<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Up Front: Outraged of Sockburn</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=135035#post135035</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=135035#post135035</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In New Zealand, you more than likely know the friends or family of an actor in question (that is if you don't know them directly). Does that make fancying them even more wrong?</p></blockquote><p>It certainly makes it *feel* wrong.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:55:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=135003#post135003</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=135003#post135003</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not when you see them in the supermarket.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:12:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=135002#post135002</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=135002#post135002</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In New Zealand, you more than likely know the friends or family of an actor in question (that is if you don't know them directly). Does that make fancying them even more wrong?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:09:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134997#post134997</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134997#post134997</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And speaking of Havoc <a href="http://www.outrageousfortune.co.nz/people/cast/claire-chitham/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fancying</a>, or not so much any more..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:53:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134992#post134992</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134992#post134992</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Didn't Outrageous Fortune work the relative strengths of Van and Jethro into the storyline about fathering the twins? Spunk and loyalty.</p><p>The wrongness of Loretta fancying was also addressed overtly if I recall. And check <a href="http://www.outrageousfortune.co.nz/2009/10/antonia-prebble-supports-the-movember-foundation/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the mo</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:44:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134990#post134990</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134990#post134990</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>most of us make decisions about whether or not we'd like to sleep with someone after that person has moved or spoken.</p></blockquote><p>Oh yes. A good gait or gravelly purr works wonders.  And (striking generalisation) women have been known to pay attention to body language that signals social rank and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:36:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134989#post134989</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134989#post134989</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I am not disputing that, in any way. Jethro would be a cruel, selfish bastard.</p></blockquote><p>And yet....</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:36:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134988#post134988</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134988#post134988</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Maybe part of the appeal of the women in Bones (right with ya there, btw) is that their characters are also really, really smart?</p></blockquote><p>Yup. I'll broaden that to really talented, which is something I find engaging and attractive. I find people who have and use talent much more attractive…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:35:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134985#post134985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134985#post134985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Lyndon, wasn't that about men falling asleep?</p><p>More? Pish.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:31:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134984#post134984</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134984#post134984</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think Van would be much the more attentive lover.</p></blockquote><p>I <3 you Russell.</p><p>And Emma, also a yes here to Loretta.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:29:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134983#post134983</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134983#post134983</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I also fancy Loretta.</p></blockquote><p>As would I, if it didn't seem so wrong.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:28:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134981#post134981</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134981#post134981</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think Van would be much the more attentive lover.</p></blockquote><p>I am not disputing that, in any way. Jethro would be a cruel, selfish bastard. I also fancy Loretta.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:25:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134980#post134980</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134980#post134980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>evo psych as if it's the Sacred Truth on sexual behaviour</p></blockquote><p>Secondhand story, but I believe it was someone who taught philosphy of science had a favourite hypothetical example:</p><p>Why do women orgasm less than men? Someone has to stay up and watch for predators...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:20:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134979#post134979</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134979#post134979</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I can even get this slightly back on topic. I fancy Jethro, but not Van. Same facial features, proportions, same genes...</p></blockquote><p>I think Van would be much the more attentive lover.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:10:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134978#post134978</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134978#post134978</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Heterosexual men are typically attracted to several basic features in women most of which can be directly linked to reproductive success (hips, breasts, youth, fitness).</p></blockquote><p>Woah there. Maybe <em>part</em> of the appeal of the women in <em>Bones</em> (right with ya there, btw) is that their characters are also really, really…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:09:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134977#post134977</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134977#post134977</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Standard Disclaimer for this argument: I've got no problem with evo psych in itself. I think it gives us valuable knowledge and insight. What I do have a problem with is the presentation of evo psych as if it's the Sacred Truth on sexual behaviour, and the media's habit of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:05:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134975#post134975</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134975#post134975</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>'GRARGHevolutionarybiologyevolutionarypsychologySTABBY!'</p></blockquote><p>Whereas I like your version much better Danielle :).</p><p>This stuff fascinates me precisely because of the really wonderful mix of things that go into deciding whether or not they "wouldn't kick out of bed".</p><p>The reality is that biology plays a part but it by no means is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:03:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134972#post134972</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134972#post134972</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That suggests that attractiveness is far more complex than basic evolutionary biology would suggest.</p></blockquote><p>Thank GOD you said this, because I started writing a post three times and became entirely too tired to finish it. The basic gist was 'GRARGHevolutionarybiologyevolutionarypsychologySTABBY!', so yours put it much better.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:50:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134968#post134968</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134968#post134968</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Can't be doing with pretty boys.</p></blockquote><p>Which means Jackie and I can divide up and pursue different men instead of wasting energy competing for the same ones. </p><p>A theory only slightly dampened by John Barrowman's extreme gayness.</p><p>I can even get this slightly back on topic. I fancy Jethro, but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:34:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134965#post134965</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134965#post134965</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Some fanciers of men even think this guy is a smarmy git.</blockquote> Oh, I agree. Can't be doing with pretty boys. But then I fancy Mikey Havoc, so I could quite possibly be deemed the least qualified person in the world to say who's attractive to other people.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:16:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134951#post134951</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134951#post134951</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And yes of course there is a broad spectrum and outliers.</p></blockquote><p>'Outliers' suggests a scenario where most people agree about who is attractive, and a few people disagree. But as Megan says, you have to actually work quite hard to find a person that most members of the requisite gender/sexual…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:16:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134946#post134946</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134946#post134946</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I have been, with 3 close friends, for 2 years, trying to find a "universally attractive" man.</p><p>Four heterosexual women of similar age, and we are yet to find one we all think is incredibly attractive. (Apparently one of them just doesn't get the Kahui thing.)</p><p>We've found a lot…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:54:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134940#post134940</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134940#post134940</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Everyone finds different things attractive, don't they?</p></blockquote><p>OK a very PC answer and sure I agree to a point.</p><p>BUT</p><p>Heterosexual men are typically attracted to several basic features in women most of which can be directly linked to reproductive success (hips, breasts, youth, fitness). Similarly with heterosexual women although…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:26:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134932#post134932</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134932#post134932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Everyone finds different things attractive, don't they?</p></blockquote><p>Yes indeedy. While I'm not the only bisexual woman I know whose long-term relationship operates under an Angelina Exception, you could survey both groups and get some average data, but the variation inside the groups would be so big it'd be difficult to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:51:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JackElder</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134928#post134928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134928#post134928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Are bisexual women attracted to the same women to which heterosexual men are attracted?</p></blockquote><p>People are people. Most people are attracted to at least some other people.  The type of people who people are attracted to varies from person to person.  </p><p>Which is to say:  there isn't a single type…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:33:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134925#post134925</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134925#post134925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>...and none of the women?</p></blockquote><p>OK since this is about the only place I can ask the question...</p><p>Are bisexual women attracted to the same women to which heterosexual men are attracted?</p><p>I know I can't remotely predict which men women find attractive and frequently find myself saying "you like…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:20:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134919#post134919</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134919#post134919</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hart Hanson? The guy who made a character bisexual, then three episodes later forgot and had her panting after every guy in the place and none of the women?</p></blockquote><p>Oh yes... the Year of The Has-bian. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:07:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134910#post134910</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134910#post134910</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hart Hanson? The guy who made a character bisexual, then three episodes later forgot and had her panting after every guy in the place and none of the women?</p><p>A sitcom is necessarily different from a drama that has some light relief. I haven't seen that particular episode of BBT…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:29:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134909#post134909</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134909#post134909</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But isn't that the art of comedy?</p></blockquote><p>Sure, but I also understand why folks like Bill Prady and Bones creator Hart Hanson just don't view the autistic spectrum as a laughing matter &mdash; and that's not necessarily a bad thing.  I think it was Hanson who said that if he…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:16:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134905#post134905</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134905#post134905</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Put the label of Asperger's on her, and would the reading inevitably become open to something more distasteful...</p></blockquote><p>But isn't that the art of comedy? To me the very best, most enjoyable comedy is that which exposes what it is to be human, in its sometimes embarrassing detail. And surely…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:57:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134773#post134773</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134773#post134773</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>We were in fits over the most recent ep to screen here &mdash; where Leonard's mother comes to visit and totally bonds with Sheldon &mdash; because it's like one long Asperger's joke.</p></blockquote><p>Though its quite understandable how actor Jim Parsons and the producers of the show get <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2210635/pagenum/all/#p2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">rather twitchy</a> at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:54:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Judi Lapsley Miller</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134687#post134687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134687#post134687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We love Big Bang too, which is another data point strengthening the correlation between degree of personal geekiness and love of the show. But it is a documentary, not a sitcom isn't it ;-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:41:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134674#post134674</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134674#post134674</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And why didn't I look into <em>Outrageous Fortune</em> earlier? Obviously I've been away from home far too long. Am, erm, obtaining it now to check it out properly.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:10:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134672#post134672</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134672#post134672</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Eh, I thought the sex scenes in The L Word were pretty good, actually. Sure, manicured and glossy, but no more so than the rest of the show. Seemed pretty realistic to me, in an LA-showbiz power-dyke kind of way.</p><p>Now, talking about realistic lesbo scenes, <em>Bound</em> still wins for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:05:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134656#post134656</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134656#post134656</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yeah, well the WebMarshall at work has blacklisted PAS now because of an earlier 'Upfront' thread so now I have to take the laptop in, connect to the interweb with a modem and have a sly read rather than just getting it up (ooh-err) on the PC via the company…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:55:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134653#post134653</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134653#post134653</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There's probably a reason I shouldn't be this incredibly proud of that, but I can't think of one.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:35:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134652#post134652</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134652#post134652</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Actually I've got a slightly legitimate reason for a greater-than-can-be-usually-mentioned-in-polite-company knowledge of porn &ndash; my day-job is blocking spam, and I've had to read an awful lot of it. I've also had to experiment with visual classifiers, which does involve having a 'corpus' of data.</p></blockquote><p>Speaking of which: Hart's Law…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:02:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134642#post134642</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134642#post134642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Nimoy probably does. Part of his strangeness..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:06:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134637#post134637</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134637#post134637</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Brilliant!</p></blockquote><p>Leonard Nimoy's DNA. I squeed so bad.</p><p>Also, know what Leonard (not Nimoy) sleeps in after sex? There's a t-shirt. And some boxers... Does nobody sleep naked in the States?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:56:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134633#post134633</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134633#post134633</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>We were in fits over the most recent ep to screen here &mdash; where Leonard's mother comes to visit and totally bonds with Sheldon</p></blockquote><p>...and the ep where Sheldon attempts to understand the etiquette of gift-giving. Brilliant!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:39:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134631#post134631</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134631#post134631</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What is everyone else supposed to be seeing in it?</p></blockquote><p>We loved it, which is unsurprising given how many 'the physics are stupid in X fantasy series' discussions I've sat through (alright, led).</p><p>Since it's been on TV we've been watching it with our kids, and our nearly-14 yo son…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:17:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134629#post134629</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134629#post134629</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Me too.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:09:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134628#post134628</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134628#post134628</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It perpetually amazes me that The Big Bang Theory has enough of an audience to survive. Seems like it's directly targeted at me and my bestest friends. What is everyone else supposed to be seeing in it?</p></blockquote><p>My darling and I also have that feeling that it's made just for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:06:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134617#post134617</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134617#post134617</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No, but they're so horribly put upon by the non-penis bearing half of the human race.</p></blockquote><p>We must be watching a different show. I don't think either gender comes across in a particularly well-rounded light.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:18:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134612#post134612</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134612#post134612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Of course, Two and A Half Men is based primarily on malice but it is such well-written and well-delivered malice...</p></blockquote><p>So is <em>Fawlty Towers</em> &mdash; and Sybil Fawlty may well have been the mother of all untameable shrews but 1) who wouldn't be driven insane by Basil, and 2) there…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:50:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134609#post134609</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134609#post134609</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						@Sacha and Sue &ndash; thanks for that. May need to fill myself in, as it were.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:35:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134603#post134603</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134603#post134603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>i think they are showing everything from the very beginning starting next Tuesday.</p></blockquote><p>Actually they start repeating Outrageous Fortune tonight at 9.30pm on tv3.  </p><p>I presume it's right from the first episode, though they showed that series last year. Its hit-the-ground-running greatness fair blew me away at the time.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:45:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134599#post134599</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134599#post134599</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Are there numbers somewhere for this?</p></blockquote><p>Oops, you're right. I'd searched the internet but unfortunately came back with a sample of well rated OF episodes and badly rated international rugby.</p><p><a href="http://www.throng.co.nz/blog/agb-nielsen" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here</a> are some more comprehensive numbers, giving 6 international rugby matches an average of 479.4k, and 10 OF episodes an…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:20:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134597#post134597</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134597#post134597</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ratings, schmatings!  Let's not subscribe to the idea that Peoplemeter measurements* are anything to do with accurate audience measurement, nor anything much to do with what television viewing might be.</p><p>* which claim to measure "Presence in a room where a television set is on' in a sample of 500…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:05:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134595#post134595</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134595#post134595</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>To tie this into another recent discussion: OF gets higher ratings than rugby. Admittedly being free-to-air helps.</p></blockquote><p>Are there numbers somewhere for this? Because I'm slightly surprised. Single sports events tend to do very well. Usually in prime time, usually on a weekend etc. So is that on average, or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:38:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brodie Davis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134594#post134594</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134594#post134594</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For some reason I can never get into big bang theory,  I guess the years of watching great british comedys (coupling, etc) means that I just can't stomach laughter tracks anymore.    Unless its a standup/talk/guest show I don't need to hear what the audience found funny.  And I sure don't…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:37:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anth</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134586#post134586</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134586#post134586</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						To tie this into another recent discussion: OF gets higher ratings than rugby. Admittedly being free-to-air helps.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:52:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134584#post134584</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134584#post134584</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Of course, Two and A Half Men is based primarily on malice but it is such well-written and well-delivered malice--the kind of put-downs we wish we had thought of when faced with human self-delusion or stupidity?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:45:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134568#post134568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134568#post134568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I presumed that was the entire lesson of the show. It's not so unrealistic either &ndash; it seems to me that the men who insist on the most freedom from female influence in their thought patterns are by far the biggest slaves to women.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:42:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134565#post134565</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134565#post134565</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Are there any nuanced male characters in it, for that matter?</p></blockquote><p>No, but they're so horribly put upon by the non-penis bearing half of the human race.  Sex may well make fools of us all, but there's the merest hint of a possibility men have something to do with their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:37:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134558#post134558</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134558#post134558</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Although: rule 34. Does that work for TV?</p></blockquote><p>I'm not sure anyone has written the rules of New Zealand television. Well, the BSA, but they don't count for our purposes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:09:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134557#post134557</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134557#post134557</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Are there any nuanced male characters in it, for that matter?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:40:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134549#post134549</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134549#post134549</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It perpetually amazes me that The Big Bang Theory has enough of an audience to survive. Seems like it's directly targeted at me and my bestest friends. What is everyone else supposed to be seeing in it?</p></blockquote><p>Its a pretty traditional &mdash; if very well-cast and executed &mdash; sitcom (social…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:36:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134545#post134545</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134545#post134545</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Are you guys telling me that there is a Game show on TV with sex scenes?</p></blockquote><p>As far as I can tell....no? </p><p>(Although: rule 34. Does that work for TV?)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:45:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Amy Gale</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134540#post134540</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134540#post134540</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think all good TV now must be targeted at some sort of geek market.</p></blockquote><p>It perpetually amazes me that The Big Bang Theory has enough of an audience to survive. Seems like it's directly targeted at me and my bestest friends. What is everyone else supposed to be seeing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:09:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Yamis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134538#post134538</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134538#post134538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As a westie high school teacher I'd say most of the characters would be our low to mid graduates.</p><p>Fortunately this year my 7th form geo class would give a WTF?! response to most character behaviour.</p><p>Personally I'd date Pascalle though.  Just don't tell my kids.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:54:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134536#post134536</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134536#post134536</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So, this means I'm not the only person with a list of OF characters in order of bonkability? (Basically, you just make a list in order of niceness, and then tip it upside down.)</p></blockquote><p>I work on stupidity, and no inversion necessary &mdash; but I'll spare everyone the epic over…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:48:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134534#post134534</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134534#post134534</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I am reading this thread with much amazement. Are you guys telling me that there is a Game show on TV with sex scenes?<br />What are the prizes like?.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:53:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134533#post134533</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134533#post134533</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah, we've liked Glee a lot too.</p><p>Quite happy to just re-adjust to the local screening schedule though.</p><p>Unlike True Blood, where a certain person in the house <em>had</em> to see it <em>as soon as humanly possible</em>. Or, I suppose, non-humanly possible ...</p><p>Just watched ep 1 of HBO's [[http://goldkicks.blogspot.com/2009/09/hbos-bored-to-death.html|Bored…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:26:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134532#post134532</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134532#post134532</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm deriving a certain amount of wry amusment from your willingness to (ahem) 'let it all hang out' vis-a-vis your knowledge of porn, and the contrast with your reaction to something as anodyne as 'two-and-a-half men' (ugh! disgusting! of course I never watch that crap!)</p></blockquote><p>I did it just for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:05:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134531#post134531</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134531#post134531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's coming soon to TV3, Danielle. PASS</p></blockquote><p>And can I just reccommend that everyone watches it, because it is AWESOME. (And, for some weird reason, doing double-duty as a rest home for secondary characters from Heroes.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:49:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134528#post134528</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134528#post134528</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>if I happened to be bisexually inclined...</p></blockquote><p>That's, what, 65°?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:47:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134524#post134524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134524#post134524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>True Blood....Jason Stackhouse wanders into shot ballocks naked</p></blockquote><p>We just chewed our way through the first series in a couple of weekends (Must....have! More......box sets! Graaaagh!! The Hunger!!!)</p><p>Am I alone in being more than a little disturbed by the scene with him and the Laura Bush mask? :)</p><blockquote><p>I'll…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:04:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134519#post134519</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134519#post134519</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So, this means I'm not the only person with a list of OF characters in order of bonkability? (Basically, you just make a list in order of niceness, and then tip it upside down.)</p><blockquote><p>if I happened to be bisexually inclined...</p></blockquote><p>Don't let me get in your way, I'll be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:29:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tony Parker</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134518#post134518</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134518#post134518</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But, damn it, if I happened to be bisexually inclined there is no way I'd kick Robyn Malcolm and Kirk Torrance out of bed if they were offering.</p></blockquote><p>There's a number of older single women teachers at school who would quite happily have Judd/Torrance's shoes under their bed.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:20:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sayana</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134517#post134517</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134517#post134517</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Up until, oh about 3 episodes ago, I had never seen more than about 30 seconds of Outrageous Fortune. </p><p>Then I went to visit a certain friend who was recovering after a major operation and was subjected to a Whole Episode. </p><p>So now, I have how many series to catch…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:17:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134513#post134513</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134513#post134513</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>My wife and I have this conversation regularly. The room that, for example, HBO shows get to 'breathe' and develop compared to network shows is quite noticable.</p></blockquote><p>But how about <em>True Blood</em>?  That show is so awesomely, multi-levelled stupid its brilliant.  And the moment the guy who plays Jason Stackhouse…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:39:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134512#post134512</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134512#post134512</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Not to mention The L Word</p></blockquote><p>Um, good call... If you're slightly beyond being titilated by the idea of ladies enjoying an occasional helping of muff then 'The L Word' kind of worked as an utterly gonzo soap opera &mdash; West Hollywood 90210, if you like or Grey's Clitoris. Not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:37:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134510#post134510</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134510#post134510</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The characters talk about sex constantly, but Charlie, the ultimate he-whore, is always shown in bed in a t-shirt, boxers, and sometimes socks.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>This is the standard apparel of male porno stars. I don't think the joke is lost on 50% of the audience. I see coded references to hetero…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:21:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134509#post134509</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134509#post134509</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>re HBO and American network TV. By some coincidence, I did a lecture today on HBO as 'transgressive' television, quoting both David Chase ("I had had it up to here with all the niceties of network television...I don't mean language and I don't mean violence. I just mean storytelling, inventiveness,…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:16:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sue</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134508#post134508</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134508#post134508</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And I have to admit that I made the decision early on not to watch OF. I can't remember why. I now regret that decision.</p></blockquote><p>i think they are showing everything from the very beginning starting next Tuesday.  </p><p>or you could pop down to the local library and rent it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:05:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134504#post134504</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134504#post134504</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I mean to say: we can hope for much more (I do) but can expect the least they can get away with.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:44:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134503#post134503</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134503#post134503</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>if the [OF] sex scenes are all Emma's making them out to be.</p></blockquote><p>They're often funny, which is also rare in TV sex land.</p><blockquote><p>Do you mean that The L Word has realistic sex scenes?</p></blockquote><p>Realistic? Oh dear no, that is not what I turn to television for. I can…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:33:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134501#post134501</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134501#post134501</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And I have to admit that I made the decision early on not to watch OF. I can't remember why. I now regret that decision.</p></blockquote><p>Me too. I could invent a reason though. Fortunately, you can rent the earlier seasons on DVD &ndash; I'm sorely tempted, if the sex scenes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:12:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134500#post134500</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134500#post134500</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Do you mean that The L Word has realistic sex scenes?</p></blockquote><p>Heh, well it deviates from the Standard Sex Scene in one way, which is one way more than most shows do.</p><p>But I'm equally happy about the whole Hoochie Mamma philosophy &ndash; that you don't have to be angular…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:09:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134498#post134498</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134498#post134498</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh god, have I missed the beginning of that series? FAIL.</p></blockquote><p>It's coming soon to TV3, Danielle. PASS</p><p>And I have to admit that I made the decision early on not to watch OF. I can't remember why. I now regret that decision.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:06:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134497#post134497</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134497#post134497</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>. . . gleefully set fire to it like you would a wanker's townhouse.</p></blockquote><p>Excellent, very excellent.<br />Though you'd probably need to bring your own accelerant as it'd be a bit, you know, soggy.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:59:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134496#post134496</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134496#post134496</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Glee, of all things</p></blockquote><p>Oh god, have I missed the beginning of that series? FAIL.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:55:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134495#post134495</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134495#post134495</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The characters talk about sex constantly, but Charlie, the ultimate he-whore, is always shown in bed in a t-shirt, boxers, and sometimes socks.</p></blockquote><p>This is the standard apparel of male porno stars. I don't think the joke is lost on 50% of the audience. I see coded references to hetero…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:52:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JoJo</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134494#post134494</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134494#post134494</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Not to mention The L Word</p></blockquote><p>Do you mean that  The L Word has realistic sex scenes? Not in my queer world. It may be a little more realistic than some shows, but it's still essentially Emma's "one attractive woman and one attractive [wo]man, aged between twenty and forty". It's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:51:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134493#post134493</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134493#post134493</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Not to mention The L Word, although I guess that falls under your umbrella of "A couple of U.S. cable-only shows and British gay-specific dramas aside..."</p></blockquote><p>Originally a long rambling paragraph that mentioned The L Word and Queer as Folk by name, then I thought about Torchwood, tried to go…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:45:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134492#post134492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134492#post134492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There's a sex scene (of all things) American Pie that I thought was quite realistic. It was the couple's first time and they awkward and not quite sure what to do and then it was over quickly.</p></blockquote><p><em>Glee</em>, of all things, has also had a couple of quasi-sex scenes of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:43:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134491#post134491</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134491#post134491</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm a non-Outrageous watcher, but I knew something major had gone down when I was checking Twitter this morning and found a succession of "Fuuuuuuuuuuuck!" comments from late last night.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:40:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134488#post134488</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134488#post134488</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What, you mean with the neck-biting and the blood drinking and the sharp! pointed! teeth! and the 'crawling out of the ground covered in soil' and all that?</p></blockquote><p>Well, they are vampires--and I don't know whether they wear socks.</p><p>As Bill and Sookie are an item in 'real life', I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:30:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134486#post134486</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134486#post134486</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>and sometimes socks.</p></blockquote><p>Business socks?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:28:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134485#post134485</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134485#post134485</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not to mention The L Word, although I guess that falls under your umbrella of "A couple of U.S. cable-only shows and British gay-specific dramas aside..." A refreshing antidote to the usual fare, although (see Richard) not necessarily the most accurate televisual depiction of LA sapphistry and/or real estate afforded…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:27:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134484#post134484</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134484#post134484</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Would you make an exception for HBO dramas such as Six Foot Under or True Blood?</p></blockquote><p>The most disturbing sex scene in <em>Six Feet Under</em> has no sex or nudity in it at all, just... <em>nuzzling</em>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:25:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134483#post134483</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134483#post134483</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Would you make an exception for HBO dramas such as Six Foot Under or True Blood? The sex in the latter is pretty damn spot-on (or so I have been told!)</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, True Blood was one of the cable shows I had in mind there. I wonder if, though, the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:17:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jed Soane</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134482#post134482</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134482#post134482</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There's a sex scene (of all things) American Pie that I thought was quite realistic. It was the couple's first time and they awkward and not quite sure what to do and then it was over quickly.</p></blockquote><p>I'm still practicing to make sure my first time isn't like that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:16:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134481#post134481</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134481#post134481</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The sex in the latter is pretty damn spot-on (or so I have been told!)</p></blockquote><p>What, you mean with the neck-biting and the blood drinking and the sharp! pointed! teeth! and the 'crawling out of the ground covered in soil' and all that?</p><p>And I've lost count of the number…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:16:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134480#post134480</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134480#post134480</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Would you make an exception for HBO dramas such as Six Foot Under or True Blood?  The sex in the latter  is pretty damn spot-on (or so I have been told!)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:07:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134479#post134479</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134479#post134479</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There's a sex scene (of all things) American Pie that I thought was quite realistic. It was the couple's first time and they awkward and not quite sure what to do and then it was over quickly.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:58:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134478#post134478</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134478#post134478</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not going to promise, or even ask, that the comment thread be that way. What you read from this point on is your own responsibility.</p></blockquote><p>I'm one of those annoying (and sometime, annoyed) people who doesn't feel they can watch something from halfway, or miss out bits in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:50:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>richard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134477#post134477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134477#post134477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ooh, ooh, I know this one! That's sarcasm, isn't it? I've been hearing about that...</p></blockquote><p>Like many people, I am occasionally a little bit sarky. But you say it almost like it's a bad thing :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:38:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134474#post134474</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134474#post134474</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well previously I was using my own taxonomy (who gives a shit what other people are calling things ;-)</p><p>#OF!OF!OF!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:27:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134473#post134473</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134473#post134473</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I didn't even bother hashtagging, figured *everyone* would know what I was taking about.</p></blockquote><p>I did actually pause last night trying to work out what hash-tag I should be using. The agony of the early adopter...</p><blockquote><p>The poor job TV dramas usually make of portraying sex has always surprised me…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:25:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>richard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134471#post134471</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134471#post134471</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The poor job TV dramas usually make of portraying sex has always surprised me as well, given how accurate they are with everything else. </p><p>(I, for instance, used to live in a New York apartment at least as nice as the one on Friends.).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:18:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134470#post134470</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134470#post134470</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I didn't even bother hashtagging, figured *everyone* would know what I was taking about.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:17:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kmont</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134469#post134469</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134469#post134469</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The people running the official Outrageous Fortune Twitter account were beside themselves, although I think they may have been drinking.</p></blockquote><p>It would be unprofessional not to frankly.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:16:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134467#post134467</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134467#post134467</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It was fun last night watching #outrageous tweets show up on TrendsMap &mdash;  biggest in Auckland, but right down the country, and in the Australian cities and in London.</p><p>It was trending No.1 at about 11pm &mdash; which  resulted in:</p><p>(a) People in South America and elsewhere thinking that #outrageous…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:59:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134466#post134466</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-outraged-of-sockburn/?p=134466#post134466</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:59:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
