even listed as one of the main benefits in the Online Voting Working Group's report, despite Elections (and Statistics NZ) sitting on…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:17:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338571#post338571</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338571#post338571</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm glad to hear online voting isn't a priority for the 2017 general election at least.</q></p><p>Yeah, me too. Technical and social issues aside, it in no way addresses what the Commission identifies as the issues with voter turnout: engagement, and valuing one's vote.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:11:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nigel McNie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338570#post338570</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338570#post338570</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"...you can download a ballot paper, print it out, fill it in, scan it, and upload it."</p><p>As the number of votes received from overseas grows, and as the internet voting push from government moves forward, we are beginning to head towards a time where hacking our elections become merely…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:52:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338568#post338568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338568#post338568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Just a few reasons why we shouldn't take our electoral agencies &mdash; and the job they do exceptionally well &mdash; for granted as much as we do.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:46:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Phil Lyth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338563#post338563</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338563#post338563</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As an aside, to add in that the website with all NZ's legislation has been tweaked to improve accessibility. See the bottom of <a href="http://t.co/V8sqO3kcNg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://t.co/V8sqO3kcNg</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:46:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338562#post338562</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338562#post338562</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That was my favorite part! I’m getting misty-eyed just thinking about reading it.<br />[not joking]</q></p><p>There is, basically, a whole 'nother column in there about accessibility issues.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:44:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338561#post338561</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338561#post338561</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I haven’t even touched on the Commission’s award-winning work on providing secret voting for visually-impaired people.</q></p><p>That was my favorite part! I'm getting misty-eyed just thinking about reading it.<br />[not joking]</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:43:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338560#post338560</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-reviewing-the-election/?p=338560#post338560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:43:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
