<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Speaker: Science and Democracy</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=342540#post342540</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=342540#post342540</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>More on this subject:</p><p><a href="http://www.interest.co.nz/business/76218/physics-professor-calls-govt-learn-lessons-scientists-being-silenced-during-fonterras" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.interest.co.nz/business/76218/physics-professor-calls-govt-learn-lessons-scientists-being-silenced-during-fonterras</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:00:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328160#post328160</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328160#post328160</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Just a thought, but I think it would be preferable if WO was always attributed by name not by monicker. "This is just nasty stuff on the part of Cameron Slater and others". The man should own his vile outpourings and be held accountable for them as much as possible.</q>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sept 2014 18:22:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marc C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328151#post328151</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328151#post328151</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Haha, yes, a typo, result of too quick commenting, and not double checking it.</p><p>Sorry for that, but at least you can get a humorous side of it.</p><p>FINANCE MINISTER English, of course applying an ACTUARIAL approach to welfare, which boils down to achieving cost savings, no matter at what…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sept 2014 16:32:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328149#post328149</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328149#post328149</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>One ring to rule them...</strong><br /><q>Fiance Minister</q><br />I love that New Zealand has a Minister Of Engagement!<br />:- )</p><p><br />Hmmm, continuing his 'Benefit/Crack Cocaine' addiction metaphor ...  it seems from that site, that English also thinks Education is addictive as well...<br /><q>We know hooking adults back into the education system…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sept 2014 16:19:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328147#post328147</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328147#post328147</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Fiance Minister</q>someone showing a higher level of commitment than the Minister for Foreign Affairs? ... but sadly, a commitment to ideology rather than critical evaluation of evidence.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sept 2014 16:13:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328146#post328146</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328146#post328146</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>(Quoting Ian Powell)<br /><q> this is just nasty stuff on the part of Whale Oil and other</q></p><p>Just a thought, but I think it would be preferable if WO was always attributed by name not by monicker. "This is just nasty stuff on the part of Cameron Slater and others". The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sept 2014 16:09:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marc C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328127#post328127</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328127#post328127</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Here is more about how Fiance Minister and Deputy PM Bill English has adopted his own new position on welfare reform, apparently based on the kind of "science" that is being taught, spread and "sold" by persons like Professor Aylward and his loyal "student" or follower, Principal Health Advisor, Dr…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sept 2014 14:32:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marc C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328106#post328106</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328106#post328106</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Quote from the above post:<br />"What I do believe, is that any privilege we have as scientists is a privilege based on public trust in scientific activities.  Such trust should not be based on myths about scientific objectivity, nor on nonsense about us being best placed to make policy decisions:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sept 2014 12:12:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328062#post328062</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328062#post328062</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In the eyes of the usual suspects:</p><p>Mike Joy, Lisa Te Morenga and Nicholas Stern are "academics".<br />David Bratt, Mansel Aylward and Christopher Snowdon are "scientists".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sept 2014 23:57:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328050#post328050</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328050#post328050</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, come on st ephen, they also like policy that earns them favour from donors, policy that makes Labour look bad, policy that personally enriches their ministers of cabinet, policy that divides society to make the poor fear each other, policy that pumps up our dollar to make local wealth…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sept 2014 20:53:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>st ephen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328035#post328035</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328035#post328035</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						At the end of the day there's only one kind of evidence that the Nats want for policy development, and that's the evidence supplied by David Farrar to tell them whether voters (or at least the ones they care about this week) give a shit or not.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sept 2014 16:59:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328033#post328033</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328033#post328033</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is a thought provoking post Thank you Nicola.<br /><q>recent visit here by British anti-tax spin doctor Christopher Snowdon to talk about the evils of taxing sugary soft drinks.</q><br />So he kinda snuck in quietly, talked to like-minded people and away. Wonder what those evils are hmmm...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sept 2014 16:34:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328032#post328032</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328032#post328032</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bravo! Let's which (if any) media run with this...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sept 2014 15:27:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328030#post328030</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=328030#post328030</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Good to see someone speaking forthrightly. There are other people in more secure positions than Lisa (including the other scientists behind Fizz) who should stand up too.</p><p><q></p><p>Hate merchants at it again with smear tactics</p><p>Sunday, 28 September 2014, 1:00 pm<br />Press Release: Association of Salaried Medical Specialists<br />Hate merchants…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sept 2014 15:19:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327996#post327996</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327996#post327996</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hopefully science will find that having fun is actually good for you at some point.</q></p><p>wahey! :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sept 2014 21:53:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327985#post327985</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327985#post327985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The obvious path into a marijuana law is to have it used for medical purposes.</q></p><p>Yes, it might be a consolation as I die of cancer 30 years from now that at least I can get painkilling cannabis, even if the law is still against it being available for fun.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sept 2014 18:17:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327983#post327983</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327983#post327983</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>BIMs </q><br />oh stop it with the whacky acronyms... :))</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sept 2014 18:01:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327979#post327979</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327979#post327979</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Phew! </strong><br />Here's one problem we can relax about...<br /><q> <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/us-homeland-security-moves-tackle-climate-change-risks-225151680.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">US Homeland Security</a> moves to tackle climate change risks<br />"Increasingly, we've moved not only from a security focus to a resiliency focus," said Caitlin Durkovich, assistant secretary for infrastructure protection at Homeland Security</q><br />They'll lead the way on tenable urban planning....…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sept 2014 16:48:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327946#post327946</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327946#post327946</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As a scientist in a CRI, do you see this as a concern?</q></p><p>As a random scientist in a CRI whose expertise is not in environmental science or monitoring or reporting ... my opinion is of little more value than most :).</p><p>What I can say from experience with any…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sept 2014 08:23:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327945#post327945</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327945#post327945</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						ah, same as ELTs then :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sept 2014 08:21:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327943#post327943</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327943#post327943</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>SETs</p><p>?</q></p><p>Senior executive team</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sept 2014 08:05:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327903#post327903</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327903#post327903</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Umm don’t think Treasury is a very science based dept. Could be wrong tho’. All those numbers… looks kind of sciencey.</q></p><p>I really hope the departmental Chief Executives probably drafting BIMs as we speak aren’t just random weirdos picked up off the street.  They can contain all the free and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 20:21:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327899#post327899</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327899#post327899</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> (c.f. Michael Cullen’s dismissal of Treasury’s 2005 briefing to the incoming Government as the usual triennial “ideological burp.”</q><br /> Umm don't think Treasury is a very science based dept. Could be wrong tho'. All those numbers... looks kind of sciencey.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 20:02:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327894#post327894</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327894#post327894</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks, interesting. I’d be keen on any comment on a particular issue I’ve been watching for years: State of the Environment reporting.</p><p>Only two have ever been completed nationally (1997 and 2007). The National Party campaigned across two elections to support SoE reporting in legislation and to give responsibility for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 19:53:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327884#post327884</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327884#post327884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>no matter what stripe the government is an “adviser” is precisely that</q></p><p>a lesson I've learned, yes</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 19:37:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327883#post327883</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327883#post327883</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>SETs</q></p><p>?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 19:37:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327873#post327873</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327873#post327873</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>While like any person Professor Sir Peter Gluckman may have faults this is an extremely unfair characterisation of him.</p><p>He is a very good scientist in his own field and as science adviser he has tried to advise without burning the delicate bridge between the adviser position and the office…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 18:49:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327865#post327865</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327865#post327865</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The obvious path into a marijuana law is to have it used for medical purposes.</p><p>Sarah Silverman showed us how easy it is to carry in modern U.S society, a pen full of liquid. It's a medicine people. It's not a great long term party drug but it's a good…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 17:47:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nicola Gaston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327864#post327864</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327864#post327864</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks JC. I would clarify that the CoE requires that scientists "not present themselves as experts outside their areas of expertise". Nothing to prevent them from commenting on other matters with reference to published science &ndash; but that is of course true for everyone.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 17:43:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327863#post327863</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327863#post327863</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m not sure if there’s a ministry, department, society or foundation in NZ that hasn’t written about the cannabis law being a disaster.</q></p><p>Don't forget the two select committee inquiries ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 17:40:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327855#post327855</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327855#post327855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Are you saying such instruction (whether explicit or inferred) is not your experience?</q></p><p>Exactly. I've never had any instruction from management that I could not air my opinions. As long as I don't speak for PFR and I don't.</p><p>And yes I'm from PFR and the water quality questions were…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 17:12:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327852#post327852</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327852#post327852</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As a complete aside, I'd like to say <br />that CRI would be a fun place<br /> to answer the phone on <br />'Talk Like a Pirate Day'...</p><p>...as you were.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 17:05:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327844#post327844</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327844#post327844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>.. we can pretty much say what we think… providing we are clear that it is our personal opinion (educated or not) and not the position of the company for which we work.</q></p><p>So if I interpret you right, the company opinion (I assume you mean the CRI as a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 16:05:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327842#post327842</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327842#post327842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Nothing prevents any scientist from referencing any commentary or accessing other scientists which makes the section in the ethics document pointless. Cannot have it both ways.</q></p><p>Huh? I don't understand the problem. If I read the relevant literature in order to become knowledgable about a subject and then pass on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 15:46:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327840#post327840</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327840#post327840</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And that is exactly what he is doing to scientists within our CRIs. He is buying both their scientific integrity and their silence.</q></p><p>No he isn't. He buys the CRI boards of directors and the SETs. Since they are like him, businessmen and accountants and they understand being bought and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 15:40:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JC Carter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327835#post327835</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327835#post327835</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>o because if you read his essays he fully references his data. Where he doesn't know himself he can access scientists who do know and can give you the citations.</q></p><p>So on one side we have an ethics document that attempts to tell scientists to stick to their area of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 15:17:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Humph Applebey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327833#post327833</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327833#post327833</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Appreciate the reply and link Russell – I hadn’t come across that report or article before and now see at least Gluckman’s attempted some dialogue on the subject using evidence. It does make a mockery of the role of science advisor when evidence that goes against National’s agenda is ignored.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 14:54:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327832#post327832</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327832#post327832</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em> Even more significant were the Prime Minister’s comments to the BBC, where he stated that he could always provide another academic to give a counterview. </em></p><p>Not quite – you missed the important bit. What the PM actually said is this:</p><p>__ <strong> Sackur: </strong> Yeah but he’s a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 14:49:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327830#post327830</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327830#post327830</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>I then received, in particular from CRI scientists who are, as one correspondent reported, “gagged from talking to the media on topics that might seem critical of government policy from 2 months out from the election”.</em></p><p>If this is the case, the best thing scientists across all sectors can do…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 14:38:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327829#post327829</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327829#post327829</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>These clowns</q></p><p>See that's the kind of thing I'd say to their faces too :).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 14:35:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327827#post327827</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327827#post327827</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So for the cannabis debate there is simply nothing he could say that already has not been said – the PMs office knows all the arguments and evidence and they have decided their policy based on ideology not evidence IMO.</q></p><p>Snap.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 14:34:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327826#post327826</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327826#post327826</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>wouldn’t that mean that the chief scientist would have to zip up about an enormous range of topics that he currently opines on?</q></p><p>No because if you read his essays he fully references his data. Where he doesn't know himself he can access scientists who do know and can give…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 14:34:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327825#post327825</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327825#post327825</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>When you say ‘generally’, does that leave a gap for willfully staying out of the cannabis policy disaster?</p><p>His voice should be heard, telling NZ – and Key – that the evidence is clear and to stop criminalising people. The costs to society are shocking.</q></p><p>Gluckman was responsible for [[http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/give-teens-break-cannabis-pm-told-ck-94570|a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 14:33:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327824#post327824</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327824#post327824</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>trying to retain connection and have some influence.</p><p>but that is exactly the foundation of 'access journalism' as revealed by #dirtypolitics. Trading off the truth of a matter now in exchange for future opportunities.</q></p><p>I really don't think they are the same at all Sasha. I think dirty politics has…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 14:31:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JC Carter</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327815#post327815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327815#post327815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>only represent themselves as experts in their fields of competence as defined by their formal qualifications or other demonstrable experience (Rule 4.1(2)a)<br />---</p><p>wouldn't that mean that the chief scientist would have to zip up about an enormous range of topics that he currently opines on?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 13:36:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nicola Gaston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327814#post327814</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327814#post327814</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I certainly think of privilege as a responsibility, but think it is important to acknowledge the privilege we have.</p><p>Thanks for your points above &ndash; they are all very good.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 13:34:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327812#post327812</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327812#post327812</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>trying to retain connection and have some influence.</q></p><p>but that is exactly the foundation of  'access journalism' as revealed by #dirtypolitics. Trading off the truth of a matter now in exchange for future opportunities.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 13:31:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Humph Applebey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327808#post327808</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327808#post327808</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>When you say ‘generally’, does that leave a gap for willfully staying out of the cannabis policy disaster?</p><p>His voice should be heard, telling NZ – and Key – that the evidence is clear and to stop criminalising people. The costs to society are shocking.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 13:20:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Humph Applebey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327805#post327805</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327805#post327805</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I suspect that what you see as a lens of National ideology over Gluckman's advice is instead Gluckman trying to retain connection and have some influence.</q></p><p>I understand your point and agree entirely &ndash; which is the issue. No doubt his past work is admirable, but playing politics and ignoring…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 13:14:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327804#post327804</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327804#post327804</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Out of habit most scientists are reluctant to state absolutes because we have enough experience with artifacts to know that we can be made to look like complete dicks.</q></p><p>I think it's more that politics is all about convincing people to act more strongly than the evidence supports (a balanced…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 13:09:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327802#post327802</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327802#post327802</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>He is a very good scientist in his own field and as science adviser he has tried to advise without burning the delicate bridge between the adviser position and the office of the PM. </q></p><p>Agreed. I think he walks that line consciously and generally very well.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:59:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327801#post327801</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327801#post327801</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What I do believe, is that any privilege we have as scientists is a privilege based on public trust in scientific activities.</q></p><p>I tend to use the word responsibility rather than privilege.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:56:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327800#post327800</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327800#post327800</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>People talk, mistakenly I think, about evidence-based policy, when really we should discuss evidence-informed policy.</p><p>Typically, research doesn’t produce a black and white answer, it produces something like a consensus that if we do X, then there is a Y% probability of Z happening.</q></p><p>You are right. But there are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:55:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327799#post327799</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327799#post327799</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Gluckman a ‘scientist’ is not something that meets the definition of ‘Scientist’, when anything he says is filtered by the National machine.</q></p><p>While like any person Professor Sir Peter Gluckman may have faults this is an extremely unfair characterisation of him.</p><p>He is a very good scientist in his own…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:51:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327798#post327798</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327798#post327798</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How universal is the application of the RSNZ Code at the moment?</q></p><p>Those rules are simply a statement of what a good scientist will do anyway. They are nothing more or less than common sense for scientists. So while I'm not a member there is nothing in the rules that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:45:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327795#post327795</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327795#post327795</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What to do about off-shore quasi-scientific organisations and their spokespeople?<br />Such as the alleged <a href="http://www.icrwhale.org/abouticr.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Institute of Cetacean Research</a> and their sell-mouth in NZ, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Inwood" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Glenn Inwood?</a></p><p><q>Inwood worked as a press secretary for Lianne Dalziel, Immigration Minister in the New Zealand Labour Party government. He also worked simultaneously for Morris Communications…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:39:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327794#post327794</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327794#post327794</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>People talk, mistakenly I think, about evidence-based policy, when really we should discuss <strong>evidence-informed</strong> policy.</p><p>Typically, research doesn't produce a black and white answer, it produces something like a consensus that if we do X, then there is a Y% probability of Z happening.</p><p>For instance, research could tell us:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:36:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327793#post327793</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327793#post327793</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The most valuable thing I see scientists do in the media is to point out when various voices are talking a load of bollocks. On account of the preponderance of evidence which contradicts whatever it is.</p><p>Especially if it's <em>me</em> someone's correcting. That's an <strong>absolute privilege</strong>, even if I do…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:34:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Humph Applebey</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327791#post327791</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327791#post327791</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A couple of years ago, a colleague of mine got in touch with Key's 'science' advisor (I'll explain why I've put that in quotes later) about the beneficial medicine that is cannabis. His email was replied to by an assistant who said he was out of the country and couldn't…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:25:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nicola Gaston</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327789#post327789</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327789#post327789</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hi Geoff &ndash; no, it isn't universal at all (as Felix says) which is where the suggestion that CRI boards could sign up to support the Code came from. I also agree that it isn't a panacea or a substitute for thinking about those grey areas.  I do think that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:19:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Felix_felix</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327787#post327787</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327787#post327787</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						BTW: should have said this above. Great post, Nicola.  Thanks.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:14:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Felix_felix</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327786#post327786</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327786#post327786</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>RSNZ members, obviously, but also a lot of those receiving funding through them.  Marsden for example has/had this in their contracts as a duty of the contractor:</p><p>"Comply with the Royal Society's Code of Professional Standards and Ethics and with other relevant recognised codes relating to the type of research…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:11:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327784#post327784</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327784#post327784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks, Nicola.  Been bothering me too. I touched on the vilification of Mike Joy in a <a href="http://publicaddress.net/speaker/vote-for-water/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Speaker post</a> a few weeks ago.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 12:04:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Willmott</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327781#post327781</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327781#post327781</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks Nicola, couple of things. </p><p>How universal is the application of the RSNZ Code at the moment? It's not compulsory to be a RSNZ member, is it a requirement for all funding sources? For scientists embedded in industry?</p><p>Industry funded/led projects (increasingly encouraged by govt) generate the most direct contradictions…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 11:48:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327779#post327779</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327779#post327779</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It seems to be a wider problem of what happens when scientific evidence is seen to be on a collision course with the picket-fence lifestyle. If a Big Lie is so huge that no one would believe it was fake, then the Big Truth is so huge that no one…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 11:46:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327771#post327771</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327771#post327771</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is a thought provoking post, and a much needed one.  New Zealand is approaching the status of a one party state, much as it did after the 2002 election, and the “critic and conscience” role of academics is therefore more important than usual.</p><p>I was deeply disturbed when in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 11:10:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327770#post327770</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-science-and-democracy/?p=327770#post327770</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sept 2014 11:10:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
