<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Up Front: Making a List, Not Bothering to Check It</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101455#post101455</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101455#post101455</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Been around for a while, that one.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, and despite all technological, ideological and social advances, it persists. It draws it's bow furthest in times of fear. Exploiting that fear, to subjugate followers, according to it's continually rejigged mandate. And with every election the christians win, their mandate to impose…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:26:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101440#post101440</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101440#post101440</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>christianity</p></blockquote><p>Been around for a while, that one.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:59:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101434#post101434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101434#post101434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>what's behind this growth in moralism when we're supposed to be becoming more liberal</p></blockquote><p>christianity.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:54:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101286#post101286</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101286#post101286</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Which is because these laws are enforced by elected prosecutors. People who can get votes out of being 'tough on crime' can also directly prosecute offenders.</p></blockquote><p>In light of that, it's hugely ironic that Australia, and in particular the Australian Labor Party, which has made a big issue of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:17:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101278#post101278</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101278#post101278</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Actually, while we're dumping really offensive moralism, try the story of Jessie Logan. This isn't child pornography: she was 18 when she sexted nude photos of herself to her boyfriend. After they broke up, he sent the photos to other girls at her school. As a result, she was bullied…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:58:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101277#post101277</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101277#post101277</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Article 1773992 of the Deep Space Concordat clearly states that " <em>No Ferengi shall sit in judgement over alternate life-forms</em> ..."
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:49:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101264#post101264</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101264#post101264</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah, it's all about protecting victims, except that it isn't, it's clearly about getting off on your moral crusade, and the actual outcomes are beside the point.</p><p>My partner and I were discussing this a couple of nights ago: what's behind this growth in moralism when we're supposed to be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:51:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101259#post101259</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101259#post101259</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>are-you-out-of-your-freaking-mind-you-morons</p></blockquote><p>Very much my reaction too (on reading a report in last Sunday's <em>Japan Times</em> ). I mean, it's so batshit crazy on so many different levels:<br />(i) the Kafkaesque insanity of attempting to try her <em>as an adult</em> , for <em>child</em>  pornography of herself (surely at least one of these…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:39:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101090#post101090</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=101090#post101090</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I watched this last week. Sapolsky is a brilliant guy; I loved his books, and it was nice to see that he's a good speaker too</p></blockquote><p>I was relieved when he stopped stepping between those two safety 'fixed positions' at the beginnng. Enjoyed that Stephen. Thanks.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:40:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100993#post100993</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100993#post100993</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>DeepRead: <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2732704984000303543" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Robert Sapolsky on primate sexuality</a>.</p><p>I watched this last week. Sapolsky is a brilliant guy; I loved his books, and it was nice to see that he's a good speaker too.</p><p>Anyway: from his POV, sex and aggression are intimately related in the brain (to extract, summarize and brutally…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:48:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100984#post100984</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100984#post100984</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Classic censorial behaviour from prosecutors in the US taking an "educational" approach to teen sxting:</p></blockquote><p>Yikes. Here's <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/MillerComplaintfinal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the suit filed against Mr Skumanick, the district attorney</a> by the girls and their mothers.</p><p>He appears to be a censurious nutbar who doesn't like teenagers. Girls especially.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:19:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100977#post100977</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100977#post100977</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I know there are studies that show that individuals who view large amounts of porn (ie more than six hours a week, which is about four movies) are more likely to have raped and to have poor attitudes to women, but they're not showing a causal link, just a correlative…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:02:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100972#post100972</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100972#post100972</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Classic censorial behaviour from prosecutors in the US taking an "educational" approach <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&amp;objectid=10563689&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">to teen sxting</a>:</p><blockquote><p>But when MaryJo Miller protested to Skumanick that the photo portraying her daughter and Kelly couldn't possibly be considered child porn, he replied that the girls were posed "provocatively," according to the lawsuit.<br />...</p><p>But Skumanick…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:43:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100966#post100966</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100966#post100966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What can I say about an image that we can't safely look at.</p></blockquote><p>Censorship, pretty much by its definition, stops us from talking about things. It curtails freedom of speech, that's it's job.</p><p>I have found myself in quite surreal situations as a result, and I totally get where steven…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:43:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100964#post100964</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100964#post100964</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I know there are studies that show that individuals who view large amounts of porn (ie more than six hours a week, which is about four movies) are more likely... to have poor attitudes to women,</p></blockquote><p>So Paul Henry...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:24:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100963#post100963</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100963#post100963</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If somebody wanted to stop me producing something because other people consuming it would cause harm, my first response would be 'prove it'.</p></blockquote><p>Fair points.</p><p>I'd imagine there is anecdotal evidence on both sides. Some people might have access to the stuff and it prevents them doing anything further. Others…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:21:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100950#post100950</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100950#post100950</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What can I say about an image that we can't safely look at.</p></blockquote><p>Emma checked with me, and my view was that it would be reckless to link to images that have been defined as "child pornography" by a court.</p><p>Personally, I think the decision in that case was nutty,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:00:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100935#post100935</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100935#post100935</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Quickly quickly Emma! Clear the Cache!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:05:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100927#post100927</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100927#post100927</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and while we're here, 'downloading'. </p><p>Someone sent me a link to an image to check whether it was okay to link to from here. In order to determine that, I went and looked at it.</p><p>That means I've 'downloaded' it. I've committed just as much of a crime as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:43:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100924#post100924</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100924#post100924</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The French documentary on these trends in the US, Outlawing Indecency , is out there on the wires, and highly recommended. I was shouting at the television by the end of it.</p></blockquote><p>I was sitting with my head in my hands thinking 'I wish I was more <em>surprised</em>  by any…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:31:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100923#post100923</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100923#post100923</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From the are-you-out-of-your-freaking-mind-you-morons, department:</p><p>The <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-1146-Seattle-Eastside-Parenting-Examiners~y2009m3d27-Dont-treat-kids-who-post-sexy-photos-as-sex-offenders-says-Megans-Law-mom" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">latest teenage girl in America to be charged with child pornography offences after sending her boyfriend nude pics of herself with her mobile phone</a>.</p><p>If she is convicted, she will spend the rest of her life on a public sex offenders' register. Does nobody involved…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:27:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100922#post100922</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100922#post100922</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Is it a different story if the experience wasn't portrayed negatively? Like if rape or other abuse of someone was presented as positive? Not just for you, but "OK for someone else to do because it's fiction and freedom of speech"?</p></blockquote><p>I have this really big space between 'things I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:00:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100907#post100907</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100907#post100907</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It seems to me that the guilty parties will continue to find access to this stuff, no matter what, links or no links, censorship or no censorship, just like everything else in life, and personally I feel the less (involving children)  that is made the better.  I might get my…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:14:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100895#post100895</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100895#post100895</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I've been criticised for writing scenes that involved rape, even though experience was portrayed extremely negatively, showed real and horrendous consequences, and the writing left me shaking and in tears.</p></blockquote><p>Is it a different story if the experience wasn't portrayed negatively? Like if rape or other abuse of someone was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:15:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100891#post100891</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100891#post100891</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>My line is that if it involves obvious pre-pubescent children, and it is showing sexual activity, it should not be permitted. Sure, things like Simpson porn will be caught up in that, but frankly I don't care.</p></blockquote><p>See, I disagree. No real people were harmed by the production of that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:46:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>TracyMac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100888#post100888</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100888#post100888</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Regarding the "cartoon porn" thing, I agree that the Simpsons thing was pretty extreme. However. I have also seen explicit drawings/sketches/etc of child sex which are so representational it's entirely open to question whether or not it was drawn "from life".</p><p>Where do you draw the line?</p><p>My line is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:41:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100816#post100816</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100816#post100816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Nice post Steven, a number of interesting points you broach re ownership, fair use, and the disparities with the way other violent acts are represented. as you say;</p><p>"to reject all methods of communicating and understanding the atrocities of war,"</p><p>that's really the crux what is needed for significant social…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:23:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100717#post100717</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100717#post100717</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And the Australian Classification Board's website has been hacked.</p></blockquote><p>had a laugh...blame China...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:19:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100713#post100713</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100713#post100713</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'd not ever be in favour of using real children to produce pornography in any way, no matter how manipulated the images were, for the reasons Sam stated:</p><p>    Even the tamest softcore including actual adults is predicated upon the consent of the adults appearing. Minors by definition can't give that…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:15:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100654#post100654</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100654#post100654</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That ruling about the Simpsons porn being classed as child pornography seems a bit wacky &ndash; or is it my sense of values that's out-of-kilter?</p><p>(I haven't seen it &amp; have no wish to see it, but cartoon characters, ffs, = 'kiddie porn'...?)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:04:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100642#post100642</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100642#post100642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ah, here we are, squishy middle position again. </p><p>I'd not ever be in favour of using real children to produce pornography in any way, no matter how manipulated the images were, for the reasons Sam stated:</p><blockquote><p>Even the tamest softcore including actual adults is predicated upon the consent of the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:35:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100620#post100620</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100620#post100620</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I can't work out what I did that was good,so now you've got me worried... :)</p></blockquote><p>You didn't accusatorially question my motives.</p><blockquote><p>might leave this one for the night I think. :)</p></blockquote><p>yeah, fair dos.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:46:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100618#post100618</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100618#post100618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Thanks Sam F</p></blockquote><p>I can't work out what I did that was good, so now you've got me worried... :) Sorry if that post seemed too shrill or I seemed to be jumping down your throat at times. I was writing and posting way too slow and missed a whole…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:43:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100616#post100616</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100616#post100616</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Sam F
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100615#post100615</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100615#post100615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Like Emma said;</p><blockquote><p>It'd be incredibly tricky to determine if, say, a film clip featuring a man appearing to be strangled was real or simulated, consensual or non-con. But I don't think that means that you take the easy way out like the British have and ban and prosecute simulation…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:32:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100614#post100614</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100614#post100614</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I've had a think about that, knowing full well that there probably are pornographic images of myself as a child out there, or in a shoe box somewhere. I'd imagine the psychological ramifications would be that I would feel angry,</p><blockquote><p>My apologies Steven if I seem crass in my writing,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:16:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100610#post100610</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100610#post100610</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I am asking you mark taslov-</p><p>and the technology was there in 1995 too-</p><p>the next load of nothing doesnt need to be responded to:</p><p>"I am an art history major"</p><p>-whoop de doo: I'm a poet.</p><p>Frankly, art &ndash; of all kinds- DOESNT receive "far too much blame for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:47:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100606#post100606</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100606#post100606</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Does mark taslov actually *know* what child pornography is?</p></blockquote><p>who are you asking Islander?</p><blockquote><p>It aint photos of naked kids.<br />It is photos/video streams of raped and otherwise molestested &ndash; frequently tortured(as tho' rape wasnt torture enough) &ndash; kids.</p></blockquote><p>It <strong>is </strong> photos Islander<br />and it is <strong>movies</strong></p><p>And this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:31:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100605#post100605</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100605#post100605</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The sort of material mark taslov says he is discussing is<br />a)not pornography<br />b)well covered (for centuries!) by artistic licence and<br />c)harmless</p><p>BUT</p><p>the areas that child pornography are concerned with &ndash; including those that arouse paedophiles- are very different indeed.</p><p>And art stuff &ndash; o, and counselling? After conviction…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:28:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100603#post100603</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100603#post100603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Thank you Sam. I have been huffing nothing.</p></blockquote><p>Didn't mean to offend &ndash; I didn't actually realise that was a position you yourself gave some credence to, rather than a devil's advocate-type argument that someone else could potentially distort out of what Emma said.</p><blockquote><p>Producing naked photos of children, whether…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:07:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100602#post100602</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100602#post100602</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don't think what I'm saying is not that dissimilar from Emma's manifesto;</p><blockquote><p>Producers of child pornography are aggressively prosecuted. (That's actual child pornography that involves harm to actual children, not fiction or drawings.)</p></blockquote><p>Bearing in mind (as any journalism course will iterate) that photographs are no longer indisputable evidence…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:06:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100601#post100601</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100601#post100601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Does mark taslov actually *know* what child pornography is?</p><p>It aint photos of naked kids.<br />It is photos/video streams of raped and otherwise molestested &ndash; frequently tortured(as tho' rape wasnt torture enough) &ndash; kids.</p><p>I spent 5 years of my life on the Indecent Publications Tribunal, and we did have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:45:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100596#post100596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100596#post100596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm going to break the deafening silence: given that producing this stuff is by definition harmful to children, who would be seriously making such a case and what would they have been huffing?</p></blockquote><p>Thank you Sam. I have been huffing nothing. Producing naked photos of children, whether by means of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:28:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100531#post100531</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100531#post100531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Based on that though, a case could be made though for compiling a selection of produced in a way not harmful to children.</p></blockquote><p>I'm going to break the deafening silence: given that producing this stuff is by definition harmful to children, who would be seriously making such a case and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:17:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100508#post100508</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100508#post100508</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>your saying we shouldn't...</p></blockquote><p><strong>no Kyle.</strong><br /><strong>I'm not</strong></p><blockquote><p>will use child pornography to... ease the urge,</p></blockquote><p>Has been observed to be a common misuse of all genres of porno.</p><blockquote><p>has been produced by harming children, it's hardly keeping children safe overall, is it?</p></blockquote><p>In agreement with you Emma. Based on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:44:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100501#post100501</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100501#post100501</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry.</p><p>*goes back to sitting on hands*</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:22:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Stevenson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100497#post100497</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100497#post100497</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Don't poke him Kyle, he enjoys it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:13:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100496#post100496</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100496#post100496</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So you blacklist all child porn sites, offer absolutely no dedicated counseling for people who are into looking at child porn, it really leaves the potential pedophile no recourse but to leave the house and find a child...</p></blockquote><p>You're saying that we shouldn't prosecute people who put child pornography on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:10:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100492#post100492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100492#post100492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So you blacklist all child porn sites, offer absolutely no dedicated counseling for people who are into looking at child porn, it really leaves the potential pedophile no recourse but to leave the house and find a child...</p></blockquote><p>I see I did leave out any suggestion of what to do…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:54:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100490#post100490</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100490#post100490</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So you blacklist all child porn sites, offer absolutely no dedicated counseling for people who are into looking at child porn, it really leaves the potential pedophile no recourse but to leave the house and find a child...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:37:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100484#post100484</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100484#post100484</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But the censors office doesn't just say 'yes' or 'no'.</p><p>They say, 'yes &ndash; R18, M' etc. So there has to be subjectivity to achieve that, unless someone is going to make an incredibly unuseful list of what is and isn't allowed at each level, which then becomes time stamped…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:45:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100483#post100483</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100483#post100483</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I presume that the censors office is governed by legislation (the er... can't remember what the Act is called now), and is largely at arms length from the government in terms of their decisions as a result.</p></blockquote><p>The current legislation (by far not just in NZ but pretty much everywhere)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:23:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100479#post100479</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100479#post100479</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I presume that the censors office is governed by legislation (the er... can't remember what the Act is called now), and is largely at arms length from the government in terms of their decisions as a result.</p><p>Which would seem to me to be how you'd want this to work…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:00:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100477#post100477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100477#post100477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Funding for the ACMA-like body, any heinously complicated process is going to cost money to administer, where is it from?</p></blockquote><p>Well, any kind of monitoring or policing body is going to cost. I feel that if you're policing for less it should be cheaper, but I strongly suspect that's not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:46:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100438#post100438</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100438#post100438</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Location of the ACMA-like body in government? Is it an independant body like PCE, not independant but seperate like the Electricity Commission, part of the Ministry for Odds and Sods (sorry &ndash; Internal Affairs), a division of the Police? How will this choice affect its operations?</p></blockquote><p>I would suggest that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:19:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Stevenson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100428#post100428</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100428#post100428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kicking the tires again...</p><p>Funding for the ACMA-like body, any heinously complicated process is going to cost money to administer, where is it from?  Modem tax, levy on ISPs based on traffic volumes, from the general tax fund, wave a magic wand?</p><p>Location of the ACMA-like body in government?  Is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:22:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100275#post100275</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100275#post100275</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>My impression of the Emma System would be that illegal sites would be targeted by the law. So the list should stay pretty short over a long period of time (possibly places that are illegal in one country but not in another?).</p></blockquote><p>Indeed. Sites should come off it because they're…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:41:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100274#post100274</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100274#post100274</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How do you manage this, investigate everyone?</p><p>Not arguing, just kicking the idea around a bit...</p></blockquote><p>Exactly what I'm after, dude.</p><p>This is what the ACMA does: investigates sites it receives complaints about. Anyone can lay a complaint, including an employee of the ACMA. But instead of black-listing the site,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:40:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100266#post100266</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100266#post100266</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My impression of the Emma System would be that illegal sites would be targeted by the law. So the list should stay pretty short over a long period of time (possibly places that are illegal in one country but not in another?).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:31:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Stevenson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100253#post100253</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100253#post100253</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Legal would be 'legal to view in the country of the filtering software company'.</p><p>Illegal would be... well not legal.</p></blockquote><p>Sorry, I was unclear, how do you know that what a filtering company has put on their illegal list is in fact illegal?<br />I thought Emma's plan was to have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:06:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100241#post100241</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100241#post100241</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But parents don't have sex in the house or anywhere else--do they???</p></blockquote><p>I believe that rule only applies if they're married. Parents living in sin... well, probably sin I guess.</p><blockquote><p>how do you define a legal versus an illeagal site?</p></blockquote><p>Legal would be 'legal to view in the country of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:47:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Stevenson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100228#post100228</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100228#post100228</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Would you settle for Czarina, or Czarette?</p><blockquote><p>All filtering software companies, however, must produce annual public lists of all the legal sites they block.</p></blockquote><p>how do you define a legal versus an illeagal site?  Eg filering company defines a site as illeagal, so not on the list up for inspection.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:24:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100213#post100213</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100213#post100213</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm pretty sure that's still Russell's job...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:49:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Stevenson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100197#post100197</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100197#post100197</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Emma for teh Interweb Czar!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:28:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian MacKay</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100193#post100193</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100193#post100193</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But parents don't have sex in the house or anywhere else--do they???
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:22:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100189#post100189</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100189#post100189</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And by continuing to stigmatise sex with all their hysteria they not only make it more attractive to the cussedly contrary young 'uns, but they also make it less respectable and available for those of us who <strong>don't</strong> stigmatise it.</p><p>(Sounds like you're suggesting that they limit themselves to single-child…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:20:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100172#post100172</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100172#post100172</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I suspect that that demographic will still be shrill in their demands for the whole thing to be sanitised &amp; steam-cleaned.</p></blockquote><p>And you know what really doesn't go down well? Suggesting that if they don't want their kids to ever encounter sex the first thing they should do is stop having…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:37:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100166#post100166</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100166#post100166</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sounds good to me, Emma, but I don't think it will go down well with the "all care, no responsibility" parents that fail to talk to their kids about the interweb, fail to provide any guidance about using the net and just see the computer (like the tv) as a…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:28:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100158#post100158</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100158#post100158</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>So, let me see if I've got this right: If you expect any degree of transparency or accountability from a government agency (an agency, as far as I can tell, that alternates between bullying and lying about its activities), you're virtually dishing out kiddie pron to every teenage boy in…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:16:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Stevenson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100030#post100030</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100030#post100030</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Leaving aside the issue of internet censorship, what are the chances of this actually working?  </p><p>Working meaning all 'bad' sites blocked, all 'good' sites not blocked and a well managed process around the whole thing that allows for updates and doesn't annoy people.</p><p>Is the best thing we can hope…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:44:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100002#post100002</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=100002#post100002</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So, let me see if I've got this right: If you expect any degree of transparency or accountability from a government agency (an agency, as far as I can tell, that alternates between bullying and lying about its activities), you're virtually dishing out kiddie pron to every teenage boy in…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:24:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99897#post99897</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99897#post99897</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Is it just me, or is "clearly implying" sex what 15-year old boys do? "Yeah, we totally did it last night, man. Like, with the sex and everything. Yeah."</p></blockquote><p>More like "I'd sure engage in brief and unsatisfying sexual relations with her, <em>if</em>  you know what I mean."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:14:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99893#post99893</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99893#post99893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And Australians are prepared to put up with that?</p></blockquote><p>Lots of 'em are really quite angry about it. Nobody much seems to really want it. But they just had an election, so what are you going to do?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:59:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99892#post99892</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99892#post99892</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>The daily fine is a risk once you've been informed that you're linking to banned material, and fail to remove the link. It's still a stonking great sum of money, but it's not quite as ridiculous as the hysteria has portrayed. You're given a chance to fix the problem before…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:57:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JackElder</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99885#post99885</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99885#post99885</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Is it just me, or is "clearly implying" sex what 15-year old boys do?  "Yeah, we totally did it last night, man.  Like, with the sex and everything.  Yeah."
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:28:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99884#post99884</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99884#post99884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So is a couple appearing with offspring "a scene which is cut so that it is clearly implied that two of the characters had sex"</p></blockquote><p>Better filter out all those <em>Brokeback to the Future</em>  YouTube mashups then...</p><p>'Clearly implied' is a wonderful phrase too.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:22:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99882#post99882</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99882#post99882</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So is a couple appearing with offspring <em>"a scene which is cut so that it is clearly implied that two of the characters had sex"</em>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:05:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99880#post99880</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99880#post99880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And Australians are prepared to put up with that?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:01:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99879#post99879</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99879#post99879</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I heart Stephen Fry<br />Although sometimes I think it is unfair that one person can be so clever and talented :)</p></blockquote><p>It hasn't all been easy for him</p><blockquote><p>Fry has been diagnosed with cyclothymia, a mild form of bipolar disorder.[40] He suffered a nervous breakdown in 1995 while appearing in…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:00:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99874#post99874</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99874#post99874</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Initially the first, coming up soon, all ISPs will apply it compulsorily.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:46:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99866#post99866</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99866#post99866</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't quite understand. Is this a hosts file that is Govt. approved that you can have on your machine if you chose. Or a hosts file that an ISP can attatch to your account if you so wish. Or is it a compulsory hosts file that ALL ISPs must…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:18:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather W.</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99862#post99862</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99862#post99862</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>about half of the sites on the list are not related to child porn and include a slew of online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, [and] Christian sites</p></blockquote><p>So most of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:06:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JackElder</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99857#post99857</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99857#post99857</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I imply sexual activity just by walkin' down the street, dawg.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:51:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99855#post99855</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99855#post99855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Implied sexual activity? That means no pictures of Mums and Dads with, God forbid, Children?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:48:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99846#post99846</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99846#post99846</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There's an AU$11 000 fine for linking to a site on the banned list.</p></blockquote><p>The daily fine is a risk once you've been informed that you're linking to banned material, and fail to remove the link. It's still a stonking great sum of money, but it's not <em>quite</em>  as ridiculous…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:18:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JackElder</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99815#post99815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99815#post99815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So would this blacklist prevent any connections to the server?  Because it strikes me that the first thing you might know about it, if you were one of those innocents caught out by it, would be when you couldn't establish an SMTP connection to your mail server... or FTP any…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:01:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jo S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99811#post99811</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99811#post99811</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I heart Stephen Fry</p><p>Although sometimes I think it is unfair that one person can be so clever and talented :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:47:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joanna</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99810#post99810</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99810#post99810</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>it means a scene which is cut so that it is clearly implied that two of the characters had sex, even though you didn't see them do it.</p></blockquote><p>So any of the episodes of the early X Files, cos Mulder and Scully were like, <em>totally</em> doing it? And the same…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:42:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99793#post99793</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99793#post99793</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>implied as opposed to actual ... this is a completely meaningless standard, so of course it produces bizarrely erratic results.</p><p>Really? I'd have thought most stuff (well much of it anyway) didn't involve actual sexual activity, drug use or violence. You see people having sex, or doing drugs in a…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:01:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99790#post99790</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99790#post99790</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So, what does being on the blacklist mean?</p><p>Does canteens.com.au get any Australian traffic? Or is it something less insidious?</p></blockquote><p>Currently, it means that anyone using filtering software on their PC can't access the site. Also if the site is hosted in Australia, the ACMA can issue fines and take-downs.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:55:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99784#post99784</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99784#post99784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Do they have to give the Christians *actual reason* to feel persecuted? It's tiring enough dealing with the delusions.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:28:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dave Patrick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99783#post99783</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99783#post99783</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So, what does being on the blacklist mean?</p><p>Does canteens.com.au get any Australian traffic? Or is it something less insidious?</p></blockquote><p>That's pretty much what it means, yes &ndash; Australian ISPs are supposed to block traffic from their subscribers to all the sites on the blacklist.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:27:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99764#post99764</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99764#post99764</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Depressing.</p><p>I'm off to re-read Kafka's 'The Trial'.</p><p>If memory serves, Josef K ends up completely exonerated and marries the judges daughter after a humerous interlude in court involving ladies underwear, strangely-shaped vegetables and trousers that keep falling down.</p><p>That should cheer me up.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:20:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99762#post99762</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99762#post99762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						LOLnui
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:10:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99756#post99756</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99756#post99756</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>and what about images of humourously shaped vegetables? clearly morally dangerous.</p></blockquote><p>To quote Baldrick: "it is if you sit on one".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:00:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99754#post99754</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99754#post99754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>implied</em>  as opposed to actual ... this is a completely meaningless standard, so of course it produces bizarrely erratic results.</p></blockquote><p>Really? I'd have thought most stuff (well much of it anyway) didn't involve actual sexual activity, drug use or violence. You see people having sex, or doing drugs in a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:58:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Stevenson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99753#post99753</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99753#post99753</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You can just see the line of thinking developing in the 'mind' of the committee that created this.</p><p>We have a list of suspect sites<br />We must protect the public from suspect sites<br />Ergo, we cannot show the public the list of suspect sites 'cos the great unwashed will want…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:58:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99752#post99752</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99752#post99752</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Like our Dunners brethren, I suspect it's the evil veges.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:53:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99749#post99749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99749#post99749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So, what does being on the blacklist mean?</p><p>Does canteens.com.au get any Australian traffic? Or is it something less insidious?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:51:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99744#post99744</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99744#post99744</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You Dunedin people are pervs.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:38:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99739#post99739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99739#post99739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						but think about the children! &ndash; we want them to eat their veges ....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:05:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ali bramwell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99733#post99733</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99733#post99733</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>...implied sexual activity, drug use or violence...</p></blockquote><p><em>implied</em>   as opposed to actual. <br />well you know the slopes of the North Otago Hills are quite suggestive of female curves. surely that listing should include any online reproductions of McCahon paintings. quite a few landscape images imply sexual activity come to think…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:06:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99732#post99732</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-making-a-list-not-bothering-to-check/?p=99732#post99732</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:06:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
