<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Polity: In defence of the centre</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=373316#post373316</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=373316#post373316</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						hmm
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:02:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353194#post353194</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353194#post353194</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry I had to nip out midway through editing there for a rod of dowel, but coming back to this:</p><p><q>It seems to me that you’re rather bitter on Rob Salmond. I think this is misplaced. It’s perhaps a sad truth that a party like Labour has to consider positioning…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:24:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353186#post353186</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353186#post353186</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It seems to me that you’re rather bitter on Rob Salmond.</q></p><p>No, not at all, his work this year and the lack of confidence this work has given me in Labour’s future direction definitely irks me, but Rob Salmond, I don’t know him, it’s never personal, he’s just another number…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:59:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen R</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353183#post353183</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353183#post353183</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I'm not a typical Green voter either (so far as I know), since I mostly like their economic and social policy &ndash; environmental issues are a distant 4th or 5th place really</q></p><p>That's a significant part of why I vote for them &ndash; I looked at relevant financial policy and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:33:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353181#post353181</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353181#post353181</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Thanks Ben that was illuminating both in terms of how much it revealed as much as how much it didn’t</q></p><p>I'm starting to realize that stats is supposed to be that way.</p><p>It seems to me that you're rather bitter on Rob Salmond. I think this is misplaced. It's perhaps…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:21:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353137#post353137</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353137#post353137</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Ben that was illuminating both in terms of how much it revealed as much as how much it didn’t, very impressive work. I guess to be a little clearer about what I was getting at in the section you quoted above, my issue with these blogs is not so…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 21:06:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353124#post353124</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353124#post353124</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Or perhaps I should say – there might once have been a rhetorical reason for doing so, when parties like ACT purported to offer an option in the bottom right quadrant. But in practice the opinions of their membership, and then ultimate their leadership, were actually in the upper right…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:23:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353123#post353123</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353123#post353123</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sent.</p><p><q> that political compass that was doing the rounds a few years back had far more to offer if only our surveys had been less one dimensional.</q></p><p>Well, ironically, when the parties are actually placed on it, they form a reasonably straight line (albeit on a slope), which pretty much…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:16:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353120#post353120</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353120#post353120</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>However, I also slowly realized another obvious thing, in hindsight, that the questions themselves were also dominated by that division</q></p><p>Yeah that’s the limitation there, that political compass that was doing the rounds a few years back had far more to offer if only our surveys had been less one…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:41:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353119#post353119</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353119#post353119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The culmination of a Masters and a Doctorate in Political Science is a perpetuation of this traditional visualisation of the political spectrum as a dualistic linear continuum. </q></p><p>Heh! I can tell you the culmination of a few weeks work tossing the NZES data backwards and forwards was that I was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:32:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353116#post353116</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=353116#post353116</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just to be absolutely clear I’ve got this straight. The culmination of a Masters and a Doctorate in Political Science is a perpetuation of this traditional visualisation of the political spectrum as a dualistic linear continuum. </p><p>Though we could just as easily substitute ‘left’ for the word ‘compassionate’ and ‘right’…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:51:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=348041#post348041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=348041#post348041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I believe the block vote was abolished and individual union members got to vote as affiliates?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:17:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=348040#post348040</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=348040#post348040</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I have read claims  that the whole supporters voting thing was pushed strongly from the right of labour, as it weakened the strength of the union vote, only it turned out supporting voters were even less interested in the right of labour than unions.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:09:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347993#post347993</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347993#post347993</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think affiliated is the unions. Supporters is the 3 pound public.</q></p><p>I'd sort-of unthinkingly assumed the Union votes would be as fully registered members.  A friend who's a member told me before the election that there's a lot of top-down driven block-voting by the unions in these elections.</p><p>So…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:57:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347991#post347991</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347991#post347991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think affiliated is the unions. Supporters is the 3 pound public.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:22:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347987#post347987</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347987#post347987</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm really encouraged by Pagani's assertion that Corbyn will never be PM.</q></p><p>Mildly annoyed I didn't stick a lazy £20 on him becoming leader at the originally offered odds of 600/1.  Maybe I'll check out what's being offered on him becoming PM.</p><p>I'll pop my Fisking hat on for a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 20:14:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347952#post347952</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347952#post347952</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, it's very hard to generalize what works best. I think we have to get over even trying to do that, and take each case on its merits. Even if Corbyn did manage to mobilize more voters, snatch the election, that's not necessarily something that will work here.</p><p>Likewise, while…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:49:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347945#post347945</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347945#post347945</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> the careful, nuanced wariness of other professional politicians. You can have no doubts what they value, and the policies they espouse.</q></p><p>Plain-speaking politicians, unguarded politicians, especially on the left, are liable to be monstered by the right-wing noise machine. As is already happening to Corbyn.</p><p>Possibly another reason National are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:30:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347932#post347932</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347932#post347932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>From a speech on pay equity that Andrew Little gave on Friday night &ndash; <a href="http://campaign.labour.org.nz/margaret_long_memorial_speech" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Margaret Long Memorial Speech</a>.</p><p><q>That’s why the next Labour Government will take a lead on pay equity.</p><p>We’ll start with urgently working on paying aged healthcare assistants and caregivers fairly, and work out a track to…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:50:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347929#post347929</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347929#post347929</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Much of the appeal of Corbyn and Sanders (and Trump, in a different way, for that matter) is a long record of speaking honestly and consistently &ndash; and their 'outsider' status.<br />I can't remember where I read it, but none of these candidates have what someone described as the careful,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:41:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347925#post347925</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347925#post347925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> David Cunliffe was as far out as Corbyn.</q></p><p>What was his point?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:15:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347915#post347915</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347915#post347915</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Given her record, I'm really encouraged by Pagani's assertion that Corbyn will never be PM.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:25:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347914#post347914</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347914#post347914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>pondered on just how our so called ‘centre left’ in Godzone are going to respond to this.</q></p><p>Ponder no longer:</p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=11512750" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&amp;objectid=11512750</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:18:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347855#post347855</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347855#post347855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wonder what those defending the centre line will make of this?</q></p><p>Well, they'll either STFU and realise that the has an overwhelming mandate from the people they are supposed to be representing, and that they can like it or lump it.</p><p>Or they'll unite and conspire to undermine him…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2015 19:42:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosemary McDonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347831#post347831</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347831#post347831</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Now,  I wonder what those defending the centre line will make of this?</p><p>We "politically irrelevant"  Bus dwellers gave a rather stunned(who would have thunk it?) but resounding cheer at the news this morning.  We tried not to get cross at the Natrad newsreader repeating the 'socialist Marx fan' narrative...and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2015 16:34:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347791#post347791</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=347791#post347791</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Corbyn wins in the first round with a clear 59.5% of the vote.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:13:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346705#post346705</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346705#post346705</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's probably worthy of a spot in the Dirty Politics thread all things considered.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:28:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346696#post346696</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346696#post346696</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I suppose I am a bit late with this news but I am so pissed off that I had to post it somewhere.<br /><q>Dita De Boni ‏@KeepingMum  Aug 9<br />Hi all.  In answer to questions, it is true the Herald has discontinued my column as of three weeks from now.…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:08:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346690#post346690</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346690#post346690</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Or a war…</q></p><p>Or other meaningful change...for the worse.</p><p>I'm definitely not excited by the prospect of another Depression. Like a war, it's one of those times we're likely to romanticize after the fact (so long as we win), but at the time it's a real fuck. And there's no…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:26:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346687#post346687</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346687#post346687</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which is why it often, and unfortunately, takes a Great Depression-grade crisis to push through meaningful change.</q></p><p>Or a war...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:31:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346686#post346686</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346686#post346686</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think it probably has more to do with having no motivation (and in fact more or less the exact opposite) to challenge natural human psychology and the existing status quo.</q></p><p>Which is why it often, and unfortunately, takes a Great Depression-grade crisis to push through meaningful change.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:34:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346680#post346680</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346680#post346680</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No, but it does say: "It’s as if someone were out there making up pointless jobs</q></p><p>Ok, I submit...    ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:43:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346679#post346679</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346679#post346679</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So 25% unemployment back then would have had a disproportionally greater knock-on effect.</q></p><p>Possibly but I was thinking the workforce back then also included children plus the fact that many just wouldn't be counted. Its a tricky one to figure but the fact is that neo-lib economics seems to claim…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:41:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346678#post346678</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346678#post346678</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> When the fourth National Government set it up that way, did the thought of creating lots of middle class jobs not enter their head?</q></p><p>I would like to think that the reason for doing it were as stated, increasing competition leading to lower prices, at least that what Bill Birch…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:33:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346677#post346677</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346677#post346677</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    (I don't (quite) think the system was designed like this by some sort of shadowy billionaire illuminati cabal).</p><p>As far as I can see the article doesn't specifically say that</q></p><p>No, but it does say: "It’s as if someone were out there making up pointless jobs just for the sake…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:17:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346676#post346676</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346676#post346676</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I read somewhere that during the Depression in '29 the unemployment rate was only 25% of the workforce</q></p><p>Thinking out loud, but the workforce in '29 would have (I assume) mostly been male (with certain industries such as the garment industry in New York/Chicago being exceptions), and family sizes would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:03:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346668#post346668</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346668#post346668</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This offers one theory. Strays a bit to far over the paranoia line, in my opinon (I don’t (quite) think the system was designed like this by some sort of shadowy billionaire illuminati cabal).</q></p><p>We've been conditioned to blame everyone below us for holding us back instead of those above…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:23:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346652#post346652</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346652#post346652</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Sure, no company or manager is going to employ somebody to do a bullshit job if it is not going to improve the bottom line of the company</q></p><p>It might improve the bottom line of the company, in isolation, but not add anything useful in totality.</p><p>My first job, we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:12:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346644#post346644</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346644#post346644</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Perhaps the old Empire Building strategy comes into play here</q></p><p>First thing that jumped out at me. There's a lot of departments in organizations that are cost centers in the first place, with negative bottom lines at all times. Excellent places for bullshit jobs. Thinking back, the whole Y2K team…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:10:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346642#post346642</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346642#post346642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> (I don't (quite) think the system was designed like this by some sort of shadowy billionaire illuminati cabal).</q></p><p>As far as I can see the article doesn't specifically say that and, although the conspiracy theorist in me craves that conclusion, I don't believe that.<br />I think it is just a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:04:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346602#post346602</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346602#post346602</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So what do we do with all those unemployable people? this is worth thinking about and is the province of the Labour Party because...<br />They shoot horses, don't they?</q></p><p><a href="http://libcom.org/library/phenomenon-bullshit-jobs-david-graeber" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This</a> offers one theory.  Strays a bit to far over the paranoia line, in my opinon (I don't (quite) think the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:59:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Aaron Incognito</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346589#post346589</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346589#post346589</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						All good, I can see your point. Thanks for the welcome :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:36:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346542#post346542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346542#post346542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Welcome to the future train Ian, take a seat. <br />You will be travelling in first class because your ticket says "has a clue". Perhaps those of us in this, relatively, small group may have some influence with the guy in the signal box, who, it may be noted, is not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:47:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosemary McDonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346538#post346538</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346538#post346538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>f only National hadn’t got rid of night classes and had actually expanded the community education programmes,</q></p><p>...and,  perhaps,  had encouraged the Telly Barons to screen educational,  informative and intellectually stimulating programmes....?</p><p>But no....we have eyes glued to Shorty Street and brains disengaged.</p><p>SNAFU</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:36:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346537#post346537</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346537#post346537</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Tangata twitch...</strong><br /><q>So what do we do with all those unemployable people?</q><br />Hang on a minute &ndash; ain't we the new 'Leisured Masses' they promised we'd become, along with the 'Paperless office', back when the machines (and then other countries) started taking our jobs away...<br />...if only National hadn't got…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:29:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346525#post346525</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346525#post346525</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry Aaron, I didn't mean it to be personal. I do think it is important for people to exchange ideas and those ideas do not have to be backed up by anything. <br />I guess I am just too tired of the likes of D4J and Undecided Voter and all the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:48:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346524#post346524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346524#post346524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You're fine. Nobody needs to justify pseudonyms.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:47:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346522#post346522</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346522#post346522</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There's been similar arguments floating around for a good few years now:</q></p><p>Now that's what I'm talking about... (Jeeze, I hate that phrase)<br />This is one of the reasons Labour are caught between a Black Hole and a Dark Place, the people who actually labour are few and far between…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:43:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Aaron Incognito</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346496#post346496</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346496#post346496</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My blog is anonymous for several reasons, the most serious is because of family reasons. My immediate family all use pseudonyms online. We don't want to be contacted by a certain relative, and we are easy to find due to our unusual last name. I'm more than happy to email…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:29:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346494#post346494</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346494#post346494</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>pa-ra-noia</q><br />Just around the corner from me.<br /><a href="http://www.maplandia.com/new-zealand/northland/paranui/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.maplandia.com/new-zealand/northland/paranui/</a><br />Well, its close.<br />;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:01:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346493#post346493</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346493#post346493</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Graeber has things to say on this.</q></p><p>Mightily impressed with Graeber's <em>The Utopia of Rules</em>. He's a bit like John Pilger, in that he's irrefutably insightful with most of his big-picture analyses, while seeming a little naively indulgent of some of his apparent fellow-travelers. For example, Crimethinc Collective, "probably the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:18:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346491#post346491</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346491#post346491</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Meanwhile, the #greatfallofchina seems to be gaining pace: over 8% down today &ndash; I wonder if the market propping cash has run out, or the government has just given up on it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:03:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346490#post346490</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346490#post346490</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>here's a timely Salon article .... basically our growing income disparity is a symptom of us not handling technological change well &ndash; yes the robots are coming to take away our jobs, and if we can figure out how to spread the resulting wealth, rather than creating a 1% and…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:51:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346489#post346489</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346489#post346489</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Steve Braunias's having him hide under Key's house was pretty good</q></p><p>a fitting grovel</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:20:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346488#post346488</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346488#post346488</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>or say you used to vote Labour but now because (insert inflammatory accusation here) you don't.</q></p><p>pa-ra-noia</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:18:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346485#post346485</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346485#post346485</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Mike, the psycho</q></p><p>I thought Steve Braunias's having him <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/Steve-Braunias/news/article.cfm?a_id=974&amp;objectid=11500899" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">hide under Key's house</a> was pretty good.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:45:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346483#post346483</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346483#post346483</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The exclusive bretheran?</q></p><p>Hmmm, good point. Now who else do we know that doesn't wear the required tie with those smart business suits? Ah yes... Mike, the psycho, Hosking, bog scrubber to the powerful.<br />;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:29:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346481#post346481</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346481#post346481</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    Ah, but… who would then clean John Key’s toilet?.</p><p>The exclusive bretheran?</q><br />Aren't they forbidden to share common drains with ordinary mortals? Whatever, I have a horrible feeling that there's a hardcore of Blue devotees out there for whom the experience would be akin  to Catholics taking the waters at…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:26:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346479#post346479</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346479#post346479</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> a more sustainable infrastructure is a well educated population, kitted out with contempory toolboxes.</q></p><p>Ah, but... who would then clean John Key's toilet?. You see we have to have poor people otherwise how could the wealthy feel so superior?.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:07:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346472#post346472</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346472#post346472</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hey. It's my blog.</q></p><p>My problem with anonymous blogs is that if you can't stand by what you say then why should I listen.<br />Aaron (Bhatnagar) Incognito as far as I know. You see it is a trick of the right to pretend to be left and then screw up,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:45:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346453#post346453</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346453#post346453</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I mean this government and too many of their peers in business have a backwards idea about what counts as 'infrastructure' or how to develop a platform/ecosystem rather than a product.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:46:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346452#post346452</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346452#post346452</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Epic! I think you're right if the main thrust there is to suggest that Left is not <em>synonymous</em> with Labour, even if it's correlated. Opposing immigrant labour is an example of an idea that goes with the Labour movement, but is not necessarily socially progressive at all, and to that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:20:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346451#post346451</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346451#post346451</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Please do keep writing it, too. I’m interested in what you come up with.</p><p>PS: Welcome to PAS</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:03:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Aaron Incognito</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346450#post346450</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346450#post346450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hey. It's my blog. It's blue because I thought it was the best (free) stock colour combo offered by Wordpress for that layout.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:49:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346448#post346448</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346448#post346448</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Owning the infrastructure/platform is always better, yes. However, we have a cohort of senior decision-makers who think the phrase means little more than highways.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:14:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346446#post346446</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346446#post346446</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Nice analogy =)</p><p><q>This has to be taken in context.<br />Labour inherited an almost bankrupt treasury after the “think big”</q></p><p>I’ve heard that trotted out as justification for the throwing out of the baby with the bathwater all too often by the monocular, but I’ve usually heard it as a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:53:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346443#post346443</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346443#post346443</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Joe, wrt to that cartoon, I'd probably insert Sir Rogernomic's shoulders beneath John Key's feet, but still atop that mountain of cash.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:22:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346442#post346442</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346442#post346442</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>"Between 1984 and 1993, New Zealand underwent radical economic reform,</q></p><p>This has to be taken in context.<br />Labour inherited an almost bankrupt treasury after the "think big" projects of Muldoon. In a typical National way someone had a great idea and the supporters of the party meddled with it for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:21:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346441#post346441</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346441#post346441</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						reckon biological fabbing will be a bigger game-changer
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:20:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346440#post346440</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346440#post346440</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>However it was under National that the Colombo Plan was implemented:</p><p>    Schemes of student assistance, begun in the 1950s, brought young Asian students to New Zealand. In particular the Colombo Plan attracted Malaysians, Thais and Indonesians. A few married New Zealanders and settled. By 1971 there were almost 3,000 Malaysians…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:47:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346439#post346439</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346439#post346439</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes but 3d printing is still just a tool like any other, not even that new a tool it was hampered by patents for years</p><p>Cheap printing lets us make stuff like rocket engines cheaper, but it's never likely to make plastic parts more cheaply than injection moulding in volume.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:43:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346438#post346438</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346438#post346438</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>My examples may be just as cherry-picked and oversimplified as Rob’s, but this is fundamentally my problem with “centrism” or “centre-left politics” as it has been practised by NZ Labour since 2008</q></p><p>Yeah, prior to 2008 things <em>were</em> different. When I think political “centre”. Implementing a surveillance state in which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:37:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>KiwiBarnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346437#post346437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346437#post346437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						+100, Tom
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:31:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346436#post346436</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346436#post346436</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>innovative electric engines,</q></p><p>Not only the electric motors but the turbines and even the two stage nozzles, a part that would be virtually impossible to manufacture by conventional means.<br />Of course, our beloved Government did little to help this company as the good ol' US of Eh? felt it would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:29:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346435#post346435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346435#post346435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>automation could be a benefit for workers if the resulting gains were appropriately directed.</q></p><p>An argument I have been repeating for decades.<br />We were told back in the sixties that automation would give us more leisure time, all it did was steal our jobs and give the benefit to those…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:21:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346434#post346434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346434#post346434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    Relevant</p><p>Also, interesting. Hopefully he continues.</q></p><p>That begged more questions than it answered for me, particular his asides about New Zealand First:</p><p><q>Conversely, some of the possibly-racist-but-definitely-conservative social policy in New Zealand First would normally be considered right-wing, but the party is currently (unfortunately) considered left-wing.</q></p><p>I have little difficulty…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:17:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346433#post346433</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346433#post346433</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Consequently, governments can't and shouldn't try and pick winners. </q></p><p>This government has picked extractive industries, dairy farming and construction including roads. The results either support your hypothesis or just prove that dunces with a 1950s mindset make bad choices.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:02:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346432#post346432</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346432#post346432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						3D printing is one of the fundamentals that allows NZ's RocketLabs to undercut competitors worldwide in speed of production of their innovative electric engines, and lower costs enough to disrupt their whole industry.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:59:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346431#post346431</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346431#post346431</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>yes Steve I'm that easily fooled. If only we could all have your smarts.</q></p><p>See, we can agree on some things. ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:56:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346430#post346430</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346430#post346430</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Nails it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:23:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346429#post346429</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346429#post346429</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						here's a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2015/08/23/robots_are_coming_for_your_job_we_must_fix_income_inequality_volatile_job_markets_now_or_face_sustained_turmoil/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">timely Salon article</a> .... basically our growing income disparity is a symptom of us not handling technological change well &ndash; yes the robots are coming to take away our jobs, and if we can figure out how to spread the resulting wealth, rather than creating a 1% and…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:16:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346428#post346428</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346428#post346428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>People in government and politics (and the management levels of most/all large companies) generally don't have a clue about technology, they just hear about something and latch on to it: "3D printing matter transmutation! Rockets to space! Jet packs!"</p><p>Consequently, governments can't and shouldn't try and pick winners. They should…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:10:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346425#post346425</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346425#post346425</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Stephanie Rodgers translates her disagreement with Rob's view into <a href="https://bootstheory.wordpress.com/2015/08/24/in-defence-of-actually-standing-for-something/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">contrasting messages</a>:</p><p><q> __"No one should have to work more than 40 hours a week to feed their kids. Everyone has the right to the absolute basics – a warm, safe home, a social life, time off with the kids, good food…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:27:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346424#post346424</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346424#post346424</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a story Russel Norman gave to the press</q></p><p>yes, that part was not impressive</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:16:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346422#post346422</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346422#post346422</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						One challenge for a lot of people on the left (ironically, those in the Anderton/Pagani sub-corpuscle, mostly) is to recognise that automation could be a benefit for workers if the resulting gains were appropriately directed. At least he must have been paying the workers enough that the machine was a…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:01:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346420#post346420</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346420#post346420</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> <em>That’s a two way street, not helped by this sort of thing.</em></p><p>Was that from before or after Labour rejected Green approaches to work closer during the last election campaign?</q></p><p>To be fair, it was a bit more than "approaches to work closer", it was a bid to commit to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:35:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346417#post346417</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346417#post346417</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						McCarten has gone quiet lately. But when he split it felt like Anderton had run out of kudos and was running on ego.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:39:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346415#post346415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346415#post346415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Shortly before the move to Sydenham Anderton appeared in a photo in the <em>Herald</em> with a newly installed industrial robot at his Auckland engineering works. The thing was being used to weld supermarket trolleys. Anderton admitted to a certain angst about its effect on jobs, while explaining that circumstances compelled…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:14:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346414#post346414</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346414#post346414</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Roll up, roll up!</q></p><p>Quite coincidentally I've found myself adorned in a very similar waistcoat this evening.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:08:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346413#post346413</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346413#post346413</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						McCarten has gone quiet lately. But when he split it felt like Anderton had run out of kudos and was running on ego.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:57:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346411#post346411</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346411#post346411</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Roll up, roll up! Scoff a dancing turd or down a dead rat! If 'e can, Canterbury can't. ..</q></p><p>Heh! <br />BTW Anderton's dumped Alliance colleagues aren't without effective political skills. It was a group drawn from these disaffected that mounted the legal challenge that brought about Bob Parker's first significant…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:31:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346410#post346410</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346410#post346410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Blunt disagreement with the Salmond proposition <a href="http://thestandard.org.nz/rob-salmonds-argument-too-simplistic-and-wrong-in-its-assumptions/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">at Te Standard</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:22:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346409#post346409</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346409#post346409</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Roll up, roll up! Scoff a dancing turd or down a dead rat! If 'e can, Canterbury can't. ..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 20:55:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346408#post346408</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346408#post346408</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>National's PR team are top notch, they even have you believing Labour are useless and whining about them</q></p><p>yes Steve I'm that easily fooled. If only we could all have your smarts.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 20:50:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346407#post346407</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346407#post346407</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>A big part of Helen Clark's victory in 1999 was when she buried the hatchet with Jim Anderton, who had quit Labour a decade earlier in disgust.</q></p><p>Anderton goes way back with Clark, and behind the scenes was likely never really estranged from her politically. The strong network ties he'd…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 20:14:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Seriatim</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346402#post346402</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346402#post346402</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If he's read Paul Mason's "Postcapitalism &ndash; a  Guide to Our Future" and listened to Salim Ismael's recent interview he might have a few new ideas.<br /><a href="http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/ntn/ntn-20150730-1006-tech_entrepeneur_salim_ismail_on_building_a_start_up-048.mp3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/ntn/ntn-20150730-1006-tech_entrepeneur_salim_ismail_on_building_a_start_up-048.mp3</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:45:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Seriatim</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346401#post346401</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346401#post346401</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						“The accusation is widely made that Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters have moved to the extreme left on economic policy. But this is not supported by the candidate’s statements or policies. His opposition to austerity is actually mainstream economics, even backed by the conservative IMF. He aims to boost growth…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:34:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346400#post346400</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346400#post346400</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>A big part of Helen Clark's victory in 1999 was when she buried the hatchet with Jim Anderton,</q></p><p>...and Andrew Little said on the Nation this week that it was too far away from the Election to talk about coalitions but Labour had worked with the Greens and NZFirst in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:13:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346398#post346398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346398#post346398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If Labour do not demonstrate for voters right now that they can work constructively with progressive allies, we will get another term of the incumbents. Labour’s caucus and party are kidding themselves if they imagine getting to 40% this time.</q></p><p>A big part of Helen Clark's victory in 1999 was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:37:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346397#post346397</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346397#post346397</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Are you really saying you are happy with how Labour have conducted themselves since about 2007?</q></p><p>Panic is never a good look and Clark was a hard act to follow. Trouble is, trying to get the leadership right distracted from the message. I can understand the panic, National's PR team…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 15:18:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>grant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346395#post346395</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346395#post346395</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Calling Mr. Oswald with the swastika tattoo..</p><p>Thanks Joe. Haven't heard that for years.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:36:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346394#post346394</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346394#post346394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Clearly even the exponents of the most extreme viewpoints like to be thought of as centrist.</q></p><p><em>Calling Mr. Oswald with the swastika tattoo<br />There is a vacancy waiting in the English voodoo...</em><br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydpablsm7f0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydpablsm7f0</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:16:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>grant</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346392#post346392</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346392#post346392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I was idly browsing through my Oxford Dictionary Of Quotations last night and came across this little pearler from Oswald Mosley  (English fascist leader in the 1930's):</p><p>"I am not, and never have been, a man of the right. My position was on the left and is now in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:07:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346390#post346390</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346390#post346390</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Relevant</q></p><p>Also, interesting. Hopefully he continues.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:39:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346389#post346389</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346389#post346389</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> You win those people over by being relevant to them as they are, not by telling them they’re worldview needs a rethink. It is just basic psychology. Tell people they were right all along; they like you. Tell people they were wrong all along; they don’t.</q><br />Yeah well what needs…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:37:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346385#post346385</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346385#post346385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And what approaches has Labour made to the Greens since the election to improve the relationship, do you know?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:39:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346384#post346384</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346384#post346384</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It was from July this year.  I saw it on a Green friend's FB page.  I've googled the quote, and it comes from a July 2015 press release.</p><p><a href="https://www.greens.org.nz/news/press-releases/labour-and-national-too-afraid-do-what%E2%80%99s-needed-stop-rising-house-prices" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Labour and National too afraid to do what’s needed to stop rising house prices</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:37:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346383#post346383</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346383#post346383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That's a two way street, not helped by this sort of thing.</q></p><p>Was that from before or after Labour rejected Green approaches to work closer during the last election campaign?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:30:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346380#post346380</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346380#post346380</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If Labour do not demonstrate for voters right now that they can work constructively with progressive allies, we will get another term of the incumbents.</q></p><p>That's a two way street, not helped by this sort of thing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:52:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346379#post346379</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346379#post346379</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, in normal times, appeals to the centre, whatever the fuck that might be, probably prevail.</q></p><p>While I can't speak to centrism, the term "centre left" is a widely understood shorthand for a popular set of policies and attitudes about mixed market capitalism, regulation and the redistribution of income. It's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:59:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346373#post346373</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346373#post346373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mike Smith <a href="http://thestandard.org.nz/the-centre-of-attention/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">responds</a>.</p><p><q>I don’t know where Rob Salmond was in 1999, the last time Labour won government in New Zealand. Labour went into that election with a declared coalition partner on its left in the Alliance, with declared policies to raise the top rate of income tax, to bring…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 22:02:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346372#post346372</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346372#post346372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Perhaps some of the left wing success in Greece, Spain and the other countries "enjoying" austerity is resonating in the UK also?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:35:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346370#post346370</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346370#post346370</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I can't understand why you keep "putting the boot in" here, unless of course you are content with National having another term just to spite Labour. What exactly is your problem?.</q></p><p>Are you really saying you are happy with how Labour have conducted themselves since about 2007? I am hardly…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:01:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346369#post346369</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346369#post346369</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I'm not sure this is a fruitful line of criticism.</q></p><p>I could critique that anonymous pseudo left wing blog but I would rather not waste my time when I have more important things to do, like checking for navel fluff.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:52:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346367#post346367</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346367#post346367</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Labels may not be popular amongst the chattering classes but they sure as hell work with the uninformed and they, my friend, are the problem.<br />Going for the "centre" is not the answer, the people need informed and recognisable parties to enact their will. we have to engender that will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:16:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346366#post346366</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346366#post346366</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Public Address' default branding is slate blue. Hard News is a Nazi brown. I'm not sure this is a fruitful line of criticism.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:03:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346365#post346365</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346365#post346365</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><br />Relevant.</q></p><p>To who?<br />An anonymous blogger who thinks blue is the right colour for a "left wing" blog. Gimmee a break.<br />That is about as subtle as...<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Azf320JDdqU" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Azf320JDdqU</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 19:46:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346364#post346364</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346364#post346364</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> it assumes the sole reason for the existence of the Labour party is to be elected</q></p><p>That is unkind. I would have said it assumes that change can only be made from the government benches, so that winning on a compromise platform of being a bit nicer is better than…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 19:44:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346363#post346363</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346363#post346363</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You will recall it is not the Greens who have resisted working together. </q></p><p>No, that is National, they refuse to work with anybody unless they promise to back their neo-liberal agenda to the hilt. Labour, after "9 long years" of getting most things right, have been subject to the continuous…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 19:39:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346362#post346362</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346362#post346362</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="https://fundamentallyuseless.wordpress.com/2015/08/21/cleavage-political-cleavage/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Relevant</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 19:31:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346361#post346361</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346361#post346361</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Colonel Trotter <a href="http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2015/08/22/swamp-things-the-political-centre-contains-only-what-the-left-and-the-right-put-into-it/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">weighs in</a>. h/t Hebe
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 19:00:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346360#post346360</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346360#post346360</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You will recall it is not the Greens who have resisted working together. Labour does not need to 'point out' anything, they need to get over themselves and have a genuine conversation. </p><p>Winston on the other hand would be hard to trust, but he managed to be on-board for the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 18:51:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346359#post346359</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346359#post346359</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You'd stick to your guns and just continue to refuse fleshing out the conflict zone, talking instead of the similarities and concessions that are not blockers to either group.</q></p><p>As I see it, Labour should be automatically doing that with Greens and NZFirst. Point out what similarities exist, then how…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 18:06:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346356#post346356</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346356#post346356</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is it possible to take a 2-pronged approach, where a Left strategy is pitched to the core base, and a Centre strategy is pitched to floating voters, without both prongs tripping each other up? Or are they mutually exclusive?</q></p><p>I think it's possible. You target each group with different emphasis…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 17:14:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346354#post346354</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346354#post346354</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Corbyn and Sanders are basically the Occupy/trade union candidates. Harawira and Dotcom tried, and failed, to do the same in NZ. I’m an avid politics follower, and even I’m having trouble thinking of an equivalent in the NZLP. Cunliffe and Little had the backing of the unions, but they’re not…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:11:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346353#post346353</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346353#post346353</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This whole analysis is so depressing, because it assumes the sole reason for the existence of the Labour party is to be elected.</q></p><p>Well, it's analysis that says being elected is vitally important to Labour, for sure. Which I don't think is false. </p><p>We've got 2 main points in contention:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:49:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam Bradford</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346344#post346344</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346344#post346344</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This whole analysis is so depressing, because it assumes the sole reason for the existence of the Labour party is to be elected.  Maybe it is.  I consider joining it sometimes, and then I remember it's run by indecipherable centrist robots who are terrified of disagreeing with anyone.  I really…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:23:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346341#post346341</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346341#post346341</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I enjoyed reading George Monbiot's article and would quickly add the following:</p><p>&ndash; I think the bar chart Rob provided is really important;</p><p>&ndash; the centre-left emphasises the way in which majoritarianism lends legitimacy to change. The tension between authenticity and the allegedly compromised character of the centre-left is too…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:14:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>AMBSmith</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346338#post346338</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346338#post346338</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Corbyn is the only one offering policy for late-stage capitalism in the 21st century. Quantitative easing for the people instead of bank bailouts has some significant support <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/aug/19/corbynomics-why-we-should-take-it-seriously" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/aug/19/corbynomics-why-we-should-take-it-seriously</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:49:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346337#post346337</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346337#post346337</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well, I've got skin in the game directly, since I'm in the UK, and was enthused enough about Corbyn/Watson (and disgusted enough by the alternatives) to pay my three quid and cast a vote.  And it's the first time I've actually felt enthused about 'The Mainstream' for years.</p><p>Anyone thinking…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 21:23:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346336#post346336</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346336#post346336</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>when it lasts longer, it helps more poor, oppressed, exploited people. That’s why Working for Families is better than a UBI and high marginal taxes – it’s broadly popular enough that the right can’t afford to undo it</q><br />Hi Rob. I'm genuinely curious &ndash; do you think WWF is in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 20:47:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Lyall</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346335#post346335</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346335#post346335</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm not sure the situation in the UK is a 100% fit for NZ since we have PR. In the 2014 election if people didn't think that Labour is far enough left then they had the option of voting for the Greens or Mana.</p><p>Also if people don't think National…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 19:48:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346322#post346322</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346322#post346322</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think that there are three main reasons why people vote for right-wing parties at the moment:</p><p>a: the flood of propaganda in the media, not just Mike Hoskins style blatant partisanship, but the more insidious narrative of division that we are continuously fed, even from ostensibly liberal sources (imaginary…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:45:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346320#post346320</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346320#post346320</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You do realise that the Conservative Party just won a general election with an absolute majority, right?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:19:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346309#post346309</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346309#post346309</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not that I'm suggesting a Corbyn-led Labour Party would win the next General Election. The moment he takes the leadership, the MSM and the bulk of the PLP will wage war on him (hell, it's already happening as we speak). But then, neither Burnham or Cooper are likely to take…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:07:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346308#post346308</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346308#post346308</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<strong>Nick Russell</strong> __"...he is promising to wind the clock back to Labour's 1983 manifesto, the longest suicide note in history...This seems to appeal mainly to people who were not around in 1983 and who think that the voting public secretly yearn to renationalise the railways, abandon nuclear weapons etc ......…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:35:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346307#post346307</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346307#post346307</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The political landscape if framed by the sustainability debate. Labour I would put at somewhere around the Brundtland approach (fence sitting between status quo and reform) and National in the neoliberal camp (firmly status quo). Neither (at the moment) strike me as transformative in nature..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:29:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346305#post346305</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346305#post346305</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Rob</strong> <em>"How have centre-left parties gone when they've tacked</em> away <em>from the centre ?.....it goes badly"</em><br />and<br /><em>"declining centre-left fortunes when its narrative swings left.."</em><br />and<br /><em>"the centre-ground really is where elections are won and lost"</em><br />and<br />__"pulling the centre back towards the left is massively, massively hard. You win…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:20:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346304#post346304</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346304#post346304</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think the only way Labour and the SNP will ever enter into a long-term coalition is if Labour essentially gives up in Scotland, like the Conservatives have.  As long as Labour aspires to win Scottish seats in Westminster, it must fight the SNP.  That's FPP for you.  That doesn't…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:09:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346303#post346303</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346303#post346303</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I consider WFF to be more like an employer subsidy than anything else, shifting the cost of a fair wage on to other taxpayers. <br />Employers should be paying a living wage.<br />A lot of research points to higher wages at the lower end creating more growth in the economy through…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:59:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346302#post346302</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346302#post346302</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don’t see how you work that out. <br />Tories 330 – 1 in Scotland<br />Labour 232 &ndash; 1 in Scotland<br />SNP 56</p><p>If Labour had done better in England, they could have chosen to bury the hatchet with the SNP and form a government, or sulk in opposition to a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:55:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346301#post346301</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346301#post346301</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Which is not to say that I disagree with your main thrust here, Rob. I just don't think it's something that one can generalize about. Which is why I don't agree with Tom either. It seems to me that both strategies are always on the table. If you break the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:52:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346300#post346300</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346300#post346300</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>What is happening in England right now is in some ways a replay of the Scottish independence referendum. The intervention of the English establishment politicised Scotland and while the referendum failed, the dominant establishment party – Labour – was routed and it increasingly looks like a Phyrric victory. Corbyn could…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:49:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346299#post346299</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346299#post346299</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don’t really care how radical or not radical the change is, I care how long it lasts.</q></p><p>I care how <em>good</em> it is. I don't want either radical or long lasting change if they're for the worse.</p><p><q>That’s why Working for Families is better than a UBI and high…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:42:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346298#post346298</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346298#post346298</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Check out this story in the Financial Times that talks about his support base:</q></p><p>Paywalled, unfortunately. But you snipped the bit that's the evidence? I can't say I have any feel for how amazing getting 5,000 volunteers is in a country of 64 million people. That it was unexpected doesn't…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:33:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346297#post346297</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346297#post346297</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you think it is too hard, get out of the way and find someone more interested in trying.</q><br />…spotted in Venice.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:31:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Salmond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346295#post346295</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346295#post346295</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Let’s start with your proposed purpose for Labour, which I think you’ve got half right. My changes are in CAPS, and basically delete “radical” and insert “lasting:”</p><p><q> The purpose of the Labour party is to be a vehicle of LASTING change, to stand for something that gives hope to the…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:13:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Katharine Moody</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346294#post346294</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346294#post346294</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My reading of it is that Sanders and Corbyn are both appealing to anti-globalist sentiments &ndash; they are rejecting today's dominant ideology of globalization;</p><p><a href="http://mams.rmit.edu.au/es4cefpg6ifj1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://mams.rmit.edu.au/es4cefpg6ifj1.pdf</a></p><p>I heard Sanders mention his rejection of the military-industrial complex in the US, for example, and he supported that assertion by pointing out his No…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:07:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346293#post346293</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346293#post346293</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Semmens is the left wing. He has rejected the position of centre forward many times.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:56:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346289#post346289</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346289#post346289</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						More to the point, democracy in the West is less likely to go down in a hail of bombs and bullets, than it is to rot slowly from within.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 02:26:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346288#post346288</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346288#post346288</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Tom Semmens <strong>1</strong> .....     Rob Salmond <strong>0</strong><br />(Brilliant, eloquent, hard-hitting strike by Centre-Forward, Semmens, from his own side of half-way &ndash; straight into the back of the net)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:27:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346286#post346286</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346286#post346286</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Similar story in the US. Enthusiasntic support for Sanders almost organising itself.<br /><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/bernie-sanders-rallies-2016-grassroots-support-121512.html?cmpid=sf#ixzz3jG4mIbhu" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/bernie-sanders-rallies-2016-grassroots-support-121512.html?cmpid=sf#ixzz3jG4mIbhu</a><br />I think both candidates are less concerned with winning the next election than with saying what they feel needs to be said, changing the conversation,  addressing the elephants stomping on the furniture, shitting all over the floor…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:37:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346285#post346285</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346285#post346285</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Tony Blair and Bill Clinton were very astute politicians...</q><br />Blair and the Clintons have another thing in common &ndash; they both despise anyone from outside their familiar networks of vested interests as political amateurs. On the evidence of his contributions here, Rob Salmond's pretty comfy with that world view.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:29:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346284#post346284</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346284#post346284</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Danyl offers some <a href="https://dimpost.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/variations-on-the-same-old-theme/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">relevant reckons</a>.</p><p><q>This pattern of left-wing centrists adopting ‘strategic values’ because ‘that’s what voters want’, and then getting annihilated because of total political ineptitude is becoming a depressingly familiar trend. There’s a cargo-cult mentality to it, I think. ‘Bill Clinton and Tony Blair were centrists’, the reasoning…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:16:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346283#post346283</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346283#post346283</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The actual destruction of democracy only really happens when free voting is prevented. That might not even be needed by oligarchs controlling the system, if low participation does the job for them all by itself. But it could always leap back into action with sufficiently motivating causes. Only if the…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:12:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346282#post346282</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346282#post346282</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>190,000 since the 2015 general election according to the guardian – that was at 9 August. </q></p><p>You are flat wrong.<q> <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/15/jeremy-corbyn-world-supporters-mentors-influences" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The polls may be wrong</a> (YouGov has Corbyn on 57% of the Labour electorate) and the 400,000 people who have swelled the number eligible to vote in Labour’s leadership to…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:19:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346278#post346278</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346278#post346278</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And here's some of the reaction to recent NZ Labour positioning, with usual caveats about single polls rather than trends. Seems even racists want to feel confident their interests will be represented competently. <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/71308270/national-jumps-to-outright-majority-in-latest-roy-morgan-poll" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/71308270/national-jumps-to-outright-majority-in-latest-roy-morgan-poll</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:06:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346277#post346277</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346277#post346277</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you think it is too hard, get out of the way and find someone more interested in trying.</q></p><p>This.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:03:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346276#post346276</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346276#post346276</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What Alex said. Centre is a really poor and unhelpful expression.</p><p>Also, if it's so hard to move the centre against whatever objective yardstick we choose, what enabled the right to do it in the last 30 years?</p><p>In fact I don't like this metaphor of "pulling people toward you"…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:47:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alex Coleman</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346274#post346274</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346274#post346274</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Clarity is always a good quality in a politician. Saying what they’re for, and saying why they’re for it in simple, accessible language, are cornerstones of good political communication. But you can have clarity, and be competent, no matter where you stand on the ideological spectrum. “Clear” does not mean…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:16:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>KiwiBarnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346273#post346273</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346273#post346273</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Right on the money!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:05:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>KiwiBarnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346272#post346272</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346272#post346272</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"Here are some of the best, clearest centre-left communicators in modern political history. Clinton and Obama in the US, Lange in New Zealand, Hawke and Keating in Australia, Blair in the UK. Clear communicators, all. Politically competent, all. Hard left? None"  </p><p>Politically competent maybe but that does not equate to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:02:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>william blake</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346268#post346268</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346268#post346268</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I used to have a room with a wonderful family and Don used to run a large successful electrical company. He was always saying that under Muldoon having more than half the country employed by the state was a recipie for disaster. He had a good point. He also said…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:57:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346264#post346264</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346264#post346264</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Also, I really doubt you will ever have a radical popular left.  I'd have thought it would have to be one or the other...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:47:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346263#post346263</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346263#post346263</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Maybe Corbyn does sound old fashioned to baby boomers and gen xers, but he doesn’t to the under 35s who are lapping up the first ideologically coherent voice of hope on the UK left they’ve ever heard.</q></p><p>I'd feel a lot more hopeful about that if you had some evidence.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:46:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346262#post346262</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346262#post346262</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Pitching for the youth vote in this day and age is a waste of time.  There are too few of them and they don't turn out to vote.  Danyl McLauchlan has blogged on this point repeatedly and he is right.  Admittedly that was in the NZ context but I would…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:44:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346260#post346260</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346260#post346260</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>One definition of insanity is said to be doing the same thing and expecting a different result.</q></p><p>And how has the same worked out for UK Labour the last few elections? Like I said, times change. This site is full of forty and fifty somethings who grew up knowing a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:32:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346259#post346259</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346259#post346259</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>At what point does declining interest and popular disgust at tweedle dum tweedle dee parliamentary neoliberalism destroy democracy itself?</q></p><p>I think the sad answer to that, Tom, is "at no point". Democracy is not a single system with highly specific institutions and a binary level of satisfaction. You could argue…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:30:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346258#post346258</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346258#post346258</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This is an old discussion, of course. But it's good to have it in one place here, otherwise we just end up having it everywhere.</p><p>I think the most fraught part of it is that the moving goalposts means that discussion is always comparing apples and oranges. Because Left and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:23:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346257#post346257</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346257#post346257</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>UK Labour (possibly in coalition with the LibDems) would almost certainly have won in 1983 if it had not been for the Falklands War, or if the Argentines had won said war:</p><p><a href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/voting-intention-1979-1983" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/voting-intention-1979-1983</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:13:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346256#post346256</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346256#post346256</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>400,000 people have joined up to support Corbyn.</q></p><p>190,000 since the 2015 general election according to the <a href="guardian">guardian</a> &ndash; that was at 9 August.  Mostly union members.  Look, this is great and all, but it reminds me of the Milifans before the last general election.  They formed a lovely little…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:07:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346255#post346255</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346255#post346255</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The other thing I’d like to point out is declining participation in politics and in voting, something which 400,000 new UK Labour party members tells me is entirely due to “centrism”, will eventually lead to a crisis of democracy itself. At what point does a ’democratically” elected government lose it’s…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:05:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346254#post346254</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346254#post346254</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That's probably the best post of yours I've ever read on here, Tom.</q></p><p>If you had a lifestyle block and Mr Semmens strayed onto it you wouldn't shoot him any more than I would.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:58:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346253#post346253</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346253#post346253</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>(claps)</p><p>That's probably the best post of yours I've ever read on here, Tom.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:52:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346252#post346252</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346252#post346252</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hmmm, this is meant to be a reply to Rob, not anyone else…</p><p>First, actually let’s not consider the alternative. Let’s first consider where clinging to the “centre” has got the anglosphere Labour parties. Look at the UK – Kendall. Blair. Mandelson. Cooper. UKIP hosing up their traditional working class…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:47:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346251#post346251</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346251#post346251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As those things are eroded, or disappear, at the same time as a class of super-wealthy has emerged, it’s not ridiculous to think redistribution of wealth is part of the answer. <br />Is that ‘old school class warrior’ talk? Or stating the obvious?</q></p><p>And sadly today's hyper-class can opt out of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:39:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346250#post346250</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346250#post346250</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They could do worse than to look to Iceland for a least worst solution.</q><br />We hope. Even Zimbabwe might offer a few lessons. Because this imaginatively bankrupt where-Britain-goes-we-go hiding to nowhere passed its use-by date around a couple of generations ago.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:38:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346249#post346249</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346249#post346249</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The question for the NZ left’s leaders is thus not what policies they favour just now, but what they’d do about a banking collapse / house price crash / Fonterra bankruptcy etc.</q></p><p>They could do worse than to look to Iceland for a least worst solution.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:29:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346248#post346248</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346248#post346248</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						1945? Attlee could have gone to the electorate on a platform of similar policies to Churchill, keeping the mines and railways in private hands, no social security, no free education, hanging on in India as long as possible, etc.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:16:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346247#post346247</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346247#post346247</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The left in Britain has a long and painful history of arguing that the voters don’t know what is good for them and will eventually see the light etc.</q></p><p>TPPA anyone?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:16:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346246#post346246</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346246#post346246</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>How did he deliver different policies to those which John Major would have pursued in those years? If anything Major might have been less likely to ally himself with the United States’ most extreme right president since the 1930s to take part in an illegal war? Or to criminalise teenagers…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:09:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346245#post346245</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346245#post346245</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Also, can I ask a question of Nick (and anyone else of that alignment)? Why, if you think that broadly centre-right policies are a good idea, do you support Labour? Why not just vote/join/support National?</p><p>(I'm not snarking, this is a genuine question that I'd like to hear answers to?)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:03:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346243#post346243</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346243#post346243</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>To clarify, I referred to the Wilson/Callaghan governments perceived failures in the 1970s, and the subsequent election of Thatcher.</p><p><q>Blair won 3 straight general elections</q></p><p>How did he deliver different policies to those which John Major would have pursued in those years? If anything Major might have been less likely…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:55:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346241#post346241</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346241#post346241</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don't buy the "Labour failed" argument at all.  Blair won 3 straight general elections.  Name me another Labour leader who did that.</p><p>The real failure is the succession of Labour leaders who each went down in a hail of ideologically correct bullets.  But that's the left for you.  Better…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:45:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346239#post346239</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346239#post346239</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I grew up in England in the late 70s and early 80s.</q></p><p>So did I. I got a free university education, just as one thing I wouldn't get today.</p><p>Sure, it wasn't the easiest place to become very rich, but the working and middle classes were somewhat better off than…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:35:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346238#post346238</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346238#post346238</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>With respect to the graph you present it conflates political views with actual voting patterns. I understand there is quite a lot of concern that many of the 7% that haven’t turned out NZ after 1999 election are those on the left who don’t have anything to vote for. This…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:30:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346237#post346237</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346237#post346237</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In my view, for as long as the currently perceived benign economic and political environment continues, Labour won't win an election.</p><p>Received wisdom is that there is no support for their moving to the left.<br />It's unlikely, given ACT's poor showing, that they could usefully move back to the Roger…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:29:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346236#post346236</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346236#post346236</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Somehow 2015 doesn’t feel like the 1980s. Different times call for different solutions</q></p><p>Corbyn isn't offering new solutions.  He is a fossil.  As far as I can see he is promising to wind the clock back to Labour's 1983 manifesto, aka the longest suicide note in political history (copyright G…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:27:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346234#post346234</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346234#post346234</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>How did UK Labour break out of this funk? Tony Blair.</p><p>Not exactly – </p><p>This makes the presumption that no one else would have been electable at the time.  Given 17 years of Tory rule there was a lot of anything but a Tory will do.  Failures in the previous…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:23:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>llew40</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346230#post346230</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346230#post346230</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Small family footnote: our Dad &ndash; a coal mining engineer whose own dad was a red-ragger who marched &ndash; was asked to stand for Labour in the local south Wales electorate. He declined and Neil Kinnock ended up accepting the nomination.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:19:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346229#post346229</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346229#post346229</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Blair also won because those Tories who weren’t self destructing were hanging themselves in women’s underwear.</q></p><p>Well they weren't killing themselves doing so...I'm not that presumptuous about what goes on in the privacy of one's own home.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:17:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346225#post346225</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346225#post346225</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the question might be whether someone perceived as an old-school class warrior is the best person to address late-stage capitalism in the 21st century.</q><br />People tend to forget how much we owe to socialism. Public health, progressive taxation, free education, everyone either employed, independently wealthy, or begging on the streets.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:06:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346222#post346222</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346222#post346222</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Of course the right of Labour seems right-wing. It is. Broad church, etc.</p><p>Little has said Labour will keep trial periods. Clark presided over 9 years of widening the gap between wages and benefit payments.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:50:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346221#post346221</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346221#post346221</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Somehow 2015 doesn’t feel like the 1980s. Different times call for different solutions. </q></p><p>I guess the question might be whether someone perceived as an old-school class warrior is the best person to address late-stage capitalism in the 21st century.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:49:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>keeaa</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346220#post346220</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346220#post346220</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Nope, right-wing. Try again.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:48:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346219#post346219</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346219#post346219</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What policies reside there, if any?</q></p><p>90-day employment trial periods, for instance. Not increasing benefit levels, for another.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:44:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346218#post346218</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346218#post346218</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I wouldn't be making a local case based on first-past-post UK. Or on elections where the voters happened to deliver viable coalition numbers for Labour and parties to its right. </p><p>Coalition might go to the left this time &ndash; if Labour can pull its weight, and Winston doesn't slime back…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:41:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Wildo</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346217#post346217</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346217#post346217</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Blair also won because those Tories who weren't self destructing were hanging themselves in women's underwear.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:38:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346216#post346216</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346216#post346216</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I think with Corbyn we are back at (a). </q><br />Somehow 2015 doesn't feel like the 1980s. Different times call for different solutions.  <br />The economic challenges and the societies we live in have changed massively. Much of that change has been a move to the right. That's led to many things…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:34:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346215#post346215</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-in-defence-of-the-centre/?p=346215#post346215</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Monbiot also said- <br /><q>The middle ground is a magic mountain that retreats as you approach. The more you chase it from the left, the further to the right it moves.</q><br />And <br /><q>What is attractive about a party prepared to abandon its core values for the prospect of electoral gain? What…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:23:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
