<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Up Front: No Smoke</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=180568#post180568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=180568#post180568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Speaking of Sherlock Holmes and smoking, he smokes a pipe in the film of course, and the credits end with the following note, which is probably quite common but I don't recall seeing it before: </p><p>"No person or entity associated with this film received payment or anything of value, or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:35:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kath Davies</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=180032#post180032</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=180032#post180032</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I remember it got a lot more interesting riding or driving through the Auckland university district after the place was fully iPodestrianised.</p></blockquote><p>Time for the London approach to prevent texting injuries: <br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=807vebt-mmQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=807vebt-mmQ</a></p><p>[Warning: this video is to be taken by a grain or three of salt, a point apparently missed…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:08:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179870#post179870</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179870#post179870</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Better hope you don't hit any of them Stephen.</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/4100794/Police-get-new-DNA-powers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Warning:Your DNA are belong to us</a></p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/4048411/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Warning:Ur Txts also r belong to us</a></p><p>A search of stuff.co.nz (with default safe search on) reveals 698 articles with the word 'warning' compared to 629 articles with the name 'New Zealand'.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:00:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179817#post179817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179817#post179817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It makes shared cycle-pedestrian areas quite a lot more hazardous. Even if you politely tinkle your non-threatening bell as loud as you can, you can't warn some people that you're behind them because they have noise-cancelling insulation from the outside world.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:02:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179816#post179816</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179816#post179816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I remember it got a lot more interesting riding or driving through the Auckland university district after the place was fully iPodestrianised.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:48:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179718#post179718</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179718#post179718</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/4099924/Pedestrian-death-rise-blamed-on-iPods" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">''Manufacturers … should be made to [warn] consumers of the risks they run.''</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:37:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179629#post179629</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179629#post179629</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For my part, I'm sorry Sacha.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:09:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179628#post179628</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179628#post179628</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Warning &ndash; crud lowers credibility
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:01:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179623#post179623</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179623#post179623</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Warning: this warning may cause anxiety.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:47:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179622#post179622</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179622#post179622</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Finally all media is nothing more than a series of computer generated warnings, humanity* finally taking heed is paralyzed by fear.   </p><p>*Excluding the select few, whose job it is to remove anything resembling life from all art forms.  </p><p>[Warning this post contains American English, questionable grammar and unprovoked punctuation]</p><p>[Apologies:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:43:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179613#post179613</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179613#post179613</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But politicians around the world are calling foul on the proliferation of unrealistic images, particularly in fashion and celebrity media. UK Equalities Minister Lynne Featherstone wants a health warning on airbrushed photographs, telling viewers they are not real. French MP Valerie Boyer is advocating the same move in France.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&amp;objectid=10671260" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&amp;objectid=10671260</a>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:20:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179568#post179568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179568#post179568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I expect there is pretty much nothing in <em>Spartacus</em> that would be considered 'acceptable' in terms of modeling behavior. But at least they weren't smoking.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:30:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>SteveH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179457#post179457</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179457#post179457</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No. That's not what I am saying. I am saying that, if you believe that for reasons of social acceptability* you shouldn't show say, rape, even when entirely historically justified, in certain kinds of film, then I don't think you can object to a similar refusal to show smoking,</p></blockquote><p>Is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:23:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179452#post179452</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179452#post179452</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I understand that censorship around rape depictions is more nuanced too. You aren't allowed to depict it such that the women appears to be enjoying it, if there's any clear intimation that it is an actual rape rather than, say, a strange fantasy that consenting adults are getting into. Not…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:39:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179450#post179450</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179450#post179450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I honestly don't think an R rating is reasonable. That is, as you say, for graphic sex and violence. A PG13, or a warning before a program plays that it contains smoking wouldn't bother me too much.</p></blockquote><p>It would feel strange to me that on the way to the theatre…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:10:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179444#post179444</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179444#post179444</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So you're saying that there is a parallel between the change in society attitudes towards both rape and smoking, and since it's not morally acceptable to show rape at 7:30 (or in a G movie) we therefore shouldn't show smoking?</p></blockquote><p>No. That's not what I am saying. I am saying…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:18:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>SteveH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179442#post179442</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179442#post179442</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But the pertinent thing, that rape was socially acceptable in certain circumstances and here and now isn't, and that that has very similar implications for historic depictions as any other change in social acceptability is, I think, sound.</p></blockquote><p>So you're saying that there is a parallel between the change in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:02:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179441#post179441</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179441#post179441</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh, I have a stupider reason for starting smoking. I did it to get my lungs used to smoke so I could smoke joints without choking and looking like a total loser.</p></blockquote><p>I don't remember how I started smoking, but I remember why &mdash; it was fucking wonderful, like being…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:16:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179437#post179437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179437#post179437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ah! That is precisely the image I was looking for &ndash; while flailing around in these wailful woeful times-</p><p>fig leaves!</p><p>If you &ndash; blot out?Make the shots smoke&amp; dissolve? Turn ciggies into daffodils? Re-shoot entire films???<br />How actually do you remove the tobacco-smoking from reallly seminal films?</p><p>Fig-leaving is not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:00:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179435#post179435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179435#post179435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Except it's self-referential: we censor smoking in films because some people have decided it's socially unacceptable, as opposed to mildly annoying. Whereas when it comes to rape the stigma is just a little bit more justified. </p><p>I think people will look back on these decades of anti-smoking obsession in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:53:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179434#post179434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179434#post179434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But the pertinent thing, that rape was socially acceptable in certain circumstances and here and now isn't, and that that has very similar implications for historic depictions as any other change in social acceptability is, I think, sound.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:39:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179415#post179415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179415#post179415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Lucy TB &ndash; sorry for remark. The evening just felt wrong and *I* wound up getting snide.</p><p>I will insist tho' that smoking in rural areas of the West Coast isnt a huge problem, but drinking alcohol is (with consquent avoidable vehicle accidents...)</p><p>Re Jackie &amp; Emma's remarks above &ndash;</p><p>love…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:11:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179401#post179401</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179401#post179401</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh darling &ndash; the biggest hugs ever.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:44:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179397#post179397</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179397#post179397</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You, madam, are a goddess.</p></blockquote><p>Pff, it's a necessity, you can't buy bread. And at least we have the power to cook it. We have been so, so lucky. It's still hitting me, what's happened to my city.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:32:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179394#post179394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179394#post179394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						@Emma &ndash; baking bread? You, madam, are a goddess.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:22:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179386#post179386</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179386#post179386</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Even suicide is a bit over the top as an analogy, it seems to me. Showing somebody having a cigarette is really much closer to showing somebody having a glass of wine.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:44:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>SteveH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179382#post179382</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179382#post179382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think the problem (that is to say, I made this mistake) is confusing `morally acceptable to show' and `morally acceptable to show at a given time'.</p></blockquote><p><em>Two and a Half Men</em> plays alcoholism for laughs at 7:30. Why are realistic portrayals of smoking relatively unacceptable at that time?</p><blockquote><p>Is…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:41:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179381#post179381</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179381#post179381</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That, Emma, is actually quite a good reason. And let's face it, faced with what you are all going through in Chch, a cigarette can only be a reassuring thing. As would be a joint.</p></blockquote><p>I haven't had time to sit down for a cigarette yet, Jackie. After I get…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:32:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179377#post179377</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179377#post179377</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That, Emma, is actually quite a good reason. And let's face it, faced with what you are all going through in Chch, a cigarette can only be a reassuring thing. As would be a joint.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:09:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179360#post179360</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179360#post179360</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I know it's a stupid habit, made stupider by the fact that I started in my early 20's just to look cool.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, I have a stupider reason for starting smoking. I did it to get my lungs used to smoke so I could smoke joints without choking and looking…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:04:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179348#post179348</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179348#post179348</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>'m constantly outraged that shock ads for road safety, ACC etc. don't come with a warning, and a loud one at that. </blockquote> So what do ya think of the drug driving campaign? Makes the drugs look less harmful than alcohol. So, good or bad? I am soo confused. <em> Stressed</em>,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 13:26:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179342#post179342</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179342#post179342</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Really? Smoking is on par with rape in terms of what's morally acceptable?</p></blockquote><p>Obviously not. It is however a thing that has been a lot more socially acceptable in other places than it is now (thank god).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 12:44:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179333#post179333</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179333#post179333</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Moderation I think is the word. Moderation.</blockquote> There you go, leave well be ffs! Making everything/else smokefree is not moderate or reasonable in a society of equals.Educate those who don't know, but dictatorship don't feel democratic to me unless you get all the smokers in agreement.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:53:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179329#post179329</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179329#post179329</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Second-hand smoke is not really the issue for me; it is the pong of smoke-saturated clothing or furnishings.</p></blockquote><p>Now Geoff, please to inform me but, don't you, your attire  and your furnishings ever wash? I mean once you get home after that social eventful night before.</p><blockquote><p>Indeed, I prefer the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:28:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179326#post179326</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179326#post179326</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ok catching up, I see it has been mentioned.<br /> As you were....</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:16:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179324#post179324</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179324#post179324</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>, and alternating from week to week between cocaine and ambition, the drowsiness of the drug, and the fierce energy of his own keen nature.</p><p>That I think indicates that, however often the word is mentioned, the drug use is habitual.</p></blockquote><p>Only on page 1, bit slow I know, but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:06:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179303#post179303</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179303#post179303</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm a smoker very much of webweaver's calibre, although I do smoke if I am alone in my car. I am afraid that both my husband and I smoke &ndash; moderately, on the smoking scale, I have been told. I must say that when I used to smoke far more…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:08:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179295#post179295</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179295#post179295</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>superior snide person</p></blockquote><p>Come, come, Islander. This has been civilized all round. This snide field is nine miles wide, you have to search hard for a peck of snide.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 08:54:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179289#post179289</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179289#post179289</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It is a rather dramatic analogy, but I think it is fair.</p></blockquote><p>Really? Smoking is on par with rape in terms of what's morally acceptable?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:59:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179288#post179288</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179288#post179288</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Similarly, if I was trying to give up smoking, I might want to avoid a super-smoky movie.</p></blockquote><p>Would you also wish to avoid a super-smoky book?80</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 05:15:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179287#post179287</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179287#post179287</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Okay, but if you make a modern film set in a time when those attitudes existed, are you going to erase them from the script because it's unacceptable? There's a difference between depiction and endorsement. There is a difference between a racist film and a film which depicts racism. It's…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 02:17:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179284#post179284</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179284#post179284</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think that's quite defensible --- racist films remain racist, no matter if when they were made they expressed acceptable social attitudes. In terms of representations of historical truth, again, there are a great many historic truths we nowadays won't have on the television.</p></blockquote><p>Okay, but if you make a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:30:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179281#post179281</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179281#post179281</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Superior snide person?  Me?  WTF?  Please try re-reading my posts as though I was having a conversation.  Okay, the numbering kind of messes that up a bit, but I was trying to be succinct.</p><p>I am sorry about making assumptions.  It annoys me intensely when other people do it, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:30:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179275#post179275</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179275#post179275</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						chris &ndash; I mentioned my uncle Bill; his father died at 65 (oesophagal cancer &ndash; he'd worked on a tar marchine for many years before his death- never drunk alcohol, never smoked.) My uncle smoked from his 8th birthday &ndash; died at 80, after drinking a LOT of alcohol, and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:42:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179264#post179264</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179264#post179264</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Great grandfather lived past 80 smoking a pack a day, grandfather died at 84, smoked two packs a day for 40 years. Neither died from smoking related illnesses, but yes, they did die. Our family has been smoking tabaccy for nigh on 400 years. I figure I'm more likely to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:50:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179263#post179263</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179263#post179263</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Lucy Telfar Barnard &ndash; dont be fagged. I know my area(yes, it's Tai Poutini). I also have family on the east coast of the South Island, who are in rural areas, and they have the same perspective (GP included.)<br />And, dunno when someone last came through here with a statistical…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:29:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179257#post179257</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179257#post179257</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Islander, </p><p>1.  you said "rural areas", not "the Coast" (I assume you mean West, rather than East?), so I was talking about NZ rural areas in general &ndash; where tobacco use is on average higher than in urban areas.<br />2.  I thought you were talking about how the ratio between…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:55:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179253#post179253</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179253#post179253</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.martinlindstrom.com/sounds/CigaretteLightandInhale.wav" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ignition, combustion, inspiration, expire</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:27:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179251#post179251</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179251#post179251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Lucy Telfar Barnard &ndash; wrong, wrong and wrong- alcohol-related deaths(not necessarily traffic related) =15%, and lung-diseases, along with depression = gently passed-over suicides in a lot of instances), and hard core accidents  (squished-by-slips we call 'em, and yes, they include road accidents) are the majors...tobacco use is very minor on…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:45:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179248#post179248</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179248#post179248</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But here's the thing. People do shit that is bad for them. Whether that's smoking, eating too much, drinking too much, shagging inappropriate people, or getting into fights. Blowing shit up or taking illegal drugs. Or whatever your harmful behaviour of choice is.</p></blockquote><p>A bunch of those would get you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:26:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179246#post179246</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179246#post179246</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But there's cause of death and cause of death, no? It's rare for a disease to have a single certain cause &ndash; there are plenty of non smokers who die of lung cancer. But when you get flattened by a bus, it's a little more clear cut. And besides people…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:20:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179245#post179245</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179245#post179245</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In which direction, Islander?  I would assume that road traffic mortality rates would be higher, traffic pollution-related mortality rates much lower, and tobacco use-related mortality rates slightly higher.  Tobacco use would still come out the biggest killer.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:18:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179244#post179244</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179244#post179244</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Maybe, Lucy Telfar Barnard, look at clustering-</p><p>I am pretty well certain that you will find a really different imbalance when you look at rural deaths-</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:08:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179239#post179239</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179239#post179239</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sigh.  Seems I can't quite quit.  I'm addicted to health statistics.</p><p>Deaths from traffic accidents: +/-400 per year</p><p>Deaths from traffic related pollution: +/- 1200 per year (as estimated here <a href="url">http://www.transport.govt.nz/research/Documents/health-effects-of-vehicle-emissions.pdf</a>)</p><p>Again, deaths from tobacco use: +/- 5000 per year.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:56:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179233#post179233</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179233#post179233</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry, tongue firmly in cheek there, I should have been more clear.</p><p>I'm not presumptive on the internet, and if I'm going to tell others how to behave (quite rarely), I'll do that directly.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:27:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179231#post179231</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179231#post179231</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think that's something we can all agree on. Right?</p></blockquote><p>No. In fact I think that when they started showing grisly medical pictures on cigarette packets I might have made the point that it would be like painting pictures of cars wrapped around trees on the side of vehicles -…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:09:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179226#post179226</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179226#post179226</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ur, living in an extremely rural/remote area &ndash; No, actually, George-
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:52:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179225#post179225</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179225#post179225</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Dude, you're just not hanging around with the right kind of pro-cycling activitists. I've heard attitudes way more virulent than this expressed about cars.</p></blockquote><p>If it was up to me, cars would be decorated like cigarette packets &ndash; much <a href="http://www.copenhagenize.com/2009/07/driving-kills-health-warnings.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">like this</a>.</p><p>I think that's something we can all agree on.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:43:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179224#post179224</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179224#post179224</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						All this talk of smoking has caused me to roll up and check my lighter fluid. 'evening all!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:42:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179223#post179223</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179223#post179223</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Addenda to webweaver- I happily smoke in my own home when there are kids about (unless they are lung-compromised) because it is my home and this is what I sometimes do...I have had 3 of the older generation of nephews (I have a lot of nephews but only 2 nieces)…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:41:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179221#post179221</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179221#post179221</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That lecturing shit is hardly ever about 'concern for you' anyway. It's usually a cocktail of some other less altruistic motivations.</p><p>(I've never smoked, but I am also 12.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:25:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179220#post179220</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179220#post179220</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Re: Peter Ashby. I think he genuinely was trying to help, and his crimes were fairly minor. But his punishment was too, merely a number of people telling him to change the tune. If he brings a new tune I really do want to hear from him and did actually…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:22:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179219#post179219</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179219#post179219</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I always wonder if those people who give me lectures realise it just makes me want to smoke more. (Yes, I am 12.) And that goes for most anti-smoking ads, too.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:06:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179215#post179215</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179215#post179215</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>webweaver, as a smoker (one to 3 cigars a month, a couple of pipes maybe) I concur with all you've written &ndash; with this exception: I smoke when I like in my own home, and &ndash; after requesting permission- in my mother's home (she loves the smell of cigars.)</p><p>I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:57:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>webweaver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179213#post179213</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179213#post179213</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As one of those dirty smokers I have a vested interest in this conversation I suppose, so here goes...</p><p>I wouldn't dream of smoking in my house or car, or anyone else's house or car. Gross. I used to live in a 7th-floor flat with no garden and so all…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:45:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179212#post179212</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179212#post179212</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ian Dalziell- I agree, on 23rd afterthoughts, apropos Peter Ashby...</p><p>he pissed me off big time personally (re his comments related to osteoarthritis) and for others (his truly embarrassing comments on Emma's CFS, and others in that thread.)</p><p>But &ndash; waving feelers* feebily &ndash; he does come from a scientific…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:45:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179211#post179211</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179211#post179211</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Dude, you're just not hanging around with the right kind of pro-cycling activitists.</p></blockquote><p>I think my only response to that is 'thank heavens'. If I'm ever in that situation, they might have to put a warning on *me* for 'realistic violence'.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:44:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179209#post179209</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179209#post179209</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						When I smoked in Oz we had a little old building caretaker Nazi who seemed to take especial pleasure in ordering us not to stand within the eaves of the building when we smoked. If it was raining, we were meant to get wet, that was his rules. Indeed it…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:37:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JackElder</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179204#post179204</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179204#post179204</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And yet no annoying busybody ever comes up to me and tells me to remove my 'cancer wagon' from the road, as they do to my outside-smoking mother.</p></blockquote><p>Dude, you're just not hanging around with the right kind of pro-cycling activitists.  I've heard attitudes way more virulent than this expressed…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:53:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179203#post179203</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179203#post179203</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes, but if we start watching it now, we'll have missed all the cool stuff in between. We need to catch up on the other seasons first.</p></blockquote><p>If you do get it out, be warned, the rude sex in it can actually spread beyond the screen.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:52:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179202#post179202</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179202#post179202</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>albino albedo...</strong></p><blockquote><p>...to walk around the city at night in winter with <strong>someone white</strong> tied over their mouths.</p></blockquote><p>would that be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Winter" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johnny (or Edgar) Winter</a> ?</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbgogmR5q7U&amp;feature=related" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbgogmR5q7U&amp;feature=related</a></p><p>or just Johnny Walker?</p><p><br /><strong>Leg bone connected to the butt bone...</strong></p><blockquote><p>Hopefully they take up jogging and they <br />go away quicker.</p></blockquote><p>This [[http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/11/phys-ed-can-exercise-moderate-anger/?scp=1&amp;sq=can%20exercise%20moderate%20anger&amp;st=cse|exercising restraint…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:49:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179199#post179199</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179199#post179199</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>back when Wellington was looking at banning smoking on footpaths (at cafes and things), I had a massive hissy fit at several co workers, pointing out that I breathe in a damn sight more cabon monoxide walking down Courtenay place from all the buses than I do from the odd…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:42:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179197#post179197</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179197#post179197</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>but I don't want to even start drawing up that kind of league table for sexual abuse.</p></blockquote><p>*cough*  That should read "for depictions of any form of sexual or physical abuse".  Really stupid to FUBAR my own argument with imprecise wording.</p><p>And Russell, Simone Horrocks is a very smart woman.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:29:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179191#post179191</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179191#post179191</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And who's ever had a joint and <em>giggled</em>, that's ridiculous. They should be... actually, I can't remember what the negative consequences of marijuana are. Is that one of them?</p></blockquote><p>All I'm sayin' is, don't harsh my buzz.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:51:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179189#post179189</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179189#post179189</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As opposed to realistic violence, which some films carry a warning about &ndash; I suspect you're much more likely to be bashed by your partner than fall into a room full of needles.</p></blockquote><p>OK, that was a fair come back to the snark.  But that's where I start getting nervous…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:39:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joanna</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179178#post179178</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179178#post179178</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"Contains strong horror violence" &mdash; as opposed to the romantic type that makes you want to run out and French kiss kittens?</p></blockquote><p>As opposed to realistic violence, which some films carry a warning about &ndash; I suspect you're much more likely to be bashed by your partner than fall into…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:01:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179177#post179177</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179177#post179177</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						More and more I want advisories to warn me that a programme is very stupid, or that a film is excessively formulaic, or that Nastassja Kinski ca. 1988 is not in it so really what's the point? But it just doesn't happen.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:00:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179176#post179176</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179176#post179176</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What is the job of a film rating, on the other hand? Simply to point out that certain parts of a given film may be objectionable for certain reasons</p></blockquote><p>And some of the notes the MPAA attach to their ratings are Dada haiku of offensive desire to avoid offending anyone.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:57:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179175#post179175</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179175#post179175</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Something else just occured to me. </p><p>Smoking in a movie has never made me want to smoke, simply because I pretty much always want to smoke. It might remind me that I want to smoke, but that urge is always there. I imagine it's the same for alcoholics and drug…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:45:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179172#post179172</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179172#post179172</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Needn't be limited to sex &amp; drugs, either. I'd rather have known, for example, that a recent otherwise incredibly excellent movie contained a gruesome scene involving a corpse. Similarly, if I was trying to give up smoking, I might want to avoid a super-smoky movie.</p></blockquote><p>I'm constantly outraged that shock ads…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:36:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179171#post179171</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179171#post179171</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Let's name our nannyism. I'd ban advertising of all things to children under the age of, say, 12, and ban advertising of things that cause harm to people other than the direct consumer &ndash; so alcohol and yes, cigarettes as well on account of the second-hand smoke thing.</p></blockquote><p>I can't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:33:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179169#post179169</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179169#post179169</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I feel like I've posted this before, but here it is again: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/17/books/17moon.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Goodnight Moon Goes Smokeless</a>, which inspired this <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/25/AR2005112501543.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">parody</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:24:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179168#post179168</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179168#post179168</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>what's the job of art? Is it to present an aspirational and respirational ideal, or to accurately reflect the world we live in?</p></blockquote><p>Oh but art doesn't have a <em>job</em>. So bourgeois! Art's on the creative dole, mining and moulding our collective subconscious while lying on the couch being clever.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:21:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179166#post179166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179166#post179166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I would like some way of getting all the people who are rudely confrontational to outdoor smokers</p></blockquote><p>Um, yes.. On a trip on Australia, there was a very nasty gent who apparently objected to us smoking <em>four large tables</em> away from him on a huge outside terrace that was a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:16:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179163#post179163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179163#post179163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Okay, I can reply to this bit 'cos it's unrelated and won't get my blood pressure up:</p><blockquote><p>Outrageous Fortune is currently airing at 8:30.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, but if we start watching it <em>now</em>, we'll have missed all the cool stuff in between.  We need to catch up on the other seasons…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:54:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179160#post179160</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179160#post179160</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote> I to walk around the city at night in winter with someone white tied over their mouths.</blockquote>I say, that's a touch racist, init?.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:37:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179159#post179159</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179159#post179159</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Let's name our nannyism. I'd ban advertising of all things to children under the age of, say, 12, and ban advertising of things that cause harm to people other than the direct consumer &ndash; so alcohol and yes, cigarettes as well on account of the second-hand smoke thing. Let's have…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:35:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179158#post179158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179158#post179158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Just to change tack a bit, I'm now trying to think of any films/TV shows on before 9.30 (when alcohol advertising is allowed) that do regularly show tobacco use.</p></blockquote><p><em>Outrageous Fortune</em> is currently airing at 8:30. As Russell mentioned in the Media7 discussion last night, Robyn Malcolm insisted that Cheryl…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:29:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179157#post179157</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179157#post179157</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>One of the wonderful side effects of the social discouragement of smoking is it gives justification to those that wish to be rude, arrogant, opinionated fuckers. Hopefully they take up jogging and they go away quicker.</p></blockquote><p>And the annoying thing is, blowing smoke directly into their face seldom makes them…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:28:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179156#post179156</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179156#post179156</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I would buy into the idea that smoking in movies and TV glamourises it. Certainly Joan Holloway makes it look pretty hot.</p><p>But here's the thing. People do shit that is bad for them. Whether that's smoking, eating too much, drinking too much, shagging inappropriate people, or getting into fights.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:26:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179155#post179155</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179155#post179155</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						One of the wonderful side effects of the social discouragement of smoking is it gives justification to those that wish to be rude, arrogant, opinionated fuckers. Hopefully  they take up jogging and they go away quicker.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:24:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179152#post179152</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179152#post179152</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Last night's Media7 discussion of smoking on screen is in chapter 2 of <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/media7/s5-e14-video-3755278" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the ondemand video</a>. I thought Simone Horrocks was really interesting on the topic. Clever family, that one.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:21:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179151#post179151</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179151#post179151</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Lucy:</p><blockquote><p>Most people don't smoke, so by that definition, smoking is not normal.</p></blockquote><p>*head-desk*  Redacted original comment until I can get Mister Grumpy on the first bus out of town.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:20:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179150#post179150</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179150#post179150</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And yet no annoying busybody ever comes up to me and tells me to remove my 'cancer wagon' from the road, as they do to my outside-smoking mother.</p></blockquote><p>back when Wellington was looking at banning smoking on footpaths (at cafes and things), I had a massive hissy fit at several…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:19:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179149#post179149</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179149#post179149</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That's just because I haven't done your area yet. I'm only one man, you know.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:17:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179148#post179148</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179148#post179148</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>pollution is a major killer and cars are a major cause of pollution</p></blockquote><p>And yet no annoying busybody ever comes up to me and tells me to remove my 'cancer wagon' from the road, as they do to my outside-smoking mother.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:14:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179146#post179146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179146#post179146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Why not demand that every male and female lead in films be shown to be a keen jogger?</p></blockquote><p><em>Ashby II: Electric Joggaloo</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:10:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179145#post179145</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179145#post179145</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Stalin, Hitler and Mao would have been early mentors...</p></blockquote><p>Wait, did you just associate anti-tobacco compaigners with Hitler?  Well, I guess this thread's over then.  </p><p>(And yes, I'm well aware that Hitler was anti-tobacco, and you can bet tobacco companies use that to their best advantage too).</p><p>Even if it's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:09:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179144#post179144</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179144#post179144</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Okay fair point. And how many times do you remember seeing kids in the playground imitating the Karate Kid crane pose? Lots. So I'll have to think about that one a bit more.</p></blockquote><p>I would personally beg you not to. I don't want to see violence moved to a late…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:09:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179140#post179140</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179140#post179140</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Karma Chameleon...</strong></p><blockquote><p>...the main character's job is to edit old films to remove/replace props (ie alcohol or tobacco) or people depending on the latest court case.<br />I wonder if this is where they got the idea from?</p></blockquote><p>Stalin, Hitler and Mao would have been <a href="http://gajitz.com/before-photoshop-7-photo-edits-that-literally-made-history/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">early mentors...</a><br />...or Woody Allen…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:01:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179139#post179139</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179139#post179139</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Also, having every incidence of smoking followed by a negative consequence of smoking would be completely unrealistic.</p></blockquote><p>I don't know about unrealistic, but certainly not feasible within the scope of most plot arcs.  But that's my point.  It's because there's generally no feasible way of showing the negative consequences that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:59:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Stevenson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179135#post179135</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179135#post179135</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Read Bellwether, it's awesome.</p></blockquote><p>Preachin' to to choir sister, preachin' to the choir</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:54:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179134#post179134</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179134#post179134</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes, the always terrible consequences of violence in film. Like, say, Karate Kid, or The Matrix, or Kung Fu Panda, powerful indictments against brutality that they are. Or Charles Bronson's films, etc.</p></blockquote><p>Okay fair point.  And how many times do you remember seeing kids in the playground imitating the Karate…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:45:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179131#post179131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179131#post179131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In the book "Remake" by Connie Willis</p></blockquote><p>Andrew, in early draft I removed a paragraph from this column about Connie Willis's <em>Bellwether</em>, a book I like to push with an almost missionary zeal. Read <em>Bellwether</em>, it's awesome. </p><p>It's mostly about a woman who researches trends, trying to find out what…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:33:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Stevenson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179128#post179128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179128#post179128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Minor case of life imitating art<br />In the book "Remake" by Connie Willis, the main character's job is to edit old films to remove/replace props (ie alcohol or tobacco) or people depending on the latest court case.<br />I wonder if this is where they got the idea from?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:08:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179125#post179125</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179125#post179125</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Viscous wit...</strong></p><blockquote><p><em>Phlegm, My Lovely</em></p></blockquote><p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humorism#Four_humors" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> <em>humour</em></a> is strong in this one...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:52:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179124#post179124</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179124#post179124</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So with (unhealthy) drinking and violence in film, you get to see the adverse consequences. With smoking (always unhealthy), you don't.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, the always terrible consequences of violence in film. Like, say, Karate Kid, or The Matrix, or Kung Fu Panda, powerful indictments against brutality that they are. Or Charles…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:51:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179122#post179122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179122#post179122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I did read somewhere recently that  all the smoking in <em>Mad Men</em> is herbal cigarettes (dock leaves, anyone?).  Not sure whether that makes it better or worse.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:50:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179117#post179117</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179117#post179117</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>After having a very civil drinking disagreement with someone recently over Holmes's cocaine use, I came home and picked up my copy of Adventures, flipped it open, and the cocaine is mentioned on the first page (A Scandal in Bohemia):</p><p>    Holmes, who loathed every form of society with his whole…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:27:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179115#post179115</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179115#post179115</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I am not saying that all depiction of smoking in film/TV is paid for by tobacco companies.  Some of the advertising they get for free instead.  </p><p>I've been thinking about the difference between the depiction tobacco use, and the depiction of alcohol and violence in film.  I think the difference…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:21:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179111#post179111</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179111#post179111</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not to mention <em>Phlegm, My Lovely</em>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:59:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179110#post179110</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179110#post179110</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Stout Hibernian stock...</strong></p><blockquote><p>also the image of David Tennant in red velvet is going to linger behind my eyelids for a while</p></blockquote><p><em>Tennant's Red Velvet</em> now there's a Boutique Beer just waiting to happen...</p><p><br /><strong>ya can't hold a candle to Chandler...</strong></p><blockquote><p>The Big Sleep.<br />Favourite movie of all time, quite…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:48:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179108#post179108</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179108#post179108</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'd just struggle to believe that anything like Mad Men or Outrageous Fortune which depicts a smoking culture is only, or indeed primarily, doing it because of pressure from the tobacco industry.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, there's work needed to prove any conspiratorial link there.</p><p>Overall, I agree. I don't watch TV to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:40:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179100#post179100</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179100#post179100</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>BTW, for product placement to work don't you need an identifiable brand?</p></blockquote><p>I watched <em>In a Lonely Place</em>  tonight. A great film, with cracking dialog, sardonic leads, faces that could melt or freeze hearts (often within the same scene), and a lit cigarette about every two minutes.</p><p>I don't know…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:27:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179099#post179099</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179099#post179099</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And just to take it to the reductio ad absurdum, instant R rating for <em>Gavin and Stacy</em> anyone?  We all knows that there's an obesity epidemic out there, and what kind of message are we sending when fatties like James Corden and Ruth Jones are normalizing bad life style choices…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:14:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179098#post179098</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179098#post179098</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And furthermore, I get seriously f'd off by what are, in effect, a bunch of bullshit excuses made for the tobacco industry.</p></blockquote><p>@Lucy Telfar Barnard.  When I start shilling for tobacco companies &ndash; or anyone else &ndash; rest assured you'll know about it.  Until then, I don't really appreciate what…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:01:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179096#post179096</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179096#post179096</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Product placement is endemic in US TV particularly ("Oh my god, is that the new Porsche Cayenne?") so I'd be very surprised if tobacco companies weren't doing it too.</p></blockquote><p>I like to play a game with US-made media: spot the PC. You come up with the odd surprising alternative company…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:22:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179094#post179094</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179094#post179094</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>(also the image of David Tennant in red velvet is going to linger behind my eyelids for a while)</p></blockquote><p>That is a <em>smoking</em> jacket.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:56:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179093#post179093</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179093#post179093</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Is anyone saying depiction of smoking should be banned? I understand the push to be toward R rating it, in much the same way as graphic violence and sex.</p></blockquote><p>The WHO guidelines I quoted in the article re: internet depictions of smoking are about totally preventing access, which would create…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:55:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179090#post179090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179090#post179090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Lucy, are you saying that there would be no cigarette smoking in film and TV unless the tobacco industry directly pay for it to be there?</p></blockquote><p>I thought that too until a careful reread of Lucy's words. I missed the 'just' in the piece you quoted first time too.</p><p>Is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:51:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179089#post179089</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179089#post179089</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Who saw tonight's episode of QI (Yes I know all the cool kids had if from friends in the UK years ago) where they mentioned John Lennon's disappearing ciggie on the cover of <em>Abby Road</em>? (also the image of David Tennant in red velvet is going to linger behind my…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:41:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179086#post179086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179086#post179086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Also, Ross's definition of "polite" is... interesting.</p></blockquote><p>Aww shucks Ems. Ta.  ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:19:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179085#post179085</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179085#post179085</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Tobacco use in film and TV is not just there for verisimilitude, or characterisation, or artistic reasons. It is paid product placement by tobacco companies. They pay for it, as a form of advertising, because it works.</p></blockquote><p>Lucy, are you saying that there would be no cigarette smoking in film…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:14:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179084#post179084</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179084#post179084</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Running...hehe. Nice.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:13:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179083#post179083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179083#post179083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Just so we're on the same page: you're still okay with people shooting each other and beating the shit out of each other in films, yes? Getting drunk? Being comically blotto?</p></blockquote><p>All hilariously good fun I would have thought. Don't we do that all the time? All 25% of us?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:12:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179077#post179077</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179077#post179077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Those are all reasonable points. My major concern is that quitting smoking may lead to running &ndash; is that a price that we are prepared to pay, as a society?</p></blockquote><p>Heh. I've been trying to figure out a way to make that joke all afternoon. Well played, sir.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:44:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179075#post179075</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179075#post179075</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I'd be really happy with none of course. But that is an unreasonable attitude to have. But if there are actors who feel that they have to oblige the director/writer/producer/bank roller then so be it. I would hate to think they would not get paid if they did not light…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:33:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179074#post179074</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179074#post179074</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Don't the CDC have any actual diseases to control?</p></blockquote><p>Well sure, but fortunately they've got their priorities right.  </p><p>Smoking is implicated in 5,000 of NZ's 29,000 deaths a year.  There's a reason smoking is called an epidemic.  Of course those people would have died eventually anyway &ndash; everyone does -…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:27:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179073#post179073</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179073#post179073</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I reckon the bars have increased their bottom line immensely. Just from the cleaning bill. The (lack of) repainting too must have saved a small fortune.</p><p>My dry cleaning bill dropped through the floor and the P/WAF (Partner/Wifey Acceptance Factor) increased immensely.</p></blockquote><p>Those are all reasonable points. My major concern…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:22:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179072#post179072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179072#post179072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And, Ross, you could cut the condescending "civilized" bullshit? From what I've seen of your average bar on a Friday night, you've nothing to be smug about.</p></blockquote><p>You are dead right there on the last bit. But I did say, sit. But yeah, well, I'll take the meaning of it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:18:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Hosking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179070#post179070</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179070#post179070</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Darwin Awards of some guy who ate a lot of baked beans, got drunk, feel asleep in a small room with no windows and a closed door and actually died of his own farts</p></blockquote><p>That must have been a <strong>lot</strong> of baked beans.</p><p>The reason I say this is because…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:41:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179068#post179068</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179068#post179068</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well. About 20 something % (low end) smoke. So they tell us.</p><p>This link suggests that movies are still portraying smoking in 49% of them.</p></blockquote><p>That's 49% of movies, not 49% of <em>characters</em>. Those numbers don't, in fact, say that movies are depicting smoking at a higher rate than in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:37:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179065#post179065</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179065#post179065</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"All told, 51 percent of the top movies in 2009 didn’t show tobacco use at all".</p></blockquote><p>Sigh... so <em>Avatar</em> may have been an over-produced, narratively anorexic blitzkrieg of style over substance, but at least the big blue noble savages didn't smoke! </p><p>Don't the CDC have any actual diseases to control?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:06:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179064#post179064</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179064#post179064</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Is it to present an aspirational and respirational ideal, or to accurately reflect the world we live in?</p></blockquote><p>Well. About 20 something % (low end) smoke. So they tell us. </p><p>[[Is it to present an aspirational and respirational ideal, or to accurately reflect the world we live in? | This…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:55:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179058#post179058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179058#post179058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The problem then will be, what do we do with all the extra people?</p></blockquote><p>You need to ask?</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Sp-VFBbjpE" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Sp-VFBbjpE</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:37:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179057#post179057</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179057#post179057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Craig &ndash; this is a not-unknown phenomenon on the West Coast.</p><p>The most well-known explanation comes from the long-ago but still lamented Mary of Fox Glacier Hotel.</p><p>She once had one of her housemaid's complain that the *ceiling* (12' stud) of a bushie's room was covered with shit.</p><p>Knowing the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:06:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179056#post179056</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179056#post179056</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>yes, appeal to Stephen Fry</p></blockquote><p>Thou shalt not question Stephen Fry.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:56:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Christopher Thompson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179055#post179055</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179055#post179055</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Of course Cumberbatch's Sherlock's nicotine patches are, appropriately, full strength and multiple. Under the circumstances I don't think the cocaine's necessary; he's not a member of the Groucho Club.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:46:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179054#post179054</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179054#post179054</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>(Can anyone explain to me the mechanics of vomiting on a ten foot high ceiling without getting a drop anywhere else?)</p></blockquote><p>Simple, Watson. I'm familiar with the various distances and arcs of projectile vomit from a 3 week study involving myself and my entire family and nonovirus, just ending yesterday,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:38:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179053#post179053</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179053#post179053</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't have corroboration of the figures, so I didn't mention it, but an old episode of QI (yes, appeal to Stephen Fry) said that smoking shortens your life span by five years, but being castrated lengthens it by thirteen...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:31:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179048#post179048</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179048#post179048</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If you analyse the figures that ASH bandy about you will notice that if they banned smoking not only will people never die but more human beings will  spontaneously pop into existence. The problem then will be, what do we do with all the extra people?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:11:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179043#post179043</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179043#post179043</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I was speculating that the next generation are going to think a hand with the first two fingers extended and slightly parted is some kind of covert symbol for something.</p></blockquote><p>It is. The mystic secret number two.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:37:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179042#post179042</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179042#post179042</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Second-hand smoke is not really the issue for me; it is the pong of smoke-saturated clothing or furnishings.</p></blockquote><p>Fair enough &mdash; I want to slap people who think (literally) eye-watering amounts of scent are a substitute for regular applications of soap, water and a decent deodorant. ANd the smell of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:36:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179041#post179041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179041#post179041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Indeed, I prefer the aroma of a well-placed fart as the smell dissipates much more quickly.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, and can be enjoyed safely in bed. Well, mostly safely &ndash; I did read in the Darwin Awards of some guy who ate a lot of baked beans, got drunk, feel asleep in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:36:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179040#post179040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179040#post179040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Och.  Dan Brown would have a field day...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:34:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179039#post179039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179039#post179039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Not to mention make many subject look like they're giving the fingers to the viewer...</p></blockquote><p>I was speculating that the next generation are going to think a hand with the first two fingers extended and slightly parted is some kind of covert symbol for something.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:27:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179037#post179037</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179037#post179037</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Taking the smoking out of mad men, or off the Rita Angus portrait, would just remove those things from their time.</blockquote>  Not to mention make many subject look like they're giving the fingers to the viewer...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:23:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179035#post179035</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179035#post179035</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>in 'popular movies' if you smoke you're either weak-willed and neurotic</p></blockquote><p>or a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman_Cottle" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chief Medical Officer</a> ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:12:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179032#post179032</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179032#post179032</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I tend to think I felt almost as refreshed as most of the smokers after those little breaks.</p></blockquote><p>I don't think that 'refreshed' is the right word for most unpleasant experience for non-smokers encountering smokers is the smell.  Second-hand smoke is not really the issue for me; it is the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:56:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179031#post179031</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179031#post179031</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Mad Men never makes me feel like having a cigarette. Or a drink. It does make me want to buy clothes.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, it does me. It makes me want to wear fitted dresses and drink martinis and smoke at my desk. </p><p>But I can honestly say i've never done any…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:52:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179030#post179030</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179030#post179030</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Or it may be that it was made a while ago, and was about old people.</p></blockquote><p>When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth...? Nah, too simple.</p><p>Here's a suitably urbane <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/theatreblog/2010/jan/06/smoking-stage-theatre-cigarette" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">artistic rationale</a> for banning onstage smoking in the West End (it's not the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:49:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179029#post179029</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179029#post179029</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And there's something else that really fucks me off about the figures the CDC is waving round:</p><blockquote><p>"However, nearly half of popular movies still contained tobacco imagery in 2009, including 54 percent of those rated PG-13, and the number of incidents remained higher in 2009 than in 1998,"</p></blockquote><p>So, what's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:48:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179028#post179028</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179028#post179028</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I believe that on stage passive smoking may have been responsible for the "Curse of Dads Army" by which most of the actors in the classic English sitcom are now dead.</p><p>Or it may be that it was made a while ago, and was about old people.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:40:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179027#post179027</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179027#post179027</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I know nothing of Holmes' use of cocaine &ndash; I just think it's absolutely ludicrous to retroactively remove cigarettes from old films etc. Madness.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:15:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179026#post179026</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179026#post179026</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No, they made quite an explicit choice to not include any references to or depiciton of cocaine use &ndash; largely, I understand, as a condition of RDJ taking the part, for obvious reasons.</p></blockquote><p>Which is rather odd, because Downey's biggest critical and commercial success has been playing [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_in_a_Bottle#Films|a barely functional…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:06:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179025#post179025</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179025#post179025</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There's quite a few prescribed psychoactives that could be similar to the Holmes portrayal. Maybe Ritalin?</p><blockquote><p>Interesting, in that it suggests Holmes uses cocaine as a downer, rather than an upper.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, that's kind of where I'm going with Ritalin. His brain is portrayed as bordering on hyperactive, although not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:05:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179024#post179024</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179024#post179024</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My own stint as a 'smoker' was during my only time of high-rise office work. It was an extremely convenient excuse to take frequent breaks that involved sunshine, fresh air, and generally idling hanging around, which didn't run the risk of being ambushed at the coffee machine by someone about…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:58:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179023#post179023</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179023#post179023</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Interesting, in that it suggests Holmes uses cocaine as a downer, rather than an upper.</p></blockquote><p>Could imagine Sherlock Holmes using Adderall nowadays &ndash; killing off his flights of genius to make him <a href="http://thefastertimes.com/lifeaftercollege/2010/08/26/why-arent-we-all-on-adderall/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">happy</a> in the mundane world.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:53:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joanna</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179017#post179017</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179017#post179017</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I watched the DVDs of <em>This Life</em> the other year, and I couldn't believe how much they were smoking! Inside! At work! Holy crap! It was unreal. And that's only 15 years old or so...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:37:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179015#post179015</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179015#post179015</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>alternating from week to week between cocaine and ambition, the drowsiness of the drug, and the fierce energy of his own keen nature.</p></blockquote><p>Interesting, in that it suggests Holmes uses cocaine as a downer, rather than an upper.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:32:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179014#post179014</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179014#post179014</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In the Guy Ritchie / RDJ version, Watsons admonishes him for experimenting with something used for "eye surgery" &ndash; which was one of the early medical uses of cocaine.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, I honestly thought watching it that it was entirely obvious, but I wonder how much I read into it by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:29:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179013#post179013</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179013#post179013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How many times is Holmes' cocaine use referred to in the Conan Doyle books anyway?</p></blockquote><p>After having a very civil drinking disagreement with someone recently over Holmes's cocaine use, I came home and picked up my copy of <em>Adventures</em>, flipped it open, and the cocaine is mentioned on the first…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:27:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Ritchie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179012#post179012</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179012#post179012</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In the Guy Ritchie / RDJ version, Watsons admonishes him for experimenting with something used for "eye surgery" &ndash; which was one of the early medical uses of cocaine.</p><p>How many times is Holmes' cocaine use referred to in the Conan Doyle books anyway? My impression is it's not many,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:23:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179005#post179005</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179005#post179005</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Possibly the definitive philosophical rondelay on the subject:  <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=E0i4xgH4vOgC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=richard+klein+cigarettes+are+sublime&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=Z8ern5r-yU&amp;sig=k82qu9AQNNPUXussd7-4e2ckJX8&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=xAJ_TJGJIIP58Aah9K3jAw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=3&amp;ved=0CB0Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cigarettes Are Sublime</a> by Richard Klein (also author of the equally subversive and counterintuitive <em>Eat Fat</em>):</p><blockquote><p>Cigarettes ... are sublime by virtue of their power to propose what Kant would call a "negative pleasure": a darkly beautiful, inevitably painful pleasure that arises from…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:00:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179004#post179004</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179004#post179004</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not so much about smoking and movies--and changing social norms-- but  this has prompted a memory of travelling through the Texas Panhandle  in the early 1980s.  We chanced upon a local museum in some tin-pot town (it may well have been Waco), presided over by a local wizened crone.  Poking…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:00:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179003#post179003</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179003#post179003</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Does he even drink much in the film? He gets wine thrown in his face, that much I remember. And drinks some fine spiked wine. But other than that?</p></blockquote><p>Hmmm &ndash; I was pretty sure I remembered some pointed references to alcohol, but maybe they were being deliberately vague? I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:43:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179001#post179001</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179001#post179001</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Here, researchers at the Otago School of Medicine are calling for...</p></blockquote><p>Always with the calling for something! How do you call for something anyway? Half the news on TV seems to be of someone or other calling for something. I think I'd like to call for a few things myself.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:34:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179000#post179000</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=179000#post179000</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>RDJ was looking a little fagged and punch drunk in that movie...</p><p>...will there be tokin' resistance from the snuff movies?</p><p>...and there goes that <a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2cxvSmlPoaM/SloZkf9e84I/AAAAAAAABvw/bHs5lItev5Y/s800/8715_Rita_Angus_Self_Portrait_Smoking.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rita Angus</a> self portrait, too...</p><p>and puff the magic dragon, will get the big C</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:31:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178995#post178995</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178995#post178995</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No, they made quite an explicit choice to not include any references to or depiciton of cocaine use &ndash; largely, I understand, as a condition of RDJ taking the part, for obvious reasons.</p></blockquote><p>I understand that, but there is also the implication that he was on something during those times,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:17:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178994#post178994</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178994#post178994</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>See, I did not notice that cocaine had been replaced in the Guy Ritchie film at all &ndash; I just assumed it was implied that it is what he was on when he was holed up in his office experimenting on the dog.</p></blockquote><p>No, they made quite an explicit choice…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:13:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178989#post178989</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178989#post178989</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The RDJ Sherlock seemed highly adrenalized... danger as drug?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:44:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178987#post178987</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178987#post178987</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hard to believe I know but Dad was told to smoke by a doctor in the early 80s for a chest cold so it took some time for the message to take.</p></blockquote><p>In the 80s? Wow. Oddly, I was just discussing this on Twitter &ndash; last summer I had a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:31:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178986#post178986</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178986#post178986</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In 1985 there was some palaver over the smoking in Desperately Seeking Susan. Some outraged mother had decided it was a children's film (and evidently Madonna was a popular children's entertainer), and therefore children who saw the film or even looked at <a href="http://www.impawards.com/1985/posters/desperately_seeking_susan.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the poster</a> would be lured into the world…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:28:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178985#post178985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178985#post178985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						See, I did not notice that cocaine had been replaced in the Guy Ritchie film at all &ndash; I just assumed it was implied that it is what he was on when he was holed up in his office experimenting on the dog.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:27:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178984#post178984</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178984#post178984</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>not considered medicinal by anyone</p></blockquote><p>Hard to believe I know but Dad was told to smoke by a doctor in the early 80s for a chest cold so it took some time for the message to take.  </p><p>I can't find the 30s song I was looking for but from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke!_Smoke!_Smoke!_(That_Cigarette)" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">47</a>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:23:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Josh Addison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178982#post178982</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178982#post178982</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>all three Die Hard movies (yes, I said three)</p></blockquote><p>Damn straight &ndash; Die Hard 2 is a piece of crap.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:12:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178978#post178978</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178978#post178978</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sherlock Holmes is an interesting case, because, as you mention, the mere fact that Watson does disapprove strongly of his cocaine use in-story is highly unusual for the time &ndash; I would say, more unusual than disapproving of smoking would be today (as smoking is not considered medicinal by anyone…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:02:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178977#post178977</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-no-smoke/?p=178977#post178977</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:02:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
