<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Southerly: A Tale of Two Iceblocks: Part 2 (Or A Hopefully Helpful Pointer For Politicians &amp; Policy Makers Who Wish to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions)</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=369429#post369429</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=369429#post369429</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>and ’ten thousand suns in a coffee cup’ sure does have a ring to it (or is it a torus?)</q></p><p>Apparently it's not any kind of torus.</p><p>Without getting back into the weeds of the thing, there's a <a href="https://vimeo.com/183052530 " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> physical process</a> generating high energy light in frequencies not previously…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 11:18:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=369428#post369428</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=369428#post369428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>** are there Harptoseconds, Chico and Grouchtoseconds?<br />– Life = Marx Time©</q></p><p>They certainly had a way with numbers: </p><p><q>Rufus T. Firefly: Gentlemen, Chicolini here may talk like an idiot, and look like an idiot, but don't let that fool you: he really is an idiot. I implore you, send…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 10:52:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=369427#post369427</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=369427#post369427</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Daft Vaper – I am your sun!</strong><br />I hear one can get cheap oven shells made in Mexico…<br />and <em>’ten thousand suns in a coffee cup’</em> sure does have a ring to it (or is it a torus?) Joe to Go!<br />…but seriously, over at ‘Time Division’* they are working…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 08:28:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=369426#post369426</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=369426#post369426</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omUSfYuVT1c" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omUSfYuVT1c</a></p><p>There’s a US company called Brilliant Light Power that says it’s on the cusp of transforming the way the world produces and uses energy. </p><p>BLP is <a href="http://www.brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/DC-Roadshow-RLM-web-121216.pdf " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> developing a prototype ‘SunCell’ generator that it plans to field test in 2017</a>. The discovery underpinning the device is said to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 00:02:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364953#post364953</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364953#post364953</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Many thank for your very interesting and helpful comments, CCH!</p><p>I really appreciate all those links.  Not being a tax expert myself, I don't know the jargon, and it's hard to even identify the correct search terms for the literature.</p><p>There's a lot to digest in both your comments and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 18:54:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>CCH</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364896#post364896</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364896#post364896</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Lots to chew, and I wish I had time to engage more deeply, but here's a few quick thoughts. (I'm a tax policy nerd for a US think tank, but views here mine alone).</p><p>(1) The tax/econ jargon for the popsicle problem is "leakage" addressed through "border adjustments." A *lot*…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 10:11:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364732#post364732</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364732#post364732</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> while we wait </q><br />Know that alright..<br /><q> assumptions</q><br />About people ? nah mate dont do it<br />I'm for the idea, how its put into practice...pass<br />Though I think a multi pronged approach and more than a few "lifestyle" changes is the only option left. Some just wont take it, well, seriously.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 19:14:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364728#post364728</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364728#post364728</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The Conversation have an interesting article, suggesting that rather than try to reshape the consensus on reducing emissions directly, we work on <a href="https://newmatilda.com/2016/08/02/neoliberalism-poisoned-climate-action-and-renewables-are-the-antidote/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">redirecting the economy a bit instead</a>.</p><p>Yeah, I know, I write too much and address points you'd rather not talk about. I'll go away now.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:31:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364724#post364724</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364724#post364724</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thank you for your thoughts, Moz.  I’ve altered your third quote above to include the full text (which I feel is  an important part of what I said).</p><p>I do appreciate your comments, and they’ve  certainly highlighted various parts of my blog where I’d made assumptions about pre-existing knowledge.  Many…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 15:10:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364723#post364723</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364723#post364723</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Because the lifetime emissions of a product depends on the way it is disposed of (e.g. aerobic vs. anaerobic decomposition)</q></p><p>If you want to lock in your 100 year timescale, I think you have to use a 100 year timescale, you can’t say “this thing over 12 years, this one…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 14:53:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364721#post364721</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364721#post364721</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Ian Dalziel</strong> wrote:</p><p><q>While tropical forests continued to decline, a remarkable change is happening: tree cover on agricultural land has increased across the globe, capturing nearly 0.75 Gigatonnes carbon dioxide every year.</q></p><p>Just to be clear, Ian, I’m certainly not saying that atmospheric carbon isn’t sequestered in trees – but…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 14:18:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364716#post364716</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364716#post364716</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>but you are expecting to be allowed to apply tariffs to imports which is just as difficult.</q></p><p>No I’m not, Bart.  A consumption tax is not an import tariff.</p><p>GST is a consumption tax (i.e. not an import tariff) as well – hence we can change the rate of GST…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 11:59:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364712#post364712</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364712#post364712</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That’s why I really hate economic solutions to real problems.</q><br />ergo real solutions to economic problems need eco-logic not ego-logic...<br />;- )</p><p>Bean counters never factor in the plant!<br />even when they have a 'hill of 'em'!<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGEhZMaH7Lc" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGEhZMaH7Lc</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:44:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364711#post364711</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364711#post364711</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m certainly not suggesting “getting a new tax put in place worldwide” – exactly the opposite!</q></p><p>Yeah I get that you aren't asking other countries to put in place the tax, but you are expecting to be allowed to apply tariffs to imports which is just as difficult.</p><p>I guess…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:23:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364710#post364710</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364710#post364710</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>now ya see em, now ya don’t…</strong><br /><q> <em>ad naseum</em> </q><br />What is this – some kind of advertisement for a museum of network attached storage devices?<br />:- )</p><p><strong>Discussed or disgust?</strong><br /><em>Argumentum ad nauseam</em> or <em>argumentum ad infinitum</em><br /><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_nauseam#Etymology" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_nauseam#Etymology</a><br />:- )</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:18:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364709#post364709</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364709#post364709</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Trees a crowd...</strong><br /><q>While tropical forests continued to decline, a remarkable change is happening: tree cover on agricultural land has increased across the globe, capturing nearly 0.75 Gigatonnes carbon dioxide every year. A new study titled "Global Tree Cover and Biomass Carbon on Agricultural Land: The contribution of agroforestry to…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:06:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364705#post364705</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364705#post364705</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Continued…</p><p><q>How would you modify your PGST to encourage negative emissions? Why have you not done so?</q></p><p>I’m not sure as to your definition of negative emissions, Moz.  Some researchers describe the conversion of a dairy farm to crops as a negative emission – but I (and a PGST) would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 06:05:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364704#post364704</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364704#post364704</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>To answer your other questions, Moz:</p><p><q> you seem to have pre-compromised on 100 years as your CO2e period. Why do that rather than use the more accurate one year figure?</q></p><p>It’s not me who decided on  100 years as the CO2e period.  All the official data is based on those…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 06:02:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364703#post364703</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364703#post364703</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So are there two categories, “organic methane” and “conventional methane” (I kid, I kid, they’re “bio” and “fossil”), which have different effects, so one is taxed and one not? Your statement above admittedly makes me boggle every time I read it, so I might be missing something important.</q></p><p>Yes, you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 04:24:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364702#post364702</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364702#post364702</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						After talking to my partner, I think my objections/questions can be summarised as follows. I'm kinda thinking of them as review questions/comments, but then I keep thinking "this is a mass media article about ice blocks" and it doesn't reaqlly seem like the right approach, or good questions. But anyway...…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:58:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364701#post364701</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364701#post364701</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I’ve assumed that there is stuff that everyone knew – whereas clearly it’s not well known. There are standard tables of Global Warming Potential values defined by the IPCC </q></p><p>I tried to get you to understand that an exponential decay and a linear average is a bad combination, but you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:21:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364697#post364697</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364697#post364697</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Written out, my vague sense of unease looks extremely complicated and unlikely.</q></p><p>I certainly admire your ingenuity, Michael!  I hope that you're putting your intellectual energy to work as a tax lawyer or some such.</p><p>Yes, all sorts of weird effects may be possible at hypothetical extremes &mdash; the question…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 19:44:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Homer</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364695#post364695</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364695#post364695</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>No, I wouldn't say so. By having the PGST refunded to exporters (as with GST now) then the PGST can have neither an incentive nor disincentive effect. My view is that we should neither subsidize clean energy in exports or punish dirty energy in exports because we don't have control…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 19:22:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364688#post364688</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364688#post364688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Physically, I thought that the long timescale was the whole point behind taxing everything as CO2 rather than having separate rates for all the different gases of concern, specifically methane? I thought you were arguing that since CH4 and CO2 have one carbon each, they pay the same tax. Or…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:12:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364685#post364685</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364685#post364685</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a problem that once this is in place then governments have an incentive to increase greenhouse gas emissions in order to increase their tax take.</q></p><p>That's a feature, not a bug. The higher that tax the lower emissions will get. Usefully, even at zero net emissions that proposed PGST will…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:02:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364684#post364684</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364684#post364684</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It occurs to me that don’t you have a problem that once this is in place then governments have an incentive to increase greenhouse gas emissions in order to increase their tax take.</q></p><p>Yes, the perennial problem with excise taxes (you probably recall that the US federal government couldn't levy…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 16:43:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364668#post364668</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364668#post364668</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I suppose I need to wait for <strong>part 3: the counter-productive effect of causing an increase in emissions from the rest of the world (as happens with our current ETS and the currently proposed alternatives).</strong></p><p>Because that's something I am not convinced of.There's a whole pile of work being done…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:25:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364667#post364667</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364667#post364667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Also, I came up with this but couldn't really fit it in to the above post, but I still like the analogy:</p><p><q>in the long run we're all dead, but given the choice I'd still assassinate Hitler not Ghandi</q></p><p>The short term effects *matter*.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:13:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364666#post364666</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364666#post364666</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm not so much annoyed as confused. You're bringing up stuff from points I thought were clear to both of us, with entirely new approaches.</p><p><q>    scale of centuries rather than financial years or electoral cycles. See, in all honesty, I don’t ever remember mentioning any such thing.</q></p><p>Again, two tracks:…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:12:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364660#post364660</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364660#post364660</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Setting aside the impossible task of getting a new tax put in place worldwide ...</p><p>It occurs to me that don't you have a problem that once this is in place then governments have an incentive to increase greenhouse gas emissions in order to increase their tax take.</p><p>This would…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:32:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364659#post364659</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364659#post364659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						By the way, many thanks  to <strong>Moz</strong>, <strong>linger</strong>, <strong>Lilith</strong>, <strong>Andin</strong>, <strong>Michael Homer</strong>, <strong>Ian Dalziel</strong> and everyone else who read a very long blog and contributed to this discussion.  It's certainly given me a lot of feedback in terms of trying to explain this stuff in future!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:07:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364649#post364649</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364649#post364649</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Politically the problem with “a carbon tax with tariffs” is that “new tariff” is philosophically unacceptable to most of the powerful international trade and financial institutions, as well as many of the hard right neo-liberal governments in power around the worlld (arguably including NZ). Regardless, NZ may find that part…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:06:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364641#post364641</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364641#post364641</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I’m still confused by the apparently important difference between the PGST and a carbon tax when it comes to the point of sale tax calculations. I thought you were taxing inputs directly as a way of avoiding the complex carbon tax calculations at the point of retail sale, which is…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 11:38:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364636#post364636</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364636#post364636</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They eat locusts in Dunedin now, ya know!</q></p><p>As an energy engineer, I thoroughly approve!  Extremely energy efficient, and &mdash; according to a paper that I once read &mdash; exactly what the digestive system that we inherited from our proto-hominid ancestors has evolved to digest.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 11:14:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364635#post364635</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364635#post364635</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Responding to another question by email:</p><p><q>What’s wrong with a revenue neutral carbon-tax on selected emissions?</q></p><p>Yes, that seems like one of the few workable alternatives in New Zealand (if properly done) that wouldn’t tend to increase world greenhouse gas emissions.  Essentially you’d be putting things like industrial emissions and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 11:09:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364632#post364632</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364632#post364632</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Which leads me to: the political problem.</p><p>The reason we exclude farming and a whole pile of other emissions is not technical, it's political. Our government wants not to tax certain parts of the economy, and we can't make them.</p><p>Politically the problem with "a carbon tax with tariffs" is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:35:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364630#post364630</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364630#post364630</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Wow, I must suck at explaining this stuff. The border issues are the whole point that I’ve been trying to make</q></p><p>Yes, but that doesn't make your system any different from the existing carbon taxes &ndash; it's widely accepted that at some point tariffs will have to be applied to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:25:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364616#post364616</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364616#post364616</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>the lottery of lobsters and lotophagi…</strong><br /><q> I’d said “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locust" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">locust</a>-eaters” instead of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus-eaters" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">“lotus-eaters”</a>.</q><br />the shorter <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locus" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">’locus</a> eaters’  would be more apt in the current discussion…<br />(the plural of course being that famously misspelt Norse trickster – loci!!)</p><p><a href="http://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/383224/locusts-menu-dunedin-bar-video" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">They eat locusts in Dunedin</a> now, ya know!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 06:49:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364615#post364615</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364615#post364615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>To respond publicly about a question that I receieved via email, RE: this section of my blog:</p><p><q>In theory, the refund of PGST on exports could be calculated via a system of documentation that shows the accumulated dirty energy for any good or service (in the long term this may…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 06:14:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364614#post364614</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364614#post364614</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>How is a local exporter that doesn’t have a differently-polluting competitor affected by this? It seems that provided that 1) all outputs are exported, and 2) there is no competing exporter in the same category with a lower CO2-equivalent to unbalance the rebate, there is no net impact on the…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 05:51:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Homer</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364613#post364613</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364613#post364613</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						How is a local exporter that <em>doesn't</em> have a differently-polluting competitor affected by this? It seems that provided that 1) all outputs are exported, and 2) there is no competing exporter in the same category with a lower CO2-equivalent to unbalance the rebate, there is no net impact on the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 22:28:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364611#post364611</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364611#post364611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I didn’t mean that as a criticism (of your explanation, or of the concept of a PGST) at all. It seems totally clear to me that we need it.</q></p><p>It's okay to criticize (though I realize that you weren't)!  I'm hoping that someone will suggest a better solution...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 22:02:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364610#post364610</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364610#post364610</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Could be worse. If you listen to the current series of David Baddiel Tries to Understand… (specifically, at the 7 minute mark in the episode on “The Cloud”), you’ll hear one of the nominated “experts” helpfully using the wrong multiplier to explain petabytes …</q></p><p>It's odd what you can say…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 21:59:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364609#post364609</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364609#post364609</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s a complicated issue and – as far as I can see – has to have a somewhat complicated solution. Of course, a binding global agreement would in many ways make everything so much more straightforward!</q></p><p>I didn’t mean that as a criticism (of your explanation, or of the concept…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 21:57:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364608#post364608</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364608#post364608</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s very interesting David, but to this non-engineer it seems very complicated! Not the overall clean iceblock/dirty iceblock idea, but all the many components in calculating whose fault the greenhouse gases are.</q></p><p>Fair enough!  Yes, it is conceptually a bit complicated (though our existing ETS seems worse to me —…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 21:50:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364607#post364607</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364607#post364607</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the knowledge doesn’t seem able to make its way to policy makers and policy analysts. I wrote these two pieces at the urging of a colleague in an attempt to ‘throw the information over the wall’ to the policy people</q></p><p>It's very interesting David, but to this non-engineer it seems…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 21:18:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364604#post364604</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364604#post364604</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Could be worse. If you listen to the current series of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07ktd2g/episodes/downloads" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> <em>David Baddiel Tries to Understand…</em></a> (specifically, at the 7 minute mark in the episode on “The Cloud”), you’ll hear one of the nominated “experts” helpfully using the wrong multiplier to explain <em>petabytes</em> …
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 20:07:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364602#post364602</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364602#post364602</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the missed step (part 1) just took my breathe away.</q></p><p>It does mine, too!</p><p>I should emphasize that this wasn’t an original observation on my part or anything.  It’s extremely well-known in energy engineering circles (and elsewhere), but the knowledge doesn’t seem able to make its way to  policy makers…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:57:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364596#post364596</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364596#post364596</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>. Embodied emissions on imports aren’t even considered on other schemes I’ve seen proposed for New Zealand.</q></p><p>Hate to sound snarky but I could guess why at that and be in the ball park.<br />But dont let me sidetrack you.<br /> You have a great idea, will it reach a wider…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:19:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364593#post364593</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364593#post364593</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, as would your system… without the border tariffs that also fix the carbon tax. So the question to answer is: would we be better applying that fix to the existing system, or should we throw it all away and start the process again with the PGST?</q></p><p>Wow, I must…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 17:58:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364590#post364590</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364590#post364590</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>carbon tax when applied to dirty energy in New Zealand is that it would increase greenhouse gas emissions for the world as a whole</q></p><p>Yes, as would your system... without the border tariffs that also fix the carbon tax. So the question to answer is: would we be better applying…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 17:23:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364587#post364587</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364587#post364587</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Except that for all its faults, a carbon tax is widely known and discussed. </q></p><p>But one of the faults of a carbon tax when applied to dirty energy in New Zealand (as I’ve tried to point out) is that it would <strong>increase</strong> greenhouse gas emissions for the world as a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:26:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364583#post364583</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364583#post364583</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I would point out that all the other proposals I've seen seem a lot worse...</q></p><p>Except that for all its faults, a carbon tax is widely known and discussed. A whole new approach would both create confusion and give excuses for further delay. As <a href="https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20090928-00/?p=16573/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">OldNewThing reminds us</a>, new features [[https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ericgu/2004/01/12/minus-100-points/|start…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:02:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364580#post364580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364580#post364580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So with the landfill, they pay for the methane production, but if they sell that methane to someone who burns it, there is no tax refund for the methane but there is tax on the CO2 produced by burning.</q></p><p>Okay I see what you’re asking.  The idea, of course, is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 15:53:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364579#post364579</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364579#post364579</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I suppose the core problem is that you use "averaged over time" rather than naming a period, so it's not clear whether you mean over the next thousand years or million years. You've ruled out anything much under a century, though. Your ranges are inappropriate, IMO, since the solutions we…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 15:50:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364577#post364577</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364577#post364577</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>plantation vs old growth forest, they’re identical to you</q></p><p>Only from an energy perspective!  I'd say old growth forest has value that can't be measured in joules &mdash; and should be considered (protected) via totally different laws.</p><p><q> think I’m struggling with your time scales. To me, it doesn’t matter whether,…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 15:18:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364573#post364573</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364573#post364573</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It’s illegal in New Zealand, of course, to release synthetic refrigerants into the atmosphere, so that’s not an issue that needs to be covered by my demonstration proposal</q></p><p>No, but it does need a container deposit levy style system to make sure that there's no systematic "accidental" release (at the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 15:06:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364572#post364572</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364572#post364572</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> The methane emitted at the landfill, for example, would be charged on a carbon-dioxide-equivalent basis</q></p><p>The reciprocal problem I was using as an example was the one where companies were paid for destroying a gas, but not charged for creating it. Profit!</p><p>The PGST tax has the problem that if…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 15:04:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364571#post364571</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364571#post364571</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As a GHG methane has the huge advantage that it’s a short-term gas, so if we stop excreting it it’ll be gone in a mere 20 to 100 election cycles. Which may be your confusion?</q></p><p>Perhaps.  It's not really so much the methane as the residual carbon dioxide (or not)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:57:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364570#post364570</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364570#post364570</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The idea of using forests for carbon sequestration seems like a wholly separate issue</q></p><p>Yes, once you rule negative emissions out they are. You also rule out embodied energy as sequestration, which makes some substitutions difficult (plantation vs old growth forest, they're identical to you)</p><p>I think I'm struggling with…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:55:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364568#post364568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364568#post364568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Right, so in this view there is no energy storage in the tree per se, so there’s no negative tax applied for planting trees or any other carbon-negative activity.</q></p><p>Well, you could say there’s no dirty energy storage in the tree.</p><p>The tree, if burnt, would provide mostly clean energy.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:38:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364565#post364565</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364565#post364565</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The PGST you’d pay on the tree would mainly consist of</q></p><p>Right, so in this view there is no energy storage in the tree per se, so there's no negative tax applied for planting trees or any other carbon-negative activity. That makes the system much simpler, but it makes negative…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 13:33:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364564#post364564</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364564#post364564</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So how can biomethane and fossil methane be considered to have the same GWP100?</q></p><p>Maybe consider a process view rather than a static view. For any given interval we have some methane being released, and some breaking down, but there's a net amount of methane in the atmosphere. Sure, that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 13:24:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364562#post364562</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364562#post364562</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>This week, this year, this decade, methane is methane regardless of where it comes from. Half life in the atmosphere is between two and five electoral cycles, so as far as the political system is concerned it’s permanent once released.</q></p><p>Here’s what confuses me:</p><p>If, as I understand they are,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 13:16:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364559#post364559</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364559#post364559</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Indirect relevance, but I met a climate change denier recently. It was at a thing where we all had to contribute something. He (a climate scientist) contributed a catalogue of human shortcomings  which motivate people to subscribe to the idea of anthro CC.</p><p>I didn't have time to talk to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 13:12:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364555#post364555</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364555#post364555</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I’m not convinced that your side notes and implicit “wood as a construction material is energy use” really convey even to me that you intend cutting down that tree in my front yard to incur an energy use tax for the embodied energy in the timber, let alone for the…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 12:52:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364552#post364552</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364552#post364552</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I'm currently reading Anne of Avonlea to my daughter. </q></p><p>:) I was singing "there was an only lady who swallowed a fly" to entertain my sister in law yesterday. She loved it. Also, she's 25 years old. But apparently hadn't heard the story before</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:49:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364551#post364551</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364551#post364551</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm aware that I'm picking at the corners of an argument I wholeheartedly agree with, so I hope that's coming through.</q></p><p>That certainly comes through, Moz &mdash; and it's very helpful!  One learns to think a certain way as an energy engineer, and this often makes it confusing when you…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:41:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364549#post364549</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364549#post364549</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>David, I agree with you in general and in more than 90% of the detail. I'm aware that I'm picking at the corners of an argument I wholeheartedly agree with, so I hope that's coming through.</p><p>I'm not convinced that your side notes and implicit "wood as a construction material…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:23:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364548#post364548</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364548#post364548</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>minor nit &ndash; I think you mean "milk solids"</q></p><p>Thanks Paul &mdash; that'd be my aging eyes! Now fixed...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:02:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364547#post364547</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364547#post364547</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Deforestation and other land degradation, farming especially ruminants, clathrate destruction, refrigerant gas releases, etc, are all significant problems that should be included.</q></p><p>Actually (nearly) all of this <em>is</em> included in the numbers that I discussed!</p><p><q>Russia is basically fucked the day we count methane from permafrost and clathrates, as their…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:59:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364545#post364545</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364545#post364545</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						minor nit &ndash; I think you mean "milk solids"
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:55:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364544#post364544</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364544#post364544</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It's worth noting that you have also focussed entirely on energy, so you're ignoring the flatulent bovine in the room.</q></p><p>As I mentioned in my discussion, the methane emissions from ruminants are due to the conversion of solar energy (e.g. via grass) into chemical potential energy in meat.  So that…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:50:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Moz</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364542#post364542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364542#post364542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It's worth noting that you have also focussed entirely on energy, so you're ignoring the flatulent bovine in the room.</p><p>It's at least conceptually possible to include methane waste/leaks/dumping from fossil energy mining as part of the "energy cost", but it's very easy when looking at energy to overlook GHG…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:35:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364539#post364539</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364539#post364539</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Rob Stowell</strong> wrote in the <a href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-1/?p=364181#post364181" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">comments for Part 1 of this blog</a>:</p><p><q>A carbon tax isn’t just – or even primarily? – aimed at consumers, but at producers, too, of course. Isn’t it possible that the NZ iceblock [exporters] will (in response to a carbon tax) even further reduce their…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:00:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364538#post364538</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364538#post364538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I realize that I’ve doubled-down on the emotion-laden issues here—not only discussing anthropogenic climate change <em>but also taxes!</em> </p><p>As before, could I politely request that we avoid a stooshie about whether the climate scientists and atmospheric physicists are right or wrong – and concentrate purely on the subject of discussing…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:58:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364537#post364537</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/southerly-a-tale-of-two-iceblocks-part-2/?p=364537#post364537</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:58:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
