<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Speaker: Naked Inside the Off-Ramp</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292926#post292926</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292926#post292926</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And while we're still on Muldoon, not long before he got drunkenly tipped out of office, he quipped that "the average NZer wouldn't recognise a deficit if he tripped over one". That sounded very much like Muldoon dismissing the deficit as a "beltway issue", much like Key similarly dismissing cyber-snooping…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2013 01:56:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292867#post292867</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292867#post292867</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Key has very much something to hide if he's going for broke on the GCSB controversy, and I can’t help but think that those who dismiss it as a ‘beltway’ issue remind me of when Rob Muldoon glibly dismissed the 1981 anti-Tour movement as a reason that ‘politics should stay…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:36:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292841#post292841</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292841#post292841</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>doctrines around evidence, privacy, and the rights and liberties of the subject rather than employment or tort law.</q></p><p>How's that work? Before any of those other doctrines come into play it's necessary to establish if secondment alters the relationship between the party being surveilled and the parties carrying out the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:29:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Withers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292799#post292799</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292799#post292799</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The so-called conservatives in the National Party today are just as nutty in their own way as the GOP in the US. The values our democracy is founded on appear to mean nothing to them.....even as they claim to be defending them by defiling them.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:13:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292794#post292794</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292794#post292794</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Eh I have no ide what the courts would fall back on but I suspect it's way more likely to be doctrines around evidence, privacy, and the rights and liberties of the subject rather than employment or tort law.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:53:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292774#post292774</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292774#post292774</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The indeterminacy of the law means that all acts are ambiguously legal.</q></p><p>Exactly. The law is <em>not</em> explicitly clear, no matter what some commentators think. My point about principal/agent was that ordinarily secondment alters the relationship between the seconded individual and the organisation to which they are seconded. GCSB officers…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:13:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292770#post292770</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292770#post292770</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think trying to use principal/agent analysis here is kinda pointless. Likewise vicarious liability. (Apart from anything else, both are civil concepts.)</p><p>The indeterminacy of the law means that all acts are ambiguously legal. The GCSB (as a secret agency evading the courts) is particularly prone to that.</p><p>It is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:56:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292757#post292757</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292757#post292757</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>the term “the belt-way”: <br />most often found encircling complete &amp; utter pants?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:12:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292751#post292751</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292751#post292751</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_in_English_law" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_in_English_law</a><br />may be relevant. </p><p>ISTR you can spend a whole class in law school on that subject.</p><p>But if the definition of "secondment" involved the employee using their access to GCSB's interception systems as opposed to merely their technical knowledge, then I suspect that isn't relevant, they were agents of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:54:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Love</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292741#post292741</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292741#post292741</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If NZSIS or NZ Police were the requesting agency, by definition it involved someone on whom GCSB were forbidden to spy...</q></p><p>That would be true only if the NZ police never investigated foreigners.</p><p>Note, that in the GCSB 2003 Act an important reason for other agencies to request GCSB assistance…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:12:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292716#post292716</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292716#post292716</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Allowing them to be seconded to other organisations doesn’t overrule that.</q></p><p>O'rly? My understanding of the law about secondment is that it is far from as black-and-white as you appear to believe. AFAIK, the seconded employee becomes, for the purposes of agency and principal, an agent of the seconding organisation,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:29:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292712#post292712</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292712#post292712</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No. Secondment (or co-operating with other agencies) was entirely legal. It is plainly there in the 2003 GCSB act.</p><p>What was illegal, regardless of whether on secondment or not, was GCSB agents/resources being used to spy on NZers.</q></p><p>It can't be both. It can't be both legal and illegal. Secondment…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:25:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292697#post292697</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292697#post292697</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>We do have 88 potentially illegal spying incidents. There’s no ruling from a court, so it’s not certain whether they were or weren’t illegal. And what’s been revealed by a former head of the GCSB subsequent to the report as to how assistance was actually rendered makes it that much…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:23:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292646#post292646</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292646#post292646</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I intensely dislike "the belt-way": it's difficult to keep reading when that term comes up in a piece about NZ politics. It's good to find my hitherto sneaky dislike of the silly term is shared.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:54:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292640#post292640</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292640#post292640</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It is not being seconded that was illegal, it was spying on NZers that was illegal. Being on secondment didn’t mean it suddenly became legal for GCSB agents to spy on NZers.</q></p><p>Correct. And thinking it was legal didn't make it so, or excuse the actions. "Ignorance of the law…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:44:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Love</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292632#post292632</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292632#post292632</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And the argument is being made right now that secondment is illegal.</q></p><p>No. Secondment (or co-operating with other agencies) was entirely legal. It is plainly there in the 2003 GCSB act. </p><p>What was illegal, regardless of whether on secondment or not, was GCSB agents/resources being used to spy on NZers.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:24:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292592#post292592</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292592#post292592</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>dream up a more appropriate metaphor</q></p><p>the Thordon Bubble has long appealed</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:59:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292559#post292559</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292559#post292559</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It would be nice if some commenters checked their spellings.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:09:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292555#post292555</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292555#post292555</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What Kier should have written, unconnected to anyones post, subtweet style:</p><p>__It would be nice if uninformed commentators wouldn't pretend to knowledge they don't have.</p><p>It would be nice if those who shill for politicians would make that clear in their occasional posts, especially when those politicians are notorious pedlars…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:35:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292550#post292550</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292550#post292550</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Some distinguished New Zealanders did try and tell Key this, but they were all dismissed in scattergun attacks on their virtue, assisted gracelessly by his Attorney-General Chris Finlayson during the bill’s Third Reading Debate. God and sin seemed to have caused its own rot there, but never mind, if Peter…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:31:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292549#post292549</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292549#post292549</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So basically in the sample we know about (because a court extracted the documentation), they broke the law, and in the samples we don't know about they didn't.</p><p>And they denied breaking the law up to the point where they were forced to admit it.</p><p>You can draw your own…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:26:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292542#post292542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292542#post292542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Key seems to have tipped into the Rob Muldoon “you can think what you like but if you disagree with me you are a fool” political mode.</q></p><p>Exactly! It almost makes me think he's had enough of this PM lark and is just trying to see how far he can…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:51:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292541#post292541</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292541#post292541</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    I'll let this stand, but continuing in this vein would be unhelpful.</p><p>Presumably because it's impolite rather than untrue.</q></p><p>PAS is different from other blogs because it tends not to attack the person and instead address (politely) the ideas and reasoning.</p><p>That is one of the major reasons PAS is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:48:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292540#post292540</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292540#post292540</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Did the other agency (police) have a warrant to intercept (e.g.) Dotcom’s communications?</q></p><p>Dotcom was a clear case of GCSB interception, not secondment. But GCSB acted under the incorrect belief that Dotcom was not a resident, so the police having a warrant (or not) doesn't matter. They absolutely broke the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:41:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292538#post292538</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292538#post292538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Did the other agency (police)  have a warrant to intercept (e.g.) Dotcom's communications?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:32:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292535#post292535</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292535#post292535</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>No more messin' around...</strong><br /><q>If that mix tape were about snapper...</q><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmCQAxP6s3Y" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmCQAxP6s3Y</a><br />...here comes the 'No More Buddy, Buddy New Look Labour'!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:23:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292534#post292534</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292534#post292534</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No, but he’s also not about to admit to illegality under his command, either.</q></p><p>If seconding personnel to other agencies is illegal, then he already has made that admission. And the argument is being made right now that secondment <em>is</em> illegal.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:17:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292533#post292533</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292533#post292533</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>unless you’re suggesting that Sir Bruce (who has been extremely outspoken about his disapproval of this legislation) is part of the National spin machine?</q></p><p>No, but he's also not about to admit to illegality under his command, either.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:07:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292532#post292532</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292532#post292532</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But Kiwis don't care about the GCSB. If that mix tape were about snapper, though...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:05:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292530#post292530</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292530#post292530</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yet another sign the GCSB is entering the public consciousness...</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/blogs/blog-on-the-tracks/9071709/i-Spy-a-GCSB-mixtape" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">i-Spy: a GCSB mixtape</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:56:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292528#post292528</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292528#post292528</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    <br /><em>Now who’s applying 2013 hindsight to things?</em></p><p>In what respect?</q></p><p>Your confident assertion that (what some claim is) clarity of illegality now, in 2013, was clearly illegal from inside the GCSB in prior years, based on what you <em>think</em> might be and should be the operating pattern. The only hard…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:54:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Love</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292508#post292508</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292508#post292508</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Now who's applying 2013 hindsight to things?</q></p><p>In what respect?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:21:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292507#post292507</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292507#post292507</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Joh Bjelke slapped some kind of ban on Red Tulip chocolates and Steinlager. That was about it.</q></p><p>And that was just Queensland. Additionally, the scale of his corruption came back to bite him in the arse just a couple of years later. One member of the 'brain drain' that actually…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:20:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292503#post292503</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292503#post292503</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Now who's applying 2013 hindsight to things? Which is the problem with trying to discuss the issue at all: it's impossible to examine this without applying hindsight.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:16:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292492#post292492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292492#post292492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We do have 88 illegal spying incidents by the GCSB according to the report after all. Is that report wrong?</q></p><p>We do have 88 <em>potentially</em> illegal spying incidents. There's no ruling from a court, so it's not certain whether they were or weren't illegal. And what's been revealed __by a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:52:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Love</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292489#post292489</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292489#post292489</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>if one reads what Sir Bruce said...</q></p><p>Although, to his credit, Sir Bruce appears to not support the new GCSB legislation, he can hardly be relied on as a neutral commentator on what went on at the GCSB when he was in charge of it. </p><p><q>Unless one is arguing that…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:48:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292488#post292488</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292488#post292488</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But did any actual bad things happen to NZ as a result of US displeasure at our nuclear stance? </q><br />Joh Bjelke slapped some kind of ban on Red Tulip chocolates and Steinlager. That was about it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:45:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292487#post292487</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292487#post292487</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But did any actual bad things happen to NZ as a result of US displeasure at our nuclear stance? </p><p>We obviously didn't get invaded. If our exports to the US suffered, it didn't impact the economy much (compared with the simultaneous effect of Roger Douglas). McDonalds, Coca Cola and IBM…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:43:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292484#post292484</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292484#post292484</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>There was no ambiguity in the 2003 law. The GCSB could not spy on NZers, but it could render assistance to police etc. Which is fine, these are not inconsistent statements. This just means that the GCSB (if it followed its legislation) could not spy on NZers in the course…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:37:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Aidan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292482#post292482</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292482#post292482</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The Lange story after we withdrew from the nuclear club is instructive. He had a ton of shit poured on him.</q></p><p>Me1: Something something bullying.<br />Me2: Realpolitik! Something something naive!</p><p>For me the instructive part of the nuclear free and Rainbow Warrior episodes was the realisation that the US had…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:35:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292481#post292481</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292481#post292481</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The Lange story after we withdrew from the nuclear club is instructive. He had a ton of shit poured on him.</q></p><p>Quite. And we weren't even a participating member!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:33:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292475#post292475</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292475#post292475</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Fair point about the span of the Anglophonic world, but neither of them has ever been a member of Five Eyes. The consequences would be as a result of pulling out, not as a result of no longer being in.</q></p><p>The Lange story after we withdrew from the nuclear club…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:25:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292474#post292474</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292474#post292474</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Ireland is not in Five Eyes, nor is (at least partly Anglophonic) South Africa. Neither of these countries have suffered any dire consequences as a result.</q></p><p>Fair point about the span of the Anglophonic world, but neither of them has <em>ever</em> been a member of Five Eyes. The consequences would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:18:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292470#post292470</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292470#post292470</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I thought that happened a long time ago.</q></p><p>Yes. But removing it is a chance to stop that rot.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:12:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292468#post292468</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292468#post292468</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The GCSB could not spy on NZers, but it could render assistance to police etc. Which is fine, these are not inconsistent statements. This just means that the GCSB (if it followed its legislation) could not spy on NZers in the course of rendering assistance to the police, etc.</q></p><p>And,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:07:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292463#post292463</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292463#post292463</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>David Shearer has resigned as Labour Party leader apparently!!</q></p><p>My guess is his not-so-secret meeting with Key, which Key used as a stick to beat him with in the debate last night, was the final straw for elements of the caucus that clearly were not informed the meeting took place.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:58:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292462#post292462</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292462#post292462</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>He put his head above the parapet, and tried to sell himself as someone who cared, someone who might take a stand, and then just sold himself…</q></p><p>Well yes, and I see how his actions are deserving of scorn, but the abuse he's been subject to seems a bit more…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:44:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292461#post292461</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292461#post292461</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>since all it leads to is SIS politicisation</q></p><p>I thought that happened a long time ago.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:42:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292459#post292459</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292459#post292459</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>David is dead long live the new David...</strong><br /><a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/politics-news/shearer-resigns-labour-leader-5539434" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Shearer has resigned</a> as Labour Party leader apparently!!<br />on the heels of his <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/politics-news/senior-member-david-shearer-s-staff-quits-5517421" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chief of Staff resigning the other day...</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:40:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292458#post292458</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292458#post292458</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>pulling out of Echelon means shitting on the rest of the Anglophonic world </q></p><p>Ireland is not in Five Eyes, nor is (at least partly Anglophonic) South Africa. Neither of these countries have suffered any dire consequences as a result.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:39:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Love</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292457#post292457</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292457#post292457</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...when one considers that pulling out of Echelon means shitting on the rest of the Anglophonic world (and their Western intelligence/security partners), not just shitting on the US...</q></p><p>Yes. And exactly the same risks were involved in a nuclear free declaration. </p><p>The nuclear free declaration was in fact a worse…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:35:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292456#post292456</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292456#post292456</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, it's not really fair to say Labour's always the party of the status quo on these issues. Nuclear free NZ, anyone?</q></p><p>Point. But on spying? Abolishing the GCSB and closing Waihopai is <a href="https://www.greens.org.nz/policy/security-services-policy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">official Green policy</a>. What's Labour's?</p><p>(reading that policy document, I'm optimistic for a compromise. But its going…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:34:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292455#post292455</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292455#post292455</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>The Oh Zone...</strong><br /><q>It would be nice if our political journalists would stop being so bloody lazy and dream up a more appropriate metaphor.</q><br /><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/wellington/9064918/Street-closed-after-sinkhole-opens" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Thorndon Sinkhole</a> <br />has a certain ring to it....</p><p><br /><strong>Dunning the Dunne...</strong><br /><q>And what’s with all the hating on Peter Dunne?</q><br />He put his head above…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:34:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Love</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292453#post292453</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292453#post292453</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The demonisation of GCSB as deliberately breaking the law and knowing they were doing so doesn't stand up to scrutiny...</q></p><p>If you read the Hansard debates of the 2003 legilsation, much of the debates consist of Keith Locke saying this bill does not prevent the GCSB spying on NZers and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:25:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292451#post292451</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292451#post292451</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>one saying the GCSB couldn't spy on New Zealanders, and one saying they could spy on behalf of other agencies </q></p><p>So, if a taxi driver is not allowed to break the speed limit, and they are allowed to carry passengers, they can break the speed limit when they're carrying passengers?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:18:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292450#post292450</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292450#post292450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it was equally unthinkable, by non-radicals, that we could declare ourselves nuclear free.</q></p><p>Nobody said it's unthinkable that we could pull out of Echelon. What Paul said is that there <em>would</em> be severe consequences, and based on the reaction by the US to the anti-nuclear issue we can be quite…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:17:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292449#post292449</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292449#post292449</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That’s the opinion of the courts, I believe.</q></p><p>Nope. It’s the opinion of the commentariat; it’s never been ruled on by the judiciary. And the absolute certainty of various commentators that it’s unquestionably illegal is not supported by what Sir Bruce told NetHui about how things really worked. It’s murky…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:14:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292448#post292448</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292448#post292448</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>one saying they could spy on behalf of other agencies </q></p><p>There was no such clause. What there was was a clause <em>requiring</em> them to assist other government agencies.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:06:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292447#post292447</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292447#post292447</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That’s a disputed opinion. </q><br />That’s the opinion of the courts, I believe. That’s the illegal spying <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/politics-news/john-key-apologises-kim-dotcom-5105817" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">John Key apologised to Kim Dotcom for</a>. <br />As the political fallout began to toxify, the line changed: the illegality became a ‘disputed opinion.’ Then the legal experts started to be disparaged, and those who’d…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:05:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292446#post292446</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292446#post292446</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I have to say, I don't particularly support us having a GCSB or SIS or our Echelon participation. However, be that as it may, there's a huge amount that can be done absent abolition to improve those two institutions.</p><p>Also, it's not really fair to say Labour's always the party…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:59:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Love</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292445#post292445</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292445#post292445</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The very real consequences of disestablishing NZSIS and/or GCSB and withdrawing from Echelon...should be sufficient to win that argument on the day</q></p><p>I wouldn't be so sure. In the 1970s, it was equally unthinkable, by non-radicals, that we could declare ourselves nuclear free.</p><p>Sure, there is probably an argument for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:58:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292444#post292444</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292444#post292444</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>John Key has become a smaller man, more petty than we’ve seen him before.</q></p><p>This. And:</p><p><q>Spoken like a tactician</q></p><p>And that, I think, is a major problem in NZ politics. Does our political class have any strategists? The Greens seem a little better than most at long-term thinking, but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:50:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292443#post292443</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292443#post292443</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the GCSB was secretly ignoring its legislation.</q></p><p>The GCSB was the recipient of a law that was ambiguous in the face of the <em>actual</em> operational pattern of being a supporting agency. The demonisation of GCSB as deliberately breaking the law and knowing they were doing so doesn't stand up to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:48:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292442#post292442</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292442#post292442</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think the Greens could be persuaded to accept serious reform</q></p><p>I think serious oversight would satisfy the Greens, by and large. An independent watchdog with resources and teeth, reporting to an empowered select committee on which the PM doesn't even sit, never mind sitting as Chair, would go a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:43:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292441#post292441</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292441#post292441</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For more evidence of Dunne's integrity, and the reasons behind his anti-party pill crusade, <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0310/S00135.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this page might inform</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:38:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Aidan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292440#post292440</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292440#post292440</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And the main problem with the 2003 version was that we subsequently found that the GCSB was secretly ignoring its legislation.</q></p><p>Which seems to be the culture of these sorts of organisations, namely "A Few Good Men"-eqsue. You can't handle the truth etc.</p><p>This <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1983/03/27/magazine/the-silent-power-of-the-nsa.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">1983(!) article about the NSA</a> could…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:38:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292438#post292438</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292438#post292438</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I loathe the use of the term inside the beltway, it supposes the general public don’t care or understand… </q></p><p>I loathe the term because it refers specifically to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_495_%28Capital_Beltway%29" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">highway, I-495</a>, <a href="https://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&amp;ll=38.926297,-76.929016&amp;spn=0.285785,0.676346&amp;t=h&amp;z=11" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">surrounding Washington DC</a>. Using "inside the Beltway" to refer to anything in NZ politics makes as much sense as referring…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:37:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292437#post292437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292437#post292437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And the main problem with the 2003 version was that we subsequently found that the GCSB was secretly ignoring its legislation.</q><br />That's a disputed opinion. It's also claimed that there were two ambiguious clauses, one saying the GCSB couldn't spy on New Zealanders, and one saying they could spy on…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:36:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292435#post292435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292435#post292435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'd imagine that after horsetrading post-review, they'll vote for it if it improves the GCSB in the way they want it. Why would they vote against a bill that pushes the GCSB in the direction that they believe it should go, as part of a coalition government?</q><br />Oh, they'll vote…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:30:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Love</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292433#post292433</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292433#post292433</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Dunne initiated a number of worthwhile amendments to the bill, more than anyone else managed, but one person versus 59 can only do so much.</q>.</p><p>He could have always voted against it. And then the government would have had to propose entirely new legislation (or go to a snap election,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:20:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Love</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292432#post292432</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292432#post292432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The 2003 GCSB Bill was not proposed as a response to Sept. 11. The first reading of the 2003 Bill was in May 2001, before Sept. 11.</p><p>Also, note that it took 2 years for the passage of the previous bill, because there was a desire to get it right…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:14:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292431#post292431</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292431#post292431</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>If there’s a credible independent inquiry into the security services, the spectacle of the National Party lining up to vote it down will be so damaging and ludicrous that of course they won’t (and if they do, well, that’s fine by me). Likewise, the Greens would love to get some…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:13:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292430#post292430</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292430#post292430</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The key differences between most corporates and a democracy are in the treatment of minorities and the engagement with minority opinions. Key’s behaviour during public hearings on the bill made it plain that in his view alternative opinions were a waste of his time.</q></p><p>Key seems to have tipped into…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:11:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292429#post292429</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292429#post292429</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Presumably because it’s impolite rather than untrue.</p><p>Maybe since he’s chosen to engage here, he could justify his man Dunne selling his vote and tell us what he got for it? Ambassadorship? Ministerial seat back? Clear run at the next election? Or just hard cash from some US-backed ‘trust’?</q></p><p>The…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:07:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292428#post292428</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292428#post292428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But Greens, Mana and Maori don't like the GCSB or SIS and are unlikely to vote for the likley outcome of any inquiry that isn't stacked in their favour (and that shouldn't happen).</q></p><p>I'd imagine that after horsetrading post-review, they'll vote for it if it improves the GCSB in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:04:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292427#post292427</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292427#post292427</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>These differences may also not be sensed or articulated by many New Zealanders, which would explain why he appeals so successfully to the pragmatism in NZ culture in which a high placing on some leaderboard is sufficient proof of a successful strategy.</q></p><p>The key differences between most corporates and a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:00:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292426#post292426</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292426#post292426</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>demonstrate that Key was lying about his foreknowledge of the original raid.</q></p><p>Nearly. He's asserting that Key had foreknowledge of <em>Dotcom</em> before the raid, whereas Key is claiming that he'd never heard of the man up until the circus was in town and the master was in the ring.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:54:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292425#post292425</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292425#post292425</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Yon Dunne has a lean and hungry look…</strong><br /><q>…his man Dunne selling his vote…</q><br />Here is our man Dunne back in <em>Canta</em> in July, 1974, selling his ‘Presidential’ qualities to the proles …</p><p>__(ps: feel free to grab this image and use where and how you like, or contact me…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:54:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292424#post292424</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292424#post292424</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, you are right.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:53:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292423#post292423</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292423#post292423</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Your snideness despite Russell's request, and your accusations like "Or just hard cash from some US-backed ‘trust’?" (presumably totally without foundation) suggests that genuine engagement is not really your intention. </p><p>It's not for me to justify what Dunne did, that's up to him. He's tried to do that.</p><p>In my…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:45:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292422#post292422</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292422#post292422</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Paul Buchanan has a good discussion of the actual possibility of leaving Echelon <a href="http://www.kiwipolitico.com/2013/06/withdrawal-from-echelon-a-realistic-watershed-moment-in-intelligence-reform-or-left-political-posturing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">over here</a>. It's worth a read, particularly since it's the kind of area were he's absolutely an expert.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:36:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Grant Taylor</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292421#post292421</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292421#post292421</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Key has always impressed me as behaving like a CEO rather than a PM. There are some parallels between the leadership of a large corporation and a nation and  between shareholders and citizens.  Perhaps in the current climate of international finance and global economics, the subtle but important differences between…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:36:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292420#post292420</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292420#post292420</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Some tightening of national security policy across the globe was to be expected following 9/11. But when such measures are tightened far beyond their original intention &ndash; and/or far beyond their use-by date &ndash; it's tantamount to a permanent state of emergency, which from past historical precedent is an early…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:35:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292419#post292419</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292419#post292419</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Pete George, is, of course, a pompous old windbag with no clue.</p><p>I'll let this stand, but continuing in this vein would be unhelpful.</q></p><p>Presumably because it's impolite rather than untrue.</p><p>Maybe since he's chosen to engage here, he could justify his man Dunne selling his vote and tell us…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:30:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292417#post292417</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292417#post292417</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My worry is that if neither Labour or National hold a majority after the election and the Greens win 20% or more and hold the balance of power that the Right wing Labour faction of Robertson et al will push for a coalition with National to set us back on…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:18:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292416#post292416</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292416#post292416</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I imagine that Labour and the Greens promising a review of our intelligence services...will offer an appealing contrast and choice for many voters.</q><br />A contrast? A review of our intelligence services is already promised in the new legislation. Plus subsequent reviews every 5-7 years.</p><p>Greens have been clear about their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:17:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292415#post292415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292415#post292415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Pete George, is, of course, a pompous old windbag with no clue.</q></p><p>I'll let this stand, but continuing in this vein would be unhelpful.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:14:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292413#post292413</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292413#post292413</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...a framework that has never apprehended and convicted anyone and conspicuously failed to detect both the Rainbow Warrior bombings and, more recently, the Mossad passport fraud attempt?</q><br />On the face of it, we obviously need someone to be watching our 'friends' more closely ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:07:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292412#post292412</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292412#post292412</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>What a complete Cnut...</strong><br /><q>Far from actually claiming omnipotence, <br />Canute was demonstrating to his supporters <br />that he <em>wasn’t</em> all-powerful.</q><br />oops, I forgot that, when I used the analogy elsewhere.<br />but it still makes a mockery of Key's 'I can foretell<br />what future decision makers will do' stance<br />because he can't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:02:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292411#post292411</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292411#post292411</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Some tightening of national security policy across the globe was to be expected following 9/11. But when such measures are tightened far beyond their original intention &ndash; and/or far beyond their use-by date &ndash; it's tantamount to a permanent state of emergency, which from past historical precedent is an early…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:01:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jon J.</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292410#post292410</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292410#post292410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Pete George &ndash; Labour haven't given themselves any problems at all. It wasn't their bill. They've instead been gifted greater flexibility through their opponent's action freely taken. I imagine that Labour and the Greens promising a review of our intelligence services, alongside a promise to deliver on the MMP Review,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:59:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292409#post292409</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292409#post292409</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Pete George, is, of course, a pompous old windbag with no clue. </p><p>If there’s a credible independent inquiry into the security services, the spectacle of the National Party lining up to vote it down will be so damaging and ludicrous that of course they won’t (and if they do, well,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:54:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292407#post292407</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292407#post292407</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I would be astonished if the inquiry recommended the abolition of the GCSB and SIS</q></p><p>Could you justify why not, in particular:</p><p>&ndash; why IT security coordination is best conducted by a secret, unaccountable organisation rather than an open public body?</p><p>&ndash; why we need parallel policing bodies outside the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:52:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292406#post292406</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292406#post292406</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>where the executive should have control not just over policy discussions but also ultimately over people’s rights to express opinions or mount arguments against the status quo</q></p><p>Something like <em>"You've had your debate. There's no need to write any more."</em> ?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:45:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292405#post292405</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292405#post292405</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						However, the actual <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canute#Ruler_of_the_waves" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">story of King Canute</a> may not be the best reference point for Key's behaviour. Far from actually claiming omnipotence, Canute was demonstrating to his supporters that he <em>wasn’t</em> all-powerful.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:31:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Euan Mason</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292404#post292404</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292404#post292404</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The PM has demonstrated that he doesn’t understand the political process. He apparently views NZ as a kind of corporate entity, where the executive should have control not just over policy discussions but also ultimately over people’s rights to express opinions or mount arguments against the status quo, and where…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:26:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292403#post292403</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292403#post292403</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I would be astonished if the inquiry recommended the abolition of the GCSB and SIS. That's not the way Shearer has framed it at all, and the chances of it happening are less than zero.</q></p><p>I agree. Shearer even proposed supporting the bill with a sunset clause. But Greens, Mana…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:21:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carol Stewart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292401#post292401</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292401#post292401</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This is a very elegant commentary, Jon, thank you.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:17:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292400#post292400</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292400#post292400</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I loathe the use of the term inside the beltway, it supposes the general public don't care or understand... which simply isn't true &ndash; its elitist and condescending </p><p>as for the passing of this bill &ndash; those opposed/concerned won't be forgetting this issue nor the bullying and arrogant nature of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:10:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen R</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292398#post292398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292398#post292398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I would be astonished if the inquiry recommended the abolition of the GCSB and SIS.</q></p><p>As would I. Although I could imagine a political case being made that the GCSB shouldn't be feeding data to the Five Eyes network any more... Think of it like the privacy version of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:06:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292396#post292396</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292396#post292396</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Snowden (or Greenwald) still apparently has a lot more documents to release. This should keep the issue of govt spying going in the international media – plus there’s still a good chance that some of those releases might further explore the relationship between the NSA and the GCSB.</q></p><p>The Guardian’s…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:00:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292395#post292395</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292395#post292395</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If the inquiry recommends to retain the GCSB and SIS, perhaps with law tweaks, then Labour would have to go to National for support. which is back to where both National and Labour should have been over the last two months.</q></p><p>I would be astonished if the inquiry recommended the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:53:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Thomas Beagle</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292394#post292394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292394#post292394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I suspect Key has also miscalculated in one other major way &ndash; this issue isn't going away. Normally when you pass a law the debate dies out and people move on. The electorate's memory is short, etc, etc.</p><p>But Snowden and Dotcom should keep the issue hopping along. (The TICS…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:47:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pete George</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292393#post292393</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292393#post292393</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Labour have also created substantial problems for themselves. There have already been campaigns proposed to make this an election issue for Labour candidates, forcing them into pro or anti GCSB camps.</p><p>If about survive that and are in a position to form a coalition it would have to deal with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:44:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292392#post292392</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-naked-inside-the-off-ramp/?p=292392#post292392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:44:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
