<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Polity: The Taxpayers&#039; Union rides again!</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Johnson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358667#post358667</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358667#post358667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						John Key is a poster friendly national boy, unlike bill e and donny b , yet still the same trump like caucus bullshit behind him.zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 21:05:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob S</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358666#post358666</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358666#post358666</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>+1 Thanks for articulating this approach by Matthew Hooten which comes across as disingenuous and only another attack line from National with their calling it "barking" and all tax and oh noes it will ruin us etc. <br />With the highest numbers they can pull out of their collective arses used…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 20:36:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358622#post358622</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358622#post358622</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If someone makes a calculation on these assumptions you can’t say they are acting in bad faith, let alone that they are lying, especially if you then refuse to rule out any of these assumptions by saying “hey, $200 a week is just an idea, not a policy”.</q></p><p>The bit…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 13:17:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358568#post358568</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358568#post358568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Later, National can propose its own, with a different name, to wild applause from the usual suspects.</q></p><p>Actually National doesn't have to propose its own they can just continue on with Labour Party policies which are in effect UBI to all intents and purposes. </p><p>I wrote about this last week…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:26:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358560#post358560</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358560#post358560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not as preposterous</q></p><p>But preposterous, nonetheless. When was the last discussion of UBI in the NZ media?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 12:09:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358558#post358558</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358558#post358558</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Guess we can gather from the 'debate' this week that that the word "universal" is not a useful way of framing this now. </p><p>"Guaranteed income" or suchlike might have attracted less clutching of pearls and black/white responses. Would still have fitted Labour's 'future of work' framing too.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 09:28:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358557#post358557</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358557#post358557</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...a UBI has always been understood since first proposed by Milton Friedman among others in the 1960s...</q><br />Not as preposterous as your claiming Nelson Mandela as some kind of champion of supply-side economics, but hey. nice try. The concept of a UBI was being discussed in far greater breadth and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 06:37:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358555#post358555</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358555#post358555</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Even in my head I can guestimate $300 per week plus $85 per child would come to about $60b. If govt currently take  more than $72b that's a great wack, but not "all their revenue". And it replaces most current spending (approx $25b) on social welfare.<br />Nor is that anything…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:09:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358547#post358547</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358547#post358547</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>extinguishing the debate before it’s even been had.</q></p><p>Except the debate has been going on since the 1960s. Unless they mean a non-universal universal basic income.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:51:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358545#post358545</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358545#post358545</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the UBI is at the “what if “stage</q></p><p>So why release it? It's one thing for a government to fly kites. But for an opposition? All that does is Key's own job for him, extinguishing the debate before it's even been had.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:35:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358541#post358541</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358541#post358541</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>you can quite validly accuse people of lying, obfuscation, or bad faith if they base their example costings on assumptions they know to be unrealistic. </q></p><p>You assume bad faith, but a UBI has always been understood since first proposed by Milton Friedman among others in the 1960s to provide a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:14:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358535#post358535</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358535#post358535</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>you can’t then say that people are lying</q>Repeating that assertion doesn’t make it correct. <br />As has already been pointed out on other threads, you can quite validly accuse people of lying, obfuscation, or bad faith if they base their example costings on assumptions they know to be unrealistic. <br />DPF and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:57:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358534#post358534</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358534#post358534</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Are you suggesting that political parties should not allow public discussion of significant policy possibilities?</q></p><p>I think that if you genuinely want a policy discussion, you need to put some parameters and/or numbers around what you might consider. Otherwise you're just saying to voters "hey, how about $200 a week?"…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:48:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ianmac</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358533#post358533</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358533#post358533</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A commenter Save NZ pointed me to a Canadian town Dauphin Manitoba where an experiment in a sort of GMI was trialled in the 70s. Until the oil shock/deflation etc killed it. The data saved is only now being uncovered by a researcher Evelyn Forget.<br /><a href="http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-mincome-experiment-dauphin" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-mincome-experiment-dauphin</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:47:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angela Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358528#post358528</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358528#post358528</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Exactly my point. </p><p>I guess there may be a substantial number of voters who want to leave everything to their elected representatives, but I’m not one of them. I want and expect to be included in early stage public discussions on major policy options. Experience has shown that many and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:54:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358524#post358524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358524#post358524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Are you suggesting that political parties should not allow public discussion of significant policy possibilities?</q></p><p>Well, that is what National does, there is never any consultation with the public over anything, look at the flag debacle. No "do you want to change the flag?", just a token choice and lots…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:38:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angela Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358523#post358523</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358523#post358523</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Later, National can propose its own, with a different name</q></p><p>if the good ideas were taken up and set up properly, I wouldn't have an issue with that. But National punishes poor people for being poor, so a National party version of a UBI is likely to do exactly that,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:34:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358522#post358522</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358522#post358522</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Matthew's goal is make a discussion about UBI started by Labour an unworkable Labour policy. Therefore, it is essential to position the worst possible and most expensive structure as Labour's choice.</p><p>Later, National can propose its own, with a different name, to wild applause from the usual suspects.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:28:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angela Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358519#post358519</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358519#post358519</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Matthew, the UBI is at the "what if "stage, there is nothing firm to consider or cost yet. Are you suggesting that political parties should not allow public discussion of significant policy possibilities?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:11:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358518#post358518</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358518#post358518</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think this is a very good point. If the Labour "contractor" writing the blog doesn't like the numbers provided by Farrar, Williams, me in the NBR tomorrow or the Welfare Working Group paper you link to, perhaps it would be best for Labour to put some parameters around the…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:00:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358517#post358517</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358517#post358517</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What is not to like about the concept of a UBI<br />But Rob instead of running interference for the Labour Party how about tell us the truth<br />$200 a week while affordable for the country is not enough for most people to survive on, unless you propose tops ups<br />Treasury…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:55:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358516#post358516</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358516#post358516</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Herald reports that <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=11614193" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">robberies targetting tobacco</a> are on the increase. That's pretty predictable when you raise the price of a product so much, but guess who they asked for comment? Jordan Williams with the usual <em>raising taxes doesn't work</em> line.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:50:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358513#post358513</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358513#post358513</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Fear facts strikes again</strong><br />The media is complicit in spreading misinformation – great example in Stuff today re Metiria Turei getting into the spirit of things with tweets and pix at the <em>Hunt for the Wilderpeople</em> premiere<br />see:<br /><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/78402308/green-party-coleader-metiria-tureis-wild-night-out-at-hunt-for-the-wilderpeople" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/78402308/green-party-coleader-metiria-tureis-wild-night-out-at-hunt-for-the-wilderpeople</a><br />with photos of her fooling around in a truck – which…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:12:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358509#post358509</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358509#post358509</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don’t think the TU is really the main problem.  “Exposing” it would be of limited use because anyone who spends more than 10 minutes  looking at it with a critical eye can already see what it is.</p><p>The bigger issue is with media that simply republishes stories that are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 05:27:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358508#post358508</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358508#post358508</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Operating one of those little trains that gives rides to kiddies would do wonders for their image, but who’d trust their kids with that lot?</q></p><p>Probably the parents of Auckland Grammar or Kings College?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 02:59:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358507#post358507</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358507#post358507</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...we could make them look like crass bullies by punking or trolling them...</q><br />If they're really "a club like Rotary or Lions" they could fight back by holding community events like sausage sizzles. Operating one of those little trains that gives rides to kiddies would do wonders for their image,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:02:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358506#post358506</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358506#post358506</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>NZ’s mediascape is so shallow that it’s unlikely to go far to discredit itself by questioning a source that’s already been elevated so high. There’s a huge incentive for journos to avoid slagging off their possible future (or current) employers, so it probably just has to be put up with.</q>…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:24:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358505#post358505</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358505#post358505</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well, its annual accounts (and society rules) can be downloaded from the Companies Office at <a href="http://www.societies.govt.nz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.societies.govt.nz/</a> (latest available is currently YE Dec 2014?), but it doesn't specify specifically where the money comes from. Someone else would have to answer if there's any way that could be extracted from it.</p><p>It…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:08:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358504#post358504</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358504#post358504</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In contrast, the Taxpayers’ Union is registered as an Incorporated Society.</q></p><p>So in other words, it's legally a club like Rotary or Lions.</p><p>That said, is there any legal avenue to make them tell the whole story, such as the Electoral Finance Act or what passes for it (on the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:49:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Johnson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358491#post358491</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358491#post358491</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Money changes everything, coz they get paid to do these absurd press releases, Money can buy you an electorate like epsom, money can also buy you lesser but more funner things. Money is the token of power.</p><p>Advertising your message to hype your concerns, through not political discourse and analysis…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:51:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358489#post358489</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358489#post358489</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the Taxpayers’ Union [...] accepts financial members <br />but it’s not clear if they ever expire</q>OMG it’s an association of the undead!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:14:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358483#post358483</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358483#post358483</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Tax Payers Union, Family First et al... show the power fringe lobby groups have to promote their agenda</q></p><p>I don't mind lobby groups generally when they clearly represent people, even when I strongly disagree with them.  Lobbying's an important thing when it makes sure that views of lots of people…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:54:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angela Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358481#post358481</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358481#post358481</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Jim Rose looks at UBI in narrow economic terms, selecting social aspects like the possibility people might do less paid work and ignoring most of the other social and health ramifications. He talks about American solo mothers finding jobs because benefits were cut, without considering how long they retained them…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:19:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Johnson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358480#post358480</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358480#post358480</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Absolutely, they are a media creation. They are a very scary lobby group that is given endless free press by the media because of connections. They are after a crazy economic fix that is not grounded in any kind of political or economic reality.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:19:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358478#post358478</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358478#post358478</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is there any effective means to combat how they operate, as logic, facts and research seems to fail?</q><br />It is a shame that a Truth-tellers Union isn't the obvious antidote.</p><p>I find it odd that they presume to speak for all 'Taxpayers' without proving that they have a critical mass…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:56:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358477#post358477</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358477#post358477</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Tax Payers Union, Family First et al... show the power fringe lobby groups have to promote their agenda through a under resourced media and gain public acceptance</p><p>Is there any effective means to combat how they operate, as logic, facts and research seems to fail?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:04:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358476#post358476</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358476#post358476</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>why UBI might add value</q><br />One way of looking at it is that a UBI is a grant to pursue projects that otherwise people wouldn’t have enough time to complete because of the need to work a paying job to live (or, for the existing unemployment benefit, the need to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:55:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>despud</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358475#post358475</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358475#post358475</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>my favourite bit was the "up to 56%" I have a macro in my head that automaticallly translates "up to" into "and I''m totally making this up" </p><p>I do have a question however, around why UBI might add value. I'm tempted to support it just on the basis of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:31:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358472#post358472</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358472#post358472</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Is this group anything more than a front for team Key? Can they really claim to represent taxpayers, and if so, how widespread is their membership? Who provides their funding?</q></p><p>The issue isn't so much that it's claiming to represent taxpayers.  It's that major media outlets give it blind credibility…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:57:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358469#post358469</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358469#post358469</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						How is the "Taxpayer’s Union" still a thing? Apart from being exposed as a part of the Nat's attack team in <em>Dirty Politics</em>, I've yet to see any sort of investigation into the group, if indeed it is a group and not just a single frontman and a couple of…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:25:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358468#post358468</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-the-taxpayers-union-rides-again/?p=358468#post358468</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:25:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
