<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Up Front: Because You Should Know</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>John Ormond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=123899#post123899</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=123899#post123899</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So, one bank has been caught trying to evade tax.<br />Taxes are the modest price we pay for civilisation.  If the (Australian) banks don't want to pay their fair share, then they really should go to Somalia, or Madagascar.<br />If a Maori gang tried to steal hundreds of millions of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:31:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>paulalambert</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121825#post121825</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121825#post121825</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Steven Judd: <br />"For boys who had been through the juvenile justice system, compared to boys with similar histories without judicial involvement, the odds of adult judicial interventions increased almost seven-fold," says study co-author Richard E. Tremblay...</p></blockquote><p>Thats a good study thanks.  There is also a similar idea of "deviance amplified"…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:30:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121802#post121802</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121802#post121802</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>ok, so we'll spend $150K on an internet filter to keep children safe...</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/2607013/School-for-scandal" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/2607013/School-for-scandal</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 08:28:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121798#post121798</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121798#post121798</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Joe:</p><blockquote><p>There's been a myth abroad for some time that free-market policies somehow raise the general IQ, and the needs of the vulnerable can be wished away. Much of the present bloated jail population is due to this cynical nonsense.</p></blockquote><p>Kerry:</p><blockquote><p>You're quite right, it is due to that cynical nonsense. We…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:24:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121796#post121796</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121796#post121796</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Kerry, not offended by your statement re. Weatherston, or any other aspect of your post. Sorry if it came across that way. Because of Weatherston's monstrous individuality I just don't know how far his case is relevant to the issues Sian Elias has raised, so I took your mention of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:48:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121794#post121794</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121794#post121794</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Apropos the Elias speech, some more <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090716113301.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">food for thought</a>.</p><blockquote><p>"For boys who had been through the juvenile justice system, compared to boys with similar histories without judicial involvement, the odds of adult judicial interventions increased almost seven-fold," says study co-author Richard E. Tremblay, a professor of psychology, pediatrics and psychiatry…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:46:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kerry Weston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121791#post121791</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121791#post121791</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hey Joe, didn't mean to cause offence calling CW mad as a snake, it's the chilling effect from the tv coverage &ndash; instant flight or fight response and I wanna run out of the room whenever he's on. It wasn't clear from the psych evaluations reported whether he had treatment…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:39:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121788#post121788</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121788#post121788</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>. . .  possibly up to 70% of male prisoners have an anti-social personality disorder and 50% of prisoners with major mental health issues don't get any sort of treatment. Clayton Weatherston anyone? He's mad as a snake &ndash; what will prison do to him?</p></blockquote><p>People with intellectual disabilities are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:39:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121782#post121782</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121782#post121782</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Understood. The Geddis article that Kyle linked to is worth a read.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:02:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kerry Weston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121780#post121780</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121780#post121780</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Happens anywhere when constitutional conventions are blatantly challenged.</p></blockquote><p>It was a speech to the Women In Law Society, in honour of Shirley Smith, first woman law lecturer in NZ, not a press release. The most pertinent parts of her speech, to me, were about mental illness &ndash; possibly up to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:43:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121770#post121770</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121770#post121770</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>At about the same time, my partner was a volunteer at our children's kindergarten, running the library there. He wasn't vetted, but there were tight and awkward controls on what he was allowed to do &ndash; so if a child tried to sit on his lap, he had to push…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:58:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>paulalambert</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121767#post121767</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121767#post121767</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Craig Ranapia: Someone might also like to ask when the Government abolished a basic principle of British justice: That people properly charged with crimes are entitled to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law?</p></blockquote><p>Could've beendrugs... the passage of the Misuse of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:09:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121763#post121763</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121763#post121763</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I would have been amazed if Power had not reacted that way, regardless of what sense Elias made. Happens anywhere when constitutional conventions are blatantly challenged. I doubt she is surprised.</p></blockquote><p>Recommended reading for the week: Otago Law lecturer Andrew Geddis on <a href="http://www.pundit.co.nz/content/simon-to-sian-shut-up-please" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">pundit.co.nz</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:43:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121762#post121762</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121762#post121762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>3410, are you saying things would have gone better with the censors if Mr Milk had sharper teeth?</p></blockquote><p>Please bear in mind that I'm a fairly dull-witted sort of fellow. With your help, the penny has now dropped.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:35:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121761#post121761</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121761#post121761</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						3410, are you saying things would have gone better with the censors if Mr Milk had sharper teeth?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:27:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121760#post121760</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121760#post121760</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I would have been amazed if Power had not reacted that way, regardless of what sense Elias made. Happens anywhere when constitutional conventions are blatantly challenged. I doubt she is surprised.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:26:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121759#post121759</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121759#post121759</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well, unlike, say, <em>Milk</em> , in <em>Lesbian Vampire Killers</em> , the nasty lesbians get their comeuppance. With stakes.</p></blockquote><p>Dude! They're <em>vampires!</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:25:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kerry Weston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121756#post121756</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121756#post121756</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ciavarella &ndash; him and his mate, both a pair of skunks. We'll find out when they privatise the prisons, aye? </p><p>I found it interesting that Simon Power got curmudgeonly over Dame Sian Elias' comments about early release of prisoners etc. Amazing how the Chief Justice isn't worthy of respectful attention,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:57:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121755#post121755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121755#post121755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In lo-tech news, "Samoan film censor opens door for lesbian vampires" says the Harold. And then chooses a screengrab of a male-female couple to illustrate the story.</p></blockquote><p>Well, unlike, say, <em>Milk</em>, in <em>Lesbian Vampire Killers</em>, the nasty lesbians get their comeuppance. With stakes. There's probably nothing in the least Freudian…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:48:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kerry Weston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121754#post121754</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121754#post121754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Maybe if there was another 1981,</p></blockquote><p>1981's an interesting one &ndash; I was out protesting for that and have recently completed a history paper where I covered 1981, both anecdotally and big picture, in a seminar. In retrospect, 1981 was simmering for a long time, even General Kippenberger harrumphed about…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:43:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121752#post121752</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121752#post121752</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In lo-tech news, "Samoan film censor opens door for lesbian vampires" <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&amp;objectid=10585118" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">says</a> the Harold. And then chooses a screengrab of a male-female couple to illustrate the story.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:20:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121750#post121750</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121750#post121750</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>When the citizenry feel threatened and afraid, they're much more likely to agree to, or at least not resist, intrusive, limiting measures "for your own good".</p></blockquote><p>At what point would law and order politics jump the shark? Maybe if there was another 1981, or if we had our equivalent of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:12:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kerry Weston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121749#post121749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121749#post121749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's well past time we stopped using 'paedophilia!' as a way to shut down discussion.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, that strategy is much the same as using possible terrorism to massively increase public surveillance. The UK seems especially OTT. </p><p>I also think govts, including our own, allow certain types of crime to go…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:55:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121748#post121748</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121748#post121748</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As for the "safe adults" thing, it riles me a bit because for years, even as qualified registered teachers, we weren't allowed to so much as change a child's clothing without witnesses.</p></blockquote><p>At about the same time, my partner was a volunteer at our children's kindergarten, running the library there.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:33:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kerry Weston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121744#post121744</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121744#post121744</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I wanted to be a potter, or more accurately, a ceramic sculptor and did Craft Design in the late 80's, just when ceramics was getting kicked in the guts by cheap imports. Some marvellous potters lost their livelihoods and although I played with the medium for a while, it was…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:41:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121743#post121743</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121743#post121743</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I feel that kind of thinking &ndash; "if you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to worry about' style &ndash; is very thin edge of the wedge.</p></blockquote><p>Well, given that the Home Office has had a string of high profile cases where highly confidential information about citizens had ended up…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:27:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121740#post121740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121740#post121740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What I inherited Kerry was an intense love of Crown Lynn and 60's/70's pottery. I was sent to pottery classes for a long time as a child &ndash; latterly with Mrs Becroft down the road -and I loved it but wasn't inherently talented at it. As for the "safe adults"…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:52:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kerry Weston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121739#post121739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121739#post121739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hey, Jackie, BTW did you inherit an interest in ceramics, throwing pots etc?</p><p>I feel that kind of thinking &ndash; "if you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to worry about' style &ndash; is very thin edge of the wedge. I don't know about your kindy, but a few years…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:38:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121736#post121736</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121736#post121736</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						How interesting, Kerry. Obviously as a teacher, you are subject to police vetting when you get into any training provider. Our visitors at kindergarten are supposed to sign a book, as are visitors to schools. But to be on a database? A little unusual.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:22:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kerry Weston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121733#post121733</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121733#post121733</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Slightly off-topic, but this is about a "Safe Adults" database in the UK, causing controversy. Basically, anyone who has any 'regular' contact with children in a voluntary capacity has to be vetted. A step too far?</p><blockquote><p>UK Home Office and education officials simply cannot understand why anyone wouldn’t want to…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:02:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121590#post121590</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121590#post121590</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Continuing to keep shunting things over here, Thomas has an ongoing <a href="http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/07/17/but-which-isps/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">list</a> of ISPs and their position on the filter. Oddly Telstra seems to be backing away from their original position.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:44:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121526#post121526</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121526#post121526</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I should note that the DIA has made a change to that letter. Now, instead of saying</p><blockquote><p>We understand that Internet NZ is happy with our plans</p></blockquote><p>it says</p><blockquote><p>Internet NZ has requested further information which the Department will provide.</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:02:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121524#post121524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121524#post121524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Understood. As for any lingering shame, I hope that some day soon Ellis will receive some form of full exoneration &amp; apology. Until then, Lynley Hood has done a phenomenal job of putting the truth on record.</p></blockquote><p>I agree. time for class...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:31:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121522#post121522</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121522#post121522</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>he Digital Child Exploitation Filtering System, funded with $150,000 in this year’s Budget, will be operated by the Department in partnership with ISPs, and will focus solely on websites offering clearly objectionable images of child sexual abuse, which is a serious offence for anyone in New Zealand to access.</p></blockquote><p>$150,000…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:30:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121521#post121521</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121521#post121521</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Sorry if that was unclear Joe, The Peter Ellis mention was in no way about him per se but by the damage done to him and the children in the process of using the children as pawns in the whole nightmare.</p></blockquote><p>Understood. As for any lingering shame, I hope that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:28:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>buzzy</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121520#post121520</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121520#post121520</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>To be clear, I do not believe that filtering will stop people who are even slightly motivated to find this stuff.</p></blockquote><p>Sacha's hit it on the head here. What's being blocked is a list of URLs. Web addresses, to put it another way. It's not blocking email traffic, peer-to-peer applications,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:09:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121517#post121517</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121517#post121517</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>You seem to be implying that Peter Ellis is a victim of society's failure to offer some form of early intervention to those afflicted with a 'disposition' to molest children. For the record, there is no evidence that the massive injustice dealt to Ellis stems from anything other than a…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:58:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121509#post121509</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121509#post121509</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Also of images of adults who are understood to be depicting juveniles.</p></blockquote><p>This is an area I do have concerns with, because it's a not-unpopular fetish.</p><p>Also, what's a child? If it's 'anyone under the legal age of consent', what do you do with images of fourteen year olds produced…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:20:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121507#post121507</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121507#post121507</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In the circumstances the apostrophe might have been, like<br />S3arching for M0orez L0st G1rl's????</p><p>Speaking of which<br /><a href="http://books.whitcoulls.co.nz/lost-girls/ISBN9781891830747" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://books.whitcoulls.co.nz/lost-girls/ISBN9781891830747</a></p><p>...</p><p>I have seen complaints about the use of the phrase "child sex abuse images" to cover images where the abuse is considered no more than the taking of the photograph. Also…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:03:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121506#post121506</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121506#post121506</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>OMG surplus apostrophe.</p><p>/me kills self in shame.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:34:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121505#post121505</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121505#post121505</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Which reminds me, is Moore's <em>Lost Girl's</em> available in NZ?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:34:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121503#post121503</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121503#post121503</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Okay, I've asked a couple of questions of the poor guy whose name is on the email, and he's promised to get back to me. These are they:</p><blockquote><p>Does the DIA expect or require ISPs to inform their customers that their internet connections are being filtered. Do you have any…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:13:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121501#post121501</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121501#post121501</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Uh, I hadn't seen the media release when I wrote that. Sounds like they have been thinking things through anyway.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:13:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121500#post121500</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121500#post121500</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>there is a contradiction between the implicit claim that filtering works to stop people seeing stuff, and the claim that a list of said stuff cannot be circulated lest people use it to see stuff.</p></blockquote><p>To be clear, I do not believe that filtering will stop people who are even…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:09:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121499#post121499</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121499#post121499</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						OTOH, I suppose it does feel like you're in an open democracy when some guy can just ask them and blow the whole thing open...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:04:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121498#post121498</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121498#post121498</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>“If we did, inevitably some people would visit them in the interim, effectively facilitating further offending and making the Department party to the further exploitation of children,”</p></blockquote><p>That implies that at some point in the future the list would be made available, which would be good.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:34:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121494#post121494</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121494#post121494</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I have just been emailed a media release by Trevor Henry of the DIA. It appears to be a reaction to the media attention the filtering is now attracting. In the interests of fairness, I'm going to reproduce the whole thing here, and not comment on it, at least immediately.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:09:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121488#post121488</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121488#post121488</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>So Lucy just as you state it wrong for me to remind us there is a precedent for this in the animal kingdom, just as you insist it is wrong for me to suggest that elucidation rather than shame will take us closer to solving the problem, and similarly as…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:40:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121476#post121476</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121476#post121476</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You seem to be implying that Peter Ellis is a victim of society's failure to offer some form of early intervention to those afflicted with a 'disposition' to molest children. For the record, there is no evidence that the massive injustice dealt to Ellis stems from anything other than a…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:08:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121451#post121451</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121451#post121451</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"The boy who made the original complaint was moved to another creche where his mother again accused a male creche worker of sexually abusing her son. No charges were laid."
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:02:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121450#post121450</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121450#post121450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to say there, Mark, but I find the implications distinctly distasteful and just plain *wrong*.</p></blockquote><p>Because it's easier to vilify than get to the heart of the problem.  Not until the sickos are seen as people will we have any hope of truly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:01:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121443#post121443</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121443#post121443</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Right yes. It does seem to be of limited usefulness. I guess it might deter the less serious offender, those people who aren't hooked up with the right sites/software etc.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:44:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121439#post121439</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121439#post121439</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Any international proxy server will however. Relatively easy to arrange.</p></blockquote><p>I agree. That's why I followed that paragraph with:</p><p>"Alternatively, if the filtering isn't robust and is easily evaded, the whole thing is pointless. Unless it's a way to collect potential offenders' information for later investigation..."</p><p>I mean, I understand…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:18:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121432#post121432</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121432#post121432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The loquacious version for the less technically inclined: your computer is not secure. Not even slightly. The ease with which malicious software can be installed on your computer cannot be overrated.</p></blockquote><p>Sounds unlikely. Even if you had images on your machine, having malicious software which put them there would be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:59:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121424#post121424</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121424#post121424</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Someone on Slashdot a couple of days ago was claiming that your actual traders of kiddie porn post encrypted DVDs to each other, which strikes me as plausible.</p></blockquote><p>Arrests have been made in Australia which involved staking out a PO box and waiting for someone to take delivery of actual…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:20:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121412#post121412</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121412#post121412</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I was just thinking about the refusal to disclose a list of blocked sites because it would provide a "shopping list" for sex offenders.</p><p>But hang on. Those sites are <strong>blocked</strong>.  That's the whole freakin' point. How can it matter if we know what they are? If the filtering scheme…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:43:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121408#post121408</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121408#post121408</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to say there, Mark, but I find the implications distinctly distasteful and just plain *wrong*.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:03:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121403#post121403</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121403#post121403</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>A male spotted hyena which attempted to mate with a female which succeeded in driving it off, eventually turned to its ten-month-old cub, repeatedly mounting it and ejaculating on it. The cub sometimes ignored this and sometimes struggled 'slightly as if in play'. The mother did not intervene.[56]</p><p>Infants and…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:20:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121401#post121401</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121401#post121401</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Top notch first post.</p><blockquote><p>Why bother?</p></blockquote><p>Too keep some gravy trainers in lattes and plush offices till the cows come home. Oh to have that job....as Mr Lock said</p><blockquote><p>"There is a difference &ndash; a big difference &ndash; between a people and those who rule them."</p></blockquote><p>sincerity.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:01:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>The Rabbi T. White</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121398#post121398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121398#post121398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And even if you did run across it, and quickly backed out, then suddenly got searched by the police and had a couple of images in your cache, the police are quickly going to realise that you're not the person they're looking for.</p><p>Hundreds of images in folders, different story.</p></blockquote><p>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:49:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121374#post121374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121374#post121374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Which raises the question of whether you're still a shore girl or a westie.</p></blockquote><p>The 'which kind of Aucklander are you?' Facebook quiz informed me that I was a westie, and we know how reliable those things are.</p><p>(Anyway, I was born in Venezuela to a Cajun father and an…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:24:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121371#post121371</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121371#post121371</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's what happens in Britain. Here in NZ you'll get one of these. Our system will at least be honest.</p></blockquote><p>Can't quite get my head around this, So if you click on the unpublished URL, you will be redirected to the warning screen telling you why the site is blocked.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:05:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121293#post121293</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121293#post121293</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But in a decade of pron-surfing and writing and commenting, I've never run across any child pornography, not once.</p></blockquote><p>And even if you did run across it, and quickly backed out, then suddenly got searched by the police and had a couple of images in your cache, the police are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:08:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121292#post121292</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121292#post121292</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You can take the boy out of the Shore, Kyle, but...</p></blockquote><p>Which raises the question of whether you're still a shore girl or a westie.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:06:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121240#post121240</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121240#post121240</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I know nothing about how paedophiles collect their material, but I wonder how much this software will stop. If it's torrented or emailed in zip files then this system won't do anything?</p></blockquote><p>... or if you get it through a web proxy in Ruritania. Motivated people can get round it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:15:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121238#post121238</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121238#post121238</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I know nothing about how paedophiles collect their material, but I wonder how much this software will stop. If it's torrented or emailed in zip files then this system won't do anything?</p></blockquote><p>I've seen a '90% peer to peer' figure bandied around, but no basis for it. But if you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:13:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121201#post121201</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121201#post121201</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And without dying, Kyle has <em>gone to a better place</em> .
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:23:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121200#post121200</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121200#post121200</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Tis true, lived here almost as long as in Auckland now.</p></blockquote><p>You can take the boy out of the Shore, Kyle, but...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:18:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121190#post121190</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121190#post121190</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Regardless of media, 'objectionable' is a subjective term, and I sometimes have problems with the way it's been applied.</p></blockquote><p>K, fair nuff. That is consistent :)</p><blockquote><p>I understand Sacha's point about the list, if published, becoming a menu for perverts but how can they consider (if indeed, they are considering)…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:07:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Andrew</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121146#post121146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121146#post121146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>My thoughts too. Child pornography that requires the abuse of actual children is obviously abhorrent, exploitative and illegal, and I don't think anyone here would support it.<br />..<br />But there's a middle ground &ndash; say, drawings or animations of child sex abuse that appear intended to arouse desire in paedophiles…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:49:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Logan  O&#039;Callahan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121126#post121126</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121126#post121126</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If words is enough, you can add Petronius' Satyricon to the list of block worthy classics.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:22:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121095#post121095</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121095#post121095</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Might be easier to get Emma appointed internet Czarina/Chief Censor</blockquote>I would support that on the condition I could see <a href="http://www.spcs.org.nz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Lane</a>'s face when he heard.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:08:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121089#post121089</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121089#post121089</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's about protecting the process from potential abuse, when it's all happening behind closed doors.</p></blockquote><p>That's the real problem: secrecy automatically begats suspicion, and deservedly so.  Just look at what the Australians got away with before someone leaked their list.</p><p>Oh, and speaking of the Australians, their scheme [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goEEbsEDEM4&amp;feature=player_embedded|seems to be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:41:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121084#post121084</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121084#post121084</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Independent auditing was one of the things my partner suggested while we were discussing this, and the problem is who does it, not least because they have to have the appropriate knowledge base. Would it be an improvement? Yes.</p><p>I should say, in case it sounds otherwise, that it's not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:31:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Stevenson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121083#post121083</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121083#post121083</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>An <em>independent</em> committee to review review government decisions that are not made public?<br />So you have to a) find the independant paragons who could do this and b) get the government to appoint them<br />Might be easier to get Emma appointed internet Czarina/Chief Censor</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:26:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121081#post121081</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121081#post121081</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What if there was an independent review committee to go through the secret list of blocked sites? Perhaps not all the sites, but a random 20% of them, making sure that mission creep had not occurred.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:13:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121044#post121044</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121044#post121044</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Is that last question ripe for its own Ministerial or OIA request?</p></blockquote><p>Might I have spent the last couple of days trying to frame weird indirect questions that might actually get answered? Like, asking about what's NOT on the list? Or OIA-ing them every couple of months and asking if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:35:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121043#post121043</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121043#post121043</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Emma, thanks for clearing up that little matter of what happens if/when you find you have clicked on one of the covert 'dodgy' links.  At least one will know one has 'transgressed'.</p><p>I wonder how often (or just how many times) one would have to transgress before being regarded as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:29:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121042#post121042</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121042#post121042</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's what happens in Britain. Here in NZ you'll get one of these. Our system will at least be honest.</p></blockquote><p>Seems from the details provided in the link that the menu will be made available on the internet dish by dish. Looking for bestiality? heck no this site has been…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:15:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121040#post121040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121040#post121040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Kyles from Otago</p></blockquote><p>Argh. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:04:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121038#post121038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121038#post121038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks, Emma. Is that last question ripe for its own Ministerial or OIA request?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:50:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121033#post121033</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121033#post121033</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I was just curious why you'd argue against blocking objectionable material on the internet. Is that an argument you'd use for all media?</p></blockquote><p>Kyle, I've listed my actual problems with this scheme in the article. None of them is 'because it's blocking child pornography'. Regardless of media, 'objectionable' is a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:39:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121016#post121016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121016#post121016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Wasn't my personal point really, and I haven't done the issue justice at all. Generally, keeping things like that secret is too open to misuse by those with access to power. Just saying I can see the argument for not making the list public, though as Emma suggests it's an…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:16:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121012#post121012</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121012#post121012</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm finding this all a wee bit worrying.<br />If one clicks on a link and it leads to one of the covertly banned sites, and you knew nothing about the content of the site (maybe the link label looked innocent, or the source of the link was an otherwise trusted…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:38:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121000#post121000</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=121000#post121000</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Should not knowing what is illegal as part of good parenting be a criminal offence in New Zealand? If fourteen year old Tom is accessing these sites via a proxy, wouldn't any parent prefer to try to deal with that problem before it ends him up in court?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:43:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120999#post120999</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120999#post120999</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But Sacha are we primarily trying to catch the perverts or are we protecting the majority?  Whose needs are the government catering for? Who is it their mandate to cater for? There seem to be two issues there. </p><p>In China there's a forest of blocked sites, it's not going to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:34:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120998#post120998</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120998#post120998</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Though I am mindful of the risk that non-harmful material may over time get added to the banned list by prigs and wowsers. </p><p>Is there an arrangement anywhere that works?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120997#post120997</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120997#post120997</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't see how a non-secret list of that type becomes anything other than a menu for perverts, sadly.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:57:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120994#post120994</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120994#post120994</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That was a good read. I particularly agree with:</p><blockquote><p>this stuff is pretty bad and keeping people from inadvertently stumbling over it is probably in their interest.</p></blockquote><p>as a primary focus. Question I have is as Emma mentioned; the DIA will be keeping a log of people who try to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:34:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120993#post120993</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120993#post120993</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Kyle, that was in response to Tess's initial comment</p></blockquote><p>OK. I was just curious why you'd argue against blocking objectionable material <em>on the internet</em>. Is that an argument you'd use for all media?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:24:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120991#post120991</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120991#post120991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I figure it's not linkwhoring if someone does it for you. :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:09:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120989#post120989</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120989#post120989</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Why thank you. ::blushes::
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:47:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120988#post120988</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120988#post120988</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Can I recommend Mr Harris' <a href="http://tracs.co.nz/gripping-hand/the-great-internet-filtering-debacle/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">lengthy post</a> about this topic a few months back. From a rare perspective.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:39:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120985#post120985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120985#post120985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>which is why you'll never see a book with an M15+ sticker on it.</p></blockquote><p>Must remember Kyles from Otago where even personal correspondence is run by the Censor...</p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10584138" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10584138</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:05:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Harris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120984#post120984</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120984#post120984</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Doesn't this apply to everything off the internet as well? Shouldn't they use the same standards that the censors use in relation to books, magazines, dvds, computer games etc?</p></blockquote><p>They do, as Emma notes, already use different rules for different media, but they use the rules established by the Censor.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:53:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120980#post120980</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120980#post120980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Kyle, that was in response to Tess's initial comment:</p><blockquote><p>Would it matter if they blocked all the objectionable material that they could? I'm not really seeing a downside here.</p></blockquote><p>A position Tess herself has backed away from. However, when you say:</p><blockquote><p>the same standards that the censors use in relation…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:18:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120970#post120970</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120970#post120970</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But 'objectionable' is a subjective term. As Craig suggests, what about 'objectionable' material that's used for academic or theraputic purposes?</p></blockquote><p>Doesn't this apply to everything off the internet as well? Shouldn't they use the same standards that the censors use in relation to books, magazines, dvds, computer games etc?</p><p>As…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:42:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120969#post120969</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120969#post120969</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Unless one of the incriminating pictures was the desktop background or something, what the hell are computer repair technicians doing checking out the contents of a customer's hard drive?</p></blockquote><p>Start, Recent Documents... That's perfectly legit if you're making sure the computer's working properly. Or even opening My Documents and seeing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:26:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120964#post120964</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120964#post120964</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Damn, so i guess that means I'm not a free speech absolutist ; ) And yes. re: the qualms about academics and needtoknowers having access to stuff,  the blockage of both facebook and youtube at the same time has necessitated my use of hotspot shield , which is pretty damn…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:07:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120962#post120962</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120962#post120962</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>there are Hindu paintings showing a queen mating with a white stallion for a ritual</p></blockquote><p>It may have been sexual activity, but I think you'll find that it wasn't mating.</p><p>On the other hand, maybe that's where the centaurs came from....</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:00:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120960#post120960</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120960#post120960</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Having been shown people having their throat slashed by an inconsiderate flatmate, and hearing the gargled last gasps for breath, I'd have to disagree with you there Emma.</p></blockquote><p>A few years ago, after the invasion of Iraq, a flatmate thought it was a good idea to show me a video…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:57:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120956#post120956</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120956#post120956</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What kind of repairs were required? How well was the incriminating material hidden?</p></blockquote><p>I've heard endless iterations of this, and I'm very curious. Unless one of the incriminating pictures was the desktop background or something, what the hell are computer repair technicians doing checking out the contents of a customer's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:04:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120955#post120955</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120955#post120955</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Don't worry, I will ... though I may wait until I'm home before searching :-)</p></blockquote><p>Well if you are determined it's the asvamedha sacrifice.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:00:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120944#post120944</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120944#post120944</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Our workplace can boast at least one kiddy-porn trader behind bars &ndash; about 3½ years ago, we got him busted after he took in his PC to get fixed. We rang the cops, who then rang DIA, who sent along a couple of their agents to get the details. Apparently…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:50:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120932#post120932</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120932#post120932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>describes, depicts, expresses, or otherwise deals with matters such as sex... likely to be injurious to the public good</p></blockquote><p>Richard Worth?</p><p>Anyway, looking at <a href="http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0094/latest/DLM313407.html#DLM313407" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the act</a> I'd have said it covers BDSM in an only slightly more specific way to how it covers "sex" in that section. But I don't not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:16:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120928#post120928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120928#post120928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Our workplace can boast at least one kiddy-porn trader behind bars &ndash; about 3½ years ago, we got him busted after he took in his PC to get fixed. We rang the cops, who then rang DIA, who sent along a couple of their agents to get the details. Apparently…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:58:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Thomas Beagle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120923#post120923</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120923#post120923</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Zippy &ndash; the DIA's refusal:</p><blockquote><p>The release of the filtering list (particularly in an electronic format) would facilitate access to images of child sexual buse images. I am therefore withholding this information in terms of section 6(c) of the Official Information Act (where the release of this information is likely…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:19:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120922#post120922</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120922#post120922</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But if you haved two porn films of the same degree of explicitness, and one's vanilla porn and the other's BDSM porn? One gets restricted and the other gets banned?</p></blockquote><p>I wonder whether there may be three scenarios:</p><p>&ndash; BDSM shown clearly as consensual play</p><p>&ndash; Acts of bondage, coercion…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:02:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120912#post120912</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120912#post120912</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The pictures of it that I have seen were in a book in a university library. So you'll have to find your own :)</p></blockquote><p>Don't worry, I will ... though I may wait until I'm home before searching :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:40:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120911#post120911</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120911#post120911</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It appears that in practice some matters are considered automatically bad, but this would not be one as far as I can see</p></blockquote><p>Well, yeah, the 'degree' clauses should mean that, say, a serious film that involved a couple of BDSM scenes for obvious SLAPS value wouldn't get banned. But…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:40:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120909#post120909</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120909#post120909</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Jpgs plz :-)</p></blockquote><p>The pictures of it that I have seen were in a book in a university library. So you'll have to find your own :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:20:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Zippy Gonzales</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120906#post120906</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120906#post120906</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Am interested in the Ombudsmen decision. There's no good reason the DIA can't release some obtuse breakdown of decisions. For example, list the clause/s that triggered the banning of the 7000 URLs.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:16:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120903#post120903</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120903#post120903</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's all BDSM material. All of it. BDSM practice is LEGAL.</p></blockquote><p>Bear in mind that you're in the "consideration is given to the extent, degree and manner" section there. The relevant bit of the act being that it doesn't just deal with the matters the law mentions, but does so…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:02:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120893#post120893</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120893#post120893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>For example there are Hindu paintings showing a queen mating with a white stallion for a ritual and there are ancient Greek images on pottery that are pornographic.</p></blockquote><p>Jpgs plz :-)</p><blockquote><p>So no. I change my mind. Whilst I want some things blocked I do think we should be very…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:36:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120890#post120890</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120890#post120890</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						bebing = being, obv.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:28:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120889#post120889</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120889#post120889</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There's <em>always</em>  creep.  People just can't help themselves.  "Oh, that's shocking/disgusting.  Normal people* wouldn't object to not bebing able to access that...".</p><p>* As in "normal people don't know about depraved shit like that..."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:27:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120887#post120887</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120887#post120887</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I refer you to section 132A.</p></blockquote><p>I stand corrected, which I pretty much expect as a matter of course from Graeme. I'd looked <a href="http://www.censorship.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/wpg_URL/Services-Censorship-Compliance-What-is-Objectionable?OpenDocument" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>, on the Internal Affairs website &ndash; and other pages on that site where they talk about what their job is.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:24:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120886#post120886</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120886#post120886</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's an ambiguous construction. Just how dodgy was that flatmate?</p></blockquote><p>ha. The flatmate was ok....a little morbid...the subsequent cactus trip on the other hand was far from ok, No one wants to be chased through the good people of New Brighton's sections at 3am by imaginary murder. But when the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:22:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120885#post120885</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120885#post120885</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Unfortunately, if its all done in secret, we never know whether there is mission creep or not, until its too late.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:17:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120884#post120884</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120884#post120884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>... if you look at the legislation that governs censorship in New Zealand, nowhere is child pornography separated from other objectionable material.</p></blockquote><p>I refer you to <a href="http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0094/latest/DLM314174.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">section 132A</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:17:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120883#post120883</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120883#post120883</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Having been shown people having their throat slashed by an inconsiderate flatmate, and hearing the gargled last gasps for breath, I'd have to disagree with you there Emma.</p></blockquote><p>Sorry, so poorly worded;  the throat wasn't slashed by the flatmate.  The flatmate thought it would be funny to show me the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:15:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120882#post120882</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120882#post120882</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>No-one's asking you to be. But if other people are enthusiastic about reading Justine or perusing Tiny Nibbles or watching Reservoir Dogs, they shouldn't have to rely on other people being enthusiastic about it before they're allowed to.</p></blockquote><p>All these things are legal. </p><p>Actually I have been thinking further. For…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:14:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120881#post120881</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120881#post120881</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I think the decision to withhold the blacklist has a credible foundation (basically, that releasing the information would enable criminal activity), but it is worth a shot.</p></blockquote><p>Definitely.  And if it fails, that's what WikiLeaks is for.</p><blockquote><p>And yes, the response then was timely, thorough and generally excellent. It's the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:11:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120878#post120878</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120878#post120878</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Having been shown people having their throat slashed by an inconsiderate flatmate</p></blockquote><p>That's an ambiguous construction. Just how dodgy <em>was</em>  that flatmate?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:05:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120876#post120876</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120876#post120876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Having been shown people having their throat slashed by an inconsiderate flatmate, and hearing the gargled last gasps for breath, I'd have to disagree with you there Emma.</p></blockquote><p>Mark, I don't mean in watching, I mean in dialogue. Hence the phrase 'somebody think of the children'. The Blackout copyright campaign…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:05:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120875#post120875</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120875#post120875</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm just not that enthusiastic about pornography or violence, even if it is consensual.</p></blockquote><p>No-one's asking you to be. But if other people are enthusiastic about reading Justine or perusing Tiny Nibbles or watching Reservoir Dogs, they shouldn't have to rely on other people being enthusiastic about it before they're…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:04:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120872#post120872</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120872#post120872</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Nothing else has the same STFU emotional effect</p></blockquote><p>Having been shown people having their throat slashed by an inconsiderate flatmate, and hearing the gargled last gasps for breath, I'd have to disagree with you there Emma.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:00:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120871#post120871</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120871#post120871</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>strange precedent to set or message to send -child pornography above all else in the danger stakes.</p></blockquote><p>If I were an Evil Genius, and I wanted to institute extremely invasive censorship without stirring a freedom of speech kerfuffle, this is exactly what I'd do. Start off by ONLY blocking child…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:57:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120869#post120869</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120869#post120869</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Any mention of snuff sites or other material of a violent nature?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:54:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120867#post120867</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120867#post120867</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And I understand that a lot of people won't. But 'objectionable' is a subjective term. As Craig suggests, what about 'objectionable' material that's used for academic or theraputic purposes? And look at that list:</p></blockquote><p>strange precedent to set or message to send -child pornography above all else in the danger…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:52:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120866#post120866</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120866#post120866</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I/S: I think the decision to withhold the blacklist has a credible foundation (basically, that releasing the information would enable criminal activity), but it is worth a shot. And yes, the response then was timely, thorough and generally excellent. It's the request to the Ombudsman, and the response from the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:51:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120864#post120864</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120864#post120864</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I guess I'm in two minds here. I think that illegal objectionable material should be blocked, but I can see how that could impinge on people's freedom if it went beyond what is currently illegal. </p><p>I'm just not that enthusiastic about pornography or violence, even if it is consensual.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:45:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Thomas Beagle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120862#post120862</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120862#post120862</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Anyone billed separately for local and international traffic?</p><p>Someone suggested to me that it might be possible to forward <strong>all</strong> of your traffic through the DIA filter server.</p><p>Easy way to make it all local and save money! :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:43:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120861#post120861</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120861#post120861</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>please note that in this context 'quick' may mean 'delayed as long as judiciously possible'</p></blockquote><p>Request filed: April 13.<br />Response sent: April 24.<br />Total time: 9 working days.<br />OIA time limit: 20 working days.</p><p>That's good service.  I'd also note that the response was complete and generally helpful, and that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:43:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120860#post120860</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120860#post120860</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is not the thin end of the wedge, it is not being done surreptitiously and, for the sake of sweet baby Jebus, <em>it is for your own good</em> .</p><p>How very <em>dare you</em>  object?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:42:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120858#post120858</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120858#post120858</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Would it matter if they blocked all the objectionable material that they could? I'm not really seeing a downside here.</p></blockquote><p>And I understand that a lot of people won't. But 'objectionable' is a subjective term. As Craig suggests, what about 'objectionable' material that's used for academic or theraputic purposes? And…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:38:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120855#post120855</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120855#post120855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						i think it would be better if they did block other things, I'm surprised they're not.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:34:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120854#post120854</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120854#post120854</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Would it matter if they blocked all the objectionable material that they could? I'm not really seeing a downside here.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:31:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120853#post120853</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120853#post120853</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So no other objectionable material is being blocked?</p></blockquote><p>From Thomas:</p><blockquote><p>The <strong>trial scheme</strong> was used to filter child pornography including video, photos, stories and drawings. Other illegal material (as defined by New Zealand law) is not filtered.</p></blockquote><p>Emphasis mine.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:30:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120851#post120851</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120851#post120851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Maybe I misunderstood, but:</p><blockquote><p>It is, I have to say, a very good scheme as these schemes go. They are only blocking child pornography sites, and blocking to the level of individual pages and images rather than whole sites.</p></blockquote><p><strong>only</strong> blocking child pornography? So no other objectionable material is being…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:26:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120845#post120845</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120845#post120845</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Damn, all this time I've been thinking <strong>Thomas the Tank Engine</strong> and things like <strong>Bob the Builder</strong> were child pornograpy.<br />;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:15:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120843#post120843</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120843#post120843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>if I try to access a website containing the book's text or discussion of the same then, Houston, we have a problem?</p></blockquote><p>Who the hell knows? It may be that the DIA is applying a very reasonable SLAPS test to the material to avoid doing so, but really the only…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:09:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120841#post120841</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120841#post120841</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The child pornography the DIA is blocking also includes material such as drawings or fiction, where no children were harmed in the production.</p></blockquote><p>OK, so I can walk into any bookstore or public library and walk out with a copy of <em>Lolita</em>, but if I try to access a website…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:04:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120839#post120839</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120839#post120839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The Great Strikethrough Debacle on LJ made me *very wary* of allegedly well-intentioned but unannounced attempts to censor child pornography. This is...less than optimal. </p><p>Anyway, couldn't they just publish a list of the *names* of sites (not addresses?) Then they wouldn't be encouraging access to objectionable material (well, not without…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:01:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120837#post120837</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120837#post120837</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I intend to keep adding information to this thread as it comes to light. <a href="http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/joyce-internet-filtering-agenda-nz-87186" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This</a>, for instance, is kind of interesting. Stephen Joyce, from back in March:</p><blockquote><p>"We have been following the internet filtering debate in Australia but have no plans to introduce something similar here," says Communications and IT…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:54:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120836#post120836</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-because-you-should-know/?p=120836#post120836</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:54:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
