<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Speaker: Two Ticks</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39568#post39568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39568#post39568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Graeme (man, once everyone knows you're a lawyer...)</p><p>I wonder what your opinion is on this:</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/4362346a28.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/4362346a28.html</a></p><p>I wonder how it's been legally enforced &ndash; I wouldn't have thought the McDonalds contract would say anything about your behaviour after you were employed by them &ndash; during maybe.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:15:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39406#post39406</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39406#post39406</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"The day after passage [of the Civil Rights Act] , Johnson told his aide Bill Moyers, "I think we delivered the South to the Republican Party for your lifetime and mine." Indeed, he was defeated in five Southern states in 1964, four of them states Democrats had not lost in…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:59:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39373#post39373</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39373#post39373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						All right, how about changing 'in a broader sense' to 'in a practical if not literal sense' or 'in a societal if not legal sense' or some phrase like that? Will that satisfy the conditions of the semantics-off? :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:31:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39367#post39367</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39367#post39367</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>LBJ's Great Society/War on Poverty acts were also, in a broader sense, civil rights laws</p></blockquote><p>While he did stuff that was disproportionately helpful for African Americans, those things that you've listed aren't civil rights in a broad sense Danielle. Civil rights are legal rights &ndash; right to vote, redress, right…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:58:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39359#post39359</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39359#post39359</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And a win in Michigan for Romney...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:32:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39357#post39357</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39357#post39357</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						LBJ's Great Society/War on Poverty acts were also, in a broader sense, civil rights laws: food stamps, Medicare, Medicaid, help with higher education costs... it wasn't as though he treated civil rights as an afterthought. Dude seemed seriously committed to allowing poor and disadvantaged people (who often happened to be…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:16:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39350#post39350</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39350#post39350</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes (indeed Eisenhower took steps along the path when he was President, albeit reluctantly I think), but given that the alternative to Kennedy was Nixon... I don't think he would have taken it very far if he'd been in the top job.</p><p>The alternative to LBJ in '64 was Goldwater,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:13:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39348#post39348</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39348#post39348</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And, come to think of it, why would we absolve a Republican president?  The Republicans didn't have the South to lose (as LBJ put it) and it may have shored their support in the liberal eastern states.</p><p>Just conjecture, but fascinating.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:49:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39346#post39346</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39346#post39346</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think that's a fair point Kyle, but if you add (say) Nixon into the mix you couldn't say the same thing (I know you specifically point to Democrat presidents, fair play).</p><p>King is clearly the catalyst, and I don't mean to imply that LBJ is a colossus on the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:33:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39345#post39345</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39345#post39345</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>With the Whip being less important in American politics than it is in the Westminster system, I would have thought LBJ's moral authority was as essential in mobilising the political apparatus as MLK's was in mobilising the grassroots.</p></blockquote><p>I can't buy that. The significance of LBJ in advancing civil rights…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:15:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39344#post39344</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39344#post39344</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>With all due respect to Mr. Califano, I don't think he's caught the central fatuity in HIlary Clinton's 'it takes a President' comments.</p></blockquote><p>LBJ had to do more than just sign the Bill into law, he had to ensure that it had the numbers in the House &amp; in the Senate.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:00:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39343#post39343</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39343#post39343</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's not exactly good campaigning advice is it. When running against a significant candidate of part-African descent, running down MLK's achievements, and running up the flag for the crusty white guy who agreed to sign the actual laws, ain't the best plan.</p></blockquote><p>To be fair to Johnson, 'the crusty white…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:36:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39337#post39337</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39337#post39337</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It's not exactly good campaigning advice is it. When running against a significant candidate of part-African descent, running down MLK's achievements, and running up the flag for the crusty white guy who agreed to sign the actual laws, ain't the best plan.</p><p>On the list of international figures from which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:26:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39335#post39335</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39335#post39335</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>WH:</p><p>With all due respect to Mr. Califano, I don't think he's caught the central fatuity in HIlary Clinton's 'it takes a President' comments.</p><p>Well, yes, Hilary you do actually have to be President to sign bills into law.  Nice to see you stayed awake during grade school civics.</p><p>Lyndon…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:08:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39331#post39331</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39331#post39331</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/14/AR2008011402079.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/14/AR2008011402079.html</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:32:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39329#post39329</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39329#post39329</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>recent poling &ndash; </p><p>Hillary and McCain in the lead <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2008/01/usatgallup-poll.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">nationally</a>. On the surface of things Hillary appears to be benefiting the most from Edwards' decline.</p><p>In <a href="http://www.rgj.com/blogs/inside-nevada-politics/2008/01/new-poll-democratic-race-in-nevada-dead.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nevada</a> it's a 3 horserace with </p><p>Barack Obama: 32 percent<br />Hillary Clinton: 30 percent<br />John Edwards: 27 percent</p><p>And in <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/south_carolina/election_2008_south_carolina_democratic_primary" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">South Corolina</a> things are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:45:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39322#post39322</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39322#post39322</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not sure if the Bugle counts as media. In fact, I just listened to episode 11, and it's the opposite end of the scale from serious.</p></blockquote><p>Indeed, and I thought it was mildly funny (though The Daily Show is obviously getting John Oliver's best work).  I just think, with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:50:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39318#post39318</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39318#post39318</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>perhaps the British media shouldn't get their sneer on too loudly while they're living in a country with an unelected upper house, the peculiar distortions of an FPP electoral system and a hereditary head of state.</p></blockquote><p>I'm not sure if the Bugle counts as media. In fact, I just listened…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:43:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39317#post39317</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39317#post39317</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Perhaps Clinton's team thinks the same thing. They seem to say some really dumb things at time</p></blockquote><p>Oy, talk about good Kiwi understatement... I know this comparison really upsets some folks, but Carl Rove really should start invoicing the Clinton campaign.  Seriously, why doesn't someone just come out of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:19:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39313#post39313</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39313#post39313</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This looks good:</p><p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/audio_video/podcasts/the_bugle/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/audio_video/podcasts/the_bugle/</a></p><p>John Oliver of Daily Show.</p><p>"The caucus is like selecting your leader with a tea party, amazing it hasn't caught on"</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:20:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39312#post39312</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39312#post39312</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks the Wiki:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granita_pact" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granita_pact</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:01:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Rowe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39311#post39311</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39311#post39311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well, I/O, I think Blair and Brown will go to their graves saying the 'Granita Pact' never happened, and they sure didn't go to the hustings in 1997 with their little time-share arrangement attached to the manifesto.</p></blockquote><p>I don't recall it being common knowledge before the 1997 election, it came…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:59:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39279#post39279</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39279#post39279</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And I take your point too Craig, but is it really a 'back room deal' when everyone seemingly knows about it and is resigned to it?</p></blockquote><p>Well, I/O, I think Blair and Brown will go to their graves saying the 'Granita Pact' never happened, and they sure didn't go to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:27:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39271#post39271</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39271#post39271</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>If Neil's prediction is correct then that country will have been ruled by two families for 32 years.</em></p><p>28 &ndash; Bush senior only had 4 + Mr Clinton's 8, Bush junior's 8, plus a possible Mrs Clinton 8 = 28.</p><p>But yes to your overall point.</p></blockquote><p>Heh heh &mdash; but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:07:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39261#post39261</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39261#post39261</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yes, take a seat at the back of the bus Mr Obama, it's not your turn yet. I think Peter Costello serves as a good example of why anyone with leadership aspirations shouldn't politely wait their turn.</p></blockquote><p>Well, IO, I'm a little short of sympathy for folks like Costello or…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:29:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39256#post39256</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39256#post39256</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If Neil's prediction is correct then that country will have been ruled by two families for 32 years.</p></blockquote><p>28 &ndash; Bush senior only had 4 + Mr Clinton's 8, Bush junior's 8, plus a possible Mrs Clinton 8 = 28.</p><p>But yes to your overall point. Particularly given that if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:05:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39209#post39209</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39209#post39209</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Remember, if the Dems win this year they will inherit the shit avalanche that's about to drop on the US, and in 2012 the Repubs will spin it as 'what you get when you elect a Democrat to the Whitehouse'</p></blockquote><p>And I've never heard a politician stand up and say…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:30:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39207#post39207</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39207#post39207</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My first thought when I heard the result was wildly different from the pre-vote polls was: "Were they using Diebold voting machines?" <blockquote>That said, I think the Dems will have the luxury of having their cake and eating it too. I think the Reps will be out of power for…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:19:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39201#post39201</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39201#post39201</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/michael_tomasky/2008/01/the_clinton_rebellion.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/michael_tomasky/2008/01/the_clinton_rebellion.html</a></p><p>Clinton and Obama are both good candidates IMO, but in the many dozens of articles and opinion pieces I have read on the race for the Democratic nomination, I have very seldom read discussions of the policy differences between the leading candidates.  Just shite about Clinton´s inevitability or her…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:47:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39171#post39171</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39171#post39171</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Anyway, my main objection to Clinton is that surely in a country of 300million the USA can do better than continually handing the presidency to the same friggin families</p></blockquote><p>I agree with you to the extent that there's always something queasy-making about any democracy coming to resemble a Ruritanian fiefdom,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:34:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39167#post39167</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39167#post39167</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And to be blunt WTF makes Clinton so special that she's beyond criticism from the left or within the Democratic Party</p></blockquote><p>Craig, she isn't beyond criticism, it's the type of criticism that is being objected to. I think there is a point about that. We saw it with Thatcher and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:04:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39163#post39163</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39163#post39163</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In general the liberal (mostly white, male, middleclass) pundocracy has been anti-Hillary. They have all been almost uniformly repeating the mantra that she is unelectable, she's too divisive etc for the past few years despite the fact that she's been riding high in public opinion polls.</p></blockquote><p>Neil:  I'm sure that's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:39:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39156#post39156</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39156#post39156</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Do you really think Talking Points Memo is some kind of Clinton-hating bearpit?</p></blockquote><p>i wouldn't put it quite so strongly but, yes I do. The same for The Nation apart from a few exceptions. In general the liberal (mostly white, male, middleclass) pundocracy has been anti-Hillary. They have all been…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:09:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39150#post39150</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39150#post39150</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>HP print a lot of lies about HRC which are immediately deinied by those concerned</p></blockquote><p>Or it could be a truth that everyone concerned quite wisely wanted to back away from as quickly as decently possible &ndash; I don't know for sure.  And I make no apologies for saying that's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:18:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39148#post39148</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39148#post39148</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But I think we can both agree that if the Huffington Post has convinced everyone that a 'swift boat'-style smear campaign isn't worth the risk , then they've done political discourse a great service.</p></blockquote><p>HP print a lot of lies about HRC which are immediately deinied by those concerned but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:53:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39147#post39147</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39147#post39147</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And to bring things full circle, how weird is the American primary system?</p><p>Well, if I've read <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#1746" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> and <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#1918" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> correctly (which I wouldn't bet my immortal soul on), Obama lost by two points and still walks away with a (bare) majority of NH's delegates because he's pledged three of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:09:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39143#post39143</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39143#post39143</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Sigh, Craig &ndash; as with Ralston's "Labour nuke", come back to us when this actually materialises.</p></blockquote><p>OK, Don, Bill Ralston just made it up.  Talking Points Memo &ndash; a blog I'd characterise as highly partisan but pretty wingnut-lite and hardly kneejerk anti-Hillary &ndash; is running a baseless smear.  Give me…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:13:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39139#post39139</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39139#post39139</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm happy there's still a race on. every one's had some humble pie now. But those polls? Obama apparently had such a massive lead. But HRC showed a consistent lead right thru the voting.</p><p>The Guardian is reporting a higher vote for HRC among woman amongst other factors. Maybe Obama…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:12:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39137#post39137</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39137#post39137</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sigh, Craig &ndash; as with Ralston's "Labour nuke", come back to us when this actually materialises. </p><p>Not saying it won't happen, just commenting on events so far. And we are not that far away from the end of the primaries now.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:58:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39133#post39133</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39133#post39133</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I do think the Dems have run a pretty clean campaign against each other so far. Most mudslinging seems to have come from "other sources" such as Drudge whose interests are not exactly dispassionate.</p></blockquote><p>Oh come on, Don.  Can we return from Fantasy Island for a moment, and acknowledge that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:41:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39132#post39132</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39132#post39132</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And it's loathsome to play the gender card in Clinton's defense.</p></blockquote><p>Who did that?</p><blockquote><p>If Obama gets the democratic nomination the country will go backward ... seriously?</p></blockquote><p>Not very inspirational, is it? </p><p>But criticising that statement is very different from saying "she cackles, witch". Pointing out that Obama's campaign is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:41:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39131#post39131</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39131#post39131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The drama of the primaries looks to continue. With 11% of votes counted HRC is in the lead (probalbly due to early counting of smaller communities more likley to vote HRC). And McCain looks unbeatable.</p></blockquote><p>Well, I don't actually think it says anything more about Edwards than Democrats who felt…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:31:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39130#post39130</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39130#post39130</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hillary Clinton, long criticized as cold, shows a bit of feeling and is attacked as overly emotional.</p></blockquote><p>I thought it was genuine and nice to see, but still wasn't a big fan of it.</p><p>If Obama gets the democratic nomination the country will go backward ... seriously?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:26:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39128#post39128</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39128#post39128</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I like Obama as well, but I also agree with the article Neil linked to about the treatment of Clinton. For example the term "cackle" crops up all over the place (try Youtube). The implication is that she is a witch. This is similar to some of the personal attacks…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:18:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39119#post39119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39119#post39119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>...much sympathy when they lost their shit under pressure on...</p></blockquote><p>it wasn't so much a matter of sympathy for HRC, she's a big girl in a rough game she freely chooses to be part of, but rather what it said about Edwards. </p><p>The drama of the primaries looks to continue.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:14:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39111#post39111</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39111#post39111</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/video/2008/jan/08/obama" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This is</a> an interesting video. I suspect all campaigns try to be controlling of the media but still, a sympathetic journalist from a sympathetic newspaper not being given the red carpet is a bit bizarre.</p><p>Regards Obama's speech delivery. It is great and I suspect influenced as much by his…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:04:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39099#post39099</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39099#post39099</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In a recent TV debate Edwards and Obama decided to gang up on Hillary, apparently she's the "status quo" or something. Edwards did the dirty work while Obama looked more than a little pleased.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, hell, Neil.  Bill should have taken Ann Coulter's favorite fagoot and Barak Osama out to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:41:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39081#post39081</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39081#post39081</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Something I read just now:</p><blockquote><p>The most telling laugh line in Obama's stump speech is his description of the dreadful charge his opponents make against him. "Obama's talking about hope again," the candidate says, mimicking his foes. Then his tenor drops to a low, conspiratorial pitch: <em>"He's a hope monger."</em></p></blockquote><p>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:35:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39079#post39079</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=39079#post39079</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In a recent TV debate Edwards and Obama decided to gang up on Hillary, apparently she's the "status quo" or something. Edwards did the dirty work while Obama looked more than a little pleased.</p><p><a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/anotherthing?bid=25&amp;pid=267536" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Katha Pollitt</a>'s take on Edwards.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:38:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38903#post38903</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38903#post38903</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There are various politicians whose speeches have been remixed into dance records: Lange, Kennedy and Martin Luther King, maybe others.</p><p>When I heard Obama's speech following the primaries, I thought he was similarly remixable. You couldn't remix Huckabee into anything.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:19:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38898#post38898</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38898#post38898</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And finally, Neil, I have to wonder whether Pollitt gets it when she writes drivel like this:</p><blockquote><p>Obama, <strong>the black candidate who never mentions his race</strong>, gets to smile his mile-wide smile and be a rock star. [Emphasis added]</p></blockquote><p>Did an alleged progressive writer on a left-wing magazine just go…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:24:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38893#post38893</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38893#post38893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>the real change will be from a Republican admistration to a Democrat one. Whether that's Obama or Clinton is on the level of hard vs soft pineapple lumps.</p></blockquote><p>Any son of a bitch will do, as long as s/he's <em>our</em> son of a bitch?  Let's just agree to disagree on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:39:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38891#post38891</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38891#post38891</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Obama just gets that that cynicism is real and 'change' is more than a bumper sticker slogan.</p></blockquote><p>the real change will be from a Republican admistration to a Democrat one. Whether that's Obama or Clinton is on the level of hard vs soft pineapple lumps.</p><p>Obama's "change" branding is as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:28:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38884#post38884</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38884#post38884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But the reality is always the prosaic business of getting legislation passed.</p></blockquote><p>Yes, and I'd respectfully suggest you don't get much of that done if you treat half the electorate &ndash; and the people they elect &ndash; like malicious fuckwits.  Don't know about you, Neil, but if was a Congressional…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:52:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38878#post38878</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38878#post38878</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Obama is promising to bring people together because that's what the voters want to hear. It's politics.</p></blockquote><p>very standard politics. Obama can position himself as an outsider, as some one who will go to Washington untainted by the Beltway. And so can promise reconcilliation and bipartisan etc etc.  Nice fantasy.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:06:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38872#post38872</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38872#post38872</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And here's another thought, Danyl:  While folks on both sides are (quite understandably) focused on the primaries, they don't elect presidents.  That happens in a general election where independents and ideological sluts (sorry, 'swing voters') are allowed to vote too.  Turning up the partisan volume might play well to the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:58:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38870#post38870</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38870#post38870</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The GOP is sailing towards the borders of clinical insanity (I cite the Iowa caucus nomination of Huckabee as evidence) &ndash; I really don't see the point of healing the gaps with a party that is praying itself into electoral annihilation.</p></blockquote><p>Well, Danyl, I don't really see the point of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:25:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38864#post38864</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38864#post38864</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>And I have doubts about Obama's endless rhetoric about 'a big table' and healing the rift with the republicans.</blockquote>It's just Political BS, the equivalent of saying "I'm against clubbing baby seals". Who's in favour of clubbing baby seals? No-one. Who wishes the politicians on both sides could all work together?…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:52:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38860#post38860</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38860#post38860</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>it seemed a bit confusing and it made my brain hurt</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, sorry 'bout that. It's a topic that could perhaps best be split into several posts. One on the process, another on Iowa, and it might all have been a little less headache-inducing :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:03:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Eleanor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38859#post38859</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38859#post38859</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>George W  ...  attractive as hell and says all the right things.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah. Yeah, now I see. :o<</p><p>I wonder if the George W malapropism countdown calendar comes with pictures...</p><p>:o<</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:37:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38857#post38857</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38857#post38857</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>I'm not completely clear on [Obama's] policies, but my god he has charisma ....</em></p><p>I'm also an Obama fan, purely on the basis of his charisma &ndash; but I do worry that what people like me see when they look at Obama is what people on the right saw in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:22:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38855#post38855</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38855#post38855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oops, ignore that, they're $'s, not 5's. Damn lossy compression.</p><p>Obama, $117 per vote.<br />Edwards, $48 per vote.<br />Clinton, $113 per vote.</p><p>And yes, they're not really votes, I know. Still, I need a measure I can understand, and that's close enough. Edwards has far more support than donors, perhaps…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:40:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38854#post38854</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38854#post38854</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Wow. TV advertising for Iowa caucus by leading three democrats was approximately $170 million dollars, covering 600,000 registered democrats ($280 per head), only 40% of whom turned out ($700 per head for them).</p><p>Proportion of votes came within 10% of the proportion of advertising, with Clinton behind in votes to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:44:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38850#post38850</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38850#post38850</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20070701faessay86401-p0/barack-obama/renewing-american-leadership.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Obama</a> and <a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20071101faessay86601-p0/hillary-rodham-clinton/security-and-opportunity-for-the-twenty-first-century.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Clinton</a> on foreign policy. I can't see much subsantive difference but maybe my comb hasn't got fine enough teeth.</p><p>And <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2235791,00.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Martin Kettle</a> gives a plug to that rather bizarre argument that HRC is "too divisive". There's a strand of support for Obama which is based purely on him…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:36:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38841#post38841</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38841#post38841</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I read this post yesterday and it seemed a bit confusing and it made my brain hurt, but I stuck with it. Then later I was reading about <a href="http://jezebel.com/340378/dispatch-from-an-historic-caucus" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a Jezebel reader who went to an Iowa caucus</a> and she was talking about standing in the groups on the floor of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:26:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Hosking</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38832#post38832</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38832#post38832</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And he used a lot of repeated sentences components ("Hope is..; hope is...") which intensified with repetition. It's a MLK trademark, but it's also pretty common nowadays. Of course, MLK was a *lot* more intense, but he had the voice and the power for it.</p></blockquote><p>Yep. And King got it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:26:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38823#post38823</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38823#post38823</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hillary was not the key player in her husband's presidency that she is trying to make out...</p></blockquote><p>I agree she was not a key player in foreign affairs, but she would have seen Bill's thinking and decision making process, well, intimately. What he got right and wrong on foreign policy…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:44:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38821#post38821</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38821#post38821</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>I love how 'concerned' Republicans are about Obama's foreign policy experience. You see, seven years ago George W. had, uh, been to Mexico for a visit and governed Texas, so he was clearly the ultimate Citizen of the World.</em></p><p>In both 1992 and 2000, foreign policy was not the big…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:21:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38820#post38820</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38820#post38820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Neil,<br />Hillary was not the key player in her husband's presidency that she is trying to make out, except for 2 occasions.  The healthcare debacle in 93 which was either the or a major factor in the Repubs landslide win in 94, after which she was pushed out, and only…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:15:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38819#post38819</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38819#post38819</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I love how 'concerned' Republicans are about Obama's foreign policy experience. You see, seven years ago George W. had, uh, been to Mexico for a visit and governed Texas, so he was clearly the ultimate Citizen of the World. No one on the Democratic side this go-round could possibly match…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:11:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38816#post38816</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38816#post38816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>...but I think the novelty value of Senator Clinton's vagina and who her husband is is past its use-by. In the end, if she can't mount a straightforward and consistent defence of her own voting record on Iraq in the primaries, then I don't think Obama's the only one with…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:34:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38813#post38813</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38813#post38813</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>. .. the novelty value of Senator Clinton's vagina .. </em></p><p>A subject I do my very best never to think about.  Nearly as scary as the hair on her scrotum.</p><p><em>if she can't mount a straightforward and consistent defence of her own voting record on Iraq in the primaries,</em>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:18:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38810#post38810</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38810#post38810</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hillary has more gravitas that Obama, and gravitas counts in foreign policy. That is simply the point I was making, and one I think most people and commentators agree with.</p></blockquote><p>Morgan Freeman has gravitas. I'll respectfully agree to disagree whether Clinton has anything of the kind.  Personally, and I may…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:59:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38808#post38808</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38808#post38808</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is weird &mdash; election year 2008, and <a href="http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/005015.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Federal Election Commission has shut down</a> as a result of a Senate stalemate on appointments:</p><blockquote><p>The FEC's shutdown could affect the election in a number of ways. The first and most obvious is the oversight role it plays with third party…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:40:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38806#post38806</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38806#post38806</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>8 years watching Bill deal with the world has to count for something.</p></blockquote><p>Gee, I'd love to see John McCain remind folks of his twenty years in the Senate &ndash; which might just count for a little more.  Seriously, if Clinton wants to play the gender card she would be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:30:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38805#post38805</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38805#post38805</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>Also, the foreign policy teams of both Hillary and Obama are full of people who worked for Bill Clinton so both candidates will have a very sound base in this area.</em></p><p>Maybe I am placing too much on Obama's "I'll meet with anyone no preconditions" statement in a debate, but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:28:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38804#post38804</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38804#post38804</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Obama is an amazing guy, very charismatic and honest and decent as far as I know, but he just doesn't anything in the way of experience to prepare him for the worst, most brutal job in the world. I am no fan of Hillary, but I would prefer her to…</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:12:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38803#post38803</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38803#post38803</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Hillary is definitely beatable as she has shown herself to be lousy on the campaign trail...</p></blockquote><p>Down but not out.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 09:52:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38802#post38802</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38802#post38802</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Obama is as naive as he is inexperienced; he would most likely be the next Jimmy Carter. Nice guy, means well but an utter failure as a President.</p></blockquote><p>I think you are over stating this point but there ibis some truth in this  &ndash; compared to Hillary Obama he will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 09:50:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Bremner</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38801#post38801</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38801#post38801</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Great to see Hillary take a face plant in Iowa, she is down, but far from out. She has proven recently that she is not a good campaigner, but she has a strong machine behind her and she is as tough as nails (putting up with Bill screwing around on…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 09:29:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38795#post38795</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38795#post38795</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>FYI: the doco was called <a href="http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hacking Democracy</a>. It was nominated for an Emmy ... <em>from their website:</em></p><blockquote><p>The documentary, broadcast on HBO throughout November &amp; December 2006, exposes the dangers of voting machines used during America's mid term and presidential elections. Electronic voting machines count approximately 90% of America's votes in…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:48:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38794#post38794</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38794#post38794</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Slightly off topic;Graham alluded to a lack of transparency/accountability in NZ selection processes.</p><p> If you like the idea of voting for your candidates &ndash;  you could do worse than the Greens, who let their members choose their candidates in a 'list ranking process'. It's a secret, postal ballot, where members…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:39:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>InternationalObserver</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38793#post38793</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38793#post38793</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A great result for Obama and Edwards! <br />But ...</p><p>Having just watched (in Australia, no link, sorry) a documentary on the Diebold voting machines I have to say I'm very fearful of the future of any 'democracy' in the USA.</p><p>Obama may look like a winner now, but all that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:35:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38787#post38787</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38787#post38787</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Not that I think the US President elections are actually very democratic, just ask Al Gore</p></blockquote><p>Take it as read that I wasn't a particularly happy chap on Sunday, September 18 2005.  Just because a result is agonisingly close, and not to my liking, doesn't make an election 'undemocratic'.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:44:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38786#post38786</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38786#post38786</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And I don't mean to thread jack, but I wonder if our domestic pollies are going to be taking the right lessons from Obama.  After reading Ralston's... err, rather peculiar HoS column this week, I'm not feeling overly optimistic.  Might be the year to keep in mothballs any smug superiority…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:29:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38785#post38785</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38785#post38785</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I should also point out that a Prime Minister isn't a President, and especially not a US-style executive President. Constitutionally, they're princeps, not dominus &ndash; first among equals, not an elected king.</p></blockquote><p>But the Iowa caucus, or indeed any of the primaries, don't elect a President. It's a political party…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:18:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38784#post38784</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38784#post38784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Obama's no firebrand, but I think he strikes a good balance as being calm, intelligent and generally nice, whereas &ndash; crass as it may sound &ndash; I don't think he wants to be seen as a fire-up black man.</p></blockquote><p>Well, yes, it was crass &ndash; I think Obama just doesn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:15:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38783#post38783</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38783#post38783</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not sure when he picked up the style, but his way of speaking is quite like a non-religious version of MLK. Not just his references to the man and his message, but his way of speaking, and what he says.</p></blockquote><p>It's a soft version of the Southern inflection at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:05:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38782#post38782</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38782#post38782</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not sure when he picked up the style, but his way of speaking is quite like a non-religious version of MLK.</p></blockquote><p>Nope, Denzel Goes To Washington.  Seriously...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:32:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38781#post38781</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38781#post38781</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not sure when he picked up the style, but his way of speaking is quite like a non-religious version of MLK.</p></blockquote><p>Nope, Denzel Goes To Washington.  Seriously...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:32:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38778#post38778</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38778#post38778</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This would all be a good point if what happened today (yesterday) was an election, not a primary.</p></blockquote><p>It's a good point for primaries as well.  I agree that parties can pick their leaders however the hell they want to, but if you wan't to claim the mantle of democracy,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:32:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38774#post38774</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38774#post38774</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Iowa has a population of 3 million. So that is 335,000 represents 11% of the population, including those under 18 who cannot vote.</p></blockquote><p>Something I didn't mention &ndash; it was nearly 3000 words as it was &ndash; Iowans who will be 18 at the election, but aren't yet, get to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:18:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38769#post38769</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38769#post38769</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Not a bad tactic at all. You can see why young people are flocking to him.</p></blockquote><p>It's not just the MLK cadences, but the cool. He seems assured and natural, which I think lends him credibility. I can't help but find him quite exciting. Matthew  Yglesias is <a href="http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/01/obamas_speech_1.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">electrified</a>.</p><p>He should…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:57:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38766#post38766</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38766#post38766</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not completely clear on his policies, but my god he has charisma ....</p></blockquote><p>I'm not sure when he picked up the style, but his way of speaking is quite like a non-religious version of MLK. Not just his references to the man and his message, but his way of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:47:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38765#post38765</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38765#post38765</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Given the timing and limited duration of the caucus &ndash; a two-hour window on a weeknight &ndash; I don't think it is entirely a matter of "choice".</p><p>Seriously, if a country held an "election" where the poll was inconveniently timed and open for a very short window of time, they'd…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:36:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38764#post38764</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38764#post38764</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If the rest choose not to vote, that is an equally democratic choice.</p></blockquote><p>Given the timing and limited duration of the caucus &ndash; a two-hour window on a weeknight &ndash; I don't think it is entirely a matter of "choice".</p><p>Seriously, if a country held an "election" where the poll…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:27:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38761#post38761</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38761#post38761</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Superb speech by Obama ...</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNZaq-YKCnE" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNZaq-YKCnE</a></p><p>I'm not completely clear on his policies, but my god he has charisma ....</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:02:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38760#post38760</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38760#post38760</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Of course, it is highly probable that (if the system were to permit it) "no confidence" would win over any of the listed candidates, especially for the Republicans. Which is the likely reason for the much lower Republican turnout &mdash; their choices are pretty much as characterised by Craig above.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:02:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Ellis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38758#post38758</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38758#post38758</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Iowa has a population of 3 million.  So that is 335,000 represents 11% of the population, including those under 18 who cannot vote.</p><p>If the rest choose not to vote, that is an equally democratic choice.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:57:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38755#post38755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38755#post38755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						335,000 out of 300 million.  In America, they call it "democracy".
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:23:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38754#post38754</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38754#post38754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Just under 220,000 Democrats caucused tonight. About 115,000 Republicans did. That is a very big vote in itself.</p></blockquote><p>The next pres will be a Dem no doubt about that. 335,000 people get to have a direct and personal say in who the next most powerful person in the world will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:02:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38746#post38746</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38746#post38746</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The traditional candidate selection process in New Zealand, then?</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, but at least that happens amongst party officials.  It has no place in a popular election.</p><p>Democrat results are <a href="http://www.iowacaucusresults.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>, BTW.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:05:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38745#post38745</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38745#post38745</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						From the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/12/27/DI2007122702075.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">WaPo discussion</a>: biggest Democratic turnout ever.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:01:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38743#post38743</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38743#post38743</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From TPM:</p><blockquote><p><strong>META-STORY</strong></p><p>Beyond who won on each side, there's a very big partisan message out of tonight. Just under 220,000 Democrats caucused tonight. About 115,000 Republicans did. That is a very big vote in itself.</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:57:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38742#post38742</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38742#post38742</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Like what, the potential for intimidation, bullying, and thuglike behaviour?</p></blockquote><p>The traditional candidate selection process in New Zealand, then?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:55:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38738#post38738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38738#post38738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>To me if implemented well this system has a lot more to offer than secret ballot voting.</p></blockquote><p>Like what, the potential for intimidation, bullying, and thuglike behaviour?</p><p>There's nothing in there that couldn't be captured by a simple preferential system &ndash; which would also have the advantage of encouraging a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:25:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38737#post38737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38737#post38737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You could make an argument, but if you're running an election and want to state government to pay for polling clerks and voter education etc. you probably can't complain too much.</p></blockquote><p>I'd figured it was something like that.  But at the same time, it really does seem like it should…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:19:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Luke Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38735#post38735</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38735#post38735</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think it is interesting that people are calling the idea of caucusing undemocratic. To me if implemented well this system has a lot more to offer than secret ballot voting. This is not to say that the system is implemented well. The low turn out would suggest perhaps not.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:41:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38734#post38734</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38734#post38734</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Looks like Obama... by 5% or so.  Clinton, Edwards pretty even.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:40:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38733#post38733</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38733#post38733</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And Obama predicted to win for the Dems. With a real fight for second between Edwards and Clinton.</p><p>Really high turnout apparently too (still much lower than a primary, of course).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:39:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38731#post38731</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38731#post38731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And a bunch of places now calling Iowa for Huckabee... bad news for Mitt Romney, good for John McCain.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:19:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jolisa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38730#post38730</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38730#post38730</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The New York Times says Huckabee wins; Romney has conceded.</p><p>Also, Obama has pulled ahead by a couple of percentage points.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:17:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38729#post38729</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38729#post38729</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Josh Marshall says:</p><blockquote><p>The Obama folks say they're expecting a turnout of 207k, which would be at the highest end of expectations.</p><p>I think 2004 was around 120k and that was considered a high turnout caucus.</p></blockquote><p>From a comment on Election Central:</p><blockquote><p>What's rural and what's not in Iowa? I…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:16:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38728#post38728</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38728#post38728</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Man. I knew a fair bit about the American political system and the primaries, but you've brought up a few quirks there which I hadn't even heard of.</p><p>The other thing to remember is that 90% of the time the delegates at the convention have only one job &ndash; waving…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:09:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38727#post38727</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38727#post38727</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">TPM Election Central</a> is good too:</p><blockquote><p>Right now, Hillary, Obama, and Edwards are basically in a statistical dead heat &mdash; each has roughly 32%, with 513 of 1,751 precincts reporting.</p><p>A caveat: The small, rural precincts report first, which is why Edwards has been ahead for the early part of…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:05:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38726#post38726</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38726#post38726</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Waaay to early to draw heaps from them</p></blockquote><p>Well cnn are already predicting a Huckabee win...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:05:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38725#post38725</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38725#post38725</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>a report from  <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=01&amp;year=2008&amp;base_name=whats_wrong_with_the_iowa_cauc#103495" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prospect</a> illustrates it's a very human process &ndash;</p><blockquote><p>A bit of drama here in precinct 23. The two women with the baby came in about 10 minutes late, and sat quietly in the Hillary camp. A few minutes later, the baby began to cry, and they took the…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:04:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38724#post38724</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38724#post38724</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Waaay to early to draw heaps from them, but it's 8:thirty-something p.m. US ET and results are being posted.  In this case <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">WashPosted</a>...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:47:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38723#post38723</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38723#post38723</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>As for the Republicans &ndash; Huckabee or Romney? Gee, gonnorhea or syphilis? Would be nice if McCain makes a credible showing (despite pretty much joining Guiliani in passing on Iowa and New Hampshire) because he's about the only person in the GOP field who isn't barking mad.</p></blockquote><p>It's been interesting…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:39:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38722#post38722</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38722#post38722</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's all very nineteenth century, isn't it?</p></blockquote><p>Early 20th century, actually. The first primary wasn't held until 1910 (it was very much closed shop until then).</p><blockquote><p>while I'm at it: why are the states determining primary dates? Isn't it the private business of the local party, and no business of…</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:08:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38719#post38719</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38719#post38719</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Republican's coices are particularly dire.  Romney seems to talk doublespeak like a native.  Huckabee's flat-sales-only tax system might make good speechifying but wouldn't work, and likely punish the poor.  Guiliani, running the late states may be crazy enough to work in this generally mad campaign but it's hard to see…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:56:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38718#post38718</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38718#post38718</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It's all very nineteenth century, isn't it?</p></blockquote><p>Well, yes indeed. And I am sure the Soviet Politburo was elected along similar lines :-)</p><p>However, it does seem to give the folks of many states an extraordinarily close up view of the various candidates over an extended period of time. When…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:55:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38715#post38715</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38715#post38715</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Would be nice if McCain makes a credible showing (despite pretty much joining Guiliani in passing on Iowa and New Hampshire) because he's about the only person in the GOP field who isn't barking mad.</p></blockquote><p>I wouldn't go that far &ndash; he's been crawling into bed with the religious right,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:04:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38714#post38714</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38714#post38714</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, and while I'm at it: why are the states determining primary dates?  Isn't it the private business of the local party, and no business of the state government?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:02:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38713#post38713</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38713#post38713</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It's all very nineteenth century, isn't it?  And the practice of staggered primaries, while it does build interest, also seems to grant a few dipshit podunk states a vastly disproportionate say on who the eventual nominee is.</p><p>(I was going to say it also allows donors greater influence &ndash; donations…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:00:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38712#post38712</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38712#post38712</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Would be nice if McCain makes a credible showing (despite pretty much joining Guiliani in passing on Iowa and New Hampshire)</p></blockquote><p>Giuliani may be passing on the small early contests to focus on some big races (a very risky strategy that must account in part of his long slide in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:00:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38711#post38711</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38711#post38711</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>[And if you don't feel like discussing electoral rules in the comments, feel free to expound on whom do you want to win? Or think will win. Or want to lose...]</p></blockquote><p>Oh, please please please, may Clinton lose by a humiliating margin if only for the pleasure of watching the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:40:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38710#post38710</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38710#post38710</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>First?</p><p>:-)</p><p>Now it really is hours to go. Anyone prepared to buck the trend of punditry everywhere and make solid prediction?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:33:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38709#post38709</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-two-ticks/?p=38709#post38709</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:33:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
