<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Polity: Poll Soup</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356918#post356918</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356918#post356918</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    Fairfax still trying to grow their own Steve Braunias.</p><p>'The Braunias that wouldn't die'?</q></p><p>Perhaps it's their practice of slapping on a big fat "Satire" label &ndash; or sometimes not. Is it something they leave up to the subs?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:18:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356916#post356916</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356916#post356916</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Fairfax still trying to grow their own Steve Braunias.</q></p><p>'The Braunias that wouldn't die'?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:45:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356912#post356912</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356912#post356912</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Fairfax still trying to grow their own Steve Braunias.</q></p><p>A tad insulting to Steve Braunias ;) TV 3 at it again. I think since Jono and Ben shifted time slots, it deteriorated and Guy Williams really is their shock jock and that's all but he does insult MPs equally. I…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 12:16:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356901#post356901</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356901#post356901</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So Guy Williams ? Is he on TV or something? Is this an attempt at a joke? If it is its pretty lousy.</q></p><p>Fairfax still trying to grow their own Steve Braunias.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 09:25:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356900#post356900</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356900#post356900</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But the analysis of the polls this week has been poor.</q><br />not just that <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/celebrities/77263068/guy-williams-lets-scrap-the-labour-party-and-start-again " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> this ...thing?... appears in the entertainment? section of Stuff</a><br />So Guy Williams ? Is he on TV or something? Is this an attempt at a joke? If it is its pretty lousy.<br />The author…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:49:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356886#post356886</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356886#post356886</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Looking at the responses, it looks more to me like confusion than bloody mindedness- particular since people who support the same party tend to share misidentification with other members of the party (for example Green voters say Labour rather than ACT or National). I think it is just that we…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:52:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356884#post356884</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356884#post356884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That's a problem with any survey at all, really. Either it's completely anonymous so you can't even check whether people are deliberately messing with it (as can happen with internet polls), or it's not and people might feel afraid in some way to answer honestly. I don't know how you…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:35:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356879#post356879</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356879#post356879</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						How were these surveys conducted, and what motivation did those surveyed have to provide accurate information? Given that the ballot box is supposed to be confidential, and that survey-takers’ identity has to be known in order to follow up the same person later, we shouldn’t necessarily expect voters to give…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:03:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356878#post356878</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356878#post356878</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I might also investigate, although not any time soon.</p><p>I wouldn't expect it to be "uniform" on jinterest! That was just a suggestion of one of the many variables that could contribute to political forgetfulness, that might have correlation. As I said, could be fun to model.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:56:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356856#post356856</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356856#post356856</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I might look into it- but I don't think it will be uniform on jinterest. For example there may be different levels of interest between people getting confused over did they vote for Labour or National, and the people who forget they voted strategically for National by actually voting for…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:21:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356848#post356848</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356848#post356848</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						70%?? Wow! That's shocking. I wonder if forgetting is correlated to any of the other variables. Low interest in politics, perhaps (jinterest). That would be a fun one to model.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:07:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356833#post356833</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356833#post356833</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Overal about 70% of voters in the 11 survey gave the same answer for who they voted for in the last election compared with who they said they voted for in the 08 one.</p><p>My impression is it is a lot about the "distance" people place parties from each other…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:47:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356832#post356832</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356832#post356832</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Grumpollie (Andrew R at Colmar Brunton ?)</q></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/Unimatrix_0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">yes it is</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:45:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356828#post356828</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356828#post356828</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>What struck me was the frailty of human memory-</q></p><p>Yes, an actual study that asked them closer to the time is more reliable than getting them to dredge back. How much more reliable? One to look into, considering that a longitudinal study is more expensive and also the opportunity has…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:30:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356772#post356772</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356772#post356772</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Note that you can link NZES surveys together to create a time series of sorts.</p><p>What struck me was the frailty of human memory- the people who gave different answers to the question "who did you vote for in 2008?" between when they were asked the question in 2008, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 20:18:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356635#post356635</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356635#post356635</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here is another way of visualising it- comparing the results between liking National and Labour, for those non-voters that expressed a liking rating for both National and Labour.</p><p>There are 2 big clusters-</p><p>A bunch (42/367) of non-voters feel the same about National and Labour, neither liking nor disliking them.…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:48:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356632#post356632</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356632#post356632</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Mainly because Labour has many fewer non-voters despising it than National has. Excluding the Don't Knows and Didn't Answers, the median Labour liking is 6 while the median National liking is 5.</q></p><p>Just checked this and you're right. Thanks. It does still, I think, point to the complexity of the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:25:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356629#post356629</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356629#post356629</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Reinforcing this, if we go to the "I would never vote for" questions, among non-voters in 2011:<br />23.4% would never vote National<br />9.5% would never vote Labour<br />15.4% would never vote Green<br />27.0% would never vote NZF</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:07:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356626#post356626</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356626#post356626</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						For completeness, here are the Greens and NZF as well (both with median of 5, making Labour the most liked of the big 4 among non-voters)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:55:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356624#post356624</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356624#post356624</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Danyl, I'm seeing them as liking Labour more- Mainly because Labour has many fewer non-voters despising it than National has. Excluding the Don't Knows and Didn't Answers, the median Labour liking is 6 while the median National liking is 5.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:47:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356618#post356618</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356618#post356618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Sorry for late reply to questions about 'the missing million'. Here's the 2011 NZES data on non-voters and how they responded to the question about whether they liked the National Party. They like Labour/the Greens quite a lot less.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:04:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356608#post356608</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356608#post356608</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Wouldn’t “No-Vote” also include those under 18 at the time of the earlier election? If so, those numbers would swamp the signal you’re seeking.</q></p><p>I'd have to look a bit harder to see if they're No-Vote or just NA (R-style), but yes, they should be accounted for. They could be…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:41:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356585#post356585</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356585#post356585</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Wouldn’t “No-Vote” also include those under 18 at the time of the earlier</q></p><p>My first thought as well, but it would tell you where people entering the political process were placing themselves.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:37:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356583#post356583</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356583#post356583</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Reply to Sacha.</p><p>No it’s not him (he seems like a very reasonable fellow though)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:25:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Robertson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356582#post356582</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356582#post356582</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for the re-cap Mark.</p><p>For the record, the Andrew R posting here is not the Andrew R from Colmar Brunton :) </p><p>When posting here I use my full name.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:23:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alex Coleman</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356581#post356581</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356581#post356581</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think there are a few groups of voters that Labour could think about</p><p>1) NZF voters that want to change the government. Think of them as 'Labour leaning NZF', or "anti-National NZF' or whatever.</p><p>2) National party voters who really don't like Winston Peters. There's a lot of them,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:21:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356580#post356580</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356580#post356580</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> it would be handy to see No-Vote in the columns, so we can see how many went from not-voting to voting which parties.</q>Wouldn’t “No-Vote” also include those under 18 at the time of the earlier election? If so, those numbers would swamp the signal you're seeking.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:13:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356577#post356577</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356577#post356577</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, there was a one off (not in 11) big move from Labour to National. </q></p><p>Also looks like quite a big move from NZF to National. </p><p>Just some thoughts, David &ndash; it could also be handy to make a net flow tally which has only the upper triangle, because we…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:59:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356572#post356572</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356572#post356572</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>"Labour lost voters to National"</q></p><p>Just another "Soundbite"</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:49:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marc C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356567#post356567</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356567#post356567</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It has been my impression after the last three general elections Labour have been “frozen” and like a possum staring into the headlight of a car in front of them. Labour and even the Greens should stop falling for this fallacy that they have to win votes off National. Well,…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:18:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marc C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356565#post356565</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356565#post356565</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Looking at the stuff.co article and also the Statistics NZ info, it shows that firstly, the non voters preferring Labour AND Greens clearly outnumber the ones preferring the National Party. And those that are on benefits, or poor, and also new migrants, they are more likely not to vote. </p><p>This…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:58:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356564#post356564</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356564#post356564</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Brilliant, David. Thanks, I really appreciate it.</p><p>So, at the decisive 2008 General Election:</p><p>About <strong>140,000</strong> former Labour voters swing to the Nats<br /><strong>20,000</strong> Nats swing to Labour<br /><strong>23,000</strong> Lab voters move to Non-Voting<br /><strong>10,000</strong> Nats also stay at home on Election Day<br /><strong>33,000</strong> former NZFers swing to the Nats…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:47:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356562#post356562</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356562#post356562</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Bottom line – nobody owns the missing million. </q></p><p>I agree...</p><p><q>And their support is worthless anyway because they don’t vote. .</q></p><p>If they continue to not vote, then sure it's worth nothing...  but many suspect it's easier to convert them from not voting to voting, (ie. from not counting to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:34:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosemary McDonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356561#post356561</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356561#post356561</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>It is time Labour and Greens get cracking on getting that missing million a bit interested in what they do and wish to do when back in government. This navel-gazing and ongoing negative self analysis will hardly get us anywhere. A clear direction and inspiring, honest policy is the start,…</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:31:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Marc C</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356560#post356560</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356560#post356560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh yes, these POLLS, here we go again, the same all over again, and again, and yet again. When I hear and read about them, I do not pay that much attention to what the media presenters tell us, but I look at what was NOT mentioned. That is often…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:18:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356559#post356559</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356559#post356559</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m curious if you know how many, and how you know. Longitudinal studies aren’t that common. It’s common to say “Labour lost voters to National”, but actually proving this based on opinion polls of total support is not very compelling. </q></p><p>I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve been polled…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:15:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356558#post356558</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356558#post356558</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Here is 05-08,</p><p>What this isn't showing, because I am just focusing on the L,H<G<NZF vote and non-vote is the Labour/Maori Party/No Vote movements.</p><p>Yes, there was a one off (not in 11) big move from Labour to National. There was also a big move of Greens to Labour of about the same order as a percentage, but the Green donor size was smaller.</p><p>Still a lot larger proportion going to no vote from Labour than National, which adds up over time.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:05:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356557#post356557</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356557#post356557</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Cheers, Russell.</p><p><strong>Some very interesting <em>Roy Morgan</em> data on Non-Voters' Party preferences by Age 2014</strong><br /><a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1409/S00256/busting-non-voter-pattern-myths-election-data-consortium.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1409/S00256/busting-non-voter-pattern-myths-election-data-consortium.htm</a></p><p><strong>And ... A few surveys on Non-Voter Characteristics</strong></p><p><strong>2008-11 New Zealand General Social Survey</strong><br /><a href="http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/people_and_communities/Well-being/civic-human-rights/non-voters-2008-2011-gen-elections.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/people_and_communities/Well-being/civic-human-rights/non-voters-2008-2011-gen-elections.aspx</a></p><p><strong>2014 Non-Voter Satisfaction Survey</strong><br /><a href="http://www.elections.org.nz/events/2014-general-election/election-results-and-reporting/voter-and-non-voter-satisfaction-survey" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.elections.org.nz/events/2014-general-election/election-results-and-reporting/voter-and-non-voter-satisfaction-survey</a></p><p><a href="http://www.elections.org.nz/research-statistics/research/voter-and-non-voter-surveys" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.elections.org.nz/research-statistics/research/voter-and-non-voter-surveys</a></p><p><strong>Young Non-Voters</strong> <br /><a href="http://www.mm-research.com/Young+People&#039;s+Participation+in+the+Voting+Process" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.mm-research.com/Young+People&#039;s+Participation+in+the+Voting+Process</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:02:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356556#post356556</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356556#post356556</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Andrew R at Colmar Brunton ?</q></p><p>that's him, yes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:25:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356555#post356555</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356555#post356555</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Cheers, David.</p><p>The 2008-11 stats are very interesting. </p><p>But, I'd especially like to see 2005-08. That's the <em>bone-of-contention</em> in this wee debate &ndash; the Election where the decisive Left-to-Right swing occurred. </p><p><strong>Lab</strong> down 7 points<br /><strong>Left Bloc</strong> down 6 points<br /><strong>Clark Govt Bloc</strong> down 7 points</p><p><strong>Nats</strong> up 6<br /><strong>Right</strong>…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:24:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356553#post356553</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356553#post356553</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for those, Mr Mark!</p><p>It's always useful to be reminded that a question has been chewed over before.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:14:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356551#post356551</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356551#post356551</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Missing Million</strong></p><p>A few posts from some years back ...</p><p>... Grumpollie (Andrew R at <em>Colmar Brunton</em> ?) analyses the New Zealand Election Study data on those of the missing million <em>with a party preference</em> in 2008 and 2011<br /><a href="https://grumpollie.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/if-everyone-got-out-to-vote-in-2011-what-difference-would-it-have-made/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://grumpollie.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/if-everyone-got-out-to-vote-in-2011-what-difference-would-it-have-made/</a></p><p>He was responding to Danyl's <em>Dim-Post</em> discussion<br /><a href="https://dimpost.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/i-just-cannot-let-this-go-by/#comments" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://dimpost.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/i-just-cannot-let-this-go-by/#comments</a></p><p>and to…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:02:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356549#post356549</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356549#post356549</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>And here are the patterns from 2008 to 2011 from the NZES</p><p>The movement between National and Labour is pretty much a wash, but Labour lost a lot more of their support to the Did Not Vote as a percentage than National lost to that group (it was about the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:54:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356548#post356548</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356548#post356548</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, the NZES is a start, but you can't get the data for 2014, for starters. It's not yet released. I spent a lot of time analyzing that study last year so I can have a look at how much longitudinal use it is. Definitely way better than nothing. </p><p>But…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:39:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356547#post356547</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356547#post356547</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>@Mr Mark. IF you are used to R, you can use the haven library to work with the SPSS format NZES. Last time it was discussed on Public Address, this was what I was using to convert the SPSS file to a csv via R.</p><p>if(!require(haven)){<br />  install.packages(“haven”)<br />  require(haven)<br />}</p><p>fileLocation…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:14:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Felix Marwick</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356546#post356546</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356546#post356546</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Actually there was some research, released during the last election campaign, that looked  at undecided/inactive voters and their possible intentions.</p><p>Going from memory (I can't locate the stories I wrote at the time), the findings showed the split, while it favoured the left, was only of a small margin. </p><p>Unfortunately…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:04:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356545#post356545</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356545#post356545</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Jack Vowles et al <strong><em>New Zealand Election Study</em></strong> would be the place to find data on the percentage of voters swinging from one party to another. Unfortunately, without SPSS, I don't have access to those stats (and they don't seem to have included them in their recent (published) post-Election…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:01:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356542#post356542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356542#post356542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I just love speculation about the voting intentions of a group of people whose only shared characteristic is not voting.  Pitching your policies to people who don't vote is like marketing hamburgers to vegans.  </p><p>The post-mortem of the UK election by the polling companies confronted the question of why their…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:36:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356540#post356540</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356540#post356540</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						N.B. it is somewhat premature to claim that "National's support has too been damaged" on the basis of a mere 1.5% shift in polling, because that change is still (just) within the noise level of the aggregate of 4 polls.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:30:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356536#post356536</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356536#post356536</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>about half the missing million are probably National-leaning voters</q></p><p>I wouldn't have thought so. How do you figure that out? </p><p>National ran a well orchestrated campaign that delighted their followers and alienated their opponents, while the opposition &ndash; umm &ndash; didn't.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:07:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356533#post356533</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356533#post356533</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Three things:</p><p>(1) Although I haven't checked, I'd say the December  <em>Herald-Digi</em> outlier (Nat 51% / Govt 55% &ndash; a massive 10 points ahead of the Oppo) probably played a crucial role in the fall of the Nat/Govt Bloc average in Jan-Feb 2016.</p><p>(2) Bear in mind that there's a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:49:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356531#post356531</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356531#post356531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I agree with Ben here, when you look at the number not voting, and the change in that number between elections, that is a huge factor in tipping the deciders.</p><p>In the US at the moment, large turnout is seen as favouring Sanders and Trump (bringing in people who otherwise…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:47:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356528#post356528</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356528#post356528</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Labour lost a whole swathe of voters to National at the 2008 General Election – and they weren’t lifelong/core Lab voters who saw the Nats as traditional enemies.</q></p><p>I'm curious if you know how many, and how you know. Longitudinal studies aren't that common. It's common to say "Labour lost…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:27:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356526#post356526</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356526#post356526</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My theory is that nothing much happens of significance until the last few days before the actual election. The people who decide the election (about 5%) decide then whether to vote at all and who for. </p><p>I also hear there is a lot of National Party money (of which they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:18:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356524#post356524</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356524#post356524</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah but tribal voting has been declining since the 1960s, Ben. Partisan dealignment throughout western liberal democracies. More and more non-aligned and (in particular) <em>softly</em>-aligned voters.</p><p>Labour lost a whole swathe of voters to National at the 2008 General Election &ndash; and they weren't lifelong/core Lab voters who saw the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:13:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356519#post356519</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356519#post356519</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Does the one-in-twelve equation factor in the missing million? Between them, Labour and the Greens failed to inspire their marginal constituents.</q></p><p>The bad news: about half the missing million are probably National-leaning voters.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:47:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Littlewood*</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356517#post356517</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356517#post356517</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Does the one-in-twelve equation factor in the missing million? Between them, Labour and the Greens failed to inspire their marginal constituents.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:29:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356516#post356516</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356516#post356516</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If polled today, I would vote Beach. </p><p>Parliament and politics kicks off in February every year, but the public don't welcome the return (by "public" I mean people whose idea of fun is music festivals and cricket and a swim, not watching points of order in the House).</p><p>These 'State…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:28:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356513#post356513</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356513#post356513</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, that’s a hill to climb. No, that’s not a towering cliff-face. I think any prognostications of doom are pretty premature at this stage.</q></p><p>Absolutely. It's close.</p><p>Yes, 1 in 12 National voters switching would get things closer. However, that's not the only way the gap could be closed, and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:06:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andrew r</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356506#post356506</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356506#post356506</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Among Nationals more obvious wealthier support group are this lower middle class block of Nat voters. Almost seems unless economy tanks, affecting that group particularly, National will be returned at next election.  Nothing else will change that outcome.  I don't think Little or Labour are currently doing a poor messaging…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:57:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rosemary McDonald</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356504#post356504</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356504#post356504</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Mr Little said he was disgusted by the incident.</p><p>"Totally unacceptable, this is a community occasion where we commemorate and reflect on a great tragedy," he told ONE News.<br />"For some scumbag to come and do that to anybody, doesn't matter if it's one of my political opponents, is totally…</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:47:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356503#post356503</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356503#post356503</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don't think the left has to win that 12% of voters &ndash; they are nationals to lose and its more likely the governing power will lose voters than the opposition pick them up</p><p>Saying that Labour especially could really do with some serious work on their messaging &ndash; case…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:28:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356500#post356500</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356500#post356500</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Which begs the question, how does the left do this?  Recently we have seen 2 strategies in action &ndash; free tertiary education and (somewhat muddled) opposition to TPP.  They haven't been game-changers so far, and one possible inference one could draw is that Labour might have done better in terms…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:52:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356499#post356499</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-poll-soup/?p=356499#post356499</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:52:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
