<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Up Front: Are We There Yet?</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=121301#post121301</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=121301#post121301</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Emma, a friend and writer based in Sydney's written a piece <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2609757.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">similar to your's</a> that you might enjoy. It attracts the same variation of comments...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:48:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114557#post114557</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114557#post114557</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Dick is just doing everything he can to stay out of The Hague.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:35:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114524#post114524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114524#post114524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>By all accounts he's been for a while, it's just that now he's at liberty to say it without contravening party policy.</p></blockquote><p>It's quite refreshing that it's been so long I can't remember properly, but I think his previous public position was 'we should let the states decide' and a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:03:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114515#post114515</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114515#post114515</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						By all accounts he's been for a while, it's just that now he's at liberty to say it without contravening party policy.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:52:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114512#post114512</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114512#post114512</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Here's one that's actually relevant. Know who's in favour of gay marriage now? <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=228988&amp;title=dick-uncut" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dick Cheney</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:44:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114444#post114444</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114444#post114444</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here's one for Bob Mcs crusade:</p><p>Woman beat young son with ladle <br />The woman had previously pleaded not guilty to a charge of assault with intent but pleaded guilty to an amended lesser charge of assault yesterday.</p><p><br /><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/2474515/Woman-beat-young-son-with-ladle" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/2474515/Woman-beat-young-son-with-ladle</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:05:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114397#post114397</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114397#post114397</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I liked a comment (unattributed, sorry) that Tantric sex was like expecting a plumber to come round to fix something...you spend all day in but no-one comes.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:41:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>LegBreak</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114370#post114370</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114370#post114370</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That 70s All Black team is easy except for... Fullback.</p><p>Lets wait until the outcome of the Bain trial is released before deciding on that one.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:27:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114368#post114368</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=114368#post114368</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But if you concentrate on thinking of your top All Black team of the 1970s you can make it last six whole minutes.</p></blockquote><p>Going, Going, gone?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:17:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113733#post113733</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113733#post113733</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Any longer though the tea gets cold.</p></blockquote><p>Any longer you'd just be showing off, really.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:57:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Hosking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113732#post113732</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113732#post113732</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Wow. You guys must really be into some Sting-and-Trudie Tantric-sex type stuff.</p></blockquote><p>Nah, mate, that's too weird.  But if you concentrate on thinking of your top All Black team of the 1970s you can make it last six whole minutes.</p><p>Any longer though the tea gets cold.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:56:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113730#post113730</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113730#post113730</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I just threw myself on the first vagina I came across. Right as rain in two minutes flat.</p><p>Heterosexuality: you're doin' it wrong. It's meant to last twice that long.</p></blockquote><p>You realise I'm filing these away for later use, right?</p><p>(I had to. We were on 799 comments.)</p><p>Actually, I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:52:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113649#post113649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113649#post113649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I just threw myself on the first vagina I came across. Right as rain in two minutes flat.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>Heterosexuality: you're doin' it wrong. It's meant to last twice that long.</p></blockquote><p>Wow. You guys must really be into some Sting-and-Trudie Tantric-sex type stuff.</p><p>Right.....?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:02:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113644#post113644</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113644#post113644</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh Craig. Bless, bless, and bless again.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:07:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113642#post113642</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113642#post113642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I just threw myself on the first vagina I came across. Right as rain in two minutes flat.</p></blockquote><p>Heterosexuality: you're doin' it wrong. It's meant to last <em>twice</em>  that long.</p><p>(If you found this advice useful, please consider making a donation.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:06:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113636#post113636</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113636#post113636</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>People may turn to gay relationships if their original relationships don't work out.</p></blockquote><p>And it even works the other way &mdash; after I caught my first live-in boyfriend fucking my (ex-)best friend in our bed, I just threw myself on the first vagina I came across.  Right as rain in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:21:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Amy Gale</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113635#post113635</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113635#post113635</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yeah, having lived through a depression and two world wars did not in any way interfere with my grandmother's being a judgemental bitch.</p></blockquote><p>For sure, there is no guaranteed link between having seen plenty and being cool with it all. </p><p>I'm reminded now of the last time I visited my…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:50:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113439#post113439</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113439#post113439</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yeah, having lived through a depression and two world wars did not in any way interfere with my grandmother's being a judgemental bitch.</p></blockquote><p>Snap! (But the other one, very Catholic, was totally right on. Go figure.)</p><blockquote><p>So I guess we're left not being able to draw conclusions about individuals on…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:14:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113383#post113383</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113383#post113383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's so conventional to pigeonhole those older than us as somehow knowing less than we do, when as you say, they've pretty much seen it all.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, having lived through a depression and two world wars did not in any way interfere with my grandmother's being a judgemental bitch.</p><p>OTOH,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:03:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113375#post113375</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113375#post113375</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Nice point, Amy. It's so conventional to pigeonhole those older than us as somehow knowing less than we do, when as you say, they've pretty much seen it all. Likely they have different words for it, but they know what's up. </p><p>Now for some reason I'm thinking about Ursula LeGuin's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 04:27:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Amy Gale</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113373#post113373</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113373#post113373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm constantly surprised that people are still opting for marriage in NZ, now that CUs are available. Why wouldn't you go for the non-discriminatory option, given the choice?</p></blockquote><p>I wonder whether some people have a lingering sense that if they get CUed then their grandparents (etc) won't understand the significance.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:54:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113334#post113334</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113334#post113334</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Has this been posted yet? I lost track.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXPcBI4CJc8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXPcBI4CJc8</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:22:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113321#post113321</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113321#post113321</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's about full participation in the guts of the business of being human.</p></blockquote><p>I just want to repeat this because of how perfectly you have nailed it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 19:18:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113312#post113312</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113312#post113312</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Joe &ndash; I felt being a bit snarky was a fitting response to someone whos critique of her writing of love and inclusiveness resorted to addresseng her sex life. <br />She has to deal with the Patriachy of the Catholic Faith constantly and is a shining light of hope and change.</p></blockquote><p>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:48:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113311#post113311</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113311#post113311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Joe &ndash; I felt being a bit snarky was a fitting response to someone whos critique of her writing of love and inclusiveness resorted to addresseng her sex life. <br />She has to deal with the Patriachy of the Catholic Faith constantly and is a shining light of hope and change.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:54:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113309#post113309</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113309#post113309</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Taking such a myopic view of religion isn't becoming.</p></blockquote><p>Isn't becoming?  FFS!  Now we have to be polite and look nice when discussing a fundamental human rights failure, a failure that is positively embraced by many religions.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:30:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113308#post113308</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113308#post113308</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Taking such a myopic view of religion isn't becoming.</p></blockquote><p>That's a really strange thing to say. This thread isn't <em>about</em>  religion, it's about gay marriage. Religion has only been discussed as it relates to discrimination against gay people. Tess's presence meant the emphasis was going to be on the Catholic…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:11:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113307#post113307</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113307#post113307</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Joe, might want to read that again (but put the chip down first). She is being explicite in her expression of truth, couched within a religious perspective.</p></blockquote><p>JT, I responded to your post in good faith. From your semiliterate and feebly snarky reply I've gained all the insight I need…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:10:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>iona woodward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113306#post113306</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113306#post113306</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>that's what happens when countries pass marriage equality laws: straight marriage goes up, as ordinary people (I surmise) find marriage now more relevant to them, because it's evolved to be more in touch with its society, more inclusive.</p></blockquote><p>That's true for me (in theory, at least; in practice I have…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 11:59:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113305#post113305</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113305#post113305</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Giovanni, that is a rather confused statement about Church infallibity &amp; a pardon.</p></blockquote><p>How so, thinking person? The pardon is there in order to restore the infallibility. Since the Church was so obviously and spectacularly wrong about Galileo, they tried to fix their own history by rehabilitating him (instead of apologising…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 11:31:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113304#post113304</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113304#post113304</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Joe, might want to read that again (but put the chip down first). She is being explicite in her expression of truth, couched within a religious perspective. </p><p>Giovanni, that is a rather confused statement about Church infallibity &amp; a pardon. One negates the other, but will resist taking on all of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 11:28:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113302#post113302</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113302#post113302</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Taking such a myopic view of religion isn't becoming. Can I suggest a little Sr Chittister?</p></blockquote><p>Specifcally what? A search of the site you've linked to yields <a href="http://www.benetvision.org/Ideas_In_Passing/10_08_07.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this passing mention of same-sex marriage</a>, but fudges the issue by talking in very general terms about the need for god's love. A…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 10:41:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113301#post113301</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113301#post113301</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The thing to understand about the Church (and it speaks to the topic, since the whole tradition thing has been raised against gay marriage in this thread) is that "it was a long time ago" is no defence. The 1600s are just as relevant as the contemporary, because the Church…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 10:24:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113300#post113300</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113300#post113300</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What nothing from the 1600s?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 10:06:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113298#post113298</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113298#post113298</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Exposing wrongs is a right thing to do.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, definitely. Shall we talk about the memo that the Vatican sent in the eighties threatening civilians who testimonies against priests in a civil tribunal of excommunication, and of a sin greater than sexual abuse on the part of a priest?</p><p>Although,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:35:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113297#post113297</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113297#post113297</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Taking such a myopic view of religion isn't becoming. Can I suggest a little Sr Chittister?</p><p>Benetvision exists<br />to encourage the development of <br />contemporary spirituality<br />from a feminist and global perspective<br />through the works of Joan Chittister.</p><p><a href="http://www.benetvision.org/Ideas_In_Passing/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.benetvision.org/Ideas_In_Passing/index.html</a></p><p><br />Exposing wrongs is a right thing to do. I wait patiently  for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:17:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Hosking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113276#post113276</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113276#post113276</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I wonder what they'd do if their God came down and said, "You're misrepresenting me..."</p></blockquote><p>Probably the same thing they did last time that happened:  nail him to a tree.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:45:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113275#post113275</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113275#post113275</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Saw a great cartoon the other day: two guys standing on the sidewalk, looking rather thoughtful, one saying to the other: "But you knew I was straight when you married me."<br />It kind've opened my eyes to something about marriage: how vitally this sort of formal partnerhip, the combining of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:16:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113268#post113268</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113268#post113268</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And that's what happens when countries pass marriage equality laws: straight marriage goes up, as ordinary people (I surmise) find marriage now more relevant to them, because it's evolved to be more in touch with its society, more inclusive.</p></blockquote><p>I suspect there's probably as many people that go home and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 13:03:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113266#post113266</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113266#post113266</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Given that the people "defending" marriage are constantly deferring to a higher power (in this case, the dictionary), perhaps a broadening of the definition would make them, as married people, feel that they were part of an institution that no longer had relevance to them? Would they have married in…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:21:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>iona woodward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113251#post113251</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113251#post113251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>*delurks*</p><p>Re the Huckerbee interview: I absolutely disagree that "marriage" means what they say it means, but pretending for a moment they're right: what would change if the word changed? Is it a case of, "My marriage wouldn't mean what I thought it meant"? Given that the people "defending" marriage…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 09:38:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113105#post113105</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113105#post113105</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Double entry accounting?</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>Okay, I'm pretty sure accountants don't do that sort of thing.</p></blockquote><p>Normal accountants don't do that sort of crap so they wouldn't know the other meaning?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:44:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113096#post113096</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113096#post113096</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Somehow these threads seem to just keep on getting better.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:06:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113066#post113066</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113066#post113066</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I used to be an accountant...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:01:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113064#post113064</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113064#post113064</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Fiscal rogering would seem to be the order of <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/topic,1892,onpoint_budget_2009_aww_shit_update_1.sm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">te day</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:52:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113062#post113062</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113062#post113062</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But Emma &ndash; don't you know nice girls don't do that sort of thing?</p></blockquote><p>I believe I have been told that, rather a lot.</p><blockquote><p>Double entry accounting?</p></blockquote><p>Okay, I'm pretty sure accountants don't do that sort of thing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:38:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113061#post113061</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113061#post113061</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Double entry accounting?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:58:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113056#post113056</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113056#post113056</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But Emma &ndash; don't you know nice girls don't do that sort of thing?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:45:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113048#post113048</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113048#post113048</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Perhaps the problem would be that you weren't including enough people in your relationships? A little from column A, a little from column B...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:57:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113039#post113039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=113039#post113039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Steven &ndash; I don't think that's an option for <em>after</em>  the gay and straight relationships fail
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:08:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112918#post112918</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112918#post112918</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You know something even worse: we named our son after the guy. I mean, I always knew there had been this monsignor Tiso condemned at Nuremberg, but I didn't know his first name, and then we named our son Joseph on account of my father being called Giuseppe and that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:00:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112909#post112909</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112909#post112909</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I was stunned by Giovanni Tiso on page 33.</p><p>A wee search has explained this (to me) as Giovanni having a few unresloved family issues I'm sure he was teased about as a kid.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jozef_Tiso" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jozef_Tiso</a></p><p><a href="http://www.spectator.sk/articles/view/31550/2/archbishop_prays_for_tiso.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.spectator.sk/articles/view/31550/2/archbishop_prays_for_tiso.html</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:53:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112864#post112864</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112864#post112864</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>To be fair, in those days the involvment of two people probably counted as group sex. Everyone was doing it, basically.</p></blockquote><p>Very good, Giovanni.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:41:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112847#post112847</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112847#post112847</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Oh basic maths skills...</p></blockquote><p>To be fair, in those days the involvment of two people probably counted as group sex. Everyone was doing it, basically.</p><p>I'd still like an explanation of who exactly was doing the begetting circa Cain's generation, but that could be a threadjack of truly biblical proportions.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:19:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112843#post112843</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112843#post112843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>going on since Adam and Eve</p></blockquote><p>Skillful implication of biblical approval, I thought..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:08:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112838#post112838</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112838#post112838</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>"This kind of thing has been going on since Adam and Eve," he said.</em></p><p><br />Oh basic maths skills...</p></blockquote><p>Heh!</p><p>"Adam and Eve and Pinch Me went down to the river to swim. Adam and Eve were drowned. Who was saved?"</p><p>The first time I heard that, when I was about…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:48:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112835#post112835</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112835#post112835</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>He said stories from the rugby league world had given group sex a bad press.</p><p>"This kind of thing has been going on since Adam and Eve," he said.</p></blockquote><p>Oh basic maths skills...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:34:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112833#post112833</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112833#post112833</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Aw, <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/2444678/Women-as-keen-as-men-for-group-sex" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">bless the Aussies</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:18:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Hosking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112700#post112700</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112700#post112700</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>When someone on TV is seriously infuriating you, go get your checkbook straight away and make a donation to a counter-cause.</p></blockquote><p>I knew, some years ago, the father of a staunch conservative Anglican family who used to do that.  It was when Paul Reeves was head of the NZ Anglican…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:10:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112690#post112690</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112690#post112690</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Did somebody say "Lindsay Lohan"?</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz1GqFWNHOU" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz1GqFWNHOU</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:48:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112685#post112685</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112685#post112685</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Rofflenui
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:28:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112675#post112675</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112675#post112675</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>People may turn to gay relationships if their original relationships don't work out.</p></blockquote><p>Man.</p><p>Who do I donate this toaster oven to?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:03:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112667#post112667</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112667#post112667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Lindsay's relationship with Sam has made me seriously reconsider my own sexual orientation.</p></blockquote><p>It certainly sets the bar for a healthy, adult, enjoyable relationship.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:42:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112666#post112666</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112666#post112666</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So if my straight relationship fails and I turn to a gay relationship and that too fails what do I do next?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:40:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112665#post112665</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112665#post112665</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh Emma, that comment's a gem!</p><blockquote><p>Children are no longer influenced by their feelings, they are influenced by the media (just look at Lindsay Lohan)</p></blockquote><p>Oh yes. Lindsay's relationship with Sam has made me seriously reconsider my own sexual orientation.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:40:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112663#post112663</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112663#post112663</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Stuff has a <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/2447062/California-gay-marriage-ban-stands" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">comment thread</a> if you want bizarre.</p><blockquote><p>People may turn to gay relationships if their original relationships don't work out.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah. That's how it works.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:32:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112658#post112658</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112658#post112658</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Which will be known in the future as 'the gay window'? How bizarre.</p></blockquote><p>I know! How will that work when doing marriage-related form-filling-out official things? If you're a same-sex couple, will you have to produce a marriage certificate issued between such-a-date and such-a-date? I foresee nightmarish bureaucratic holdups.</p><p>Also: feh.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:23:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112655#post112655</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112655#post112655</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>while also upholding the marriages that happened in the interim</p></blockquote><p>Which will be known in the future as 'the gay window'? How bizarre.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:16:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112631#post112631</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112631#post112631</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						By all accounts Sotomayor is pro-choice.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:02:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112623#post112623</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112623#post112623</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Aaaaand.... just as this thread drops off the front page, Obama announces his Supreme Court nominee, Sonia Sotomayor. The early chatter is that conservatives are nervous about her liberal race politics, but liberals might be nervous about where stands on abortion and equal marriage rights, given her Catholic background. </p><p>(NB…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 06:10:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JackElder</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112381#post112381</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112381#post112381</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>dragging the bride up to the altar and forcing her to sign up etc.</p></blockquote><p>"Excuse me, but before I can conduct this wedding I'm just going to need to check whether that shotgun is loaded."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:40:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112367#post112367</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112367#post112367</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>My partner and I were just discussing what the celebrant is actually FOR and why you have to have one at all.</p></blockquote><p>I presume it does have a role as an independent person at a wedding to ensure that nothing improper is going on &ndash; dragging the bride up to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:13:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Amy Gale</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112336#post112336</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112336#post112336</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>last night my belle and I happened to be watching an old episode of the daily show(*) featuring an interview with Mike Huckabee. Here's part II, where they discuss gay marriage.</p></blockquote><p>When it first aired, this interview riled me up so much that even yelling at the television didn't help.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:14:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mrs Skin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112312#post112312</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112312#post112312</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						OK I'm too tired to post properly, so instead I'll give you <a href="http://thisisphotobomb.com/2009/04/11/photobomb-that-guy-the-galactic-empire-joins-the-catholic-empire/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> to lighten your evening. I'm sure it will be seen by some as merely confirmation of what you already knew.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 21:37:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ChrisW</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112308#post112308</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112308#post112308</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well that stopped the thread dead.  Well, no, agreed something needed to be done to get rid of the hiccups.  </p><p>Back a few pages</p><blockquote><p>Missing link to the Huckabee interview above, here.</p></blockquote><p>Very helpful, thanks Gio.  I am coming to appreciate why the lack of traction in my point, now…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 21:06:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112287#post112287</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112287#post112287</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						p, that was WAY over the line, way over it. If you have a pressing need to discuss anal knife insertion, I suggest you find somewhere else to do it, because you're not welcome here.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:06:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>p forrester jarvie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112281#post112281</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112281#post112281</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						so what is necesarily 'fraudulent' about a marriage entered unto with a 'purely pragmatic' intent? Can anyone state this out loud?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:42:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112279#post112279</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112279#post112279</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Emma, feel free to do the same.</p></blockquote><p>Done and doing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:36:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112276#post112276</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112276#post112276</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I though that for a long time, Steve i.e. that the state should not be involved in marriage at all.  I think it's got a legitimate interest in household formation, because we tend to distribute rights and responsibilities to households, and I also think that it's got a role in…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:27:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112273#post112273</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112273#post112273</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I hadn't caught up with page when I made my last post.</p><p>So, if I'm reading this right, Deborah, Russell, and Gareth: you broadly agree with the view I've developed, that marriage is something the state could get out of almost completely?</p><p>From a legal standpoint, marriage is pretty much…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:20:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112271#post112271</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112271#post112271</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I've started deleting the troll's posts because they are, frankly, inane. And not made in good faith.</p><p>Emma, feel free to do the same.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:16:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112267#post112267</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112267#post112267</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>but there's no "the institution of marriage" thank god.</p></blockquote><p>Well...I have this image in my mind of some Monty Pythonesque big brown forbidding building, with low steps and faceless windows, into which two separate lines of people are marching, one from each side of the building, and inside they go…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:55:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112265#post112265</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112265#post112265</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well I kinda think he can :></p></blockquote><p>Not <em>by virtue of being a mechanic</em>  (I was careful to include that). </p><p>And yeah, I'm happy for anyone to be the guy, girl, computer terminal or ewok upfront; have your wedding performed however you see fit, I say.</p><blockquote><p>&ndash; presuming that the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:49:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112256#post112256</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112256#post112256</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes.... but to the extent that Father What'isname is performing a role mandated by the state, then he needs to perform that role in respect of any couples / trios / quartets etc. who come his way and ask him to to the job.</p></blockquote><p>OK, I follow the point now.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:26:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>p forrester jarvie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112254#post112254</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112254#post112254</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>from A Short History of England</p><p>I know of no way in which fair-haired people can be prevented<br />from falling in love with dark-haired people; and I do not believe<br />that whether a man was long-headed or round-headed ever made<br />much difference to any one who felt inclined to break…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:22:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112253#post112253</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112253#post112253</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes.... but to the extent that Father What'isname is performing a role mandated by the state, then he needs to perform that role in respect of any couples / trios / quartets etc. who come his way and ask him to to the job.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:22:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>p forrester jarvie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112252#post112252</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112252#post112252</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>then it is all down to what we may now realiably call fifth generation warfare </p><p>aka &ndash; a calculus of covenants!</p><p>WHO would ever settle for LESS!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:20:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112249#post112249</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112249#post112249</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The point of the state should simply be "sign the contracty bit and give it to us". I see no need for anyone to have to manage that process &ndash; if you choose to have Father Whosawhatsit do it then all power to you.</p></blockquote><p>Quite. Otherwise we'd be facing the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:14:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>p forrester jarvie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112245#post112245</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112245#post112245</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						and it is *levels of intention* that comprise the very soul of what we should be talking about (non-calm, unhappy as a claim, exclamation mark)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:09:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112243#post112243</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112243#post112243</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>we still needed a celebrant, and apparently a witnessed ceremonial declaration of intent</p></blockquote><p>It's another hang over from religious marriage IMO.  The state can only allow people that "really mean it in some illdefined and clearly inaccurate way" to marry.  That was the priest, the celebrant is the "secular" alternative.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:08:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112241#post112241</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112241#post112241</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I don't see why my mechanic couldn't be the guy "up the front" at a wedding &ndash; presuming that the only state recognition of marriage is an official form signed by both partners with appropriate witnesses.</p></blockquote><p>My partner and I were just discussing what the celebrant is actually FOR and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:00:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>p forrester jarvie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112232#post112232</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112232#post112232</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						for Crisp's sake, one does not just 'sincerely believe in all that religious stuff', one believes precisely because there is an Object right before ye whose significance is such that all other objectives are for the time being subordinated to that Object's presence in your midst &ndash; this is the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:51:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112229#post112229</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112229#post112229</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Should he, by virtue of being a mechanic, be able to grant me a civil marriage? No</p></blockquote><p>Well I kinda think he can :><br />I don't see why my mechanic couldn't be the guy "up the front" at a wedding &ndash; presuming that the only state recognition of marriage is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:45:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112228#post112228</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112228#post112228</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Should he, by virtue of being a mechanic, be able to grant me a civil marriage? No</p></blockquote><p>Well I kinda think he can :><br />I don't see why my mechanic couldn't be the guy "up the front" at a wedding &ndash; presuming that the only state recognition of marriage is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:45:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112226#post112226</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112226#post112226</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>for me that's crossing the line from acceptance of "marry whoever and however the f*ck you want" to actively dictating how someone should (or shouldn't) get marriage because you dislike their religion.</p></blockquote><p>I want to be married by my mechanic. Should he, <em>by virtue of being a mechanic,</em>  be able…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:40:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112209#post112209</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112209#post112209</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That gives that person a particular standing within the state. That is, it gives religion a particular standing within the state. I'm agin that.</p></blockquote><p>Fair enough, but for me that's crossing the line from acceptance of "marry whoever and however the f*ck you want" to actively dictating how someone should…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:19:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>p forrester jarvie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112208#post112208</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112208#post112208</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>i take no overt selbstbefriedigung whatsoever in anything</p><p>i am only after an ever closerand more intimate inspection of the fundamental difference between the formal and the institutional, or if you're up for a tipple of ac-yak, the play between the synchronic and the diachronic &ndash; and simply put, what…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:19:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick D&#039;Angelo</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112207#post112207</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112207#post112207</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>It Says So in the Bible</blockquote>Which is answered fully <a href="http://cheapsexandotherstories.blogspot.com/2009/05/leviticus-says-homosexuality-is-sin.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:16:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112202#post112202</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112202#post112202</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And point proven.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:11:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>p forrester jarvie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112201#post112201</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112201#post112201</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						a person must do no less than turm his mind almost completely upside down to even come close to understanding history
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:10:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112192#post112192</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112192#post112192</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>if that is not evidence of the most lazy, bilious &amp; dire exercise of a purely resentful imagination vastly divorced from all fact, fable, legend and tradition generating Culture then hey. see you in hell with Monty Python's Flying Circus, aye!</p></blockquote><p>And you are living in what part of the nation…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:02:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112191#post112191</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112191#post112191</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've seen nothing from p to indicate that he has the ability or intention to contribute anything to any discussion. Can I ask people to simply not feed the troll in this case?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:02:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>p forrester jarvie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112183#post112183</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112183#post112183</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>since the last time i wandered around WHAT point?</p><p>the point that the 'education' of so many new zealanders i meet seems to me to have proceeded from, or at least been eclipsed by, so much fall-out from the the tongue of Eric Idle or someone?</p><p>and is this flicking…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:54:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112174#post112174</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112174#post112174</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>well how are people feeling about I/S's plan to amend the Marriage Act?</p></blockquote><p>Sounds good to me.  'Though very roughly I think that the state ought to get out of the marriage business altogether, and only maintain a register of people who have formed households, or something like that, for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:40:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112170#post112170</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112170#post112170</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@ Gareth</p><blockquote><p>for me it's about opening up the institution of marriage to everyone in whatever way they see fit. So long as you sign the official bit of paper somewhere, it shouldn't matter if that's in a church, a backyard or a gang headquarters.</p></blockquote><p>Nah... I see that as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:36:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112167#post112167</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112167#post112167</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Seriously be happy when that lot die off, too.</p></blockquote><p>There are more than enough replacements from the successive generations to keep the traditions of ignorance, suppression and intolerance that this lot call their wisdoms and teachings alive</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:28:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112162#post112162</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112162#post112162</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>do be a good fellow and point me to at least some of your historical sources</p></blockquote><p>Since the last time you wandered around this point it was flicked away with little effort by several people, be a good boy and do your own reading.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:20:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112152#post112152</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112152#post112152</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Okay, well how are people feeling about <a href="http://norightturn.blogspot.com/2009/05/for-when-time-finally-comes.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">I/S's plan to amend the Marriage Act</a>? It seems like a fairly simple step to marriage equality: can we get some kind of consensus around it?</p><p>And Kyle, I know how you feel. My initial purpose in writing this column was to just…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:06:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112137#post112137</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112137#post112137</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I really disagree Deborah &ndash; for me it's about opening up the institution of marriage to everyone in whatever way they see fit.  So long as you sign the official bit of paper somewhere, it shouldn't matter if that's in a church, a backyard or a gang headquarters.  <br />Let's not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:50:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112131#post112131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112131#post112131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I fear however we've left behind 'the gays' and their need to be treated like the rest of us and either have marriage, or have it done away with as a civil institution.</p></blockquote><p>I think that's because for most of us, it's a no-brainer.  The only issue is how to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:42:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112127#post112127</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112127#post112127</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What a fascinating discussion. I've swayed back and forth on this rollicking ride through the Catholic Church, gay marriage, sex abuse etc.</p><p>I fear however we've left behind 'the gays' and their need to be treated like the rest of us and either have marriage, or have it done away…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:35:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112125#post112125</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112125#post112125</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Everybody stay right there &amp; don't post too much!</p></blockquote><p>Heh, I have some gay porn I need to knock out this afternoon anyway.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:28:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>p forrester jarvie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112122#post112122</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112122#post112122</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The crimes of the recent years follow in a direct line from hundreds of years of years of pain, misery and the use of the church to control, often with violence a potentially unstable mass.</p><p>do be a good fellow and point me to at least  some of your historical…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:23:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112112#post112112</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112112#post112112</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Gah &ndash; have to run back to uni &amp; then a meeting... Everybody stay right there &amp; don't post too much!</p></blockquote><p>Tui billboard.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:08:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mrs Skin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112111#post112111</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112111#post112111</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Gah &ndash; have to run back to uni & then a meeting... Everybody stay right there & don't post too much!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:01:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112105#post112105</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112105#post112105</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>f you're talking about something like rape or child abuse, speak as you would if you were speaking to a victim &ndash; because this is the internet, and you probably are. Yes, that means politeness, but it also means gentleness and empathy </blockquote> Well said.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 13:56:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112084#post112084</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112084#post112084</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>the imams, many of whom are stupid old men, grossly out of touch...</p></blockquote><p>Seriously be happy when that lot die off, too.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 13:17:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112073#post112073</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112073#post112073</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I've just read through all 34 pages of this thread over the past two days, and I've found it both exhausting and one of the most enthralling threads on PAS ever.</p><p>If anything Tess, as polite as she may be, has underlined my distaste for the Catholic Church. The calm,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 13:01:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112072#post112072</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112072#post112072</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Jon Stewart is on the button with the underlying message about who gets to justify who they are, over and over again. </p><p>For me, there are parallels with how challenging disabling stereotypes falls  largely on the shoulders of those who are least resourceful and connected. I'd rather see that load…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:56:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112064#post112064</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112064#post112064</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Excellent illumination of a very important point, Emma, thank you (and Deborah, for spelling it out upthread). Subtle button-pushing, willed or ignorant, often comes wrapped inside the politest of enquiries. Which  can leave one with only a handful of options for response: rage or Vulcan dissociation, or some uncomfortable combination…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:43:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112060#post112060</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112060#post112060</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And I wrote that before I read your post about being respectful. Doh.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:41:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112058#post112058</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112058#post112058</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>there are two of me</p></blockquote><p>Just imagine the shit <em>she</em>  gets. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:38:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112055#post112055</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112055#post112055</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Certainly a useful rhetorical step along the road to enlightenment for many people, albeit not a good place to stop and down tools?</p></blockquote><p>In some cases, yes. Sometimes &ndash; and I in no way want to imply that it's the case here &ndash; politeness itself becomes a weapon, when you're…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:32:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112019#post112019</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112019#post112019</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's not the words that offend me, but the underlying sentiment.</p></blockquote><p>Certainly a useful rhetorical step along the road to enlightenment for many people, albeit not a good place to stop and down tools?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:18:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112016#post112016</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112016#post112016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>'Some of my best friends are Emma Hart.'</p><p>Yeah, it could work.</p></blockquote><p>Oddly, this morning has included the discovery that there are two of me. That explains a LOT.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:15:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112011#post112011</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112011#post112011</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>'Some of my best friends are Emma Hart.'</p><p>Yeah, it could work.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:10:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112010#post112010</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=112010#post112010</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's why I really don't care that Tess has been nice and polite. Give me Craig's vitriol any day. At least it's honest.</p></blockquote><p>Which is more or less what Craig and I said back on page 1. I've had the experience of discovering that an acquaintance was using me in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:06:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111988#post111988</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111988#post111988</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Missing link to the Huckabee interview above, <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=213349&amp;title=Mike-Huckabee-Pt.-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:29:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Eade</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111985#post111985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111985#post111985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Why does Tess have to make a case for Jesus. Where the hell is Jesus?  Why doesn't he shine his light a bit more or ever, except on Tess of course.</p><p>Jesus is playing favourites.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:28:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111974#post111974</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111974#post111974</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The moribound swan reappears only to offer a pertinent link: last night my belle and I happened to be watching an old episode of the daily show(*) featuring an interview with Mike Huckabee. Here's part II, where they discuss gay marriage. Huckabee makes a series of annoying points that Emma…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:12:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111964#post111964</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111964#post111964</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And I'd also like to give a, uh 'big shout out' (as I believe teh kidz say) to Gio's swan song a page or two ago.</p></blockquote><p>Yes indeed.</p><p>One small thing &ndash; I'm really not comfortable with the term 'lapsed catholic', in the way it's been casually used here. While…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:01:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>st ephen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111940#post111940</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111940#post111940</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hot dang, Deborah, you write like the enlightenment personified.</p></blockquote><p>This was post #666 &ndash; I'm sure there's a Dan Brown novel in that...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 09:15:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111937#post111937</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111937#post111937</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>please, please, compliment me on my sincerity, and my effort, because, really, those things ought to count</p></blockquote><p>Yes, bravo, Deborah. That crystallised a lot of half-formed thoughts that have been swirling around in my head for the last few days. Especially this bit.</p><blockquote><p>I accept the Church's teachings.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>Lets be…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 09:03:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111936#post111936</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111936#post111936</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But I also appreciate being able to debate/converse/discuss in a civilised manner with people who disagree with my position.</p></blockquote><p>Sure, Mrs. Skin, but as they say, there's a fine line between charm and smarm. While I appreciate that you may benefit from the intellectual exercise, I find it rather annoying…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 08:54:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mrs Skin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111935#post111935</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111935#post111935</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>please, please, compliment me on my sincerity, and my effort, because, really, those things ought to count</p></blockquote><p>Goodness, yes!</p><p>That goes for pretty much everyone who's posted here. And that includes Tess. </p><p>I hear what you're saying Deborah, and I agree to a large extent. But I also appreciate being…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 08:37:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111931#post111931</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111931#post111931</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hot dang, Deborah, you write like the enlightenment personified.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 08:00:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111930#post111930</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111930#post111930</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I reread my way through all of this thread before writing this (please, please, compliment me on my sincerity, and my effort, because, really, those things ought to count) ...</p></blockquote><p>As we used to say back in the day, <em>maximum</em>  respect.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 07:56:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111915#post111915</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111915#post111915</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Deborah, given that it took me three days to catch up with this thread, you have my respect just for re-reading it, let alone making sense.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:37:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111914#post111914</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111914#post111914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>@Deborah</p><p><em>Yes... but I can't help but think that people spouting bigotry and hatred rely on our good manners not to call them out on it. As long as everyone is polite and civilised and above all nice in their manner, you can say quite vicious and nasty things.</em></p><p>.…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:33:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brent Jackson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111901#post111901</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111901#post111901</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thank you Tess for your openness and sharing.</p><p>I disagree with you, but really appreciate your detailed explanations of your beliefs and how you apply them.</p><p>(Though I cannot comprehend why any intelligent person would <em>choose</em>  to align themselves with the Catholic Church...).</p><p>Thanks,<br />Brent.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 22:59:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>p forrester jarvie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111880#post111880</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111880#post111880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>the word 'power' is being used to refer to way too many things at once, surely!<br />on the one hand, the Church has not even the power to control so much as a single priest in the field<br />and on another Hand an individual has not the 'power' to exercise…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 19:05:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111879#post111879</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111879#post111879</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/may/21/catholic-abuse-ireland-ryan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">An abuse too far by the Catholic church</a> &ndash; Madeleine Bunting, The Guardian &ndash; Comment is Free</p><blockquote><p>There needs to be a far more probing analysis of the structure of authority within the Catholic church, and the culture of deference and obedience expected of lay people towards priests. These bred…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:33:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111852#post111852</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111852#post111852</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ah, preview button. Must use preview button. Let me do that again so it's readable.</p><blockquote><p>Just as it is unfair to taint all clergy by the actions of a few, the same goes for gay activists:</p><p>    <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178354/Gay-rights-campaigner-led-double-life-leader-paedophile-ring-carried-catalogue-child-abuse.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178354/Gay-rights-campaigner-led-double-life-leader-paedophile-ring-carried-catalogue-child-abuse.html</a></p></blockquote><p>Yeah, that's the same. That's exactly the same. See the way his organisation…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 14:00:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111851#post111851</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111851#post111851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Just as it is unfair to taint all clergy by the actions of a few, the same goes for gay activists:</p><p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178354/Gay-rights-campaigner-led-double-life-leader-paedophile-ring-carried-catalogue-child-abuse.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178354/Gay-rights-campaigner-led-double-life-leader-paedophile-ring-carried-catalogue-child-abuse.html</a></p></blockquote><p>Yeah, that's the same. That's exactly the same. See the way his organisation covered up for him, and actively concealed and enabled his abuse? See how their instinct…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 13:35:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mrs Skin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111829#post111829</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111829#post111829</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Do you accept people having any form of sincere belief in the Divine?</p></blockquote><p>Yes. I think it's weird but I accept that it's genuine. But that's a very different thing than having a sincere belief in a religion. Also I have trouble with sincere belief in Vatican dogma from an…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 11:13:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111822#post111822</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111822#post111822</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=6233&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=6233&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse</a><br /><a href="http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=6165&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=6165&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse</a><br /><a href="http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=5967&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=5967&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse</a></p><p>Interesting book reviews Tess, seeing as they're from a world that I'm not too familiar with. Coughlin's a clever writer, but again, primarily an apologist for the recent papacy. It's hard not to see his repeated blaming of institutional abuse on already disgraced bishops as a rather…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:48:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111821#post111821</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111821#post111821</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Giovanni... You obviously hate the Catholic Church. I do not.</p><p>If it was priestly celibacy that caused the sexual abuse, why is the Anglican Church dealing with the same issue? I've given a link to one case, but there are more.</p><p>A warning for anyone who may get upset by…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:46:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111820#post111820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111820#post111820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What I'm saying Tess is this &ndash; why could you not raise your children with a firm set of moral guidelines and connected to their spirituality without resorting to a church?</p></blockquote><p>The moral guideline part I understand. But how could I raise my children connected to spirituality? Part of experienceing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:30:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111819#post111819</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111819#post111819</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What I'm saying Tess is this &ndash; why could you not raise your children with a firm set of moral guidelines and connected to their spirituality without resorting to a church? Once again, just asking. I've always been curious about this argument. I have friends who have become religious only…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:12:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111818#post111818</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111818#post111818</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm going to have to remove myself from this conversation, to the relief of many. Let's see if I can summarise how I feel on my way out. Tess, if you don't see how this</p><blockquote><p>Remember it's Catholic children who got abused, so your average pew sitter is NOT happy.</p></blockquote><p>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:07:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111816#post111816</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111816#post111816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hi Jackie, I'v been thinking of you since my "lawfully wedded wife" has been doing the early childhood education degree. She is planing to do like you.</p></blockquote><p>Oh good! We need more good 'uns. Keep encouraging her  &ndash; it can be a bit of a mind fuck at times. It…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:01:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111815#post111815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111815#post111815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Why can children not have access to a spiritual life without the church/place of worship thing? Just asking.</p></blockquote><p>Not sure if you read it, but I did try that and I personally found it unfulfilling. I'm not saying other do, but I did. </p><p>I was very drawn to Hinduism, but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:58:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111812#post111812</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111812#post111812</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Easter is directly from the Jewish Passover rather than from any pagan belief set. Most languages call it something derived from "Pasch" &ndash; Passover. </p><p>Hence you get all that Jesus as the lamb of sacrifice saving us from death symbolism.</p><p>The word "Easter" has pagan origins, as do all the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:54:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111810#post111810</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111810#post111810</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, so much to say. It's taken me two bloody hours to read all these posts, dammit, and I intend to have my say! Pardon me if I repeat points already made....</p><blockquote><p>I don't particularly see why anyone would want to get married who isn't religious.</p></blockquote><p>I've been wondering why…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:39:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111809#post111809</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111809#post111809</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Warning: this link could be triggering for survivors of sexual assault and rape.</p><p>"The greatest of evils"</p></blockquote><p>And there is a Bishop that needs to go, NOW. </p><p> &ndash; shakes head &ndash; </p><p>This is exactly why there is so much anger from lay Catholics, because some Bishops just persist in not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:37:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111808#post111808</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111808#post111808</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, the Holy See does need to do more.</p><p>One of the problems (so I have heard) under John Paul II was the accusing priests of sexual misconduct was a classic way that the KGB tried to remove priests in Poland. So he didn't believe it. I just don't think…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:32:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111807#post111807</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111807#post111807</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Warning: this link could be triggering for survivors of sexual assault and rape.</p><p><a href="http://timesonline.typepad.com/oliver_kamm/2009/05/the-greatest-of-evils.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">"The greatest of evils"</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:27:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111806#post111806</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111806#post111806</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Please cut them some slack, even know you most likely don't know who they are.</p></blockquote><p>Oh God yes. These poor people have been damaged in ways that are likely to affect them for life and most won't have come forward. </p><p>Whilst I think certain actions are sinful, I have no…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:23:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111804#post111804</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111804#post111804</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Tess, a good link. Not exactly a blog, but a well-articulated and heartfelt opinion piece, and the comments are interesting. Sadly, though, voices within the church such as Thomas Doyle's will remain muted until the Vatican deals proactively with abuse. Like most such statements, and your blaming of the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:16:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111802#post111802</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111802#post111802</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=6233&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=6233&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse</a></p><p><a href="http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=6165&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=6165&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse</a></p><p><a href="http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=5967&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=5967&amp;var_recherche=sexual+abuse</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:14:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111801#post111801</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111801#post111801</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How about providing a link to one of these catholic blogs that offers constructive criticism of the policies of the current papacy?</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://ncronline.org/news/accountability/irish-abuse-report-demands-decisive-action" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://ncronline.org/news/accountability/irish-abuse-report-demands-decisive-action</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:54:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111797#post111797</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111797#post111797</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Diocesis of Florence mean anything to you?</p></blockquote><p>No. The reports that I know of are from the English speaking Catholic world. America and Ireland for the most part. But also New Zealand and Australia. As far as I am aware, these are historical claims of abuse, especially from children's homes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:45:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111796#post111796</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111796#post111796</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Please, can you stop reading my words in the worst light possible.</p></blockquote><p>How about providing a link to one of these catholic blogs that offers constructive criticism of the policies of the current papacy? On an issue that you might personally feel some sympathy with. It's something you've been conspicuously…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:39:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111795#post111795</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111795#post111795</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I assure you, no one is happy that serial abusers were covered up for.</p></blockquote><p>Were? Diocesis of Florence mean anything to you?</p><blockquote><p>Remember it's Catholic children who got abused, so your average pew sitter is NOT happy.</p></blockquote><p>Wow, that was dodgy in about fifteen different ways.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:20:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111794#post111794</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111794#post111794</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here's an initiative to track the abuse in America:</p><p><a href="http://www.bishop-accountability.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.bishop-accountability.org/</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:12:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111793#post111793</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111793#post111793</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ah, so you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs then. That seems awfully cynical.</p></blockquote><p>I was making an observation, not claiming it was okay. </p><p>Please, can you stop reading my words in the worst light possible.</p><blockquote><p>If 'faithful' catholics were to constructively criticise the church's authority...</p></blockquote><p>You obviously don't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:07:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111791#post111791</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111791#post111791</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If anything I think it's really hurt those priests who are good men.</p></blockquote><p>I wasn't clear enough here.</p><p>The greatest harm has been those children and their families who have been so deeply wounded. This harm has been perpetrated by the abusers and then covered up by leaders who should…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:02:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111790#post111790</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111790#post111790</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That gays make bad parents even though research tells us otherwise</p></blockquote><p>I did not say that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:57:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111788#post111788</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111788#post111788</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Where ever there are vulnerable children or adults there will be people who take sexual advantage of that.</p></blockquote><p>Ah, so you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs then. That seems awfully cynical.</p><blockquote><p>Just as it is unfair to taint all clergy by the actions of a few, the same…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:43:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111786#post111786</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111786#post111786</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But I HAVEN"T insisted that. I have said, over and over and over again that people must be free to do what they will in this regards.</p></blockquote><p>Actually, that's a far cry from what you've said at many points in the thread. That gays make bad parents even though research…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:09:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111784#post111784</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111784#post111784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Aye aye Capt. Emma. </p><p>I'll go back to playing nice.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:54:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111783#post111783</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111783#post111783</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes, we have had a problem with sexual abuse.</p><p>Is it all sorted now?</p></blockquote><p>I bloody hope so, my oldest son is an altar boy. </p><p>If anything I think it's really hurt those priests who are good men. I've seen my boys rush up and hug the priest and he…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:52:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111780#post111780</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111780#post111780</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Okay, I'm cooking dinner, I don't have time to engage on this, and I've had the most 'fascinating' day. But we're in serious danger of losing civility here on both sides. Can we keep a lid on it please?</p><p>Otherwise it's that NIN Kirk-Spocking video...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:46:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111777#post111777</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111777#post111777</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just as it is unfair to taint all clergy by the actions of a few, the same goes for gay activists:</p><p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178354/Gay-rights-campaigner-led-double-life-leader-paedophile-ring-carried-catalogue-child-abuse.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178354/Gay-rights-campaigner-led-double-life-leader-paedophile-ring-carried-catalogue-child-abuse.html</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:42:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111776#post111776</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111776#post111776</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Pedophile sex, Tess, your church is well known for it.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, we have had a problem with sexual abuse. OTOH so have all the other churches. </p><p><a href="http://www.reformation.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.reformation.com/</a></p><p>And lets not forget sexual abuse in education.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassment_in_education" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassment_in_education</a></p><p>I mean really... Where ever there are vulnerable children or adults there will be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:37:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111775#post111775</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111775#post111775</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Steven... </p><p>If I could say it slower for you, I would. </p><p>Each and every person has to choose for themselves, including my children. Would saying it _again_ help?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:26:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111773#post111773</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111773#post111773</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A long as you're so upfront about taking your world view on sexual morality unquestiongly from a bunch of aplogists for persecution and child abuse &ndash; which is pretty much the tone of the current Vatican hierarchy, despite the cosmetic attempts to spin things otherwise &ndash; it's a bit rich…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:23:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111772#post111772</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111772#post111772</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Although they are all out of albino monks.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:22:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111770#post111770</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111770#post111770</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Shouldn't you rather be knocking up a hairy undergarment and mortifying yourself through prayer and fasting for the sake of steven's misguided soul?</p></blockquote><p>We're not into hair shirts, we do bare feet, we are the Discaled Carmelites after all, and you need to call Opus Dei if you want to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:21:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111768#post111768</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111768#post111768</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						All please excuse me, I haven't licked my picture of the Pope today, so I'm a bit snippy. I'm sure after my evening obsequiousness I'll feel far better.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:19:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111767#post111767</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111767#post111767</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I mean seriously, do I need to make you a t-shit that says "feel free to disagree with Tess" and make you wear the damn thing until the point hits home?</p></blockquote><p>In your dreams. Shouldn't you rather be knocking up a hairy undergarment and mortifying yourself through prayer and fasting…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:19:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111766#post111766</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111766#post111766</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Until such time as a future Vatican decree might endorse the consumption of rocks on Friday (stranger things have happened). Then the obsequious and grovelling 'faithful' will, as always, comply.</p></blockquote><p>Well, that's not really your problem, is it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:17:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111765#post111765</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111765#post111765</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh probably. Do fill me in.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:17:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111762#post111762</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111762#post111762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So people can debate it, even legalise it, you can call rocks "fish", or call trees "sky", but it doesn't make it so.</p></blockquote><p>Until such time as a future Vatican decree might endorse the consumption of rocks on Friday (stranger things have happened). Then the obsequious and grovelling 'faithful' will,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:15:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111761#post111761</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111761#post111761</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's your insistence that they should apply to the rest of society that makes you bigoted.</p></blockquote><p>But I HAVEN"T insisted that. I have said, over and over and over again that people must be free to do what they will in this regards. </p><p>I mean seriously, do I need to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:14:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111759#post111759</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111759#post111759</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sacha, I'm not surprised. I'm aware and I accept that many people hate the Catholic Church for a variety of reasons. I hate things that people within the Church have done. </p><p>The definition of marriage that Catholicism subscribes too is about the meaning of heterosexual sex within conjugal bonds. It…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:05:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111758#post111758</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111758#post111758</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yet those ideas about life would have been mainstream until recently.</p></blockquote><p>Along with the mistreatment of women and children, slavery, war... viva la traditional values! But, to reiterate, nobody begrudges you your superstition or your obscurantism,  Tess. It's your insistence that they should apply to the rest of society that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 16:54:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111755#post111755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111755#post111755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Tess, I know there are much deeper theological discussions which I do not plan on exposing myself to. However, that link uses contradictory leaps of logic and moral sleight of hand to support what it wants to: that sex has to involve procreation, that human life starts at conception rather…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 16:21:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111753#post111753</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111753#post111753</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yet those ideas about life would have been mainstream until recently. In Tolstoy's Anna Karenina, one of the ways that Tolstoy uses to show Anna's fall from the values of society is that she uses contraception when she makes love with Vronsky. </p><p>Homosexual sex, masturbation, contraception, abortion have all been…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:48:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111750#post111750</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111750#post111750</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>From what you say you are actively seeking to prevent conception by timing of intercourse. That sounds awfully like contra-ception to me, and I'm sure there are other church teachings about the moral similarity of actively and passively committing sin,</p></blockquote><p>Did you read the link I gave? Here's a quote…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:32:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111749#post111749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111749#post111749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Steven: since we're sliding into some rather personal stuff I'll say this. The Church teaches that "The deliberate use of the sexual faculty, for whatever reason, outside of marriage is essentially contrary to its purpose."</p><p>That's from the Catechism, number 2352 which is all about masturbation. </p><p><a href="http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P85.HTM" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P85.HTM</a></p><p>Read for yourself…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:28:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111748#post111748</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111748#post111748</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Tess, I get that you're sincere in your beliefs and that you are motivated by what you describe as conscience. </p><p>From what you say you are actively seeking to prevent conception by timing of intercourse. That sounds awfully like contra-ception to me, and I'm sure there are other church teachings…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:27:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111745#post111745</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111745#post111745</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You can have any number of sincere beliefs you like. That doesn't make the content of the belief true.</p></blockquote><p>Or any less monstrous.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:16:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111744#post111744</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111744#post111744</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And how do you explain Catholicism/Christianity prior to feudalism?</p></blockquote><p>I'm not trying to explain &ndash; I'm offering an example of actual medieval Catholic belief, as espoused by the all-pervasive church.</p><p>The fact that they were themselves a feudal landholder I'm sure had absolutely nothing to do with it (and ditto…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:12:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111742#post111742</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111742#post111742</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Masturbation is a no no, for the same reasons I expressed above about the sexual act.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:11:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111737#post111737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111737#post111737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>That's because most of them use 'artificial' contraception. (Most US Catholics do, anyway. Something like 70%, I think.)</p><p>I'm no stranger to working out my own cycle, actually, so I'm sure your method works fine if you dedicate some time to it. But saying it's not contraception is just doubletalk,…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 14:46:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111736#post111736</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111736#post111736</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Tess, how's the Atheist Inquistion treating you?</p></blockquote><p>:) Fine, thanks for asking. So far my comfy chair has been tolerable.</p><blockquote><p>I'm no theologian and I disagree with a few issues the Church Teaches. For me the value of religion is in communion and the teachings of the gospels, social justice…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 14:41:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tess Rooney</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111735#post111735</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111735#post111735</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The sincerity with which a belief is held is no indicator of the truth.</p></blockquote><p>Sure. I agree with that. There are young earth creationists who are totally sincere, but I think they are wrong as well. </p><p>My point was whether or not Idiot allowed for any sincerity in religious belief,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 14:33:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111734#post111734</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111734#post111734</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And you all seem to think that Catholics can't space their family or choose the number of children they want &ndash; they can.</p></blockquote><p>That's because most of them use 'artificial' contraception. (Most US Catholics do, anyway. Something like 70%, I think.)</p><p>I'm no stranger to working out my own cycle,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 14:30:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111731#post111731</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-are-we-there-yet/?p=111731#post111731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Do you accept people having any form of sincere belief in the Divine?</p></blockquote><p>You can have any number of sincere beliefs you like.  That doesn't make the content of the belief true.  It's just a belief.    By analogy, many children have a sincere belief in Santa Claus.  That doesn't make…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 14:24:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
