<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Speaker: An Open Letter To David Cunliffe</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=330025#post330025</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=330025#post330025</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Wellington Central, here is the full list in descending order.<br />"Wellington Central","LAB",0.860532623754756<br />"Selwyn","NAT",0.853458716249911<br />"Ōhāriu","UFNZ",0.843278540869174<br />"Rongotai","LAB",0.841374666000478<br />"Ōtaki","NAT",0.835599879117558<br />"Helensville","NAT",0.833741176470588<br />"Rodney","NAT",0.826168067579181<br />"Waitaki","NAT",0.822897699056448<br />"Dunedin South","LAB",0.82235811281337<br />"Mana","LAB",0.82204298672863<br />"Waimakariri","NAT",0.821925279520044<br />"Hutt South","LAB",0.820796042841273<br />"Port Hills","LAB",0.820739219712526<br />"Rangitīkei","NAT",0.817216427027535<br />"Hunua","NAT",0.815557519316611<br />"Napier","LAB",0.813083074189249<br />"Tāmaki","NAT",0.812631299617434<br />"Mt Albert","LAB",0.81024380609625<br />"Rimutaka","LAB",0.810115002613696<br />"Bay of Plenty","NAT",0.808763534522681<br />"Dunedin North","LAB",0.808687445329405<br />"Wairarapa","NAT",0.807214920300299<br />"Taranaki-King Country","NAT",0.807122657335954<br />"Kaikōura","NAT",0.806961747675031<br />"Palmerston North","LAB",0.806234046041076<br />"West Coast-Tasman","LAB",0.806103968697596<br />"Nelson","NAT",0.806072891591706<br />"Northland","NAT",0.803234804517029<br />"Tauranga","NAT",0.802902107688002…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:30:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Brent Jackson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=330024#post330024</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=330024#post330024</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Assuming that the percentage of the electoral roll that voted corresponds to real differences in the electorates, it would appear that Labour wins three distinct types of electorates.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:19:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=330015#post330015</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=330015#post330015</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						bravo. who is the red dot on the right?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 01:01:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=330014#post330014</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=330014#post330014</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I was up later than I really should have been working out how to make this graph
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:45:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329913#post329913</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329913#post329913</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11342299" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nanaia Mahuta</a> to contest Labour leadership!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:55:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329883#post329883</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329883#post329883</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    Let’s see where this goes…</p><p>…I have heard it said, that a Little goes a long way…</q></p><p>SHREK: Well, let me put it this way, Princess. Men of Farquaad's stature are in short supply.</p><p>DONKEY: Oh no, Shrek. There are those who think little of him.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:26:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329882#post329882</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329882#post329882</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Let’s see where this goes…</q><br />...I have heard it said, that a Little goes a long way...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:11:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329881#post329881</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329881#post329881</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I realise it has been a couple of weeks since numbers were being bandied around in this thread, but here is my election contribution, showing my working.</p><p><a href="https://github.com/thoughtfulbloke/nzelect14" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://github.com/thoughtfulbloke/nzelect14</a> </q></p><p>Thank you, David – extremely interesting!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:06:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sam F</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329853#post329853</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329853#post329853</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Does he endorse, or is that the kiss of death?</q></p><p>Andrew Little. Let's see where this goes...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:05:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329851#post329851</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329851#post329851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Cunliffe appears ready to quit</q></p><p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11341657" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">yep</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:24:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sue</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329845#post329845</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329845#post329845</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>WOW so he is now going to sit back and be a good little backbencher<br />if only he had just sat back post election, let the review happen and then resigned </p><p>Sadness</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:21:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329842#post329842</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329842#post329842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So, Cunliffe appears ready to quit: press conference at 2 pm.</p><p>Does he endorse, or is that the kiss of death?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:22:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329815#post329815</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329815#post329815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I realise it has been a couple of weeks since numbers were being bandied around in this thread, but here is my election contribution, showing my working.</p><p><a href="https://github.com/thoughtfulbloke/nzelect14" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://github.com/thoughtfulbloke/nzelect14</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:42:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329677#post329677</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329677#post329677</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And not a candidate.</q></p><p>…<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11341013" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">yet</a>…</p><p><q>the brains</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:15:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329625#post329625</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329625#post329625</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The Rabelaisian wit of David Lange: </p><p><em>...he saw that they did cause burn their regents alive like red herring, saying, Now God forbid that I should die this death! for I am by nature sufficiently dry already, without heating myself any further.</em></p><p>François Rabelais, <em>Gargantua and Pantagruel</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:32:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329624#post329624</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329624#post329624</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> David Lange joked that Clark “was so dry she was combustible”</q></p><p>Those wet &amp; dry 80s, when it was said of Thatcher that if it was wet she believed she could walk on it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:16:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329623#post329623</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329623#post329623</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/nov/10/election-new-zealand-politics" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This</a> is an interesting read from the time capsule, how things have changed.I’m enthused by what Little has to say, also:</p><p><q>1988 Labour prime minister David Lange joked that Clark “was so dry she was combustible"</q></p><p>Ideally Little could work closely with Parker to stave off any fire hazard. </p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmy3CGl6GvA" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmy3CGl6GvA</a>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:09:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329620#post329620</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329620#post329620</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>he comes across dry and dull; a most unlikely prime minister.</q></p><p>Oh come on! The man likes The Clash, The Smiths <em>and</em> Woody Guthrie. ;)<br />It is also said ,he's a good debater. That can help anywhere.  Dry and dull is just an opinion so that don't really matter unless…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:36:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329566#post329566</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329566#post329566</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As the huffle dies down, I’m liking David Parker. Straight bat, no bullsh*t, decent. And not a candidate.</q></p><p>Not to mention his <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9732633/Parker-offers-Norman-aid" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">willingness to work constructively with potential allies</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:46:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329565#post329565</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329565#post329565</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What about that Andrew Little, eh? ‘Pundits’ (Bryce Edwards at least) saying he could walk through the middle into the job. But while he seems a sharpish political operator, he comes across dry and dull; a most unlikely prime minister. <br />As the huffle dies down, I'm liking David Parker. Straight…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:30:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329503#post329503</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329503#post329503</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I guess I can’t tell the difference cognitively. Walks like a Nat, quacks like one.</q></p><p>The hair is very right wing as well.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:39:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329465#post329465</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329465#post329465</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Nicholas Shepherd shares his <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/10591582/Labours-gay-conundrum" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">opinion</a> on the fears.</p><p><q>The fears are that an openly gay parliamentary leader might fail to connect with Maoridom</q></p><p>Quite distinct from the connection likely to be enjoyed with that paragon of enlightenment: <a href="http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/hokakatanga-maori-sexualities/page-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Pakeha</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:43:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329459#post329459</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329459#post329459</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Dunne was a Labour MP from 1984 – 1994. Never been National Party</q></p><p>Heh, I actually knew that, too. But someone argued so blue in the face the other night to me that he had always been a Nat that it caused mental interference. I guess I can't tell the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:44:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329455#post329455</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329455#post329455</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Imagine an Australian type scenario where they have the Liberal-National coalition.</q></p><p>If it were two parties in an MMP coalition minus overhangs, yes. Just as Labour could easily become an ongoing coalition of an urban liberal and a working bloke party if their current factions insist. Oh, the right already…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:28:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329211#post329211</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329211#post329211</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> think it could be done. Imagine an Australian type scenario where they have the Liberal-National coalition. National here includes both groups of that party – they could create a Country party and they would win all the rural electorates if they told their supporters too vote Country MP and National…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:04:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329109#post329109</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329109#post329109</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Hospital pass...</strong><br /><q>Or would it go Tea Party over why the catch of the day is off the menu?</q><br />Maybe that's why National created that job for Shane Jones?<br />A Heat Sink...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:14:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329094#post329094</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329094#post329094</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If the global boycott really did go ahead, how would middle NZ react? Would it wake up to what’s happening on the seas? Or would it go Tea Party over why the catch of the day is off the menu?</q></p><p>The Govt would spend 3 weeks blaming Labour. Middle NZ…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:42:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329086#post329086</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329086#post329086</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Thanks DeepRed, that’s the one. The Japan Times ran the same article pretty much word for word.</q></p><p>Still no mention of it in the NZ media yet.</p><p>If the global boycott really did go ahead, how would middle NZ react? Would it wake up to what's happening on the seas?…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:00:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329085#post329085</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329085#post329085</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Boudaries have always suited National here. I don't know whether through deliberate gerrymandering or just the urban/rural split (I'd like to think the latter). In 1993 National got 35% while Labour got 34.6% and yet National got 5 more seats. The Alliance who were on Labour's left got 18%. On…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 23:36:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329082#post329082</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329082#post329082</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> This is what I found so incredibly stupid about killing off Mana. It’s like Labour don’t have a tactical bone in their bodies.</q></p><p>If Russel Norman could also please drop the ensuring ‘IM lost the election for the left’ routine that would be smashing. Green kept all its seats and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 23:04:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329056#post329056</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329056#post329056</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Because 1-0 is "far in excess of" 51-49.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:15:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Chris Waugh</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329054#post329054</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329054#post329054</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>On that basis you’d have to reject the result of every election that is held for a single position, unless it was unanimous.</q></p><p>Why?</p><p>Brazil is heading for Round 2 of its presidential election. France and (I believe) many other countries have a similar system: If no candidate wins a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:11:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329049#post329049</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329049#post329049</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I would if the majority given is far in excess of the majority polled</q></p><p>On that basis you'd have to reject the result of every election that is held for a single position, unless it was unanimous.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:59:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329047#post329047</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329047#post329047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wouldn’t call giving a majority party a majority of seats “gaming the system”.</q></p><p>I would if the majority given is far in excess of the majority polled.</p><p>ETA: And that’s also on the proviso that you even accept a party getting much less that 50% of the cast votes…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:44:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329046#post329046</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329046#post329046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						(Today we get gerrybrownleeing instead: making living conditions in an electorate so unbearable that opposition voters decamp to other regions.)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:38:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329045#post329045</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329045#post329045</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						OK, well I have been misinformed. Ignore me :-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:37:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329043#post329043</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329043#post329043</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Historically, despite occasional huge majorities for one side or the other, electoral boundaries in NZ have always been drawn by balanced committees, haven't they?</q></p><p>Boudaries have always suited National here. I don't know whether through deliberate gerrymandering or just the urban/rural split (I'd like to think the latter). In 1993…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:35:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329042#post329042</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329042#post329042</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which is not theory, it's what happened, over and over</q></p><p>I wouldn't call giving a majority party a majority of seats "gaming the system". Gaming the system requires a party receiving fewer total votes getting a governing majority. As far as I can recall NZ has only once had a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:35:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329041#post329041</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329041#post329041</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Indeed as repeatedly happened in NZ. </p><p>All electoral systems can be gained to some extent; some more than others. And as far as I can see MMP is what works best for us considering we seem to be wedded to the idea of having a local MP. I think the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:30:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329039#post329039</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329039#post329039</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>gerrymandering</q></p><p>Oops you're right. (Have you ever lived in America?)</p><p>Fortunately that never really happened in this country but yes it could, with political appointments to the judiciary and electoral commission.</p><p>Historically, despite occasional huge majorities for one side or the other, electoral boundaries in NZ have always been drawn…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:29:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329038#post329038</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329038#post329038</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I guess that is the solitary advantage of FPP, it’s hard to see how that could be gamed.</q></p><p>It's super easy to game. You only have to beat the opposition by a little bit everywhere and you can have a massive overwhelming landslide. Which is not theory, it's what happened,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:29:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329036#post329036</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329036#post329036</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>TBH, I think the idea that any large party could split into an electorate party and a list party, and come through an election successfully preposterous. I</q></p><p>Obviously they would do it in a much more subtle way to start with, until people got used to the idea, as they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:28:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329034#post329034</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329034#post329034</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>hard to see how [FPP] could be gamed</q><br />FPP was very easily gameable, on a grand scale, by gerrymandering: redrawing electorate boundaries to encompass regions in which you know your party has a narrow majority. Result: you win more than half the electorates, without needing half the total vote. (Meanwhile,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:22:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329033#post329033</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329033#post329033</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, the system can be gamed. I guess that is the solitary advantage of FPP, it's hard to see how that could be gamed.</p><p>I'd like to see the threshold disappear. I'd also suggest that for a party to appear on the party voting paper it has to field electorate…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:18:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329026#post329026</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329026#post329026</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You could make MMP more proportional by reducing the threshold, which many people here are in favour of.</p><p>TBH, I think the idea that any large party could split into an electorate party and a list party, and come through an election successfully preposterous.</q></p><p>I'm strongly in favour of reducing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:09:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329025#post329025</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329025#post329025</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If you're really that terrified by overhang seats, you can always give everyone else compensatory top up seats to restore proportionality.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:09:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329022#post329022</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329022#post329022</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just how else do you fix the inherent problem in MMP that almost by its design it can be gamed with parties deliberately creating an overhand and thus wrecking the proportionate basis of it?</q></p><p>MMP is currently less proportional via the 5% threshold to a much greater extent than it…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:03:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329020#post329020</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329020#post329020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If a party wins electorate seats then they are entitled to them. That's democracy for you.</q></p><p>I do get what you are saying and I guess it's true in a way. However, if the purpose of MMP is to have a strictly proportionate parliament then overhang wrecks it. I guess…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:00:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329015#post329015</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=329015#post329015</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> if a party wins more electorate seats than they were entitled too</q></p><p>If a party wins electorate seats then they are entitled to them. That's democracy for you.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:50:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328982#post328982</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328982#post328982</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Although I temper that by saying that it's far less broken than what we had before.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:37:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328980#post328980</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328980#post328980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> if the major parties were to majorly game it in the manner Ben proposes then MMP ends up fundamentally broken.</q></p><p>Yes, and I suggest that because a major party is already gaming it, it is already quite broken.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:20:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328974#post328974</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328974#post328974</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You can't do that to MMP, you'd have basically killed the mixed member component of it, which is pretty core. Electorate MPs make up over half our parliament, you can't unelect them because someone else in another electorate did better, that's screwed up democracy.</p><p>You might as well just go…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:56:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328969#post328969</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328969#post328969</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I think in the long-run MMP needs to be fixed. No threshold. No overhang – if a party wins more electorate seats than they were entitled too then they lose whichever electorate seats they won by the smallest margins until they are reduced to their correct proportion.</q></p><p>You can't do…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:34:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328967#post328967</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328967#post328967</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In the long run could be 20-30 years at the pace that electoral reform moves. And typically it only actually reforms at all in response to it clearly not working. What I'm reading in that reasoning is that National will only do it so long as it's just barely enough…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:11:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328963#post328963</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328963#post328963</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m not sure that they’ve thought it through, really.</q></p><p>I remember reading David Farrar saying that the National Party had spent a lot of time considering it but always backed out for the reasons above (my memory may be faulty though). Labour would copy them, there would be a huge…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:34:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328961#post328961</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328961#post328961</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just in case it's not clear what a cock punch is: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_xuf9KjmcA" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_xuf9KjmcA</a></p><p>"The blow that strikes to the core of a warrior's strength, against which there is no defence".</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:27:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328959#post328959</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328959#post328959</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There’s a much simpler reason it doesn’t happen. National and Labour have long known they could do this scheme. But it would lead to a massively overhung parliament with neither party better off (since both doing it) and the public’s faith in the system would be completely eroded.</q></p><p>I’m not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:20:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328951#post328951</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328951#post328951</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm only just settling down to pick through the election results, but it is clear Kiwi's understand MMP. The electorate winner in that respect is Ōhāriu, outdoing even Epsom, as at a minimum half the voters must have split their vote (the theoretical maximum for all electorates is mostly near…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 22:33:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328950#post328950</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328950#post328950</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks DeepRed, that’s the one. The <em>Japan Times</em> ran <a href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/10/03/world/science-health-world/environmentalists-threaten-boycott-rare-new-zealand-dolphin/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the same article</a> pretty much word for word.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:30:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328949#post328949</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328949#post328949</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The already have. They leave Auckland whenever they can to their holiday homes, a home just for holiday, that’s way cool.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:07:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328948#post328948</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328948#post328948</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Gareth Morgan explains my point incredibly well. It’s maths fuckers, do the maths. </q></p><p>I particularly liked this:</p><p><q>We might also see people and businesses relocating to other regions in search of a better lifestyle. Now that would be a revolution!</q></p><p>Something that actually could begin to address poverty levels nationwide.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:02:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328947#post328947</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328947#post328947</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And it's just made the news here in Japan (of all places!) that New Zealand is about to face trade sanctions over the lack of measures to protect Maui's Dolphin and its habitat.</q></p><p>Link to official article:</p><p>* <a href="http://www.afp.com/en/news/boycott-threat-over-rare-new-zealand-dolphin" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">AFP &ndash; Boycott threat over rare New Zealand dolphin</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:56:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328946#post328946</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328946#post328946</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>dead dolphin</q>And it’s just made the news here in Japan (of all places!) that New Zealand is about to face trade sanctions over the lack of measures to protect Maui’s Dolphin and its habitat.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:52:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328945#post328945</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328945#post328945</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We need innercity apartments that are worldclass  for warmth and sound isolation and warmth isolation , solely targeted and exclusive  to the first home buyer.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:45:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328944#post328944</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328944#post328944</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Gareth Morgan explains my point  incredibly  well. It’s maths fuckers, do the maths.  <br />Epsom , do the maths. Enjoy the masses coming your way.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:40:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328943#post328943</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328943#post328943</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We need skyrise apartments</q></p><p>Yep,  and hopefully catering well to the variety of needs, from experience, at least in terms of inner inner city, 45m2 is more than sufficient for a single individual, 60m2 comfortably accommodates a couple and 90m2 is more than enough for a 3 person family etc.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:34:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328942#post328942</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328942#post328942</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If we are going to build up Auckland, the first social housing needs to be in Epsom. </q></p><p>Irrespective of what you think of him, Gareth Morgan is on to something with <a href="http://garethsworld.com/blog/uncategorized/jafas-roll-bombay-hills/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">his piece on why gutting the RMA is attacking the symptom</a>. And the 'commenter on <a href="https://www.interest.co.nz/opinion/72193/nz-initiatives-eric-crampton-says-improving-housing-affordability-key-step-government-" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Crampton’s article</a>' is probably…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:33:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328941#post328941</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328941#post328941</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The inner city needs to be re developed to accommodate the new chaps. It’s central and is  the most efficient place for Aucklanders to live. Capitalism needs organisation.  We need skyrise apartments with nice prices and government help in all inner city suburbs. Auckland City. The New York of the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:22:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328940#post328940</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328940#post328940</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						They’d certainly be in keeping with New Zealand’s anglophile climate, with a heck of a lot more soul than what goes on here. As you mentioned earlier, if mega-city is what they want they certainly need to get cracking on something pronto.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:16:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328939#post328939</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328939#post328939</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If we  are going to build up Auckland, the first social housing needs to be in Epsom. </p><p>Buy up those inefficient cold villas and put up in brick two-up, two-downs, London style. The best house I’ve ever lived in was in London. Quiet and warm.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:01:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328938#post328938</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328938#post328938</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Surely its got to the point of rort that would involve a real removal of capital initiative from multiple home owners. This is the real political correctness. You are not allowed to say to the multiple property investor that their investment is a risk.</q></p><p>I couldn’t agree more, and this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:58:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328937#post328937</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328937#post328937</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Surely its got to the point of rort that would involve a real removal of capital initiative  from multiple home owners. This  is the real political correctness. You are not allowed to say to the multiple property investor that their investment is a risk.</p><p>At some times social concerns and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:49:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328934#post328934</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328934#post328934</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What policy would you write?</q></p><p>With only a few minutes to do so: </p><p>As well as increasing the top income tax rate, I’d go with something similar to one of those CGTs above that are multiplied with the individual’s marginal tax rate as per SA, Can, Mol.<br />Ideally in conjunction…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:41:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328933#post328933</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328933#post328933</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Auckland will have a landed class and a non-landed class, the latter never sure of its residency.  Until this shocking socially irresponsible economic house price jacking stops. It's time this rort was stopped for the hard reality of renting in Auckland and the obvious generational social reasons.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:34:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328932#post328932</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328932#post328932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What policy would you write?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:19:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328931#post328931</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328931#post328931</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>almost of the income of the very wealthy comes from capital gains</q></p><p>In the interests of aiming that weapon more squarely at the very wealthy:</p><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_gains_tax#Canada" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Canada</a>:<br /><q>(Capital gain x 50.00%) x marginal tax rate = capital gain tax</q></p><p>Ireland<br /><q> every person has an exempt band of €1,270 per year.</q></p><p>Lithuania:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:13:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328930#post328930</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328930#post328930</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>“almost of the income of the very wealthy comes from capital gains. That’s why CGT is so progressive.” &ndash; marks link</p><p>Yes, Capital is (are) your playing card(s).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:49:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328929#post328929</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328929#post328929</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="https://twitter.com/RusselNorman/status/504462698688413696" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Found it</a>, giving the benefit of the doubt,  Russel may have felt Kyle Church had answered, not an ideal exit strategy, but given the platform it’s deft enough, I obviously don’t agree with Ross Sélavy Brighton that it’s “meaningless”,  though it could for all intents and purposes be construed that…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:46:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328928#post328928</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328928#post328928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think the vision is to have a super powerful mega-city that could rival Melbourne or Sydney for capital potential , a political capital with a film industry and farming.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:19:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328927#post328927</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328927#post328927</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the Broken Window Fallacy, or a form of the Shock Doctrine.</q></p><p>Thanks Deepred, The East Cape economic <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10215096/Govt-fixes-bridge-then-replaces-it" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">miracle</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:11:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328926#post328926</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328926#post328926</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> it was a distinct turn to the right to abandon or scale back the measure.</q></p><p>Yes Gio, there’s no question in my mind that the whole spectrum is on a starboard course. On this tack, under MMP, where minor parties can promise the <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/policies/10491028/Internet-Mana-promises-free-tertiary-study" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">world</a>, compromises like the Greens made may…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:05:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328925#post328925</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328925#post328925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Perhaps this is being too cynical. but when SH 2 was blocked around the Devil's Elbow in 2012, it occurred to me that rather than making a genuine effort to permanently remedy this ongoing issue, the Government may have done a cost analysis, and reached the conclusion that intermittently requiring…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:03:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328923#post328923</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328923#post328923</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the obvious strategy of a small island run by a government bereft of ideas.</q></p><p>Perhaps this is being  too cynical. but when SH 2 was blocked around the Devil's Elbow in <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/hawkes-bay-today/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503462&amp;objectid=11059822" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">2012</a>, it occurred to me that rather than making a genuine effort to permanently remedy this <a href="http://www.voxy.co.nz/national/sh2-closed-slips-devils-elbow/5/200927" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ongoing</a> issue, the Government…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:56:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328922#post328922</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328922#post328922</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It is significant as a monetary figure, but Labour’s reduction from $5000 to 0 is arguably more so, at least wrt to the political philosophy of the party. Implementing a $2000 tax free threshold appears more realisable in an MMP Government.</q></p><p>Nonetheless, groups advocating $10,000 tax-free threshold following the raise…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:54:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328921#post328921</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328921#post328921</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The housing market could continue in Auckland for 10 &ndash; 20 years. It's seems to be perfectly placed to be blasted by the property industry. The perfect storm.</p><p>It's a sure thing with its population projections and it looks good to a government because it gives the image of money…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:39:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328920#post328920</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328920#post328920</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It is significant as a monetary figure, but Labour’s reduction from $5000 to 0 is arguably more so, at least wrt to the political philosophy of the party.  Implementing a $2000  tax free threshold  appears more realisable in an MMP Government. Any money at all is more than I can…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:36:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328919#post328919</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328919#post328919</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I thought that they went down from $10k to $2k was quite significant. I'm pretty sure it's the case as I had a conversation with Norman about it on Twitter during the campaign.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:24:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328918#post328918</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328918#post328918</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Didn’t the Greens reduce the tax free threshold to $2,000 in the end?</q></p><p>I can’t find a specific figure <a href="https://home.greens.org.nz/policy/green-taxation-and-monetary-policy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a> Gio, I don’t have the luxury of being in a position to turn my nose up at any tax free threshold whatsoever, so that number may mean more to some…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:14:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328917#post328917</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328917#post328917</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>if the housing bubble manages to pop within the next 3 years</q></p><p>I’m interested Deepred, when the housing bubble pops,  given the stats are so <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/11/global-house-prices" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">skewed</a> by the prices in one city, what are the forecasts for the average nationwide percentage drop in value? Especially</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:09:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328916#post328916</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328916#post328916</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Why the Greens?</q></p><p>Didn't the Greens reduce the tax free threshold to $2,000 in the end?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:02:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328915#post328915</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328915#post328915</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The reason your person on a low income would pay CGT on a $10K gain in value from selling a house is because it is income.<q></p><p>Having taken the time to read back of all the responses Lucy, In terms of the what I was looking for i.e something that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:00:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328914#post328914</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328914#post328914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm of the view that Cunliffe has dodged a bullet if the housing bubble manages to pop within the next 3 years. And any criminal prosecutions into Dirty Politics haven't been started yet.</p><p>I also agree with the 2 Steves that people voted for the devil they know, instead of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 16:35:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328910#post328910</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328910#post328910</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>National led government would still be a better government than Labour led government, given Labour’s apparent internal divisions.</q><br />A couple of points here. It is not a fact that National would be a better government, even hough that is what they tell us. Labour had 9 years of responsible economic…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:29:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328909#post328909</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328909#post328909</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Edit error
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:26:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328908#post328908</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328908#post328908</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>ooh, you must have loved your tribe calling the King of Tonga a slug.<br />etc, etc ,etc</q></p><p>Of course I do, Sacha.  Every bit as much as you love "your tribe" calling National Maori MPs <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/7623209/Harawiras-N-bomb-directed-at-National-MPs" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">"John Key's little house niggers"</a> &mdash; which was defended by a couple of other ex-MPs…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:56:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328907#post328907</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328907#post328907</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Craig, please enlighten me, is someone righteous like you happy to have someone as your current party leader and prime minister who lies as freely and frequently as John Key does?</q></p><p>I'm perfectly happy to criticize "my party" &mdash; and everyone in it, from the leader on down &mdash; when…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:17:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dismal Soyanz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328906#post328906</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328906#post328906</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I find it very easy to imagine a reasonable person voting National because they like National’s economic policies, and more importantly because even assuming the allegations in Dirty Politics are true, that a National led government would still be a better government than Labour led government, given Labour’s apparent internal…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:16:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>william blake</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328904#post328904</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328904#post328904</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Dead rat, the National smells more like a dead dolphin.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 08:24:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen R</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328902#post328902</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328902#post328902</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Craig, please enlighten me, is someone righteous like you happy to have someone as your current party leader and prime minister who lies as freely and frequently as John Key does?</q></p><p>I find it very easy to imagine a reasonable person voting National because they like National's economic policies, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 07:59:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328900#post328900</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328900#post328900</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Ditto I refer locals to Annette King and her office as they are likely to get problems sorted.</q></p><p>Yes Hilary. if I was to pick someone to restore the heart and soul of the Labour party, Annette’s that leader.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 04:56:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328899#post328899</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328899#post328899</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>A minor party signing a confidence and supply agreement is not a "poodle".</p><p>A minor party &ndash; in fact, a solitary man &ndash; that depends entirely on another party for its place in Parliament, its continued existence and now for that MP's personal funding, is exactly a poodle.</p><p>The distinction…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 02:17:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328897#post328897</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328897#post328897</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I really get that the government isn't shaking down to your taste</q></p><p>The Sanctimonious Craig isn't confined to the Conservative Party, clearly.</p><p>Craig, please enlighten me, is someone righteous like you happy to have someone as your current party leader and prime minister who lies as freely and frequently as…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 00:10:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328894#post328894</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328894#post328894</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>  I really get that the government isn’t shaking down to your taste, </q></p><p>And this one Craig? You are well aware why this doesn't float our boat and you are well aware for why. We don't like liars and cheats and corrupt Government that promotes and pays staff on our taxes.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 23:38:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328893#post328893</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328893#post328893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>calling anyone an animal tended to provoke the kind of dudgeon aimed squarely at one’s arse.</q></p><p>Sorry, my dog is a princess. Any animal on this planet can be treated with respect when they earn it. like all animals, some just wallow in shit. The problem being, some can just…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 23:32:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328892#post328892</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328892#post328892</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>stop humping that chair leg, little seymour</q></p><p>Trophy of the day ;)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 23:26:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328890#post328890</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328890#post328890</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>brought up around kuia where calling anyone an animal tended to provoke the kind of dudgeon aimed squarely at one's arse</q></p><p>ooh, you must have loved your tribe calling the King of Tonga a slug. <br />etc, etc ,etc</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 23:04:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328889#post328889</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328889#post328889</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Behold him stop--upon his belly crawl--His<br />tail set wagging: canine habits, all!</q></p><p>verily</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 22:59:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328888#post328888</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328888#post328888</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						stop humping that chair leg, little seymour
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 22:58:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328887#post328887</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328887#post328887</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A minor party signing a confidence and supply agreement is not a "poodle". </p><p>A minor party &ndash; in fact, a solitary man &ndash; that depends entirely on another party for its place in Parliament, its continued existence and now for that MP's personal funding, is exactly a poodle. </p><p>The distinction…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 22:44:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328886#post328886</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328886#post328886</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>poodle does not warrant dudgeon (high or low) when it so accurately reflects the relationship.</q></p><p>Faust, out walking with his pal Wagner <a href="http://img.geocaching.com/cache/10a456d9-42da-4102-b5cf-a976e24f0381.jpg?" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">meets the devil for the first time in poodle form:</a><br /> <q>WAGNER</p><p>It may be that your eyes deceive you slightly;<br />Naught but a plain black poodle do…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 22:43:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328885#post328885</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328885#post328885</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>poodle does not warrant dudgeon (high or low) when it so accurately reflects the relationship.</q></p><p>Well, I'll look after my dudgeon (whatever level it settles at) and you take care of yours.  I really get that the government isn't shaking down to your taste, but you better get used to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 22:39:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328884#post328884</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328884#post328884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						poodle does not warrant dudgeon (high or low) when it so accurately reflects the relationship.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 22:08:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328883#post328883</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328883#post328883</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I was most taken with the ‘Poodle’ reference when Linda Clark<br />unleashed it on election night – I’m guessing she was referring to British terminology which very adultly has it as</q></p><p>Well, I've heard Ms. Clark referred to in canine terms that are considered, at best, somewhat vulgar when applied…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 22:05:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328882#post328882</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328882#post328882</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>how about you stop calling Dunne and Seymour “poodles”</q></p><p>Oh pileeze. If not poodles, lapdogs. Oh look over there</p><div class="hr"><hr /></div><p>> Flavell just became flavour of the month. So. 1,2,3,4 Parties. Ain't no monster. Only got 4 heads. Whatevs. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 22:03:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328881#post328881</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328881#post328881</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Accompanied by more than one commentator saying “go away, you’re not one of us.”</q></p><p> My comment is because she was being smug and rude. In good faith (we all have no problem with Ranapiaismania) she would be welcome. To denigrate us for being involved is insulting so I'll give back…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 21:52:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328880#post328880</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328880#post328880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Julia noted...</strong><br />i d by name <br />i d by nature<br />that's me...</p><p>I was most taken with the 'Poodle' reference when Linda Clark <br />unleashed it on election night &ndash; I'm guessing she was referring to British terminology which very adultly has it as:<br /><q>Poodle: a person or organization considered to…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 21:50:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328873#post328873</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328873#post328873</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>infantalizing diminutives</q><br />There's always <a href="http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2014/09/30/gordon-campbell-on-the-farcical-elevation-of-david-seymour/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">scrounger</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 20:02:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328871#post328871</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328871#post328871</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hell yeah Ian,  all these lectures all the time, it’s all we ever get from you, lecture this, lecture that, and on ‘manners’ of all things, my body aches from dodging all your lecture. Enough with these lectures Ian! And no more infantalising poodles! </p><p>These are adults. (4/10/2014)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 17:55:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328870#post328870</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328870#post328870</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>NO THEY DIDN"T….. more like 30% ish of registered voters.</q></p><p>Yeah, and 82% of registered voters still didn’t vote for Labour, so I think that dead horse has well and truly been flogged into well-ground dog meat.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 17:46:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328869#post328869</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328869#post328869</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They can no longer govern alone – but can (and have ) made a gov’t as ‘dog walkers’ with the poodles – Seymour and Dunne, lapping up any affection sent their way…</q></p><p>Ian:  </p><p>The next time you feel like lecturing me (or anyone else) on manners, how about you stop…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 17:42:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328867#post328867</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328867#post328867</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Oh you mean the fiction we build around ourselves…Not the connection I was referring too.</q></p><p>Absolutely Andin, I hoped the Yoda clip wouldn’t have been too opaque. I get fully <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_acting" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">method</a> with these threads, and try not to break character, what’s the narrative here:</p><p>Jamesy doesn’t like Davy, Davy’s gotta…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 17:06:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>SocialMindedKiwiGuy</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328865#post328865</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328865#post328865</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Consulted the Tarot. She foresaw Cunliffe going 'Aguirre' and floating his own raft. What a salvo that would be; more ivy rash for Don Key and Joyce to scratch and an instant 20-25% boost for Labour.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:32:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>SocialMindedKiwiGuy</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328864#post328864</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328864#post328864</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Speaking of '25% parties', the Nats without Key are surely level pegging with Labour, and I can't imagine a substantial coalition deal  falling to the RHS anytime soon... Most of Key's coterie have been stood down and reinstated over the last 6 years. Sans Key, this must entail a sizeable…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:09:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328861#post328861</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328861#post328861</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>just always remember the Donkey</q><br />...it's a 'bray new world' we live in...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:42:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328860#post328860</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328860#post328860</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the wonderful John Key </q></p><p>Oh I'll just always remember the Donkey!<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTXiWQITb_0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTXiWQITb_0</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:30:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328859#post328859</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328859#post328859</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>The coagulation coalition?</strong><br /><q>...the coolness of Key</q><br />isn't that supposed <a href="http://tipnut.com/stop-bleeding-ground-black-pepper/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">to stop bleeding noses?</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:26:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328858#post328858</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328858#post328858</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>National loses one seat!</strong><br /><q>we need to accept that (almost) half the country voted National.</q><br />No longer <br />&ndash; final vote count gives:<br />&ndash; one more Green MP added<br />&ndash; one fewer National MPs</p><p><a href="http://www.electionresults.co.nz/national-loses-outright-majority" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">They can no longer govern alone</a> – but can (and have ) made a gov’t as ‘dog…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:15:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>SocialMindedKiwiGuy</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328857#post328857</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328857#post328857</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Shared leadership has been great for the greens. Bearing in mind all the failed mutineers and their post labour parties over the last thirty years, and that we're not likely to see another Norm Kirk any time soon, I'd prefer if Shearer and Ardern were to make a go of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:10:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>william blake</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328856#post328856</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328856#post328856</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Half the country? I make it one third, heaps of peeps didn't vote at all.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 13:59:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328855#post328855</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328855#post328855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>We are okay having our discussions in the open.</q></p><p>Accompanied by more than one commentator saying "go away, you're not one of us."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 13:46:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328849#post328849</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328849#post328849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Are you Graeme Edgeler? :)</p><p>For the purposes of debating the problem (and thus, solutions), we need to accept that (almost) half the country voted National.</p><p>After all, 99% of the country didn't vote for John Key. But that kind of straw-clutching gives us high levels of irrelevant accuracy, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:50:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328848#post328848</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328848#post328848</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I realize half the country voted National, </q><br />NO THEY DIDN"T..... more like 30% ish of registered voters.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:40:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328847#post328847</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328847#post328847</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Oh mi god, just got home.</q>And welcome home, where have you been?, Planet Key?<br />You will feel quite strange at first, you know, all this reality an' stuff but you will settle down, hive mind an' all that. You must be feeling quite smug though as everybody here, apart from…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:38:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328845#post328845</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328845#post328845</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I assume there's a good dose of sarcasm in Anna G's post. Nobody could write</p><p><q>I embraced the coolness of Key</q></p><p>with any serious intent. Sure, I realize half the country voted National, but although there are many plausible reasons why, "coolness" would not be on the list.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:35:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Farrell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328843#post328843</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328843#post328843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I wonder which of the trademe messageboard national supporters you are?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:11:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328842#post328842</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328842#post328842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>All your other hand-wringing and blame and conspiracy theories and bickering all simply serves to emphasise Mr Dann’s points and gives substantial momentum to the claim that the wonderful John Key deserves at least four terms.</q></p><p>So you popped in with your head stuck firmly in the sand (and somewhere…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 09:41:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328841#post328841</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328841#post328841</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> In terms of my suggestion, feeling connected to the Beehive, to the politicians as actual eating and shitting people just like us, and being empowered by that, influenced by the effort they could make to connect with us, debate us, listen to us, learn from us and adapt to us:…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 09:17:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328839#post328839</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328839#post328839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Duncan Garner <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/10577085/Time-for-a-new-broom-to-sweep-away-the-delusion" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">has reckons</a>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 07:56:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328838#post328838</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328838#post328838</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Of course, he was referring to the factional discord, orchestrated and exploited by the destructively ambitious Cunliffe.</q></p><p>For someone who’s embraced the <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9076855/Key-says-Shearer-undermined-by-his-deputy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">coolness of Key</a>, you don’t seem to place a lot of stock in what he says:</p><p><q>David Shearer was actively undermined by his deputy, Grant Robertson, Prime Minister…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 03:24:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328837#post328837</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328837#post328837</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And on the <a href="https://twitter.com/edmuzik/status/517793352649953280" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>:</p><p><q>I’m up to the point where some guy called Mark slags me off for about two pages worth of comments for not “fronting” to him #CommentsDelayed</q></p><p>I had no issue with you not fronting to <em>me</em> James.  As I said:</p><p><q>If James were to front up…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 02:52:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>anna g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328836#post328836</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328836#post328836</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh mi god, just got home. Some good friend out told me to look at your site and take in all the massive paralysis by analysis that's spewed forth in response to a straight-up, heart-felt letter/plea from James Dann.<br />What a jumbo load of shit you mostly all spout except…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 02:24:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328827#post328827</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328827#post328827</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Cunliffe has been George MCGoverned</q></p><p>Yep, I’m with you there, he has, and if not before Sept 20th then most certainly after, and as painful as that may be for him to come to terms with, it is in all but the most unlikely of circumstances, irreversible.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 22:31:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328826#post328826</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328826#post328826</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Cunliffe has been George MCGoverned. The press don’t relate to him. Trivial bastards but still always keen for a “Gotcha”. <br />Every night of the week if possible. Controversy drives  readership and the individual press want their stories rocking t.v and ratings. </p><p>It’s a writing team looking for gossip. D.C and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 22:25:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>krothville</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328825#post328825</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328825#post328825</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And the MSM, are they going to want to associate with him anymore, especially after his attempt to sue a large part of it?</q></p><p>They will associate with whomever they believe will give them the hot stories, juicy, seedy stories, because that's what they've proved themselves interested in, not the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 22:22:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328822#post328822</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328822#post328822</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Grant can talk but so can Cunliffe.  I am concerned that with the centering of both Labour and National, that the “fear of the unknown”, “devil you know…” campaign that John Key ran, was an unprecedented success. I worry that attempting to trump Key’s soothing dulcet tones with Grant’s soothing…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 22:13:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328821#post328821</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328821#post328821</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's not his game, it's the game. Calm the fuck out of the press pack with charm,wit and policy. Grant could be great t.v for Labour and to win an election you need 51% of a supportive block so hung up orientation non-believers can be marginalised. Can Grant talk?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:47:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328816#post328816</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328816#post328816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That is certainly the direction that the MSM has lead things Jack, and that was my basic reasoning in suggesting MSM-free (Keyless) live, team, debating, tours, to spite the MSM, I guess in an attempt to lead the country in another direction, the object being to hopefully leading the country.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:25:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328813#post328813</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328813#post328813</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We run presidential campaigns now, yes. Muldoon style. Bush style, Mitt style, it's all about the face.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:11:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328812#post328812</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328812#post328812</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I dont want too get too deep</q></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLrpBLDWyCI" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLrpBLDWyCI</a></p><p>Connected to the hub, to the people and personalities that defined our culture, in a nutshell, finally connected to rest of our country, beyond it merely being a place we’d only ever get to see on TV or out a car window,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:51:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328810#post328810</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328810#post328810</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Andin assumed</q><br />You assume too much young sir<br /><q>We felt connected.</q><br />But too what? I dont want too get too deep but everything is connected<br />Right I'm off for a pedicure</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:44:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328795#post328795</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328795#post328795</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Awesome stuff Ian. And to be very clear I have not suddenly become obsessive about Muldoon as much as campaign strategies, and so I was a little concerned to open the victor’s <a href="https://www.national.org.nz/about/national%27s-history" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">link</a>, but Knowledge bro. Thank you. </p><p>The first thing that grabbed me about Muldoon’s town hall meetings was…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 18:16:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>glidergirl sarah thomas</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328773#post328773</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328773#post328773</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I actually think your open letter is a weak minded attack on Cunliffe, it is not a brave move to  air “your” feelings and assume to know Cunliffe’s aspirations in such a public way , it is simply a way to kick a man further down, like the role of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 12:58:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jack Harrison</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328768#post328768</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328768#post328768</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The "grim face or power" is a good watch. According to Sir George Chapman it took "six weeks" of debate to decide Muldoon over Jack Marshall in 1974.</p><p>Top table changes are heavy affairs. In the private sector the clash of egos , the removal of rivals and the forming…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:17:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328766#post328766</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328766#post328766</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						that would be the conservative part of the left, I'm guessing.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 10:08:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328765#post328765</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328765#post328765</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						To be fair, it is the darling theory of a number of left-wing middle-aged men, Chris Trotter <em>in primis</em>.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 10:01:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328764#post328764</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328764#post328764</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I can only surmise that this is a paternalistic narrative put forward by people who claim to really know the interests of Māori and Pasifica people.</q></p><p>Or it could be a cynical attempt at divide-and-rule of low-info voters, straight from the Lee Atwater or Karl Rove book.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:48:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328763#post328763</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328763#post328763</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>ETA: I'm pretty sure the whole idea is wishful thinking, though, because the old guard would not have the courage for it.</q></p><p>There's a much simpler reason it doesn't happen. National and Labour have long known they could do this scheme. But it would lead to a massively overhung parliament…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:43:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328762#post328762</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328762#post328762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I can only surmise that this is a paternalistic narrative put forward by people who claim to really know the interests of Māori and Pasifica people</q></p><p>The way I usually hear it, the working class is white and male. The way I usually see it is that the working class…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:38:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328761#post328761</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328761#post328761</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>rising dump...</strong><br /><q>...'royal flush'</q><br />Fluush Tooilet?<br />Luuxury Lad!<br /><em>Luuxury...</em></p><p><br />I were there, <br />in the cold, <br />crumpling old sewing patterns <br />waiting, listening, straining<br />in the dark, <br />there were I...</p><p></scattered scatological impressions><br />Here's the 'David Cunliffe and the long drop from the top' thread back...</p><p>:- )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:36:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DexterX</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328760#post328760</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328760#post328760</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>All these details are in the policy document which has been sitting on the Labour website for months..</q></p><p>Would have helped if Cunnliffe had read it &ndash; me thinks.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:26:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328759#post328759</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328759#post328759</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Indeed. Given that the region people seem to think has the most conservative support for Labour, South Auckland, seems to have no trouble giving support to marriage equality and queer MPs, I can only surmise that this is a paternalistic narrative put forward by people who claim to <strong>really</strong> know…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:23:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328758#post328758</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328758#post328758</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And a split might also help with that wee problem about the conservative homophobic working class / liberal academic middle class </q></p><p>Is there a compelling reason to deal with imaginary problems?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:11:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328757#post328757</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328757#post328757</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the ’60s and ’70s were a very different proposition from the ever unwrapping present, we embrace.<br />Only a few major entertainment&amp; information sources; </q><br />Within five years of the first regular TV broadcasts in NZ Wellington was experiencing the phenomenon of a 'royal flush'. Viewers of the one and only channel strained…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:55:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328756#post328756</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328756#post328756</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And a split might also help with that wee problem about the conservative homophobic working class / liberal academic middle class not seeing eye to eye on all things party leadership.</q></p><p>Yup, these two tiny groups need not be in the room together, sucking out all the oxygen with their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:49:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328755#post328755</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328755#post328755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Cameron Conference Rap</q><br />Ice flows, man!<br />Brill!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:21:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328754#post328754</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328754#post328754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>All the young Turks...</strong><br /><q>The problem is that I’m too young to remember, I don’t know how ‘Meet the People’ really went down or worked logistically, so I hoped it would jog someone’s memory.</q></p><p>I don't jog through there that often...<br />but the '60s and '70s were a very different…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:14:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328753#post328753</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328753#post328753</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Craig could you please pull back from calling anyone who has a different perspective than yours on Cunliff’s decisions “disingenuous” or “naive” it’s mean.</q></p><p>I'm genuinely sorry you think that Sue, because I don't think someone making a bad argument (IMHO &amp; YMMV, of course) is <em>ipso facto</em> a terrible human…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:02:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>william blake</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328752#post328752</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328752#post328752</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YBumQHPAeU" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YBumQHPAeU</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:52:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328751#post328751</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328751#post328751</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oddly, almost the complete opposite Andin: The easily digestible abridged early morning cut:. <q>"With a hostile media […] to side-step this media interference” […] ”filling halls throughout the country” […] ”provincial” […] “road test"</q></p><p>Careful with them clippers.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:47:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328749#post328749</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328749#post328749</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> productions like ‘L&amp;P Top Town’, or ‘It’s in the Bag’ united New Zealand in some strange intangible way.</q><br />OOOOO.. a political television show that unites a country. Now that'll be a first!<br />Hmm, I think my toenails need clipping, excuse me... wont be a mo'</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:38:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328748#post328748</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328748#post328748</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>the Association of Free Associaters...</strong><br /><q>....you’ve posted more than two dozen marginally relevant or completely off topic comments</q><br />Shucks, I do that all the time &ndash; I didna realise it was illegal &ndash; I always figure people are nimble of mind and wit...<br />...and ya have to say some of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 06:58:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328746#post328746</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328746#post328746</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m going to leave it there.</q></p><p>I can appreciate that, The doco has it’s moments;  Bob Jones recounts the story of a cocktail party at his place where PM Bob Muldoon happened to – for whatever reason –  strip naked, chasing Bob Jones’ sister around the house, ending up with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 03:55:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328745#post328745</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328745#post328745</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As for the puppet master politics slur, <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10452464/Leaders-debate-reveals-more-even-contest" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a>:</p><p><q>But Cunliffe avoided answering, turning the topic instead to Labour’s broader tax plan. <strong>His advisers told media in the break</strong> that the tax would not apply to the family home oif it was in a trust.</q></p><p>It’s time to road test this…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 03:37:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328744#post328744</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328744#post328744</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I actually did see your suggestion that the Labour Party model itself on Robert Muldoon.</p><p>I'm going to leave it there.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 03:35:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328743#post328743</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328743#post328743</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But yeah, no worries, whatever you’re into. One of those two dozen posts was a response to your:</p><p><q>This is an unfortunate diversion,</q></p><p>With regards to me taking up Deborah’s offer to answer a question unsolicited.</p><p>When I later recommended “The Grim Face of Power” to you and name checked…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 02:55:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328741#post328741</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328741#post328741</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Responding to Deborah who had of her free will offered and taken the time to discuss Labour’s CGT I missed my edit window to include the link with ‘models’ in my final thanks, I considered giving it a miss, but I found that the German CGT’s €801 exemption was along…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:50:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328740#post328740</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328740#post328740</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Mark, you've posted more than two dozen marginally relevant or completely off topic comments.  You've already been warned by the moderator.  If you want people to think that you are deliberately derailing this thread, by all means carry on.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:29:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328739#post328739</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328739#post328739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I quite like the sound of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_gains_tax#Germany" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a>:</p><p><q>In January 2009, Germany introduced a very strict capital gains tax (called Abgeltungsteuer in German) for shares, funds, certificates, bank interest rates etc. Capital gains tax only applies to financial instruments (shares, bonds etc.) that have been bought after 31 December 2008. Instruments…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:25:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328738#post328738</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328738#post328738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And we’re really going to bring Dirty Politics into it? If you want to go there, Kyle, I’ll ask whether that label is better applied to people who only respect the rules when they find it politically convenient to do so.</q></p><p>I'm not aware of anyone not following the Labour…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:24:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sue</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328737#post328737</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328737#post328737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Craig could you please pull back from calling anyone who has a different perspective than yours on Cunliff's decisions "disingenuous" or "naive" it's mean. </p><p>I don't know anyone who wanted Cunfliff to resign on the night, nor do i think there are many here who wanted it either. So not…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:22:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328736#post328736</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328736#post328736</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Deborah that’s good enough for me, more than enough to chew on for the next couple of years.  Compared to some of the models, one advantage I hope could assist with regards to a more nuanced CGT localisation is New Zealand’s relatively low population.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:01:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328735#post328735</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328735#post328735</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I am in no position to say what Labour will or won’t do with respect to the CGT.  All I know is what is written in the policy, which is freely available on the Labour party website, and has been for months.  I never said that Labour was exploring this…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:50:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328734#post328734</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328734#post328734</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Australian CGT was inflation indexed, but it proved to be absurdly complicated, so inflation indexing was abandoned, and instead, only half of any capital gain is subject to the CGT (NB: in Australia).  Capital gains (in Australia) are taxed using ordinary old tax rates.  This is one way of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:47:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328733#post328733</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328733#post328733</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It would be possible to put in some sort of exemption like that, but there are big technical difficulties with doing it. </q></p><p>So you mean Labour won't continue to explore this avenue?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:47:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328732#post328732</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328732#post328732</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You've misread what I wrote, Mark.  It would be possible to put in some sort of exemption like that, but there are big technical difficulties with doing it.   No such exemption is in the proposed CGT.  Instead, there are exemptions for family homes, and long held small businesses (per my…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:42:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328731#post328731</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328731#post328731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Exactly what collectables are is yet to be defined,</q></p><p>Yes. It is a problem in terms of providing examples that may not be collectables, it was a difficult call whether or not to include “pedigree dog” in mine. </p><p><q>Yes, it could be possible to put in some some of low…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:35:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328730#post328730</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328730#post328730</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The theory that Cunliffe is solely responsible for Labour's defeat or even its main cause seems outlandish to me.</q></p><p>I agree with a version of this argument, but am willing to listen to the feedback people like James and Stephen received during the campaign as well. </p><p>We're not clairvoyant, so…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:34:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328729#post328729</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328729#post328729</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Lucy, I hope my post just above further illustrates my thinking, feel free to tear my suggestion apart, as what most interests me here, is how the CGT can be sold to the masses with a built in tax cut/ exemption for those at the bottom of this heap.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:26:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328728#post328728</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328728#post328728</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Collectables are exempt.  Exactly what collectables are is yet to be defined, but there's plenty of precedent to follow from other tax jurisdictions.  So that particular exemption is in place already.</p><p>Yes, it could be possible to put in some some of low level exemption.  For example, one way of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:23:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Trevor Nicholls</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328727#post328727</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328727#post328727</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No, it really isn't</q></p><p>OK, truth or dare. Are you happy with a party leader and prime minister who lies as freely and as frequently as your current party leader and prime minister?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:22:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328726#post328726</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328726#post328726</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Deborah, I understand you probably feel a bit of regret for offering now, And I have recently gone through the policy on the website in some detail, and now have a degree of familiarity with what is exempt. Perhaps I’m asking the impossible actually. I’m not sure who originally…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:15:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328725#post328725</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328725#post328725</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And we’re really going to bring Dirty Politics into it?  If you want to go there, Kyle, I’ll ask whether that label is better applied to people who only respect the rules when they find it politically convenient to do so.  </q><br />Craig it applies to John fucking Key, his obfuscation…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:12:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Telfar Barnard</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328724#post328724</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328724#post328724</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm going to try to wade in to answer your question, Mark, though my Labour Party membership has expired and I had no part in devising the CGT policy.</p><p>The reason your person on a low income would pay CGT on a $10K gain in value from selling a house…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 22:58:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328723#post328723</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328723#post328723</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That’s setting a pretty low standard for leadership of a party, and a person who wants to be prime minister Craig.</q></p><p>No, it really isn't.  I've been a member of the National Party for twenty years, including several years as an elected officer at electorate and regional Young Nats levels.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 22:56:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328721#post328721</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328721#post328721</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Perhaps Craig, but you know,  looking at the <a href="https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/nzlabour/pages/1487/attachments/original/1412164152/New_Zealand_Labour_Party_Leadership_Election_rules_02-10-14.pdf?1412164152" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">rules</a> Sacha linked to, I’m impressed by the degree of organisation. These expectations for Party members as stated in the Herald aren’t dissimilar to expectations one might adhere to in most professional meeting environments, and the Herald’s website/Quin combo:</p><p><q>"posted by Phil…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 22:54:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328720#post328720</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328720#post328720</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Actually, I've gone quiet on it because I don't want to threadjack this discussion, and by the time I got back to the thread  in the morning, other people had answered the questions you raised, so there was no point in me making the same answers.</p><p>Notable exemptions &ndash; family…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 22:48:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328719#post328719</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328719#post328719</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>More unwanted headlines, of what benefit to the Party Mr Quin?</q></p><p>Maybe it's of considerable benefit to the public to get some insight into how The Party that would really like to be The Government one day operates.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 22:42:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328718#post328718</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328718#post328718</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wish more people would get really clear about what they are prepared to support and what they aren’t and then act accordingly.</q></p><p>If the fucking party cant get their shit together what's the fucking point. We are seeing selfish posturing and it aint about the Party.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 22:41:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>mark taslov</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328715#post328715</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328715#post328715</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So you’re unhappy with the Labour party policy because it would increase the tax take from John Key from under two hundred thousand, to almost a million dollars per year.</q></p><p>No Kyle. I’m not unhappy about that. I’m unsatisfied that there is no notable <strong>exemption threshold</strong> for those eligible for…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 22:14:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328714#post328714</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/speaker-an-open-letter-to-david-cunliffe/?p=328714#post328714</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						central locking
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 22:11:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
