<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Speaker: Inequality: Too big to ignore</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333568#post333568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333568#post333568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The second is a moral choice.</q></p><p>Yes, but if economics is a moral science, then (one assumes) the science of it must be grounded in a moral framework .. and there are numerous moral frameworks.</p><p>Mary Midgley wrote an interesting book called, "Can't we make moral judgements?" It goes to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:01:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333563#post333563</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333563#post333563</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Do you have any suggestions?</q></p><p>That would be putting the cart before the horse. – given I/we don’t even know yet whether the basic assumption (i.e., that most economic tools are grounded in consequentialist ethics) has any merit.</p><p>I prefer to think of deontological ethics as being ‘duty’ based –…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:47:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333559#post333559</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333559#post333559</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>>That risks confusing a moral science for a natural one.</p><p>He seems to be saying the existing ‘toolkit’ isn’t necessarily up to the job and relying solely on these commonly used tools, “risks confusing a moral science with a natural one”.</q></p><p>I think he's making quite a profound point here.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:19:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333556#post333556</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333556#post333556</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> my question is, if so, what would alternative tools look like if they were instead developed with a virtue ethics or a deontological bias?</q></p><p>Do you have any suggestions? My feeling is that it would be extremely difficult, as deontological systems are inherently rule based. They don't even admit of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:45:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333554#post333554</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333554#post333554</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>curve dare...</strong><br /><q>It never really makes any claim about where that local maximum point is, nor does it give a method by which it could be found.</q><br />Maybe they're just having a laffer...<br />;- )<br /><em><hat/door></em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:13:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333553#post333553</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333553#post333553</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						from the other John Key(nes)...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:10:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333550#post333550</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333550#post333550</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Pfft. The Laffer curve’s fine. It’s just you get maximum tax take at 70%, rather than 30%.</q></p><p>Well the main problem is "Who knows what the curve actually looks like?" It's only real purpose is to show that it's conceptually possible that a situation could exist where lowering tax raises…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:58:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333548#post333548</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333548#post333548</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>is this the one?<br />Economics experts on OECD report from this morning…</q></p><p>In that interview, it was observed that participation in tertiary education is much higher than it was a generation ago. What wasn't mentioned was how many people actually completed their studies, which is a far more reliable indicator…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:57:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333545#post333545</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333545#post333545</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> My challenge for you is to show how it isn’t subsumed into the consequentialist alternatives, when you actually get down to nuts and bolts.</q></p><p>Interesting challenge (posit) but my thinking is early stages; to further what is only a hypotheses in the making, I need to find a collaborator with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:43:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333543#post333543</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333543#post333543</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Bart thought that it was probably scientific already to the weak extent that any economic claim can be</q></p><p>More importantly without actually reading the methods and being knowledgeable enough in that field I was willing to trust those who were in the field rather than some mere politician who didn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:37:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333532#post333532</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333532#post333532</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Pfft. The Laffer curve's fine. It's just you get maximum tax take at 70%, rather than 30%.</p><p>It's not about tax anyway, it's about shut up, rich people work harder than you.</p><p>They don't, their life is a literal cruise, but it's not about how hard you work anyway, it's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:17:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333531#post333531</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333531#post333531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The fundamentals of it all is you get a large number of people get 15% poorer so a small number of people can get 45% richer, and then the economy grows by 15% less and you have large numbers 30% worse off in real terms so small numbers can be…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:02:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Caleb D&#039;Anvers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333530#post333530</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333530#post333530</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Is it just me, or is this report being held to much higher evidential standards by the Very Serious People than supply side economics itself ever was, or “austerity” is now? The Laffer Curve was a freaking napkin doodle, and it continues to hold sway. To see the appalling smugness…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:37:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333526#post333526</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333526#post333526</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Point is, you are much better read in Greek philosophy than me</q></p><p>Don't count on that! I'm most interested to hear how virtue ethics can give insight into economics. My challenge for you is to show how it isn't subsumed into the consequentialist alternatives, when you actually get down to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:26:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333524#post333524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333524#post333524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The issue is scientists are wrong ALL THE TIME. Generally we try and be wrong in private but sometimes … Our response to being wrong is to say “we were wrong, lets try something else with the aim of being right”.Politicians are also frequently wrong. Their response is to blame…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:05:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333523#post333523</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333523#post333523</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Indeed your last para does answer that question of mine .. but the Marxian student in me would say to this:</p><p><q> because we might want to make the choice between being all poor and equal or some poor and some well off and some rich. </q></p><p>(Quoting Marx) __ The history…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:56:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333519#post333519</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333519#post333519</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Soz, read I'm at <em>aporia</em> and feeling phronetically challenged.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:01:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333516#post333516</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333516#post333516</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I assume that is largely based on your own observation of society generally? Or is it for some other reason?</q></p><p>My reason was in my <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/profile?id=953" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">first post</a> on this thread. GDP growth means a lot more goods and services being produced, which also means more being consumed. If less people…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:42:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333515#post333515</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333515#post333515</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						General note: the RNZ website lets us stream or download any audio story. When you go to the page for a show (eg: <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morning Report</a>), the best link to bring back here is the one marked "Share" which then gives visitors options about how they listen. The main heading for…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:44:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333514#post333514</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333514#post333514</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes thank you Ian. I do like to get the link in there. </p><p>So here we have an economist from each end of the spectrum (if you believe that the left/right distinction is a sophisticated enough model) who agree: bogus methodology. I too always point out bogus methodology even for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:43:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333512#post333512</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333512#post333512</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I tried to link to the audio of this earlier but it wasn’t visible to me. Now I feel I should post this even though I haven’t found the link.</q><br />is this the one?<br /><a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/player/20160658" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Economics experts on OECD report</a> from this morning...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:32:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333511#post333511</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333511#post333511</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>If after that you conclude their findings are scientifically flawed, go for it with your criticism. But at the moment it feels like you are taking pot shots at this work without any basis for it other than your reacons about cause and effect. It may turn out that you…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:00:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333507#post333507</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333507#post333507</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Can you give me an example of a “pot shot” I made? Since from the very outset I said that I actually agree with their conclusion?</q></p><p>Interesting that you agree with the conclusion &ndash; as I assume that is largely based on your own observation of society generally?  Or is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:55:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333505#post333505</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333505#post333505</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But at the moment it feels like you are taking pot shots at this work without any basis for it other than your reacons about cause and effect.</q></p><p>Can you give me an example of a "pot shot" I made? Since from the very outset I said that I actually…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:51:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333504#post333504</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333504#post333504</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> I quite literally came away none the wiser to what the guy was on about at all, however entertaining he was as a lecturer. He clearly knew his Camus and Sartre, but I didn’t really come away knowing what advice he’d be giving anyone about anything, when it came to…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:49:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333503#post333503</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333503#post333503</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If economics is not scientific enough</q></p><p>I’m pretty hard on economists in general. Particularly those that get jobs as mouthpieces for banks. But I do think there is genuine quality science done in the economics field. I think your questions about this statement from the OECD are fine. But if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:38:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333502#post333502</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333502#post333502</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But choices about how much stock to run is down to individual farmers, isn’t it? Fonterra don’t get to decide, do they?</q></p><p>Sure it is but read this;</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/dairy/10373405/Marginal-return-on-milk-solids-argument-flawed" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/dairy/10373405/Marginal-return-on-milk-solids-argument-flawed</a></p><p>and then this;</p><p><a href="http://www.agprodecon.org/node/29" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.agprodecon.org/node/29</a></p><p>In particular, noting commentary from here downwards;</p><p>__ Some farm sales are more in the nature of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:24:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333499#post333499</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333499#post333499</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not true. Business courses teach students in the first year all about ethics.</p><p>They are taught that ethics has no place in business and should be avoided at all costs.</q></p><p>I also did a course called Business Ethics, again, as part an Applied Ethics course. I quite literally came away…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:32:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333497#post333497</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333497#post333497</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Google “marginal cow”.</q></p><p>OK, did that. I'm struggling to see where Marx and virtue ethics comes into it. It's an alternative way of working out how many cows to have in a herd, right? And the underlying methodology is entirely a profit maximization process, the only dispute being about how…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:46:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sean_us Handley</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333494#post333494</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333494#post333494</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.maxkeiser.com/2014/04/a-critique-of-pikettys-solution-to-widening-wealth-inequality/#oESG0Hl1LL5tHI4C.99" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.maxkeiser.com/2014/04/a-critique-of-pikettys-solution-to-widening-wealth-inequality/#oESG0Hl1LL5tHI4C.99</a> :</p><p>"Society and the economy are organized so only the wealthy do not need to go into debt, which is serfdom in a neofeudal arrangement. </p><p>The essence of neocolonialism is the “company store,” which extends credit that can never be paid off as wages are stagnant. In a neocolonial…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:19:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333488#post333488</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333488#post333488</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hi Ben, the best example I've seen of an economic analysis that to me seems to be grounded in Aristotelian virtue ethics (i.e., a scientific/mathematical analysis aiming for the 'golden mean' .. that being the midpoint between excess and deficiency) can be found in the "marginal cow" economic analysis (with…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:38:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333486#post333486</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333486#post333486</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What I find in practice is that all the economic analyses I read as part of my work are based on only one ‘school’ of ethical thought, that being teleological/consequentialism.</q></p><p>That seems highly likely to me. They're trying to be progressive, after all. They want to build a science. They…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:45:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kim_Wright</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333485#post333485</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333485#post333485</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The interview with Jane Gleeson-White on Kim's Hill's most recent Saturday morning show included suggested alternative ways (six capitals theory) for measuring the success or failure of economic policies. If we find better metrics for measuring the impacts of policy rather than the blunt implement that is GDP we can…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:42:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333483#post333483</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333483#post333483</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Why is that a horrid neck of the woods, if it is what it is, better to acknowledge it and understand it</q></p><p>My main problem with it is that it tries to boil all economic choices down to moral choices, rather than practical ones. I think that moral choice is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:27:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333482#post333482</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333482#post333482</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>and it seems to be totally divorced from the business/economics and/or public policy schools.</q></p><p>Not true. Business courses teach students in the first year all about ethics.</p><p>They are taught that ethics has no place in business and should be avoided at all costs.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:18:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333480#post333480</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333480#post333480</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>the Late Show...</strong><br /><q>It really must be silly season.</q><br />The fact that Key still thinks he can rely on his memory says it all.<br />That, and the fact that they pushed through a Draconian Bill to increase the SIS's powers under urgency just so they could clear the decks for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:50:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333479#post333479</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333479#post333479</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						sadly, not in this case. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_T4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_T4</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:48:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333478#post333478</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333478#post333478</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Bill English tells RNZ the report is wrong (and Guyon does not let him off the hook). Then Grant Robertson says it’s right while Susie Ferguson spends most of her time trying to blame previous Labour govts.</q></p><p>Alas, Guyon failed to pick Bill English up on his use of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:22:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam Bradford</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333474#post333474</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333474#post333474</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Katharine, I think you're right. Economics is a profession where conflicting unprovable theories circulate, to be picked up and used by those in power &mdash; not used to create policy, but to justify whichever policy they already wish to pursue. No analysis of the statistical validity of this research will…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 07:27:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333471#post333471</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333471#post333471</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Try popping the other hat on for a sec and tell me how it could be made more scientific…I’d be interested to see what you can come up with.</q></p><p>This to me is a bit of the problem with our general view of economics &ndash; it is not a 'science'…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:41:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333470#post333470</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333470#post333470</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which leads to that horrid neck of the woods that sees economics in terms of class struggle rather than assuming that those in control of it actually even want equality, or see it as a good at all.</q></p><p>Why is that a horrid neck of the woods, if it is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:11:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333466#post333466</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333466#post333466</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think I understand how we ended up with this discussion. You’re confusing political and economic ideology with actual science :P</q></p><p>No, I'm not confusing them. I'm saying one is a pale shadow of the other, and it could do better. It is worth discussing how it could do so,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 22:20:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333457#post333457</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333457#post333457</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s dismaying to find that we are world leaders in the equality gap</q></p><p>If it’s any consolation we’re not even close. Were the OECD the world, and if in that period, the economic growth hadn’t skedaddled off to developing countries, where the greatest inequality incidentally is, then be dismayed. <a href="http://www.therichest.com/rich-list/poorest-list/10-countries-with-the-worst-income-inequality/10/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chile</a>,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:28:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosemary McDonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333448#post333448</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333448#post333448</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>That's because its okay to experiment on the disabled....</p><p>oh, sorry,  that was the Nazis.....</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:14:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kiwiiano</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333447#post333447</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333447#post333447</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"It seems the OECD report is very easy to ignore for the MSM as it’s already relegated to the nether regions of Stuff and the Herald websites."</p><p>That's why it should be more properly termed 'lame-stream media' LSM.</p><p>It's blindingly obvious that all our media (&amp; politicians) are captive to corporates.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:08:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kim_Wright</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333443#post333443</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333443#post333443</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Good examples Ian, but the MO seems to dig in and bludgeon the dying beast back to life rather than introduce an initiative with one possible outcome being humane euthanasia. Look how long Novopay was in the death throws before monster Joyce stopped trying to resuscitate it by throwing good…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:34:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333441#post333441</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333441#post333441</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not many are introduced as “suck it and see” options. It’s not usual to hear a minister saying,” Oh we’ll give it a bash but if it doesn’t work we’ll dump it”.</q></p><p>Except in disability policy. A parade of pilot programmes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:21:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333440#post333440</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333440#post333440</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s not usual to hear a minister saying,<br />” Oh we’ll give it a bash but if it doesn’t work we’ll dump it”</q><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INCIS" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">INCIS</a> anyone?<br />...and maybe Novopay and the <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11369088" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Joint Border Management System (JBMS)</a><br />some time soon?</p><p>I haven't heard much about the IRD's $1.5 billion computer system upgrade,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kim_Wright</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333438#post333438</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333438#post333438</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>That’s not really very specific. I wouldn’t call that a hypothesis, just a sales pitch. But what I’m getting at is that it’s never suggested that they will make a change and then rescind it if it doesn’t work. It’s got to be accompanied by ridiculous levels of confidence about…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:14:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333437#post333437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333437#post333437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    But what I’m getting at is that it’s never suggested that they will make a change and then rescind it if it doesn’t work.</p><p>I think I understand how we ended up with this discussion. You’re confusing political and economic ideology with actual science :P</q></p><p>The issue is scientists are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:13:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333435#post333435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333435#post333435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But what I’m getting at is that it’s never suggested that they will make a change and then rescind it if it doesn’t work.</q></p><p>I think I understand how we ended up with this discussion. You're confusing political and economic ideology with actual science :P</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:03:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333434#post333434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333434#post333434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s not like it’s a crime to look at your observations and then predict a model that looks like the pattern you see there. </q></p><p>Well…changing the goal posts (hypotheses under test in an experiment) leads to some sticky ethical as well as scientific issues  (incorrect p values) in my neck…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:54:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333433#post333433</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333433#post333433</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I agree that you are right to feel uneasy about that.</q></p><p>I didn't just get a major in stats so that I <em>couldn't</em> question causation claims :-). Thanks for your reply and Bart and Matthew too, I have to split for the rest of the evening so hopefully the thread…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:54:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333432#post333432</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333432#post333432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the hypothesis behind any policy change is “This will make things better for people in our electorate by delivering xyz outcome,” surely?</q></p><p>That's not really very specific. I wouldn't call that a hypothesis, just a sales pitch. But what I'm getting at is that it's never suggested that they will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:49:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333431#post333431</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333431#post333431</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If we have enough observations and put together a good model the next experiment is obvious.</q></p><p>Yes, that's pretty much what I was suggesting to Rob before. It's not like it's a crime to look at your observations and then predict a model that looks like the pattern you see…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:47:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steve black</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333430#post333430</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333430#post333430</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ben,</p><p>You are describing  a single case crossover design, and Matthew Poole's dismissal of your suggestion leads me to think he might be a Rocket Scientist rather than a Statistician. ;-)</p><p>I'll try and keep this to a level which is appropriate here in a place of intelligent people who…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:47:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333428#post333428</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333428#post333428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s quite possible to not make a prediction about what will be observed, but to just design an experiment that pits some variable against another, make observations, and then guess the hypothesis at some point that isn’t right at the beginning.</q></p><p>Sure. You could do that, if you were independently…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:39:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333427#post333427</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333427#post333427</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    <br /><em>Each time a government makes changes to policy that affect both inequality and economic growth an experiment is being performed.</em></p><p>Is it really an experiment if no hypothesis is made beforehand, as Rob Stowell asks?</q></p><p>Unless one attributes to politicians in democracies an extraordinarily-cynical level of bad faith in their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:37:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333424#post333424</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333424#post333424</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m really curious whether, in practice, you make your hypotheses in advance of your experiments.</q></p><p>Fuck yeah! it costs way way too much money, time and emotional energy to just wing it. We spend literally hours with whiteboards drawing models. Hours and hours. We spend ages with journal papers figuring…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:31:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333423#post333423</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333423#post333423</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Each time a government makes changes to policy that affect both inequality and economic growth an experiment is being performed.</q></p><p>Is it really an experiment if no hypothesis is made beforehand, as Rob Stowell asks?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:20:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333422#post333422</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333422#post333422</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>My aim is more to question how it is that we can’t adopt an attitude in which methodical experimentation is acceptable. </q></p><p>Ok I accept that.</p><p>So can you accept the in effect there have already been multiple experiments? Each time a government makes changes to policy that affect both inequality…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:18:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333421#post333421</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333421#post333421</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No way any experiment is simple enough to eliminate any doubt. </q></p><p>Of course that's an impossibly high expectation. But it can be a lot better than having no idea at all well before then.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:17:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333420#post333420</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333420#post333420</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How could you design an experiment without doing this?</q></p><p>I'm not asking about the theory of doing experiments, I'm asking about the actual practice. It's quite possible to not make a prediction about what will be observed, but to just design an experiment that pits some variable against another, make…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:16:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333419#post333419</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333419#post333419</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m really curious whether, in practice, you make your hypotheses in advance of your experiments.</q></p><p>How could you design an experiment without doing this?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:12:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333418#post333418</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333418#post333418</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I could very reliably see that it was the opening of the hand that caused the rock to fall to the ground, not the other way around, just from the fact that causation can’t flow backwards in time.</q></p><p>Which is great for a relatively simple system such as a rock…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:12:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333417#post333417</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333417#post333417</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I am faced with believing Key and his caucus or believing the OECD and their team of experts</q><br />Tough eh. But that nice Mr Key made millions, so he knows all about money. How much did any of these 'so called experts' make on the international money-markets?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:12:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333416#post333416</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333416#post333416</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The best you get is hypotheses that are consistent with repeated observations.</q></p><p>I’m really curious whether, in practice, you make your hypotheses in advance of your experiments.</p><p>ETA: Actually, to be a bit more general, I'm very interested in every bit of light you can shed about how hypotheses come…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:12:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333415#post333415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333415#post333415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I get that you are playing devils’ advocate but at some point it just becomes denial.</q></p><p>Believe me, it's not denial. My aim is more to question how it is that we can't adopt an attitude in which methodical experimentation is acceptable. That's not the same as just collecting data.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:10:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333414#post333414</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333414#post333414</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It's fairly simple to understand how people at the lower end having more money stimulates the economy. <a href="http://robertreich.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Robert Reich</a> has been explaining this for many years.<br />One of the flip sides (I reckon) is how the rich getting richer creates investment bubbles. People who have way more cash than they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:09:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333413#post333413</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333413#post333413</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>“Proof” to the standard required by economists *cough* could be achieved with a single subject, but actual scientific analysis to the point of being able to claim causality means controlled observational experiments. Willing to be contradicted by Bart, as our resident expert on “the one true scientific method”, but as…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:05:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333412#post333412</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333412#post333412</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>overall, a global report from the OECD is given less prominence than any press release by the “Taxpayers’ Union”.</q></p><p>Don’t worry, I’m sure the Taxpayer’s Union will come out to discuss this report soon enough.</p><p><a href="http://www.taxpayers.org.nz/trickle_down_economics_doesn_t_exist" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">And here it is</a> (scroll down for the full media release).  It basically seems to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:04:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333410#post333410</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333410#post333410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Try a drug, observe effect. Try raising dose, observe effect, try dropping dose, observe effect. There’s hundreds of variables they can’t control, but over time, a pattern emerges, whether the drug has the desired effect, and what side effects it has.</q></p><p>But Ben you seem to be suggesting that such…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:55:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333407#post333407</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333407#post333407</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How could we let this happen?</q></p><p>It's not just ignorance. It's also selfishness. The public voted for tax cuts and got them. The direct consequence of those cuts was in increase in the wealth of the rich and the simultaneous cutting of social welfare systems that help to lift the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:49:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kim_Wright</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333405#post333405</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333405#post333405</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The title of this blog post is sadly inaccurate. It seems the OECD report is very easy to ignore for the MSM as it's already relegated to the nether regions of Stuff and the Herald websites. Call me a left wing conspiracy theorist (let's face it, my friends do) but…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:44:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333402#post333402</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333402#post333402</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>as I understand it you are on really shaky ground to make a change to conditions for a single subject and then claim causation of any observed outcome.</q></p><p>I don't think you even need to be a scientist to see that as completely and utterly false. I could drop a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:39:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333399#post333399</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333399#post333399</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You can experiment on a single subject without a control. </q></p><p>To something of an extent it can be observed in the US, where different states run different policy settings inside the same national-level policy framework and economy, but even then it is easier to disprove a relationship than to prove…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:21:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333394#post333394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333394#post333394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How would you set up the necessarily-controlled macroeconomic environments in which to conduct such experiments? You need a country-sized (or at least one the size of a large city) economy with which to experiment, and another one to act as the control.</q></p><p>I don't know if that's true. You can…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:10:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333387#post333387</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333387#post333387</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						How could we let this happen? Well, a quick perusal of the main media websites gives us some clue. On TVNZ, TV3, Herald and Stuff, the story is confined to the margins. Credit to Morning Report for leading with it (I only heard the headlines, not the interviews), but overall,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:56:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333385#post333385</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333385#post333385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>1: Dr RUSSEL NORMAN to the Prime Minister: Does he agree with the OECD that "when income inequality rises, economic growth falls"?</p><p>2: ANDREW LITTLE to the Prime Minister: Does he agree with yesterday's OECD report that "focusing exclusively on growth and assuming that its benefits will automatically trickle down…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:54:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333379#post333379</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333379#post333379</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s effectively impossible to do proper correlation vs causation experiments with macroeconomics. </q><br />If only we had something like a World Bank that would look into this sort of thing with no strings attached...<br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Bank#Fairness_of_assistance_conditions" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">oh, hang on!</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:52:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333377#post333377</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333377#post333377</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Just quickly, because I have to pop out for some unproductive behaviour, I don't claim to know the answer, hence the question. Try popping the other hat on for a sec and tell me how it could be made more scientific...I'd be interested to see what you can come up…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:52:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333376#post333376</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333376#post333376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>>growth</p><p>What does that word really mean?????</q></p><p>In this context I think it's just a measure of the change in GDP, or maybe GDP per capita. It's always been a very fraught measure to try to maximize, because it doesn't directly measure the general welfare of people at all, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:47:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333373#post333373</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333373#post333373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Is that the only reason a controlled experiment can’t be done, or is it impossible, even if we could get to the point of being allowed to experiment? It seems to me that in theory, economic experimentation is possible, and if questions are unsettled that could be reasonably clearly answered,…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:42:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333372#post333372</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333372#post333372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It seems to me that in theory, economic experimentation is possible</q></p><p>To be fair governments are constantly experimenting. The problem is multiple variables are almost always changing simultaneously. Hence the problem determining cause or effect.</p><p>You end up with "yes you improved the economy, but not because you reduced inequality…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:36:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333370#post333370</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333370#post333370</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Speaking of inequality...<br />..Happy <a href="http://www.un.org/en/events/humanrightsday/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Human Rights Day</a> everyone!<br /><q> This year’s slogan, <strong>Human Rights 365,</strong> encompasses the idea that every day is Human Rights Day. It celebrates the fundamental proposition in the Universal Declaration that each one of us, everywhere, at all times is entitled to the full range of human…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:30:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333369#post333369</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333369#post333369</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>and we now have two major reports, OECD and IMF, arriving at the same point using different methods/data sets, so it looks rigorous.</q></p><p>Yes, and both from organizations that could hardly be accused of having been raving hotbeds of radical leftwing economists.</p><p><q>you go with the repeated, peer-reviewed stuff</q></p><p>That's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:28:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosemary McDonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333368#post333368</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333368#post333368</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hmmm....</p><p>Our wee acre of supposed pastoral bliss is bordered on three sides by a 999 acre/1000 cow dairy farm.</p><p>The owner we purchased our acre from....a rockstar of the dairy industry in his time...had to sell,  as the wolves came baying for their due.  He was a bully...so few…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:20:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Max Rashbrooke</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333365#post333365</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333365#post333365</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Good questions ... The methodology looks thorough. I'm not an econemetrician, so can't say exactly that it's correct. But it's like climate science &ndash; you go with the repeated, peer-reviewed stuff &ndash; and we now have two major reports, OECD and IMF, arriving at the same point using different methods/data…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:05:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333363#post333363</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333363#post333363</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The measured cost of our ‘rockstar’ economy?</q></p><p>Oh, ye of little faith!</p><p>Arguably the New Zealand economy is indeed like a rock star &mdash; think Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin, or Jim Morrison.  Or, for a more contemporary rocker, Amy Winehouse.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:52:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333362#post333362</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333362#post333362</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>up, up and a whey...</strong><br /><q> <em>growth</em><br />What does that word really mean?????</q><br />I think it's what milk is supposed to promote...<br />meanwhile they continue to use milk as an economic lubricant<br />(which is all money is anyway)...</p><p>for some 'growth' is maturation,<br />for others it's a tumour.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:50:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333361#post333361</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333361#post333361</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Aha, you answered while I was guessing. Timing is a fairly obvious answer. Does the methodology seem sound to you? I guess the obvious question is: Does the same apply in reverse? Can one pick growth changes and then look for lagged inequality correlation? If so, then it’s still not…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:49:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333360#post333360</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333360#post333360</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Farmgate scandal?</strong><br />I wonder how the almost halving of Fonterra's milk price to $4.70 per kilo (from last years $8.40) will impact local communities and the country in general?</p><p>Time to put some the few eggs left in another basket methinks...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:45:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333359#post333359</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333359#post333359</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But you can observe societies where inequality has changed and observe changes in economic growth</q></p><p>Sure, which is what is done, and the correlation is well established. But how do you make a sound inference about the direction of causation? Correlation is pretty good indication of some kind of causation…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:44:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosemary McDonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333358#post333358</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333358#post333358</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> growth </q></p><p>What does that word really mean?????</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:43:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosemary McDonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333357#post333357</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333357#post333357</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This...<a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/home-property/63533041/time-to-give-up-homeownership-dream" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/home-property/63533041/time-to-give-up-homeownership-dream</a></p><p>...is inequality that simply can't be ignored.</p><p>Young people,  well educated,  working HARD.</p><p>Told to "grow up and move on.."</p><p>By whom?   </p><p>So,  my hard working adult child and their partner,  having desperately been trying to save for a deposit on a home (not in Auckland),  have just about…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:40:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333355#post333355</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333355#post333355</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>this government has shown utter contempt for evidence showing that its ideology is false</q></p><p>You'll love the English interview.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:37:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333354#post333354</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333354#post333354</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bill English <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/20160497/national%27s-response-to-oecd-report" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">tells RNZ</a> the report is wrong (and Guyon does not let him off the hook). Then Grant Robertson <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/20160498/labour%27s-take-on-inequality%27s-effects" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">says it's right</a> while Susie Ferguson spends most of her time trying to blame previous Labour govts.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:36:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Max Rashbrooke</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333351#post333351</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333351#post333351</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's a good question, Ben, and the quickest answer in this case is that the OECD have done the timing so that it has to be that inequality leads to reduced growth, not the other way around. Their data takes rising inequality 1985-2005, then looks at what happened with growth…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:32:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333349#post333349</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333349#post333349</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>may represent the moment when inequality really became too big to ignore.</q></p><p>Yeah, I think you underestimate our ability to ignore large elephants in the room.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:14:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333347#post333347</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333347#post333347</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How do we know which causes which? </q></p><p>You can't do a controlled expt, nobody will let you.</p><p>But you can observe societies where inequality has changed and observe changes in economic growth. Since multiple societies have shown the same correlation it becomes less likely that there is another factor driving…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:12:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosemary McDonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333346#post333346</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333346#post333346</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Perhaps a critical mass of comfort can be socially reached that creates inertia all by itself.</p><p>It seems like a complicated question. I’d like a good answer to it.</q></p><p> I'd love to give it a go....but it would take pages...</p><p>Suffice to say,  one reaches a certain level of finnancial…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:12:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333344#post333344</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333344#post333344</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've thought inequality stifles growth for a long long time, but just as a devil's advocate, for a moment, can I ask the question: How do we know which causes which? We can see that lower growth is correlated to rising inequality, but perhaps low growth causes rising inequality, rather…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:59:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333343#post333343</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333343#post333343</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh you and your silly facts. </p><p>Our government has polled the people of New Zealand and found that they want us to continue to make the rich richer and the poor poorer – far be it for us (rich bastards) to argue with the will of the people.</p><p>Quite simply…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:52:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosemary McDonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333340#post333340</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333340#post333340</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"So this report – demolishing a key argument against inequality," </p><p> perhaps that should be "Key" argument,  Max?.</p><p>".... backing redistribution, and pointing out New Zealand as the country worst affected" </p><p>The measured cost of our 'rockstar' economy?</p><p>"... is a landmark one, and may represent the moment when inequality really…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:13:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333339#post333339</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-inequality-too-big-to-ignore/?p=333339#post333339</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:13:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
