<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Polity: Let the big lies flow</title>
		<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2026 Public Address</copyright>
			

		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358550#post358550</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358550#post358550</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>How so? There’s no reason a future Labour government couldn’t implement a moderately redistributive tax policy like a fiscally-neutral $11k UBI .</p><p>[Whereas I very much doubt that you could practically implement the $86 billion policy.]</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:15:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358549#post358549</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358549#post358549</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, although once you're above $25b it all becomes a bit academic.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:12:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358548#post358548</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358548#post358548</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						$86B-$43B is quite a big difference, you'd have to say.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:58:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358546#post358546</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358546#post358546</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My column notes that if set at Jobseekers it would cost more like $43b, plus maybe $6b for extra support for children.  This is gross of course, but you don't get to take off the full $25b because that includes National Superannuation.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:49:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358544#post358544</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358544#post358544</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ah. See I think it is very clear that Labour will not in fact set the UBI at a rate high enough to ensure that you can eliminate other welfare schemes. (See 5.3 of Harris & Bierema.) Instead it will be set at, I would imagine, the level of the Jobseeker's.…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:30:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358543#post358543</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358543#post358543</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My $86b figure is an annual figure based on three assumptions: (1) it is universal from age 18,  (2) there are no losers and (3) you can do away with other welfare schemes to remove means testing and eliminate the problem of high EMTRs.  This is a gross figure, so…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:23:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358542#post358542</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358542#post358542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>“I estimate Stephen’s car likely cost a MILLION DOLLARS”.<br />“That is a lie”.</q></p><p>I think if you explain to Stephen how you reached the million dollar figure, he ought to say more than "that is a lie" and ought instead to say something like, "no your first and second assumptions…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:17:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kumara Republic</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358540#post358540</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358540#post358540</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I’m not going to wade into the debate over whose fault the flag failure was. My views are what you’d expect them to be.</q></p><p>Speaking of the flag, I've called my final judgment on it &ndash; it can indeed be worth billions.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:12:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358531#post358531</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358531#post358531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>You can’t really accuse people of lying about the likely cost of a policy when you refuse to put any numbers around it yourself.</q>There is as yet no detailed policy to cost, which means that any numbers you pull out at this stage against it act only to shut down…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:40:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358527#post358527</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358527#post358527</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Does anyone have a good primer, or reference? </q></p><p><a href="http://www.basicincome.org/basic-income/history/ " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> History of basic income</a> Basic Income Earth Network.</p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_income " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Basic income</a> Wikipedia.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:49:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358526#post358526</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358526#post358526</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah, I'm not a huge fan of the way Labour's handled this UBI stuff, but it is pretty clear that an $82B figure is, ah, driven by some interesting assumptions.</p><p>In fact you pretty much <em>can</em> cost the preferred UBI policy set out in the Harris &amp; Bierema paper &ndash; probably…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:46:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358521#post358521</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358521#post358521</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You can't really accuse people of lying about the likely cost of a policy when you refuse to put any numbers around it yourself.</q></p><p>Of course you can accuse. "This policy is likely to cost $82bn" is a truth claim that can be wrong, and it can be consciously wrong,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:23:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358514#post358514</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358514#post358514</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You can't really accuse people of lying about the likely cost of a policy when you refuse to put any numbers around it yourself.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:27:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Johnson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358492#post358492</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358492#post358492</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In economic terms it’s a correction because our gdp has not fallen the way that was promised. So you get a significant increase of dollars to the guy or girl cleaning your work toilets or any hard low paid job like that. Suddenly they have a $10,000 increase in annual…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:07:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nat</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358484#post358484</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358484#post358484</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm fascinated with the idea of UBI but would like to read more about it. The back of the envelope calcs I've done do seem staggeringly huge, especially here in the US. Does anyone have a good primer, or reference? (I'm not an economist but happy to do maths)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:05:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358465#post358465</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358465#post358465</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>By definition, surely if it’s only applied to some groups, or in some communities, it’s not a UBI?</q></p><p>It could be universal within the group or community. Which most benefits aren't. So it's not entirely crazy to trial the idea. I don't think that's how it should be trialled here,…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:59:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358463#post358463</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358463#post358463</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>To be clear, I support the introduction of a UBI. <br />However, I'm a little confused as to how the social justice notion "that everybody is getting the same" is compatible with incremental testing or rollout. By definition, surely if it's only applied to some groups, or in some communities, it's…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:48:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358461#post358461</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358461#post358461</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just the idea that everyone is getting the same means that people start working and acting in a more community minded way. It is all about social justice.</q></p><p>Yes, I think attempting to boil the whole idea down to the exact $ each person gets is a good way of…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:33:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joe Wylie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358460#post358460</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358460#post358460</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>relentless dissatisfaction</q></p><p>Coming from English, that sounds like a politely gentrified version of Orwell's "boot stamping on a human face &ndash; forever."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:28:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358459#post358459</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358459#post358459</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>relentless dissatisfaction</q><br />Aha! <br />So that's the R &amp; D they are backing...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:26:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358457#post358457</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358457#post358457</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>National’s policies seem to be heading towards – ‘spare change?’</q></p><p>Oh Ian, you sound disappointed but never mind, that seems to be Nationals plan...<br />In parliament yesterday the inimitable Bill English informed us that...<br /><q>  <a href="http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/pb/business/qoa/51HansQ_20160329_00000009/9-income-levels%E2%80%94disposable-income " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Part of the key to this Government’s success is relentless dissatisfaction</a> </q><br />So, it is…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:01:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358451#post358451</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358451#post358451</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It also has to go to everyone at the same rate including children.</q></p><p>Did he say why? Most discussions I've seen lately propose a lower rate for children.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:44:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358450#post358450</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358450#post358450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also building up funds through returns from investments in public assets (eg Norway has huge funds from years of state owned oil exploration).</q></p><p>Whereas our govt stopped investing into the Cullen fund and keeps shifting the date when they will resume.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:42:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Johnson</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358443#post358443</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358443#post358443</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The economy promises of the last 30 years have demonstrably not been achieved . They have failed in their target performances and thus any ceo would seek an active programme of new policy. ....but no, coz national dont blink ever baby
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:30:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358441#post358441</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358441#post358441</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>end up like that other great Labour policy, “flag change”</q><br />i.e. appropriated by National, who then attempt to impose it in an unrealistic timeframe without sufficient public discussion or expert input?</p><p>Labour have called for a UBI to be <em>discussed</em>, not for one to be introduced tomorrow. Given that a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:59:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hilary Stace</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358440#post358440</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358440#post358440</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Just been to hear Guy Standing who gave examples of pilots of UBI &ndash; some in India. Says it can be small and incremental to start with. Just the idea that everyone is getting the same means that people start working and acting in a more community minded way. It…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:57:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358437#post358437</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358437#post358437</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>beggar's belief...</strong><br /><q>...or is going to end up like that other great Labour policy, “flag change”</q><br />National's policies seem to be heading towards &ndash; 'spare change?'</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:46:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358436#post358436</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358436#post358436</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And is $200 a week going to be enough</q></p><p>No, it's not. It's a ridiculous amount. Yes, a Jobseeker Allowance is $210/week, but almost everyone also receives an Accommodation Supplement, because you cannot live on that. In Christchurch, it's up to $65/week, and in Auckland it's higher. I support a…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:42:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358435#post358435</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358435#post358435</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So if David Farrar is lying, how about telling us just how Labour is going to pay for UBI, higher GST, higher taxes on all the bands, what?<br />And is $200 a week going to be enough<br />Let's wait and see how Finland manage it first before climbing on the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:24:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358434#post358434</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358434#post358434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Don't blame the media for that. They don't have the resources to do independent analysis a lot of the time, so they will regurgitate anything that sounds plausible.</q></p><p>In other words, there's a serious problem with New Zealand's current state of democracy?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:47:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alfie</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358433#post358433</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358433#post358433</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Don’t blame the media for that. They don’t have the resources to do independent analysis a lot of the time, so they will regurgitate anything that sounds plausible. </q></p><p>Sorry but I have to take issue with that comment Nick. I've worked with a lot of journos over the years and…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:38:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358421#post358421</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358421#post358421</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I suspect Audrey may be barking up the wrong tree</q><br />... or ring barking the whole forest  &ndash; just in case!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:34:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>simon g</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358417#post358417</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358417#post358417</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I realize that Rob can't control the media narrative, and so he's doing his bit: </p><p><q>when National infects our public conversation with lies and excuses, I’ll be here on Public Address providing a little ray of sun. </q></p><p>That's fine. But obviously there are two different issues at play here.</p><p>1)…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:49:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358416#post358416</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358416#post358416</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>narrative</q>?</p><p>You usually only need one of those when the lies require stitching together  ;-|</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:34:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angela Hart</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358415#post358415</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358415#post358415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A big part of the problem we have here is this unquestioning repetition of statements by the media without any checking whatsoever. Truthiness results when people have seen/read/heard the same lie so many times without it ever being challenged that they accept it as truth. It’s a terrible way to…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:33:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358411#post358411</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358411#post358411</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The likes of David Farrar and Jordan Williams know how to get the media's attention.  Labour should have had their own narrative on cost and tax rates ready to go when they announced this, so they could pre-empt the inevitable attack, but it seems they didn't and so the Government…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:44:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mr Mark</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358410#post358410</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358410#post358410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>A Yes/No Option</strong></p><p>Audrey Young thinks that <em>"it should be easy for John Key to defend himself against inevitable criticism"</em> on the flag process, clearly implying that most voters will accept his responses.</p><p>For example, she tells us: __"To those who say people should have been asked first if they…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:39:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Salmond</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358408#post358408</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358408#post358408</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Re the UBI &ndash; I'm sorry, but exactly what did you expect? It's not National's job to help Labour develop good policy, or to provide constructive feedback.</q></p><p>Fair question. Certainly I agree It's National's job to put up arguments against the idea if they disagree. But it's the media's job…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:27:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358406#post358406</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358406#post358406</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Doing hit jobs on Labour policies is basically what Kiwiblog and the Taxpayers Union do</q></p><p>To be fair, though, unless DPF is no longer on the self-appointed Board of the Taxpayers' Union (which is not actually a registered union for very good reason &mdash; nice set of rules in the…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:23:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358405#post358405</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358405#post358405</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It might be a good idea to anticipate the attacks and pre-empt them when releasing a policy, or even announcing that you are thinking about it, rather than giving the other side free hits.</q></p><p>Still waiting for anyone to explain how Labour continues to be unable to perform this most…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:18:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy2</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358403#post358403</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358403#post358403</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"They want to ensure Labour stays in opposition, and they stay in Government. So they try to find and exploit flaws in your policies" there was a time when governments were about more than the 3 year cycle, they were about ensuring that their citizens were feed and looked after…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:15:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358399#post358399</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358399#post358399</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That is not dirty politics. That is a democracy at work.</q><br />No, it’s adults being dicks – so much for the greater good of the country or healthy and reasoned debate, it’s not the system I want <em>dictating,</em> nay scrub that, <em>deciding</em> our future…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:48:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nick Russell</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358398#post358398</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358398#post358398</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Re the UBI &ndash; I'm sorry, but exactly what did you expect?  It's not National's job to help Labour develop good policy, or to provide constructive feedback.  They want to ensure Labour stays in opposition, and they stay in Government.  So they try to find and exploit flaws in your…
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:37:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bob daktari</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358389#post358389</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358389#post358389</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>shine away Rob &ndash; however here you talk to those who can see through spin, Labour's continuing problem is to get to those who believe the media regurgitation of what they're told and press released</p><p>Now the flag is done I'm growingly bitter that for all that transpired we are…</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:26:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358388#post358388</link>
				<guid>https://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/polity-let-the-big-lies-flow/?p=358388#post358388</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:26:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
