<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Speaker: Gender quotas (and helping journalists with their maths)</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=380157#post380157</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=380157#post380157</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						While the ethnic makeup of the people in the article’s photo provides some indication as to the shortcomings of this type of non-intersectional “gender diversity” – this <a href="https://twitter.com/DanaVivianWhite/status/1047181969359065089" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">tweet</a> couplet brings the conversation right up to date.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:08:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=380143#post380143</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=380143#post380143</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"When the London School of Economics investigated the use of quotas they found that they did not result in unqualified women being appointed. They found that the bar was lifted, not lowered, because the people who were missing out were mediocre men."
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sept 2018 21:24:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=380142#post380142</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=380142#post380142</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="https://www.perthnow.com.au/opinion/conrad-liveris-gender-targets-and-quotas-improve-business-and-politics-ng-b88966685z?utm_campaign=share-icons&amp;utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;tid=1537833342722" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vindication</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sept 2018 21:23:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brent Jackson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=301563#post301563</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=301563#post301563</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I guess they're doing a miniscule bit to help the under-representation of woman in the other parties.</p><p>But I too would favour the 1-2-2-2... approach.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:24:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=301523#post301523</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=301523#post301523</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Peter: The Green party list alternates male / female right from the top. </q></p><p>I’ve long thought that the Green Party, in order to be fair to both men and women, should alternate its list like serving in a tennis tie-breaker: e.g. one woman, two men, two women, two men etc…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:42:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Withers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=301522#post301522</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=301522#post301522</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Peter: The Green party list alternates male / female right from the top. As they do not win any local seats the result is 50/50 for gender if Green MPs are even in number and only out slightly if the number of MPs is not even. Their list is also…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:07:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Withers</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=301520#post301520</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=301520#post301520</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I gave Gower the benefit of the doubt for quite a while, but now he’s been moved to my  to my “Duncan Garner Response Protocol”. </p><p>Turn the volume down until over, or change the channel or turn the TV off and do something useful.  </p><p>I did see that story about…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:00:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Felix Marwick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300576#post300576</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300576#post300576</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don’t know how we are supposed to judge the ‘merit’ of MPs, but the Green Party puts a lot of women in parliament. How do they do it?</q></p><p>I believe the Greens operate a 60-40 rule. MPs of either gender will constitute no more than 60 percent of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:30:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300415#post300415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300415#post300415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Spreadsheet had one scenario. 40% party vote in 2014, followed by 42% party vote in 2017. I think I made a pretty good historical argument for why a 40% party vote was unlikely.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:16:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300414#post300414</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300414#post300414</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If we're going levity, then I for one welcome our new Female Overlords.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 23:19:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300413#post300413</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300413#post300413</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I needed some levity.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 23:13:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300398#post300398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300398#post300398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks for enlightening me. So elections are a male construct? ... time it was taken over
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:36:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Calder</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300393#post300393</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300393#post300393</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Paddy Gower is to political reporting what Glasgow skinheads are to street theatre ...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:15:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300376#post300376</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300376#post300376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Of course, the Greens are list-only in their representation, so don’t have the complications of electorate MPs (who are predominantly male) to consider. Which is why Labour can’t rely on adopting a similar, pretty simple measure to ensure gender equality.</q></p><p>It's only a matter of time before that has to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:08:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300374#post300374</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300374#post300374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think it’s because they actually treat women as people.</q></p><p>Well, they have always (I think) run a "zipped list" &ndash; alternating female/male/female/male (and then also considering other matters such as ethnicity, etc in the overall individual rankings). Which guarantees at least 50% women representing the party &ndash; which in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:59:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300371#post300371</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300371#post300371</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don’t know how we are supposed to judge the ‘merit’ of MPs, but the Green Party puts a lot of women in parliament. How do they do it?</q></p><p>I think it's because they actually treat women as people.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:39:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300369#post300369</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300369#post300369</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						But he'd still be a dickhead.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:34:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Graham</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300368#post300368</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300368#post300368</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Another argument I considered including, but left out for length, is this: please show me an organisation that claims to select on merit and actually does.</q></p><p>I don't know how we are supposed to judge the 'merit' of MPs, but the Green Party puts a lot of women in parliament.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300366#post300366</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300366#post300366</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> their “decisiveness”, their “strength”, their “determination”, etc, etc</q></p><p>I do like those qualities. Hell, they're strongly evident in my household of three women, one man. How about 'empathy', 'intelligence' and 'open mindedness' for additions. Judith Collins displayed none of them in the House today or yesterday...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:21:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300364#post300364</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300364#post300364</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Also, Parliament is a House of Representatives, not the ‘House of the smartest’ or the ‘House of those with the most power’. It currently isn’t representative of women, and by a large number.</q></p><p>This. More than anything else on this thread.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:34:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300361#post300361</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300361#post300361</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think the methodology is wrong there. There are never the same two teams being played and while the history contributes to the mythology it is not as predictive as you might think.  Especially in the MMP era where I'm a Labour party supporter but I keep voting Green because…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:21:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300360#post300360</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300360#post300360</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I dunno, tricky with his head already up his arse.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:19:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300359#post300359</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300359#post300359</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Again, it seems obvious to me that a lawyer's training is not one that best equips you for statistical analysis.</p><p>Just because we respect your legal capability does not mean we have to extend that to other areas of expertise.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:18:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300358#post300358</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300358#post300358</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bless you for all that work. But you will see that the spreadsheet includes a lot of scenarios, not simply the one you picked to critique.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:16:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300355#post300355</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300355#post300355</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I can imagine John Tamihere is seriously thinking about gender reassignment already...<br />(I mean, how hard could it be, right?)</q><br />Going on JT's past form it'd be a piece of piss. All you need to do is move one body part from the back to the front.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:01:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300353#post300353</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300353#post300353</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Rachel and Stephen are definitely right on "oh no teh demotion of menz" issue. But it's also true that, over the long term, we can't rely on the list to balance out an imbalanced electorate caucus, and that's (one reason) why chucking female only selections under the bus was an…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:47:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300351#post300351</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300351#post300351</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Having said that, while I think Labour’s move is an admirable one, we shouldn’t fool ourselves that it is going to be easy in practice. It requires a couple of tricky judgment calls:</q></p><p>I'm curious as to how they do it practically, but in reality in terms of end results,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:25:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300350#post300350</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300350#post300350</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Are our political expectations heavily differentiated by gender? </q></p><p>What I meant to say is that if you look back over the history of representation in NZ (and elsewhere), the sort of qualities that are thought to make a "good" candidate are things that men (on the whole) are more likely…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:19:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rachel Boyack</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300347#post300347</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300347#post300347</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						RoO, you've started to stray into the other argument I have about the 45 and 50%, which is the right of women in the Party to organise. I'm a trade unionist by day (and night!), and we acknowledge the power imbalance between workers and employers, so we organise, collectively. It's…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:56:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300346#post300346</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300346#post300346</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And we know – because history is good at telling us some things – that what it is people look for in political candidates is deeply gendered in nature, irrespective of how hard they try to correct for it.</q></p><p>Are our political expectations heavily differentiated by gender? Intuitively, I'm inclined…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:55:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300345#post300345</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300345#post300345</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The Oakland Athletics?</q></p><p>Nope. They select to a formula that advantages less meritorious individuals on the basis of mathematical percentages. Not the same thing at all.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:52:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300343#post300343</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300343#post300343</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We ended up with elections, I guess, because at some stage, we realised having hereditary rulers was a crock</q></p><p>We ended up with elections because a faction amongst those in power thought (correctly) that they could advance and cement their position by enlisting the less powerful in support:<br />&ndash; Colonial…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:45:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300342#post300342</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300342#post300342</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>May we compromise on “lesser”?</q></p><p>The lesser MPs are the ones in danger of demotion.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:44:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300341#post300341</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300341#post300341</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						At times like this I wish PAS had a +1 or favourite button, because I would mash it on Andrew's comment so hard.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:41:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300339#post300339</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300339#post300339</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Graeme's example proves the limits of the "only choose on merit" argument in relation to political candidates.</p><p>The A's were able to do what they did because:<br />(1) Baseball has defined rules that clearly establish the objectives of the game &ndash; you must score more runs than your opponents to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:29:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300329#post300329</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300329#post300329</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Organisations in the political domain?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:34:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300322#post300322</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300322#post300322</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>please show me an organisation that claims to select on merit and actually does.</q></p><p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moneyball" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Oakland Athletics</a>?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:11:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300319#post300319</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300319#post300319</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Great thread/discussion. I'm a Labour member like others here, but far from active as I don't live in NZ. I noted the development and the commentary but wanted to learn more, which I most certainly have here. Thanks all. It seems the issue is not the merits of the approach,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:01:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300317#post300317</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300317#post300317</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						With some hurried lunchtime calculations. Taking only the general election election results (so assuming current polling, and the actions of the party, doesn't actually matter), and abusing a loess line into something of a straight regression so I can extend it, we set the centre of the range of likely…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:39:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300313#post300313</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300313#post300313</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>so to counter this you introduce a policy to select on merit only AFTER you have been selected on the basis of your gender?</q></p><p>My remark about how organisations that claim to select purely on merit don't shouldn't be taken as mere snark. It is very hard to do in…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:21:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rachel Boyack</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300312#post300312</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300312#post300312</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>There is international evidence that in a job interview, if you have the following candidates: a) assertive man b) passive man c) assertive woman d)  passive woman, the following is the likely order of being hired:</p><p>Assertive man<br />Passive man<br />Passive woman<br />Assertive woman</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:06:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300311#post300311</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300311#post300311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>please show me an organisation that claims to select on merit and actually does</q></p><p>It seems to me that the selection process in jobs is rather like democracy generally, in that one of the principle aims is to actually keep out the really bad candidates, rather than to ensure the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:03:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rachel Boyack</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300310#post300310</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300310#post300310</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yep, that's why we will work off the "effective list", which takes those Electorate seats into account. We will have a reasonably good idea of which seats we will win and which we won't. Looking at the the Electorate seats we lost, 21 candidates from those 48 seats were women.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:56:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>flash</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300309#post300309</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300309#post300309</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>please show me an organisation that claims to select on merit and actually does</q></p><p>so to counter this you introduce a policy to select on merit only AFTER you have been selected on the basis of your gender?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:55:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>flash</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300308#post300308</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300308#post300308</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Okay, I’ve done the quantitative. Now to take issue with the qualitative.</p><p><br />Men: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J<br />Women: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J</p><p>An equal selection looks like this:</p><p>Men: A B C D E <br />Women: A B C…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:51:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300307#post300307</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300307#post300307</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Competent men and women, folks. Competency comes first.</q><br />We ended up with elections, I guess, because at some stage, we realised having hereditary rulers was a crock. They pandered to their own self interest, the rest of us could eat shit, or so it seemed, to a lot of them.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:48:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300306#post300306</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300306#post300306</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Another argument I considered including, but left out for length, is this: please show me an organisation that claims to select on merit <strong>and actually does</strong>. I have yet to see one. Sexism is systemic and structural. So to suggest "just select on merit" elides the very real difficulties in…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:42:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300305#post300305</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300305#post300305</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>hidden genders...</strong><br /><q>May we compromise on “lesser”?</q><br />phew, er...<br />or leave it as "laissez-faire" even...<br />;- )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:33:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300304#post300304</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300304#post300304</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>When you assume an increase of PV on 2011 (even a 6 point increase based on where we are now), and the requirement for 45% women, the maths doesn’t deliver any demotions.</q></p><p>Except it may require that if you select a disproportionate number of men to contest electorate races (after…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:24:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300301#post300301</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300301#post300301</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Okay, I’ve done the quantitative. Now to take issue with the qualitative.</p><p><q>Men:     A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J<br />Women:     A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J</p><p>An equal selection looks like this:</p><p>Men:     A B C D E <br />Women:     A B C…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:12:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rachel Boyack</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300300#post300300</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300300#post300300</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Graeme, yes, I popped the figures for a 34% and 38% PV up earlier. Ben Wilson makes the point that the 2005 National result came off their worst result in 2002, and I've made an assumption that our PV will lift significantly from 2011 to 2014 based on a…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:11:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300297#post300297</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300297#post300297</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Oh please! Fewer male MPs. :-) #oneupmanship</q></p><p>May we compromise on "lesser"?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:45:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tristan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300296#post300296</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300296#post300296</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>While it's nice to tie the next election to an election in 1922 (and onwards) I don't think its very relevant. The MMP elections I think are more so and from those I see there can be big changes for both parties between elections.</p><p>I expect that the margin between…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:41:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300295#post300295</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300295#post300295</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But that doesn’t necessarily mean there will be less male MPs than presently </q></p><p>Oh please! <strong>Fewer</strong> male MPs. :-) #oneupmanship</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:40:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300294#post300294</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300294#post300294</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I freely grant you're right in the sense that every new party list is likely to see some sitting MPs fare poorly.</q></p><p>Well, not if you just rank your sitting MPs as 1-34 on the party list (as has happened in the past).</p><p>But that cheap and completely unnecessary display…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:37:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300292#post300292</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300292#post300292</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Aunty government...</strong><br /><q>Surely we want THUNDERDOME</q><br />Run by a woman, IIRC....</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:33:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>AdamPope</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300291#post300291</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300291#post300291</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>To use Stephen's example on Rachel's math, we'll just give the kids a bigger cake. Johnny gets a bigger slice even as it's only half this time... </p><p>Sorry, Rachel, I'm picking at a crumb there when the menu fills me with joy; still a long way to go mind...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:28:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300290#post300290</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300290#post300290</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>be careful what you wish for...</strong><br />I can imagine John Tamihere is seriously thinking about gender reassignment already...<br />(I mean, how hard could it be, right?)</p><p>;-  )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:28:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300289#post300289</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300289#post300289</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> just used the result pages and a calculator.</q></p><p>Good enough, thanks for the links</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:26:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300288#post300288</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300288#post300288</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Don't make me test this assumption by going over past lists! </q></p><p>but will it be a statistically significant number of demotions compared to prior to the policy. Since there are more men, the raw number of men likely to be demoted is likely to be higher than the raw number…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:24:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300286#post300286</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300286#post300286</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    Hunger Games whatever.</p><p>Write me a one-pager and I’ll get it into NZOn Air. I think we’re onto a winner.</q></p><p>Surely we want THUNDERDOME. Two men enter &ndash; one man leave.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:20:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300285#post300285</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300285#post300285</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Graeme, do you have a quick source to the time series you used for this?</q></p><p>I'm afraid you'll probably have to assemble it yourself. I just used the result pages and a calculator.</p><p><a href="http://www.elections.org.nz/events/past-events/general-elections-1890-1993" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.elections.org.nz/events/past-events/general-elections-1890-1993</a></p><p>and</p><p><a href="http://electionresults.govt.nz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://electionresults.govt.nz/</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:18:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300283#post300283</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300283#post300283</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Don’t make me test this assumption by going over past lists! I am prepared to have a bet with you, Russell, that the 2011 Labour Party list will include list-ranking demotions for multiple (two or more?) male Labour MPs.</q></p><p>I freely grant you're right in the sense that every new…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:13:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300282#post300282</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300282#post300282</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>we can look to history</q></p><p>Graeme, do you have a quick source to the time series you used for this? I'd like to play along at home (or at least during my lunch hour) and am hoping not to have to spend the time to assemble it myself.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:09:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300279#post300279</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300279#post300279</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>To justify an assumption of multiple demotions of male MPs, you need to assume</q></p><p>Don't make me test this assumption by going over past lists! I am prepared to have a bet with you, Russell, that the 2011 Labour Party list will include list-ranking demotions for multiple (two or more?)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:04:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300278#post300278</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300278#post300278</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Don Brash achieved a monumental turn-around for National in 2005 (an ~87% increase in vote share).</q></p><p>Yes, off the back of the worst election result for National, ever. Which is where Labour is right now. Well, worst result for Labour since National was created, anyway, so it's the same time…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:00:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300277#post300277</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300277#post300277</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Perhaps you would like to redo your numbers based on that, and show us what would happen if Labour got ~37.5% of the vote at the upcoming election. Otherwise, I’m pretty sure most of us will assume this was simply an example of partisan hackery.</p><p>edit: that took longer than…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:59:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300276#post300276</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300276#post300276</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But I didn’t see Paddy’s statement as being that incorrect. If you take the party list as it is now and apply the new policy, you will see a shifting of positions. I don’t think calling those demotions is that misleading. </q></p><p>Um, but it is, because the new policy won’t…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:57:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300273#post300273</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300273#post300273</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Your analysis is based on an assumption that a two-term Labour opposition will increase its vote share by 45.6%. In assessing whether this is likely, we can look to history to see how common it is for two-term Labour oppositions to achieve such a turn-around.</p><p>Two-term Labour oppositions have contested…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:53:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lew Stoddart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300272#post300272</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300272#post300272</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Write me a one-pager and I'll get it into NZOn Air. I think we're onto a winner.</q></p><p>Paddy would make an outstanding presenter for this show. "Do you have the support to survive another night at #37? Are you concerned John Tamihere will shank you for your  spot?" </p><p>L</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:50:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300271#post300271</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300271#post300271</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So, your objection is that</q></p><p>Just to be clear &ndash; I don't have any objection to the policy whatsoever.  And even if I did I usually defer to the sentiment that Craig just detailed: it's their game, so it's their rules.</p><p>But I didn't see Paddy's statement as being that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:43:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300270#post300270</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300270#post300270</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But if you think that somehow quotas mean that incompetent women will be promoted ahead of competent men, then you will need to say, to my face,(or on-line will do), that I’m incompetent.</q></p><p>Frankly, I think you can look at any government &ndash; central or local, foreign or domestic -…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:42:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300269#post300269</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300269#post300269</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hunger Games whatever.</q></p><p>Write me a one-pager and I'll get it into NZOn Air. I think we're onto a winner.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:41:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300268#post300268</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300268#post300268</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for the shout out, Stephen.</p><p>For the record, I'm sticking my hand up to be a candidate for Labour at the next election.  I'll look for a list position, and I'm also running for selection in Rangitikei, because there's plenty of party vote to be had there.</p><p>Would anyone…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:34:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300266#post300266</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300266#post300266</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I like a lot of voters, I as guessing, don’t see any problem with what labour is doing, quite the opposite in fact, equality benefits us all</q></p><p>And even if you don't like it, tough titty.  Labour (like every other party) gets to select  its candidates however it sees fit.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:25:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300265#post300265</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300265#post300265</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It seems appropriate to link to the new free online data journalism course on next year<br /><a href="http://datadrivenjournalism.net/news_and_analysis/Data_Journalism_Handbook_Creators_Announce_Online_Data_Journalism_Course" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://datadrivenjournalism.net/news_and_analysis/Data_Journalism_Handbook_Creators_Announce_Online_Data_Journalism_Course</a><br />(as seen on StatsChat)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:21:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rachel Boyack</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300264#post300264</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300264#post300264</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hi everyone, thanks for the feedback so far. Yes, I have assumed an increase in the PV for Labour and the resulting numbers in Caucus. I think it's a given we will get a higher PV. Currently, Roy Morgan has us at 33.5% which would still deliver an increase of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:20:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300263#post300263</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300263#post300263</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You cannot fancy pants the maths to get around this.</q></p><p>So, your objection is that, while no current male MPs will suffer (the news story in the question) new MPs (and both sexes will be equally qualified to be there) are statistically more likely to reflect what the general population…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:18:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300261#post300261</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300261#post300261</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I agree with the policy, but also agree that the example is self-serving and will play into Paddy Gower’s hands by starting at 40% and increasing from there.</q></p><p>See the top line of the spreadsheet, assuming a 27.48% Party Vote.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:10:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300260#post300260</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300260#post300260</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks for the great post, Rachel and Stephen!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:02:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300259#post300259</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300259#post300259</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A couple of weeks ago <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01k0y5g" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Helen Clark guest-edited</a> the BBC Newshour programme. As part of it she talks about the benefits of gender quotas in politics (this bit starts at about 5:00, but if you have time, you should listen to the whole thing).</p><p>BTW's the UN's global goal is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:01:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Scott A</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300258#post300258</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300258#post300258</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I agree with the policy, but also agree that the example is self-serving and will play into Paddy Gower's hands by starting at 40% and increasing from there.</p><p>How about the figures bases on the current caucus, then a PV of 36% in 2014, then 38% in 2017.  What would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:00:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300257#post300257</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300257#post300257</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Surely the “maths” given by Rachael is pretty blimmin self serving. The only reason for the increase in men is the fact the PV has been pumped up for the example.</q></p><p>Well, yes. Up from Labour's derisory vote in the last election, roughly in line with polls. The claim being…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:58:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300256#post300256</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300256#post300256</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yeah, you change the ratio, but the rule is about the selection for next election, and it's likely Labour will do better. So yes there will be a relative decrease, but absolute numbers of men need not change.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:52:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300254#post300254</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300254#post300254</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Surely the "maths" given by Rachael is pretty blimmin self serving.  The only reason for the increase in men is the fact the PV has been pumped up for the example.</p><p>It would seem to me that, all things being equal, if you change the ratio then you CHANGE THE…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:46:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300253#post300253</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300253#post300253</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I like a lot of voters, I as guessing,  don't see any problem with what labour is doing, quite the opposite in fact, equality benefits us all</p><p>thanks for the clear and concise outline though, fraid its not going to convince those in the media and other domains that just…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:35:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300252#post300252</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-gender-quotas-and-helping-journalists/?p=300252#post300252</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:35:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
