<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Talk: Budget 09</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>mildgreens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113272#post113272</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113272#post113272</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And ETS fits in where? </p><p> (perhaps Bill English is is going to contract and converge sometime soon!)</p><p><br />And despite citizens and police being mown down as collateral damage in the war on drugs, English believes the answer to prohibition is more prohibition.... JK is coming gunning for your house if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:01:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113097#post113097</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113097#post113097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's not money on top of the Budget though &ndash; it's spending WITHIN the budget. So it's part of the surplus/deficit.</p></blockquote><p>I know. Hence reducing it reduces the deficit, increasing it reduces the surplus.</p><p>That still doesn't answer my question. You could achieve the same long term effect by saving…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:08:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113088#post113088</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113088#post113088</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How long has English been living in Wellington for now?</p><p>You’d have thought at least some of the accent would’ve worn off.</p></blockquote><p>Probably all the Standard &amp; Poors semen clogging up his windpipe, if the economically psychotic (and disappointingly weak) speeches from Messers Goff and Norman are anything to go by.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:30:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ChrisW</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113029#post113029</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113029#post113029</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>How long has English been living in Wellington for now?</p><p>You’d have thought at least some of the accent would’ve worn off.</p></blockquote><p>But OTOH I unmistakably heard him say he was providing another 36 million dollars to improve numeracy and literary standards.</p><p>Well, maybe the accent did confuse me and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:41:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113012#post113012</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113012#post113012</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I learned about the evils of retrenchment and Gordon Coates in 5th form history &mdash; did English skip class during that module?</p></blockquote><p>Forbes-Coates v2.0 alpha release.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:47:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113008#post113008</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113008#post113008</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'd much rather they save more (into the fund) when they're in surplus, and cut it right back when they're in deficit.</p></blockquote><p>It's not money on top of the Budget though &ndash; it's spending WITHIN the budget.  So it's part of the surplus/deficit.</p><p>There is a strong argument for funding…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:08:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>LegBreak</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113006#post113006</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113006#post113006</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just caught a bit of this, and here’s the issue that really gets me.</p><p>How long has English been living in Wellington for now?</p><p>You’d have thought at least some of the accent would’ve worn off.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:02:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113003#post113003</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113003#post113003</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Personally I'd much rather they save more (into the fund) when they're in surplus, and cut it right back when they're in deficit. Though if anyone can provide an explanation as to why that's a bad idea, I'm glad to hear it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:53:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terry Baucher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113001#post113001</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=113001#post113001</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>All seems pretty minor if I can be honest except that god awful GUTTING of the Super Fund. It will mean the fund will be smaller, be available later, and cover a lower portion of payments meaning more will have to be made up from taxation if entitlements are to…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:48:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112982#post112982</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112982#post112982</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I wait to see details of the $2b "reprioritisation" in spending as to how those priorities have worked out as well.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, that bit makes me *very* twitchy. It's so...non-specific, with such a large amount of money.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:47:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112980#post112980</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112980#post112980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, and spending is going backwards in real terms after next year &ndash; when you see the revenue slash (largely through the tax cut programs of Labour and National I believe) that's perhaps to be expected though.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:35:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112978#post112978</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112978#post112978</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						All seems pretty minor if I can be honest except that god awful GUTTING of the Super Fund.  It will mean the fund will be smaller, be available later, and cover a lower portion of payments **meaning more will have to be made up from taxation if entitlements are to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:33:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112977#post112977</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112977#post112977</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I meant the 11 years thing &ndash; sorry.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:30:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112976#post112976</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112976#post112976</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Pretty optimistic in terms of how long National will stay in power, too.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:30:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112973#post112973</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112973#post112973</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I see tax cuts don't stimulate the economy after all and apparently it's not ok to run a deficit. Oh well,  at least we don't have an arrogant out of touch govt any more.</p><p>I learned about the evils of retrenchment and Gordon Coates in 5th form history &mdash; did…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:24:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112970#post112970</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112970#post112970</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Super Fund: "The automatic contributions are likely to be suspended for 11 years"</p><p>11 years!  Fucken hell!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:09:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112969#post112969</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112969#post112969</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Full details from Farrar up now.<br />Still reading...</p><p><a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:05:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112965#post112965</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112965#post112965</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Trevor had some leaks the other day on <a href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2009/05/26/budget-leaks/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Red Alert blog</a>. It would be sad if the slashing of modern apprenticeships and trade training was true.<br />They sometimes blog from the House. I wonder if they will during the Budget debate.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:26:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112955#post112955</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112955#post112955</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/dim-post-budget-preview/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Once again Danyl has scooped them all</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:24:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112954#post112954</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112954#post112954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Watching the body language and facial expressions of John Key and Bill English yesterday, I got a bad feeling.<br />It got worse when I listened to what came out of their mouths.<br />If I know nothing about these guys I would assume that Bill was a politician and Jon Key…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:22:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112930#post112930</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112930#post112930</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Couldn't we lock the clowns in..?</p></blockquote><p><strong><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10566554" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Syn·o·vate</a></strong> [sin-uh-vayt, sin-oh-vayt] &ndash; <em>verb intransitive</em></p><p>1. See also <strong>bossnapping</strong>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:33:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112927#post112927</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112927#post112927</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Couldn't we lock the clowns in..?</p></blockquote><p>We will, comrade, we will.  As soon as our Glorious Socialist Revolution is complete we will send these reactionaries to appropriate "education centres".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:25:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112926#post112926</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112926#post112926</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Nice website. Let's trade links.</p><p><a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0905/S00283.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Budget 2009 &ndash; Scoop Full Coverage</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:22:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112924#post112924</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112924#post112924</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/AboutParl/SeeHear/PTV/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Parliament TV</a> &ndash; commentators come after, not before or interrupting the main thingy...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:14:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112915#post112915</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112915#post112915</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I look forward to my annual hurling of shoe at TV/radio, when presenter turns to pundit and asks:</p><p>"Are you expecting any surprises in the budget?"</p><p>Er ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:58:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112914#post112914</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112914#post112914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Couldn't we lock the clowns in..?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:57:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ScottY</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112911#post112911</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112911#post112911</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I looked over at Kiwiblog, but with DPF in the lockup, it's just the clowns in at the moment.</p></blockquote><p>Thankfully DPF doesn't need to worry about leaving his site unmonitored, as he doesn't seem to have a moderation policy.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:54:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112901#post112901</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112901#post112901</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Elsewhere, at The Standard lprent feasts on <a href="http://www.thestandard.org.nz/english-and-key-uncertain-of-budgets-focus/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Key and English contradicting each other yet again</a>, and Eddie offers <a href="http://www.thestandard.org.nz/budget-previews-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a couple of Budget predictions</a>.</p><p>I looked over at Kiwiblog, but with DPF in the lockup, it's <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/budget_lockup-2.html#comments" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">just the clowns</a> in at the moment.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:45:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112891#post112891</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112891#post112891</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I made a prediction in another thread... </p><p>I said I suspect we could wave bye-bye to the $1000 join-up incentive for Kiwisaver.</p><p>I hope I'm wrong.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:15:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112882#post112882</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/talk-budget-09/?p=112882#post112882</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Predictions, running commentaries, reviews, good links and assessments of Bill English's first Budget. Come here …
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:58:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
