<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Up Front: It&#039;s Complicated</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287904#post287904</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287904#post287904</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m tired of the thread too :-)</q></p><p>Not to stretch a point, but I do believe you are right Ben, it’s comical that the thrust of the law prohibits those most predisposed i.e. those with the unbounded energy and flexibility,  while pharmaceutical companies profit enormously from our need to perform…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:07:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287869#post287869</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287869#post287869</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which sounds suspiciously like underage couples being allowed to… experiment, without being criminalised.</q></p><p>So long as the parents don't push for prosecution. Which isn't everyone being treated equally under the law, not everyone has the same parents. But it's good to hear that good sense surrounds these laws in human…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:04:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287844#post287844</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287844#post287844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>We’re back to kids/ children swimming? because teen pregnancy, exposure to STDs, parental consent required for under 16s medical  treatment, minimum age of 16 for holding a full time job/ leaving school/ getting married/ leaving home  = derail</p><p>Emma linked to on the first page</p><p><q> Police national youth aid co-ordinator…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:50:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287749#post287749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287749#post287749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m just not sure that an argument that there aren’t really any downsides to sex is a good argument.</q></p><p>I'm not making that argument. I'm saying there's a balance of goods and harms in it, and trying to put in perspective the harms compared any number of things we do…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:43:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287747#post287747</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287747#post287747</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In this country, some stats on that would be awesome. The main killer STD, HIV turning into full blown AIDS, killed no one at all in 2011.</q></p><p>Even if no one dies in a year (and we're unusual with HIV, lots of other countries are losing people hand over foot),…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:25:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287687#post287687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287687#post287687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So you’re comparing a mostly uncontrolled cause of death with a mostly controlled cause of death here.</q></p><p>This is all true, but what I find scary is just that the suicide really is that high.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:28:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287686#post287686</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287686#post287686</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s pretty scary that intentional self-harm kills more people than motor vehicle accidents.</q><br />Not so much. At the risk of stating the bleeding obvious: <br />It’s impossible to get either figure down to zero. <br />But it’s a lot easier to limit the latter by making and enforcing legislation. <br />It’s a lot…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:19:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287684#post287684</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287684#post287684</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You hear of plenty of people dying from diseases from sexual contact though.</q></p><p>In this country, some stats on that would be awesome. The main killer STD, HIV turning into full blown AIDS, killed no one at all in 2011. I don't know how to find out, really. [[http://www.health.govt.nz/publication/mortality-and-demographic-data-2009|mortality data…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:01:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287672#post287672</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287672#post287672</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You also don’t really hear of many people dying from sex.</q></p><p>You hear of plenty of people dying from diseases from sexual contact though.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:24:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gee</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287518#post287518</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287518#post287518</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Agreed.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 16:25:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287516#post287516</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287516#post287516</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Fair enough. It shouldn't be either minimized or maximized as problem, but seen for exactly what it is. I don't think it helps HIV sufferers for people to think it's worse than what it is, either.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 16:05:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gee</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287513#post287513</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287513#post287513</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, it would be a terrible thing to happen. Also very unlikely.</q></p><p>Agreed. Sorry, wasn't trying to make a point there, just wanted to not minimise the struggle for people with sexually-transmitted HIV, or those with serious complications from other STDs.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:36:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287512#post287512</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287512#post287512</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>but, obviously, HIV……</q></p><p>Yes, it would be a terrible thing to happen. Also very unlikely. Your chances of dying in a car crash are far higher, and we put children in those from before they are even born.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 14:55:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gee</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287509#post287509</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287509#post287509</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which would get you in trouble these days, if you actually did it at a pool.</q><br />Quite :)</p><p><q> Many things that aren't STDs are serious. Many things that are STDs aren't particularly serious. They don't really hold any special place in the medical seriousness stakes..... To this end the endless…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 14:45:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287505#post287505</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287505#post287505</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Typo in last sentence, I hope it's clear what I really meant. We learn sex in a way that is akin to throwing kids in the deep end of a pool. Which would get you in trouble these days, if you actually did it at a pool.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:44:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287494#post287494</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287494#post287494</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>yes… but the consequences of untreated STDs or late treated STDs can be quite serious</q></p><p>The consequences of untreated meningitis can be death within 48 hours. Many things that aren't STDs are serious. Many things that are STDs aren't particularly serious. They don't really hold any special place in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 10:21:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gee</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287489#post287489</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287489#post287489</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which is why treatment for them should be free, anonymous, and non-judgmental, in the interests of public health, and children should know how they can access that treatment.</q></p><p>Christchurch had this when I was a teenager. Was of huge importance to a lot of teens then. It's my understanding now…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 06:22:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287464#post287464</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287464#post287464</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>were your friends being cautious for the sake of it or because they’d failed to take adequate precautions?</q></p><p>It was because their partner, or ex-partners of partners had revealed that they had an STD. Some of it was caution. A lot of it was at the insistence of the partners.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:02:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287460#post287460</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287460#post287460</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hey! Why aren't you on skype?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:27:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287459#post287459</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287459#post287459</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well that was odd, both my question(s) and whatever just happened to the site. I thought I may have had a point regarding my failure to notify my sexual partner, but that probably says more about me than anything.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:13:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287458#post287458</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287458#post287458</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Can you ever be ready for an STD?</q></p><p>No, you're quite right Ben you certainly can't, though I would contend that in some cases the recklessness of youth does seem to dull with age to some extent.   it's unwise of me to assume, but based on your school's denomination, I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:55:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287457#post287457</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287457#post287457</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Can you ever be ready for an STD?</q></p><p>No you're quite right Ben you certainly can't, though I would contend that in some cases the recklessness of youth does seem to dull with age to some extent.   Were your friends being cautious for cautious sake or because they'd failed to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:51:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287454#post287454</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287454#post287454</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And with due respect to your friends and their swabbuckling adventures, they possibly weren’t quite ready either.</q></p><p>Can you ever be ready for an STD? It's just one of the risks of sex, highly mitigable by taking precautions, and mostly treatable even if you don't. Nothing about that changes just…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:16:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287453#post287453</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287453#post287453</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And with due respect to your friends and their swabbuckling adventures, they possibly weren’t quite <em>ready</em> either. I understand that these kinds of mythologies are valuable currency in the schoolyard and I’m certainly not advocating raising the age. But in many ways I'm envious of your more leisurely stroll into…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:04:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287452#post287452</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287452#post287452</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I have heard those swabs are really painful. Are they still necessary? I’m not all broken up about the night club experience at 14, it’s just one of a great many missed opportunities.</q></p><p>To be honest Ben, I find that a little sensationalised. There are complications which as a 17…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:37:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287450#post287450</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287450#post287450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, let’s never ever forget that, no matter how old you are, you can’t legally “make a decision” to have an abortion in New Zealand.</q></p><p>Thanks for reminding me Emma, living here, I had completely forgotten about that anachronism. And thank goodness Judith Collins’ Care of Children Act 2004 was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:12:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287448#post287448</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287448#post287448</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which is another reason it’s a bad social construct, that practically puts most of the burden on women.</q></p><p>... something something feminism.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:03:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287415#post287415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287415#post287415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Thanks Ben, I’m sensing you may be a Brave New World fan</q></p><p>It's a good book. A good think about what the psychology of a well-ordered scientific society could look like. I'm more of a fan of <em>The Dispossessed</em> though, and other works of LeGuin.</p><p>I have heard those swabs…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:11:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287387#post287387</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287387#post287387</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> into the age of consent debate isn’t something I’ve got a clear plan for. It just seems worth noting.</q></p><p>Duly noted, I appreciate your candor, and I agree that the notion that people are better off being completely protected from dangerous things needs to be challenged, within reason, as for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 02:20:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287386#post287386</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287386#post287386</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Ben, I’m sensing you may be a Brave New World fan. and rather than being colored, as in your case,  by a missed opportunity in a bar at 14, my motivation here is Chlamydia, God bless her soul, and the requisite urethra swabs at 17, so the law or…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 01:50:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287385#post287385</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287385#post287385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Actually what set me off was Ben’s 7 year old learning to swim</q></p><p>I'm certainly not suggesting that 7 year olds should be having sex. Just that the beginnings of their training in something very dangerous can begin very young. I'm challenging the notion that people are better off being…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 01:17:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287384#post287384</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287384#post287384</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for your reply Emma </p><p><q>No, I understand that, that’s why I asked for clarification on your earlier comment. I’d assumed you were talking about teenagers. You appear to be talking about children.</q></p><p>Actually what set me off was Ben’s 7 year old learning to swim, it could have just…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:55:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287380#post287380</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287380#post287380</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						To be crystal clear what I’m saying here, I think it would be a wonderful thing if the average age of childbearing were to return closer to where it is most biologically suitable. I’ve seen far too much of the outcome of leaving it off until the 30s, practically my…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:07:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287379#post287379</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287379#post287379</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And I’m not having a go Emma, I’m attempting to make a genuine contribution.</q></p><p>No, I understand that, that's why I asked for clarification on your earlier comment. I'd assumed you were talking about teenagers. You appear to be talking about children.</p><p><q>if we have a nine year old legally…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:06:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287378#post287378</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287378#post287378</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>OK, I’ve stopped responding now. not to the thread, just to that reply. And I’m not having a go Emma, I’m attempting to make a genuine contribution</q></p><p>On this issue I don't have views set in stone, so I like your contribution, it furthers the debate. Yes, flirting with the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:00:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287374#post287374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287374#post287374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry the editing period ran out before I finished my final paragraph:</p><p><q>Its parents, and if its parents cannot, the state. Because a child is not a punishment, it’s a human being.</q> </p><p>With that sentiment I can’t agree more, so I feel the child whose parents are unable to legally…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:43:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287372#post287372</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287372#post287372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Emma, thanks for your reply, as I understand it Ben was flirting with the idea of removing the age of sexual consent, but the age for medical treatment without consent as I linked to is 16, if we have a nine year old legally able to consent to sex who…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:24:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287371#post287371</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287371#post287371</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Are these not of equal seriousness, polar almost?</q></p><p>No. No, they're really not. </p><p><q>pregnancy is reversible, but who’s to make that decision</q></p><p>Are you seriously asking this question? Because there is only one morally-defensible answer, and I'd hate for you to accidentally get this particular can of whoop-arse opened on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:07:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287365#post287365</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287365#post287365</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for your response Ben. I obviously agree that we’re not socially ready to lower the age but I also readily agree that that our society has created a perverse outcome in this regard,  ideologically I feel we’re on the same page.     </p><p><q>I think death is a far more serious…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 19:01:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287359#post287359</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287359#post287359</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not to overcomplicate, but the thing about swimming is you don’t see too many women emerging from the waves having been impregnated by the ocean.</q></p><p>You also don't really hear of many people dying from sex. I think death is a far more serious consequence than impregnation (which is preventable…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:48:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287353#post287353</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287353#post287353</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We could be a species that educates children about sex as our only control of it, letting them make some of the mistakes </q></p><p>Not to overcomplicate, but the thing about swimming is you don’t see too many women emerging from the waves having been impregnated by the ocean. With sex,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:25:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287337#post287337</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287337#post287337</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em><q>Also, I was under the impression that when you would have been 14, there was no “age of consent” for boys for heterosexual sex.</q></em></p><p><q>This is true. However, almost nobody knew this, so it wouldn’t have affected many people’s decision-making.</q></p><p><br />Really?  When I was at high school (mid 80’s) it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 23:56:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287113#post287113</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287113#post287113</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As an example, I am teaching my son right now, aged 7, to swim. Eventually, when I believe he can swim, I will be able to allow him freedom from control near deep water. The consequences of this are far, far, far more severe than any likely consequences of poorly…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 10:05:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287112#post287112</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287112#post287112</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Then you did the right thing, and didn’t get the outcome you wanted. That sucks, but it happens.</q></p><p>Did I do the right thing? Really? I’m asking this in a moral sense, rather than a legal sense. In hindsight, I am not sure at all. In avoiding a harm, I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 09:58:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287110#post287110</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287110#post287110</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>You totally misunderstand the point of my story. I could have said nothing at all, and maybe got laid. I only said something because of my understanding of the severity of the law regarding underage sex (like practically everyone I didn’t know that it might have not even been technically…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 00:09:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287095#post287095</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287095#post287095</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Absent the law, you don’t know what her personal feelings were or would have been about sleeping with a 14-year-old. </q></p><p>Absent the law, I don't know why I'd particularly care what her feelings were about it, unless she brought it up specifically. I may have deeply held feelings about Croatians,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 15:58:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287087#post287087</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287087#post287087</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, I was under the impression that when you would have been 14, there was no “age of consent” for boys for heterosexual sex.</q></p><p>This is true. However, almost nobody knew this, so it wouldn't have affected many people's decision-making.</p><p>People <em>should</em> always try to make sure their partners are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 12:20:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287085#post287085</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287085#post287085</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Also, I was under the impression that when you would have been 14, there was no “age of consent” for boys for heterosexual sex.  I remember it has having been relevant to some Children's Commission advocacy for a boy who was being charged liable parent contribution for having, aged 12,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 12:00:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287080#post287080</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287080#post287080</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						No, I don't know if it's inevitable things would have gone badly; all I'm saying is, per your own story, she cleared off when she found out your real age, which might have been because of the legal ramifications or might not. Personally, I would be out of there __so…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 11:12:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287075#post287075</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287075#post287075</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Maybe not, but it sounds like *she* would have been traumatized if she’d found out you were 14 later on in proceedings. Whatever the reasoning for that, it probably wouldn’t have been pretty in practice.</q></p><p>No one will ever know if that is true. The trauma you are referring to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 10:23:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287045#post287045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287045#post287045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Which features in the opening credits of the excellent Aussie series <em>Puberty Blues</em> (TV1, Sunday), where the usual seduction line is "Do you want a root?"
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 18:24:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287022#post287022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287022#post287022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What, short of asking, could constitute a “reasonable step”?</q></p><p>You could play that creepy Dragon song and look meaningfully at them, I suppose.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 15:06:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sj</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287016#post287016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=287016#post287016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"Some people have a much easier time thinking of a theoretical eighteen year old boy as a manipulative abusive predator than they do a girl. That's problematic too..."</p><p>Sorry I haven't read the article in full. This from Emma I read. This Emma I agree with and find problematic. Gender-stereotyped…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 14:01:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286995#post286995</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286995#post286995</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> She was really into it, we were getting on famously. But like a fool, I let it slip that I was 14 (too honest for your own good, you idiot, my friends said), and she freaked out and took off.</q>Or maybe she was 16, or 15, even though she said…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 12:03:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant Taylor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286979#post286979</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286979#post286979</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t have been deeply traumatized that evening</q><br />The question of "what harm is being done?" has been implicit throughout this discussion but not really surfaced until now with Ben and Lucy's latest comments. </p><p>There seems to me to be important distinctions here between the various possible…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 09:51:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286968#post286968</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286968#post286968</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>But like a fool, I let it slip that I was 14 (too honest for your own good, you idiot, my friends said), and she freaked out and took off. I was routinely mistaken for 18-20 at that age, until I opened my mouth. The cool kids knew when to…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 04:01:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>&quot;chris&quot;</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286966#post286966</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286966#post286966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>"a power of good."</q></p><p>Has a nice ring to it. Most nicknames for Herpes sound downright depressing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 23:36:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286964#post286964</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286964#post286964</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Observation could be a reasonable step, I guess?</q></p><p>That's about all there is, really. If they look mature, then I think most "reasonable" people would consider how it might have fared for them, in the same situation. They put it to the thought experiment of meeting an attractive person that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 23:03:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286961#post286961</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286961#post286961</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Observation could be a reasonable step, I guess? The Select Committee said<q>It is expected that the wider the age gap and maturity difference between an accused person and the young person, in any particular case, the more onerous it will be for an older person to establish this defence. That…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 21:38:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286958#post286958</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286958#post286958</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You’d think so, but also you’d imagine that it’s pretty rough to criminalise someone in such circumstances…</q></p><p>And we're pretty much all in agreement at least about this? That the best thing about our law in this area is that it's not often enforced?</p><p><q>it is not invariably necessary to…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 21:14:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286955#post286955</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286955#post286955</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You’d think so, but also you’d imagine that it’s pretty rough to criminalise someone in such circumstances…</p><p>[Bingo: in <em>Grace v R</em> [2011] NZCA 950, the Crown admitted: "it is not invariably necessary to make a direct inquiry of the young person or to seek independent verification" (at 17). Admittedly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 20:59:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286954#post286954</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286954#post286954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don’t actually know what “reasonable steps” are</q></p><p>Surely "asking" is a bare minimum.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 20:52:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286953#post286953</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286953#post286953</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Slightly tangentially, by my reading of this, the consensual sex I had at fifteen with my seventeen year old boyfriend was a crime. </q></p><p>You have a defense, but he doesn't, as I read it.</p><p>Even weirder, the idea that at the age of 15, if I had flirted with a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 20:49:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286952#post286952</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286952#post286952</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> consent IS possible </q></p><p>Yeah, I agree. That’s why I think “age of consent” is misleading, because the “age of consent” is generally meant as the age below which you can’t consent. But you clearly can consent if you’re under 16. Your consent just <em>isn’t enough</em> to beat s134, although it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 20:49:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286951#post286951</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286951#post286951</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for that, Keir.</p><p><q>If you look at s134A, you see that the law has a concept of “consent” for those under 16. It just doesn’t think that’s hugely important. </q></p><p>"Age of consent" doesn't come into it, anyway. Consent itself does, and is clearly important as one of the three…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 20:38:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286950#post286950</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286950#post286950</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Over sixteen is referred to, particularly when making international comparisons, as "the age of consent" because it's the age at which <em>only</em> consent matters.</p><p><q>If you look at s134A, you see that the law has a concept of “consent” for those under 16. It just doesn’t think that’s hugely important.</q>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 20:32:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286946#post286946</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286946#post286946</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/whole.html#DLM329048" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Crimes Act is reasonably readable on this front.</a> </p><p>To be quite rough, there’s a group of crimes here. One, sexual violation, is what we’d commonly call rape. It’s defined, basically, as having sex with someone who doesn’t freely, actively and informedly consent, and it carries a 20 year maximum,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 20:07:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick D&#039;Angelo</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286945#post286945</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286945#post286945</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I thought the law was “half your age plus 7”? That’s what my classmates at high school said.</q><br />I thought that was the age limit for Cougars ‘prey’?<br />(It doesn’t apply to men because regardless of her age, you’re still A Dirty Old Man)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 19:27:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286943#post286943</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286943#post286943</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wish people would stop using the term “age of consent” here. In NZ, the “age of consent” is, if anything, 12 – that’s the age below which it is impossible to use a partner’s consent in a defence.</q></p><p>What's a better term? Presumably you're not saying adults can have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 19:27:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286941#post286941</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286941#post286941</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I wish people would stop using the term “age of consent” here. In NZ, the “age of consent” is, if anything, 12 – that’s the age below which it is impossible to use a partner’s consent in a defence. The rules around sex with under-16 year olds are not framed…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 19:06:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286939#post286939</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286939#post286939</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The intellectually disabled, for instance, or insane people, could possibly be considered unfit to clearly consent.</q></p><p>I think that's actually one of the stronger arguments against a single line. A lot of physically adult people with intellectual disabilities like sex and consent to it. Ditto people institutionalised with mental illnesses.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 19:04:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286936#post286936</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286936#post286936</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Caveat the above with “Within the law, of course.” Which is what we’re discussing, so I can’t say it’s an obvious thing, about where the line should be drawn. As Emma started out by saying, it’s complicated. Everyone’s got their squick, and it gets squicky fast when we’re talking about…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 18:46:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286933#post286933</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286933#post286933</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I suspect that where you and I really differ is more likely on whether you want a crazy hodge-podge of rule and restrictions that vary depending on what exactly is under discussion, or a single “now you’re an adult” line. But I could be wrong.</q></p><p>I'm not sure, I don't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 18:26:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286932#post286932</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286932#post286932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It might be handy to instead use a “mature adult” card</p><p>The very idea sticks in my craw. It's like taking the idea of a free and progressive society, and inverting it. Patronizing paternalism is hardly a new idea.</q></p><p>I can see the attraction of that point of view. But…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 18:15:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286925#post286925</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286925#post286925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And worse the act the law measures is a physical one but maturity is so much more than the simply ability to have sex.</q></p><p>Yes. Also, conversely, one's right to have sex might have little to do with maturity. The idea that an socially immature but physically mature 20 year…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 16:37:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286883#post286883</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286883#post286883</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a “mature adult” card</q></p><p>How about a shiny badge instead with LEDs, that could be used as a ninja throwing star, with a secret tracking device ... oh</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 13:44:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286872#post286872</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286872#post286872</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The problem with age of consent laws is they try to set a threshold for maturity in the law</q></p><p>But we do that with all sorts of things &ndash; contracts, operating dangerous machinery, medical attention, (recreational) drug use, military service, you name it. Pragmatism requires a sharp line that's easily…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 12:58:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286855#post286855</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286855#post286855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes: tactically, a charge of sexual conduct with young person under 16 is way way easier to prove. You don't even have to prove the defendant <em>knew</em> the victim was under 16: the defendant has to show they took reasonable steps + had reasonable grounds + consent.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 11:55:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286854#post286854</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286854#post286854</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The problem with age of consent laws is they try to set a threshold for maturity in the law. And worse the act the law measures is a physical one but maturity is so much more than the simply ability to have sex.</p><p>Some of the arguments treat sex as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 11:52:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286850#post286850</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286850#post286850</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But who is really creating the damage here? How are the media treating this case? </q></p><p>The media hype has largely been generated and actively courted by Kaitlyn's parents, which is another thing that makes me make my 'conflicted' face about this case. But before the circus hit the road a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 11:19:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286849#post286849</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286849#post286849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Homophobia is probably a factor</q></p><p>Why?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 10:48:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286848#post286848</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286848#post286848</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But that was diametrically opposite to the argument they were making</q></p><p>I know. I just thought someone should mention that "pressuring someone into sex" is actually rape.</p><p>One of the other oddities is that in NZ it's quite legal to have sex at 16, but not legal to produce "sexually…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 10:18:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286847#post286847</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286847#post286847</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And if you rape an under-16, that’s a different (more serious) crime, and presumably if the young person consented to sex, that would be a defence though haven’t checked.</q></p><p>Which brings up another complication: "statutory rape" (and I agree with Graham, that's a terrible descriptor) seems to be quite often…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 23:28:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286846#post286846</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286846#post286846</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Whereas I agree with her, because the girl did commit rape. And that should not be trivialised.</q></p><p>See, I think that is a perfectly valid argument (especially considering attitudes about men always being “up for it”, etc.) But that was diametrically opposite to the argument they were making, and IIRC…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 23:21:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Myles Thomas</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286845#post286845</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286845#post286845</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hopefully this will eventually be resolved in courts where sense will prevail as sentences are laid down. It's impossible to adequately legislate to suit all, and sadly most laws target the under performers at the expense of the competent &ndash; recreational drugs need only be illegal for some, some drivers…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 23:18:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286843#post286843</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286843#post286843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>While I agree that underage sex is not necessarily exploitative, in some cases it sure is.</q></p><p>Absolutely. And in some cases, over-age sex is exploitative. Likewise, as Islander points out, non-sexual relationships can be just as strong as sexual ones &ndash; including as strong a bad influence. But in neither…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 20:24:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286842#post286842</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286842#post286842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I suggest &ndash; diffidentally- that relationships comprise rather more than sexual relationships...and you learn to handle those as you grow up, by living through dealing with illness/ death/disaster/change of all kinds- including the benign!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 20:05:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286841#post286841</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286841#post286841</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A particular NZ child-rapist claimed his 8-y.o. victims were consenting. He didn't "force" them.</p><p>While I agree that underage sex is not necessarily exploitative, in some cases it sure is.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 19:40:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286840#post286840</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286840#post286840</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The one thing we could agree on, sort of, was that American media often uses the age of consent &ndash; always 18 on TV, despite its variance between states &ndash; in a creepy way, creating a fantasy of illegal sex. </q></p><p>And, frankly, as far as <em>Glee</em> is concerned I'd put…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 19:27:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286839#post286839</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286839#post286839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>When you're 35, "she's legal" isn't good enough.</p><p>Classic. I wonder how that would go down as a rule in a brothel.</q></p><p>I thought the whole point of brothels was that they swap compatibility for cash as the basis of consent?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 18:00:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286838#post286838</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286838#post286838</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From that link I found this one painfully amusing:</p><p><q>When you're 35, "she's legal" isn't good enough.</q></p><p>Classic. I wonder how that would go down as a rule in a brothel. Sorry, mate, you're just too old for our girls.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 17:44:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286837#post286837</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286837#post286837</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m not sure what the analogue would be for ages of consent.</q></p><p>No, I'm not either. If there weren't predatory pedophiles, there wouldn't need to be an age of consent? But there are such people. Perhaps that may change/lessen. Or it could go the other way. To me that seems…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 17:20:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Connelly</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286836#post286836</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286836#post286836</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Good article.  Thanks
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 17:04:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286835#post286835</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286835#post286835</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think it’s more about consent than maturity – that’s an incredibly subjective idea. Furthermore, having sex is in itself a driver of maturity, a rite of passage.</q></p><p>Yep &ndash; arguably the most robust defence of ages of consent is similar to that of anti-polymarriage laws, that the intention (never…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 16:54:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286834#post286834</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286834#post286834</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						New Zealand doesn't have an "age of consent" at 16. There's no presumption that an under-16 year old can't consent. (If you took reasonable steps to discover age + had reasonable grounds to think the young person was over 16, and they consented, that's a defence to  a charge of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 16:51:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286833#post286833</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286833#post286833</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But isn’t part of that development not just age, but experience? How do you learn to handle relationships if you don’t have relationships?</q></p><p>Precisely. It's analogous to over protecting children from physical play. It doesn't really make them safer, because they don't learn what is actually dangerous, they don't develop…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 16:25:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286832#post286832</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286832#post286832</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think it's more about consent than maturity &ndash; that's an incredibly subjective idea. Furthermore, having sex is in itself a driver of maturity, a rite of passage.</q></p><p>I found <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2007/09/the_mindbooty_problem.single.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this column</a> interesting, about re-examining the whole idea of 'age of consent' and its underlying concepts. But one of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 16:22:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286831#post286831</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286831#post286831</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>An immature 25 year old? No way.</q></p><p>I think it's more about consent than maturity &ndash; that's an incredibly subjective idea. Furthermore, having sex is in itself a driver of maturity, a rite of passage.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 16:09:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286830#post286830</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286830#post286830</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						One of the "moments of recognition" for me at university was being introduced to the idea of philosophical post-modernism. Suddenly I had a name for how I'd been thinking for a long time. Yes, it depends, there's more than one way to look at that, who's asking and why do…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 15:41:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Konrad Kurta</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286829#post286829</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286829#post286829</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You're right &ndash; it is a complicated area. I know people who were barely capable of talking to the opposite sex at 15, and others who had moved out of home and had numerous partners by that time. Is there a 'reasonable man' test involved if a case ends up…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 15:41:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286828#post286828</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286828#post286828</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>an under-eighteen-year-old girl was depicted socially coercing an older (over 18 by some amount) boy into sex. The blogger was outraged that Glee was using "rape" (their description, due to the age-of-consent issue) in a titillating way. I objected to their description, on the grounds that sex involving someone below…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 15:32:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286827#post286827</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286827#post286827</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I have had exactly this argument, in a different context. I had sex at fifteen. Nobody should get to tell me that whether I consented or not is irrelevant.</q></p><p>I have a strong dislike of the phrase "statutory rape".</p><p>Rape is about lack of consent. Underage sex is underage sex.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 14:47:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286826#post286826</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286826#post286826</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The surprising thing about that piece of received wisdom for me is how accurate it actually is to what are generally considered acceptable age differences in Western society (quirks of gender aside).</q></p><p>I always thought it should be exponential rather than linear, but yeah.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 13:41:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286825#post286825</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286825#post286825</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I objected to their description, on the grounds that sex involving someone below an age of consent was not automatically rape, and shouldn't be described that way.</q></p><p>I have had exactly this argument, in a different context. I had sex at fifteen. Nobody should get to tell me that whether…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 13:36:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286824#post286824</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286824#post286824</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I recall an attempt to introduce a Romeo &amp; Juliet law here, which got shouted down as "Phil Goff wants 14-year-olds to have sex!!1!" Has anything else happened since then?</q></p><p>Nope. The end result of that clause being removed from the legislation was that we ended up with a law that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 13:32:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286823#post286823</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286823#post286823</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I thought the law was “half your age plus 7”? That’s what my my classmates at high school said.</q></p><p>The surprising thing about that piece of received wisdom for me is how accurate it actually is to what are generally considered acceptable age differences in Western society (quirks of gender…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 13:24:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286822#post286822</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286822#post286822</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> it might not be true.</q></p><p>Fair enough.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 13:18:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286821#post286821</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286821#post286821</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I thought the law was "half your age plus 7"? That's what my my classmates at high school said.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 13:17:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Josh Addison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286820#post286820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286820#post286820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I recall an attempt to introduce a Romeo & Juliet law here, which got shouted down as "Phil Goff wants 14-year-olds to have sex!!1!" Has anything else happened since then?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 13:11:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286819#post286819</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286819#post286819</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I tend to trust the ACLU. Other than that, yeah.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 13:11:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Graham</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286818#post286818</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286818#post286818</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In Canada – Canada! – the age of consent is orifice-dependent. </q></p><p>That's just asking for theme cakes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 12:51:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286817#post286817</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286817#post286817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Can age of consent law be done well at all, when age is the only signifier of maturity and power dynamic we can use? What’s its purpose?</q></p><p>I ended up in a very bizarre argument a while ago on a feminist website about an episode of Glee, where, as it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 12:50:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286816#post286816</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286816#post286816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And the fact that they waited till Kaitlyn was over 18 to press charges, so she'd be tried as an adult.</q></p><p>This may not be true. The source for this is Kaitlyn's father. An early quote from Kaitlyn's mother said that while the girls had been friends for years, they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 12:28:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286815#post286815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286815#post286815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And the fact that they waited till Kaitlyn was over 18 to press charges, so she'd be tried as an adult.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 12:20:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286814#post286814</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-its-complicated/?p=286814#post286814</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 12:20:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
